Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics最新文献_第9页

Faculty Members' Perceptions and Attitudes Towards Anti-Plagiarism Detection Tools: Applying the Theory of Planned Behavior. 教师对反抄袭检测工具的认知与态度:运用计划行为理论。

IF 1.3 4区哲学

Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics Pub Date : 2022-07-01 DOI: 10.1177/15562646221078655

Rasha M Arabyat, Bashar R Qawasmeh, Sayer I Al-Azzam, Mohammad B Nusair, Karem H Alzoubi

{"title":"Faculty Members' Perceptions and Attitudes Towards Anti-Plagiarism Detection Tools: Applying the Theory of Planned Behavior.","authors":"Rasha M Arabyat, Bashar R Qawasmeh, Sayer I Al-Azzam, Mohammad B Nusair, Karem H Alzoubi","doi":"10.1177/15562646221078655","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15562646221078655","url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To evaluate predictors of the use of anti-plagiarism detection tools (APTs) in higher education institutions.Methods: An online survey based on the theory of planned behavior was sent to members of science faculties in Jordan. Multivariate Logistic regression was conducted to determine predictors of previous use of APTs, and multivariate linear regression to predict future intentions.Results: A total of 173 faculty members completed the survey, with 78.13% indicating previous APTs use. Turnitin® (43%) and Ithenticate® (32.8%) were the most commonly used APTs. These tools were mainly used to evaluate papers before sending them to journals (65.5%) and to detect plagiarism in theses/dissertations (50.4%). Predictors of previous use were academic rank (p = 0.02) and perceived understanding of APT use (p = 0.043). Intentions for future use were predicted by attitudes (p < 0.001) and perceived behavioral control (p = 0.036).Conclusion: The theory of planned behavior successfully predicted intentions to use APTs. The use of APTs should be encouraged to all faculty members and students.","PeriodicalId":50211,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics","volume":"17 3","pages":"275-283"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9992686/pdf/nihms-1870874.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9409624","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 3

Tribal Deliberations about Precision Medicine Research: Addressing Diversity and Inequity in Democratic Deliberation Design and Evaluation. 关于精准医学研究的部落商议：解决民主商议设计和评估中的多样性和不公平问题。

IF 1.3 4区哲学

Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics Pub Date : 2022-07-01 Epub Date: 2022-02-28 DOI: 10.1177/15562646221081267

Erika Blacksher, Susan Brown Trinidad, R Brian Woodbury, Scarlett E Hopkins, Erica L Woodahl, Bert B Boyer, Wylie Burke, Vanessa Hiratsuka

{"title":"Tribal Deliberations about Precision Medicine Research: Addressing Diversity and Inequity in Democratic Deliberation Design and Evaluation.","authors":"Erika Blacksher, Susan Brown Trinidad, R Brian Woodbury, Scarlett E Hopkins, Erica L Woodahl, Bert B Boyer, Wylie Burke, Vanessa Hiratsuka","doi":"10.1177/15562646221081267","DOIUrl":"10.1177/15562646221081267","url":null,"abstract":"Deliberative democratic engagement is used around the globe to gather informed public input on contentious collective questions. Yet, rarely has it been used to convene individuals exclusively from Indigenous communities. The relative novelty of using this approach to engage tribal communities and concerns about diversity and inequities raise important methodological questions. We describe the design and quality outcomes for a 2.5-day deliberation that elicited views of American Indian and Alaska Native (AIAN) leaders about the potential value and ethical conduct of precision medicine research (PMR), an emerging approach to research that investigates the health effects of individual genetic variation in tandem with variation in health-relevant practices, social determinants, and environmental exposures. The event met key goals, such as relationship and rapport formation, cross-site learning, equality of opportunity to participate, and respect among participants in the context of disagreement.","PeriodicalId":50211,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics","volume":"17 3","pages":"304-316"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9173705/pdf/nihms-1777095.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9463888","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

Consent Requirements for Testing Health Policies: An Intercontinental Comparison of Expert Opinions. 检测健康政策的同意要求：专家意见的洲际比较

IF 1.7 4区哲学

Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics Pub Date : 2022-07-01 Epub Date: 2022-02-10 DOI: 10.1177/15562646221076764

Astrid Berner-Rodoreda, Shannon McMahon, Nir Eyal, Puspita Hossain, Atonu Rabbani, Mrittika Barua, Malabika Sarker, Emmy Metta, Elia Mmbaga, Melkizedeck Leshabari, Daniel Wikler, Till Bärnighausen

{"title":"Consent Requirements for Testing Health Policies: An Intercontinental Comparison of Expert Opinions.","authors":"Astrid Berner-Rodoreda, Shannon McMahon, Nir Eyal, Puspita Hossain, Atonu Rabbani, Mrittika Barua, Malabika Sarker, Emmy Metta, Elia Mmbaga, Melkizedeck Leshabari, Daniel Wikler, Till Bärnighausen","doi":"10.1177/15562646221076764","DOIUrl":"10.1177/15562646221076764","url":null,"abstract":"Individual informed consent is a central requirement for clinical research on human subjects, yet whether and how consent requirements should apply to health policy experiments (HPEs) remains unclear. HPEs test and evaluate public health policies prior to implementation. We interviewed 58 health experts in Tanzania, Bangladesh and Germany on informed consent requirements for HPEs. Health experts across all countries favored a strong evidence base, prior information to the affected populations, and individual consent for 'risky' HPEs. Differences pertained to individual risk perception, how and when consent by group representatives should be obtained and whether HPEs could be treated as health policies. The study adds to representative consent options for HPEs, yet shows that more research is needed in this field - particularly in the present Covid-19 pandemic which has highlighted the need for HPEs nationally and globally.","PeriodicalId":50211,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics","volume":"17 1","pages":"346-361"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9136368/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47576527","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Ethical Analysis of Egypt's Law Regulating Clinical Research 埃及规范临床研究的法律伦理分析

IF 1.3 4区哲学

Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics Pub Date : 2022-05-16 DOI: 10.1177/15562646221096188

A. Matar, H. Silverman

引用次数: 1

Assessing the Quality and Performance of Institutional Review Boards: Impact of the Revised Common Rule 评估机构审查委员会的质量和业绩：经修订的共同规则的影响

IF 1.3 4区哲学

Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics Pub Date : 2022-04-26 DOI: 10.1177/15562646221094407

M. Tsan, Hannah Van Hook

引用次数: 1

Practicalities of Impracticability: An Interim Review of Randomized Controlled Trials 不切实际的可行性:随机对照试验的中期回顾

IF 1.3 4区哲学

Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics Pub Date : 2022-04-19 DOI: 10.1177/15562646221092663

Roma Dhamanaskar, W. Feldman, J. Merz

引用次数: 1

International Regulatory Standards for the Qualitative Measurement of Deep Brain Stimulation in Clinical Research 临床研究中脑深部刺激定性测量的国际监管标准

IF 1.3 4区哲学

Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics Pub Date : 2022-04-14 DOI: 10.1177/15562646221094922

I. Stevens, F. Gilbert

引用次数: 2

The Multidimensional Nature of Research Ethics: Letters Issued by a French Research Ethics Committee Included Similar Proportions of Ethical and Scientific Queries 研究伦理的多维性质:法国研究伦理委员会发布的信件包括相似比例的伦理和科学问题

IF 1.3 4区哲学

Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics Pub Date : 2022-04-13 DOI: 10.1177/15562646221093218

T. Haaser, V. Bouteloup, D. Berdaï, M. Saux

引用次数: 0

How do Research Ethics Committee Members Respond to Hypothetical Studies with Children? Results from the MESSI Study 研究伦理委员会成员如何应对儿童的假设研究？MESSI研究结果

IF 1.3 4区哲学

Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics Pub Date : 2022-03-18 DOI: 10.1177/15562646221087530

S. Taplin, J. Chalmers, Judith Brown, Tim Moore, Anne Graham, M. McArthur

引用次数: 3

Preliminary Evidence for an Association between Journal Submission Requirements and Reproducibility of Published Findings: A Pilot Study 期刊提交要求与已发表研究结果再现性之间关联的初步证据：一项试点研究

IF 1.3 4区哲学

Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics Pub Date : 2022-02-28 DOI: 10.1177/15562646221083384

Mitch Brown, R. McGrath, D. Sacco

{"title":"Preliminary Evidence for an Association between Journal Submission Requirements and Reproducibility of Published Findings: A Pilot Study","authors":"Mitch Brown, R. McGrath, D. Sacco","doi":"10.1177/15562646221083384","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15562646221083384","url":null,"abstract":"Systemic efforts have been employed to improve the reproducibility of published findings in psychology. To date, little research has been conducted evaluating how well these efforts work. In an effort to bridge this gap, the current study looked at journal submission requirements intended to encourage authors to engage in best practices for facilitating reproducible science and offers preliminary evidence for their potential efficacy. We calculated reproducibility indices (p-curves) for three randomly selected empirical studies published in each of 23 psychology journals in 2019 and correlated quantitative results from those analyzes with the number of submission requirements for each journal that intended to ensure compliance with best reporting practices. Results indicated a greater number of submission requirements at a given outlet was associated with indices indicating greater likelihood of reproducibility of findings. We frame findings as impetus for future, more extensive, research to identify causal links between submission requirements and reproducibility.","PeriodicalId":50211,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics","volume":"17 1","pages":"267 - 274"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2022-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47877317","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0