Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics最新文献_第2页

Ethical Challenges in Mariculture: Adopting a Feminist Blue Humanities Approach 海水养殖的伦理挑战：采用女性主义蓝色人文方法

Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics Pub Date : 2024-02-10 DOI: 10.1007/s10806-024-09921-5

Jesse D. Peterson

{"title":"Ethical Challenges in Mariculture: Adopting a Feminist Blue Humanities Approach","authors":"Jesse D. Peterson","doi":"10.1007/s10806-024-09921-5","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-024-09921-5","url":null,"abstract":"As mariculture—the cultivation of aquatic organisms in marine environment—intensifies to meet the demands of sustainable blue growth and national policies, novel ethical challenges will arise. In the context of ethics, primary concerns over aquaculture and mariculture tend to stay within differing value-based perspectives focused on benefits to human and non-human subjects, specifically animal welfare and animal rights. Nonetheless, the burgeoning field of feminist blue humanities provides ethical considerations that extend beyond animal subjects (including humans), often because of its concerns with new materialist, posthumanist, and other relations-based theories. This article examines feminist blue humanities and the contributions it may bring to understanding contemporary and future ethical challenges posed by mariculture and its intensification, especially the cultivation of low-trophic organisms. By offering an overview of feminist blue humanities, this article explores some of its particularities by drawing out three major ethical concerns facing contemporary mariculture, specifically material reconfigurations, radical alteration of the lives of low-trophic species through industrialization and increases in maricultural waste products.","PeriodicalId":501152,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139771768","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Shallow vs. Deep Geoethics: Moving Beyond Anthropocentric Views 浅层地质伦理与深层地质伦理：超越人类中心主义观点

Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics Pub Date : 2024-01-04 DOI: 10.1007/s10806-023-09920-y

Giovanni Frigo, Luiz Anselmo Ifanger, Roberto Greco, Helen Kopnina, Rafaela Hillerbrand

{"title":"Shallow vs. Deep Geoethics: Moving Beyond Anthropocentric Views","authors":"Giovanni Frigo, Luiz Anselmo Ifanger, Roberto Greco, Helen Kopnina, Rafaela Hillerbrand","doi":"10.1007/s10806-023-09920-y","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-023-09920-y","url":null,"abstract":"At its inception, geoethics was envisioned as a type of professional ethics concerned with the moral implications of geoscientific research, applications, and practices. More recently, however, some scholars have proposed versions of geoethics as public and global ethics. To better understand these developments, this article considers the relationship between geoethics and environmental ethics by exploring different aspects of the human-nature relation (i.e., the moral status and role of humans in relation to the non-human world). We start by noting that the main strains of geoethical thought elaborated so far represent examples of environmental virtue ethics and defend moral weak anthropocentric positions (e.g., “ethical”, “responsible” or “enlightened” anthropocentrism). Some scholars propose that such weak anthropocentric geoethics can synthesize the different positions in environmental ethics and move beyond them toward a novel and distinct approach. We compare the meaning and the use of the term “anthropocentrism” in both environmental ethics and geoethics, stressing that although geoethics is inevitably epistemically anthropocentric (i.e., anthropogenic), it does not need to be morally anthropocentric. We consider the compatibility of non-anthropocentric stances with current geoethical theory and argue for the integration of normative non-anthropocentric accounts (e.g., ecocentric) into geoethical debates and geoscience education.","PeriodicalId":501152,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139096127","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Plantationocene: A Framework For Understanding the Links Between Ecological Destruction and Social Inequalities 种植世：理解生态破坏与社会不平等之间联系的框架

Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics Pub Date : 2023-12-07 DOI: 10.1007/s10806-023-09919-5

Ennan Wu, Yichang Xu

{"title":"Plantationocene: A Framework For Understanding the Links Between Ecological Destruction and Social Inequalities","authors":"Ennan Wu, Yichang Xu","doi":"10.1007/s10806-023-09919-5","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-023-09919-5","url":null,"abstract":"The Anthropocene, as one of the core concepts currently used to understand and reflect on the relationships among humans, species, and planet, has received widespread attention and discussion in the global academic community. As one of the important alternative concepts to the Anthropocene, the term Plantationocene was first proposed by Haraway et al. in October 2014. Compared to the former, it reveals the fundamental characteristics of the modern era, and continues to enrich its theoretical connotations amidst rapid shifts in social concepts and practices. Tracing and sorting out the genealogy of this concept over less than a decade since its inception allows for a microhistorical study of conceptual history, revealing three key dimensions of its meaning: (i) a critique of the history of (post)colonialism and extractivism, (ii) although plantations are known worldwide for monocrop agriculture and have so-called keystone species, they are essentially a multispecies symbiotic system. From its inception, the concept of the Plantationocene inherently encompasses the idea of “multispecies entanglement and multispecies politics,“ and (iii) a metaphor for structural power relations from real word to digital world. Research indicates that the Plantationocene has become a framework for understanding the connection between ecological destruction and social inequality. In the game of global ecological politics and academic power relationships in the post-humanist era, it requires us to pay attention not only to the relationships among humans but also those among multispecies to build a more just and sustainable society in the future.","PeriodicalId":501152,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138545947","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

The Harm of Desire Modification in Non-human Animals: Circumventing Control, Diminishing Ownership and Undermining Agency 非人类动物欲望改变的危害:规避控制，减少所有权和破坏代理

Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics Pub Date : 2022-09-13 DOI: 10.1007/s10806-022-09890-7

Marc G. Wilcox

引用次数: 0

On the Ethics of Anthropogenic Changes and Challenges: “Animals in Our Midst: The Challenges of Co-existing with Animals in the Anthropocene” edited by Bernice Bovenkerk and Josef Keulartz 关于人类变化和挑战的伦理:《我们中间的动物:人类世与动物共存的挑战》，伯尼斯·伯文科克和约瑟夫·克乌拉茨主编

Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics Pub Date : 2022-04-25 DOI: 10.1007/s10806-022-09884-5

J. Karg,H. Grimm

引用次数: 0

Agency and Autonomy in Food Choice: Can We Really Vote with Our Forks? 食物选择中的代理和自主:我们真的可以用叉子投票吗?

Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics Pub Date : 2022-02-22 DOI: 10.1007/s10806-022-09878-3

J. M. Dieterle

引用次数: 5

Plants as Machines: History, Philosophy and Practical Consequences of an Idea 植物作为机器:一种思想的历史、哲学和实践后果

Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics Pub Date : 2022-01-03 DOI: 10.1007/s10806-021-09877-w

Sophie Gerber, Quentin Hiernaux

引用次数: 3