{"title":"Banned: Fishing in the Data Tax Lake?","authors":"L. Keunen","doi":"10.59403/8qrdfa","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.59403/8qrdfa","url":null,"abstract":"Data gathering and analysis are valuable tools in the global fight against tax fraud. However, their use raises significant legal questions, particularly regarding the extent to which it could qualify as a prohibited fishing expedition. Previous research identified two main characteristics of fishing expeditions: speculation and excessiveness. Judges and scholars claim fishing expeditions are prohibited even though a specific legal ground for this prohibition is lacking. Therefore, it is crucial to examine the legal grounds that can be relied upon to assess the legitimacy and limitations of (big) data tax audits in relation to the prohibition of fishing expeditions.By analysing case law from the Council of Europe, the European Union, Belgium and the Netherlands, this article identifies the implicit legal grounds that support the prohibition of fishing expeditions. It demonstrates how the prohibition is incorporated into the human rights framework, the general principles of good governance and the relevance criterion embedded in European and national legal provisions with regard to investigative powers of tax administrations, providing a comprehensive perspective on their rationale to prohibit fishing expeditions.","PeriodicalId":504227,"journal":{"name":"World Tax Journal","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141100547","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"The Skewed Playing Field between Private Equity and Family Ownership Hemmed in by Intra- and Inter-Country Tax Non-Neutralities","authors":"D. Imparato","doi":"10.59403/emtrqd","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.59403/emtrqd","url":null,"abstract":"This article investigates the ownership and management dynamics of private equity investments and family-controlled holdings in the United Kingdom and Italy, and reveals a tax imbalance in their pursuit of corporate control over publicly listed firms. By employing an interdisciplinary approach and a quantitative case study analysis applied to corporate and tax planning, this article illustrates that whereas UK taxation favours private equity, Italy leans towards controlling families, highlighting its implications for the private equity industry’s competitiveness and family inter generational succession, both domestically and across borders. Hence, with no ex ante preference for a specific form of ownership model (family or private equity), the article sheds light on the impact of tax considerations on corporate control decisions, and therefore advocates for tax neutrality to level the playing field between family and private equity control. Last, the article observes a greater reliance on leverage in private equity corporate governance models compared to controlling families, suggesting that it is not the legal availability of a tax shelter (interest deductions) per se that prompts its use, but rather the controlling investor's profile that weighs on borrowing preferences.","PeriodicalId":504227,"journal":{"name":"World Tax Journal","volume":"29 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140966643","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Breaking the Double Tax Paradigm","authors":"J. Lammers, T. Magalhaes","doi":"10.59403/25cmxc","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.59403/25cmxc","url":null,"abstract":"The success story of economic globalization is often linked to an increased freedom of capital movement, facilitated by the existence of more than 3,000 bilateral tax treaties, the primary purpose of which is to prevent double taxation. Even the most outspoken critics of the international tax regime subscribe to the notion that double taxation is detrimental to global growth, development and welfare. Yet, they argue that, all things considered, tax treaties might not be worth signing. Based on an extensive review of the available tax policy and economics literature, this article shows that there is not enough of a normative or empirical basis for thinking that double taxation will necessarily restrict capital flows, provided that the combined effective tax burden is kept at a reasonable level. At the same time, treaties seem to provide investors with a legal certainty that is key to cross-border business activity. This article posits that there should be more emphasis on the legal certainty aspect of tax treaties and less on their limited capacity to prevent double taxation. In fact, relaxing the double tax paradigm could help to significantly improve tax treaties, with a view to preserving their role in fostering international commerce and investment. In this respect, the authors propose a simplified tax treaty model that, by allowing an agreed overlap between home-state and host-state taxes, would diminish overall implementation costs while increasing legal certainty and reducing the risk of lengthy tax disputes, thus benefiting both taxpayers and tax administrations. The article further demonstrates that this approach is superior to the current Pillar One proposal and other popular systemic reform suggestions in the literature, specifically the destination-based cashflow tax (DBCFT) and global formulary apportionment.","PeriodicalId":504227,"journal":{"name":"World Tax Journal","volume":"31 22","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140657437","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Taxation of Remote Workers – Is the Allocation of Taxation Rights in Line with the Benefit Principle?","authors":"C. Schwartz","doi":"10.59403/sxfvyd","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.59403/sxfvyd","url":null,"abstract":"This article deals with the taxation of the increasingly growing workforce able to perform their work remotely. The phenomenon of remote work has experienced rapid growth, particularly accelerated by the COVID-19 pandemic when employees were recommended or obliged to work from home due to government lockdowns and restrictions. With the increasing prevalence of remote work, employers are able to recruit personnel globally, transcending the limitations of local recruitment markets. Consequently, the jurisdiction for taxing employee income may change compared to work performed physically on site. In the article, the author analyses how the various articles of the OECD Model addressing employment income allocate the right to tax the income of an employee in situations of remote work. Additionally, the author raises the question whether the outcomes derived from the allocation rules in remote work scenarios align with the benefit principle. The benefit principle states that a taxpayer should pay taxes in line with the benefits received from public services in a state, and the author uses it to measure whether the states involved in the income-generating activity are sufficiently able to tax that income.","PeriodicalId":504227,"journal":{"name":"World Tax Journal","volume":"54 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139186979","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Public Health Taxes: Should Sugar-Sweetened Beverages Be Taxed? If So, How?","authors":"R. García Antón, C. Oner","doi":"10.59403/1y9cy8a","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.59403/1y9cy8a","url":null,"abstract":"Due to increasing health concerns associated with sugar consumption, the World Health Organization (WHO) has recommended the implementation of taxes targeting sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs). This article endeavours to reconnect the actual research with the potential legal framework for SSB taxation through a comparative approach. Its objective is to provide policymakers with insights into whether to introduce such taxation, the various approaches available and the resulting effects. The authors contend that SSB taxes serve as regulatory measures intended to reduce sugar consumption and address externalities. In comparison with other regulatory non-fiscal tools (total ban/minimum price policy) or fiscal policies (rising VAT rates), excise duties better fit the extra-fiscal goals associated with public health. Consequently, they propose that SSB taxes should be designed as follows: (i) covering all kinds of sugar/sweeteners, avoiding the recourse to a closed list; (ii) levying specific excise taxes in proportion to the sugar content; (iii) ensuring obligatory pass-through of these taxes to consumers; and (iv) earmarking a portion of the revenue to support health programmes and preventive campaigns.","PeriodicalId":504227,"journal":{"name":"World Tax Journal","volume":"102 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139191190","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"The Single Top-Up Tax Principle: Justification, Content and Functions upon the Design of QDMTTs","authors":"Galendi","doi":"10.59403/1jrtj2b","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.59403/1jrtj2b","url":null,"abstract":"The present contribution advances the “single top-up tax principle” as a guiding principle for the design of qualified domestic minimum top-up taxes (QDMTTs) by the Inclusive Framework (IF) and by host jurisdictions. This article, which is intended as a critical assessment of the agreed administrative guidance on the QDMTT, generally addresses the justification, content and functions of the single top-up tax principle. It considers both the design of rules on the QDMTT by the IF and implementation issues for host countries, within the permissible range of features for a QDMTT.","PeriodicalId":504227,"journal":{"name":"World Tax Journal","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139291097","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Pillar Two and Developing Countries: The Perils of Jurisdictional Blending","authors":"R. C. L. Pereira","doi":"10.59403/17a06w8","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.59403/17a06w8","url":null,"abstract":"In this article, the author analyses the jurisdictional approach to blending for the calculation of the ETR, which is an essential feature of the IIR according to the model rules on GloBE. The author supports that the jurisdictional approach to blending raises a major issue by providing incentives for transferring preferential tax regimes from low and middle-lower economies to middle-higher and high-income economies in certain circumstances. Therefore, considering the need to strike a better balance on safeguarding the tax sovereignty of all jurisdictions involved (i.e. not just the tax sovereignty of large, rich economies, but also small, poor economies), the author argues in favour of other approaches on blending. In this context, from the perspective of developing countries, given the perils of the jurisdictional approach and lack of measures that are sufficient to compensate for the loss of tax sovereignty that the GloBE proposal may cause, the global approach on blending would be preferable as a first-best option, and an entity blending or even a no-blending approach would be a second-best option.","PeriodicalId":504227,"journal":{"name":"World Tax Journal","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139319948","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"A New Scenario in International Tax Law: Two Proposals to Rethink the OECD Model in Response to the Generalization of Distance Work by Employees","authors":"I. Rovira Ferrer","doi":"10.59403/wh5spm","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.59403/wh5spm","url":null,"abstract":"This article analyses the necessity to adapt the OECD Model Tax Convention (OECD Model) for remote work. It argues that a legally binding agreement must be reached on two fundamental aspects: tax liability criteria for remote workers’ earnings and conditions determining when an employee’s remote work creates a permanent establishment (PE) for the employer. The article investigates the current regulation of these issues in the OECD Model, identifies problem areas and proposes reforms. In particular, it suggests a reformulation of tax liability determination for income from remote-working employment based on a reconsideration of the “source state” concept. Additionally, the article proposes creating an ad hoc decision tree to provide a clear and efficient method for verifying the potential existence of a PE due to an employee’s remote work.","PeriodicalId":504227,"journal":{"name":"World Tax Journal","volume":"72 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139358035","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"The Historical Origins and Current Prospects of the Multilateral Tax Convention","authors":"R. Avi-Yonah, E. Lempert","doi":"10.59403/1v56w0k","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.59403/1v56w0k","url":null,"abstract":"This article has three aims. First, it surveys the pre-BEPS efforts to create a multilateral tax convention (MTC) from the 19th century onward, and explains why these efforts have failed, leading to an international tax regime dominated by unilateralism and bilateralism. Second, it contrasts the success of multilateralism in investment and trade law. Third, it examines the BEPS era efforts to create an MTC and suggests that, while there has been more convergence of the tax laws of countries, a fundamental divergence of interests persists that will likely doom any such efforts to failure. The article concludes that, at this time, tax law still remains unsuitable to multilateralism, in contrast to investment and trade law, mainly due to the monetary impact.","PeriodicalId":504227,"journal":{"name":"World Tax Journal","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139361150","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Fundamental Elements of a Blockchain-Based Tax System: Governance, Legal and Technology Aspects","authors":"D. Post, C. Cipollini","doi":"10.59403/g0knwn","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.59403/g0knwn","url":null,"abstract":"This article, which builds on an earlier one by the same authors, aims to make a further step in the definition of the fundamental elements of a blockchain-based tax system by developing a comprehensive theoretical framework for the use of blockchain technology in the tax domain. Based on literature review and conceptual legal analysis, the authors zoom in on three building blocks respectively focusing on the governance, legal and technology aspects. Each building block is composed of a series of conceptual items that require the attention of legislators, founding entities and developers while starting to approach the design of a blockchain solution for tax. In the authors’ view, only by first solving the issues related to each of these items in a coordinated manner will it be finally possible to enable governments and tax authorities across the globe to promote a gradual shift towards a blockchain-based tax system.","PeriodicalId":504227,"journal":{"name":"World Tax Journal","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139368220","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}