Accounting, Economics, and Law: A Convivium最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
Supreme Audit Institution Recommendations and the Legal System: The Case of Indonesia 最高审计机关的建议与法律制度:印度尼西亚案例
Accounting, Economics, and Law: A Convivium Pub Date : 2023-12-13 DOI: 10.1515/ael-2022-0067
A. P. E. Atmaja, Anna Erliyana, Dian Puji N. Simatupang, Yu Un Oppusunggu
{"title":"Supreme Audit Institution Recommendations and the Legal System: The Case of Indonesia","authors":"A. P. E. Atmaja, Anna Erliyana, Dian Puji N. Simatupang, Yu Un Oppusunggu","doi":"10.1515/ael-2022-0067","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/ael-2022-0067","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The audit recommendations of the Indonesian supreme audit institution (Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan, BPK) acquired new significance after the collapse of the authoritarian state in 1998 and constitutional amendments in 1999–2002 that reformed the regulation and institutional governance of public sector audit in Indonesia. However, while the reform of public sector audit regulation was carried out through a strong adoption of private sector audit standards and the Westminster SAI model, the BPK retained some of its Napoleonic legacy. This syncretic organisation led to confusion about the BPK’s role and position in the Indonesian legal system. Using a historical and case study approach, this paper analyses the relationship between the BPK’s audit recommendations and the Indonesian legal system. It argues that it is important for the BPK to develop auditing standards that take full account of higher rules, administrative law, and national interests, or at least not to adopt and abolish auditing standards that are counterproductive to its judicial function – not merely to accommodate private international law instruments developed by private non-state actors operating outside the legal framework of a sovereign state.","PeriodicalId":503384,"journal":{"name":"Accounting, Economics, and Law: A Convivium","volume":"78 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139181194","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
How to Improve on the Gray’s Index for Accounting Conservatism 如何改进会计保守主义的格雷指数
Accounting, Economics, and Law: A Convivium Pub Date : 2023-11-17 DOI: 10.1515/ael-2023-0114
Yuri Biondi
{"title":"How to Improve on the Gray’s Index for Accounting Conservatism","authors":"Yuri Biondi","doi":"10.1515/ael-2023-0114","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/ael-2023-0114","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The Gray’s index has been used to compare accounting variables such as earnings in a sample of financial accounting figures since its introduction by Gray (Gray, S. J. 1980. “The Impact of International Accounting Differences from a Security-Analysis Perspective: Some European Evidence.” Journal of Accounting Research 18 (1): 64–76), in view to indicate the relative degree of accounting conservatism between sets of accounting standards. This note aims to improve on this index especially when variables under investigation can be negative. In the latter case, proportionality between the two variables may be hidden by its application. We suggest therefore some amendments to better show this proportionality and improve on statistical comparison of accounting figures generated by alternative sets of accounting standards.","PeriodicalId":503384,"journal":{"name":"Accounting, Economics, and Law: A Convivium","volume":"60 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139264984","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
How Tax Credit Shapes Firm R&D Strategies? 税收抵免如何影响企业的研发战略?
Accounting, Economics, and Law: A Convivium Pub Date : 2023-11-15 DOI: 10.1515/ael-2022-0098
Pierre Courtioux, François Metivier, A. Rebérioux
{"title":"How Tax Credit Shapes Firm R&D Strategies?","authors":"Pierre Courtioux, François Metivier, A. Rebérioux","doi":"10.1515/ael-2022-0098","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/ael-2022-0098","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This study extends the definition of firms’ R&D strategies to integrate fiscal considerations related to R&D tax credits. Using French company data, we identify six types of ‘extended’ R&D strategies. We then examine the relationships of these strategies with the effective rate of R&D tax credits, defined as the ratio of total tax reliefs obtained by a firm through R&D tax credit to real R&D spending. This study contributes to a better understanding of the heterogeneity of companies’ R&D strategies.","PeriodicalId":503384,"journal":{"name":"Accounting, Economics, and Law: A Convivium","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139275041","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信