Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery最新文献

{"title":"The effects of Tourniquet use in elbow surgery: A retrospective analysis.","authors":"Kai Hoffeld, Christopher Wahlers, Jan P Hockmann, Michael Sarter, Lars P Müller, Michael Hackl, Tim Leschinger","doi":"10.1016/j.jse.2024.05.049","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2024.05.049","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pneumatic tourniquets are frequently employed in extremity surgeries, aiming to enhance intraoperative visibility and minimize blood loss. While their benefits and drawbacks have been extensively studied in lower limb operations, their impact on upper limb procedures, particularly elbow surgery, remains poorly understood. This study investigates the advantages and risks associated with pneumatic tourniquet utilization in elbow surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted on 183 patients who underwent elbow surgery for fractures between January 2019 and September 2023. Patients were categorized into two groups: those who underwent surgery with a tourniquet (WT) and those without a tourniquet (NT). Subgroup analyses were performed based on fracture complexity. Data collected included patient characteristics, tourniquet usage, surgical duration, pre- and postoperative hemoglobin levels, C-reactive protein levels, pain assessments, opioid administration, hospital stay duration, follow-up, complications, and revisions. Statistical analyses were used to identify significant differences and correlations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The use of a tourniquet in elbow surgery yielded several notable outcomes. Patients in the WT group experienced significantly shorter surgical durations and hospital stays. Hemoglobin drop was lower in the WT group, indicating reduced blood loss. However, there were no significant differences in postoperative pain, opioid consumption, or complications between the WT and NT groups. Subgroup analysis revealed that the recorded differences, particularly shorter surgical durations, were more pronounced in complex fractures.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study shows promising results in the use of pneumatic tourniquets in elbow surgery in terms of enhanced efficiency, reduced blood loss, and overall safety, without compromising patient outcomes. However, the potential influence of perioperative decision-making on tourniquet usage underscores the need for further research to elucidate its role and optimize its application, especially in complex elbow fractures.</p>","PeriodicalId":50051,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2024-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141789698","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Long term (Minimum 10 Years) Survival and Outcomes of Pyrocarbon Interposition Shoulder Arthroplasty.","authors":"Hugo Barret, Jérome Garret, Luc Favard, Nicolas Bonnevialle, Philippe Collin, Marc-Olivier Gauci, Pascal Boileau","doi":"10.1016/j.jse.2024.05.026","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2024.05.026","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is major controversies surrounding the use and longevity of Pyrocarbon Interposition Shoulder Arthroplasty (PISA). The objective of this study was to investigate the long-term survival and outcomes (minimum 10-year) following PISA for osteoarthritis (OA) in young /active patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective review of prospectively collected data of patients who underwent PISA (InSpyre, Tornier-Stryker, USA) for OA between 2009 and 2012. Arthroplasty survival was known for 71 patients followed longitudinally for a minimum of 10 years. The clinical and radiological outcomes were assessed in 62 patients (62 shoulders) reviewed with radiographs. The mean age at surgery was 60 years (range, 23-72 years) and 31 shoulders (50%) underwent prior surgery before PISA. The diagnosis was primary osteoarthritis (POA=29), post-traumatic osteoarthritis (PTOA=23), post-instability osterarthritis (PIOA=10). Clinical failure was defined as repeat surgical intervention involving prosthesis revision. Clinical outcomes were assessed with Constant score (CS) and Subjective shoulder Value (SSV). The mean duration of follow-up was 11 ± 0.6 years (range, 10 to 14 years).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, the survival rate was 90% (95% CI: 82.8-96.8) at 5 years and 87% (95% CI: 79-94.8) at 10 years follow-up. Survival was 100% in PTOA (type 1 fracture sequelae) and in PIOA as well as 95% in primary OA with type-A glenoid. Revision surgery was significantly higher in biconcave (type-B2) glenoid (44%) compared to concentric (type-A) glenoid (2%), respectively (p=0.002). Among the 7 patients who were revised to RSA, 5 had painful glenoid erosion and 2 had bipolar (glenoid and humeral) erosion with thinning and finally fracture of the greater tuberosity (GT). Two shoulders with glenohumeral erosion were associated with secondary rotator cuff tears (one supraspinatus and one subscapularis tear). The mean time to revision and revision was 4 ± 1.7 years. Glenoid wear was more often superior (81%) than central (19%), p<0.001. For those shoulders not revised, the mean CS and SSV significantly increased from 39 ±14 to 70 ±14 points and 34% ±15 to 75% ±17, respectively (p<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PISA is an efficient and durable surgical procedure for the treatment of young/active patients with post-traumatic OA, post-instability OA, and primary OA with concentric (type A) glenoid erosion, but not for those with biconcave (type B2) glenoid. Biconcave (type B2) glenoid and subscapularis tear or insufficiency are risk factors for failure and revision.</p>","PeriodicalId":50051,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2024-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141789696","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Iatrogenic radial nerve injury caused by metal shaving: A case report.","authors":"Akari Mori, Kaoru Tada, Mika Akahane, Soichiro Honda, Satoru Demura","doi":"10.1016/j.jse.2024.05.048","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2024.05.048","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":50051,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2024-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141789695","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Return to sport after arthroscopic xenograft bone block associated with Bankart repair and subscapularis augmentation in competitive contact athletes with recurrent anterior shoulder instability.","authors":"Raffaele Russo, Alberto Fontanarosa, Marco Montemagno, Alfonso Fedele, Angelo De Crescenzo, Francesco Di Pietto, Roberto Calbi, Raffaele Garofalo","doi":"10.1016/j.jse.2024.05.047","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2024.05.047","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Open Bankart repair and Latarjet stabilization are two of surgical procedures used in the treatment of shoulder instability in contact athletes. The aim of this study is to evaluate the outcomes of bone block arthroscopic procedure, performed with xenograft, in combination with Bankart repair and selective subscapularis augmentation (ASA) for contact athletes with recurrent anterior shoulder instability.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively assessed contact athletes who underwent arthroscopic bone block with xenograft and Bankart repair with selective augmentation of subscapularis for recurrent anterior shoulder instability between January 2017 and December 2021. Shoulders with posterior instability or multidirectional instability were excluded. Recurrence, complications, return to sport, and functional scores (Rowe score, WOSI score, ASES score) were assessed. A CT scan at 2-year follow-up was performed to assess the status of Bone block integration, its displacement and restoration of glenoid surface.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>16 patients were included in the study with a mean age of 24. None of the patients treated with arthroscopic bone block and ASA presented new dislocation episodes. An increase in preoperative scores was observed at the last follow-up, in particular the ASES, Rowe, and WOSI scores increased from 69±7, 31±9 , 1235±46 respectively to 96.1±3.2, 94±6, 119±51. All athletes returned to sporting activity at or near the same level as pre-surgery. The glenoid bone surface increase from 83% to 116% at last follow-up.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Bone block treatment with Xenograft combined with Bankart repair and ASA procedures has been shown to be effective in treating instability in contact athletes with significant glenoid deficit. All athletes returned to athletic activity at a level similar to the pre-intervention period.</p>","PeriodicalId":50051,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2024-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141789697","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Response to Letter to the editor regarding «Intramedullary Nailing of Humeral Shaft Fractures: Percutaneous Nailing in the lateral position through the Neviaser approach is a reliable Technique ».","authors":"Hugo Barret, Rémi Carre, Pascal Boileau, Cyril Lazerges, Olivier Bozon, Pierre-Emmanuel Chammas, Bertrand Coulet, Michel Chammas","doi":"10.1016/j.jse.2024.05.031","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2024.05.031","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":50051,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2024-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141762176","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Letter to the Editor regarding Barret et al: \"intramedullary nailing of humeral shaft fractures: percutaneous nailing in the lateral position through the Neviaser approach is a reliable technique\".","authors":"Pao-Sheng Hsu, Zhi-Hong Zheng","doi":"10.1016/j.jse.2024.05.028","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jse.2024.05.028","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":50051,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2024-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141762175","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Sling and Forget It? A Systematic Review of Operative versus Non-Operative Outcomes for Scapula Fractures.","authors":"Haley C Sernandez, John T Riehl, Joshua Fogel","doi":"10.1016/j.jse.2024.05.042","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2024.05.042","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The majority of scapula fractures have historically been treated non-operatively. The current literature describing patient outcomes following scapula fractures is limited. Our objective was to determine differences in outcomes between operatively and non-operatively treated scapular fractures. The goal of our study was to provide an updated and comprehensive systematic review for scapula body, neck, and glenoid fractures focusing on several outcomes including union rate, return to work, pain, shoulder active range of motion, strength, functional scores, and any recorded complications.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The PRISMA methodology was followed for this systematic review. Articles were obtained from the PubMed/Medline database using the following search terms: scapula body OR scapula neck OR intra-articular glenoid AND fracture. Additional articles were obtained by searching the bibliographies of included references. Studies were included if they contained clinical data on one or more of our study objectives and contained participants with a scapular body, neck, and/or glenoid fracture who were at least 16 years old. A total of 35 papers, with 822 total cases were included. Studies chosen were assessed for level of evidence and reviewed for data pertaining to the current study objectives. All cases of scapula fractures found throughout the literature were analyzed for outcome data. Outcomes studied included union rate, return to work, pain, shoulder active range of motion, strength, functional scores, and recorded complications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overwhelming majority of scapula fractures go on to union. The majority of patients will eventually return to work. Persistent post-injury pain is unfortunately common. Shoulder range of motion and strength are decreased when compared to the contralateral shoulder. Non-operative glenoid fractures have the lowest reported functional scores. Malunion, need for additional surgeries, and post-traumatic arthritis were the most common complications.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>When treating scapula fractures, orthopedic surgeons must consider the specific fracture pattern, as well as patient specific goals. Risks and benefits of both operative and non-operative management should be discussed with the patient including the exceptionally low non-union rate regardless of treatment option and that persistent pain following injury is unfortunately common.</p>","PeriodicalId":50051,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2024-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141762177","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Improvement in Sleep Disturbance Following Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair.","authors":"Daniel F Schodlbauer, Casey Beleckas, Austin Vegas, Albert Mousad, Jonathan C Levy","doi":"10.1016/j.jse.2024.05.043","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2024.05.043","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Approximately 90% of patients express concerns with sleep shortly after developing shoulder-related symptoms. Previous small cohort studies have demonstrated the impact of rotator cuff repair on sleep, but none have characterized the observed benefits. The purpose of this study is to evaluate sleep improvement after rotator cuff repair including the speed of sleep recovery, the time at which improvement plateaus, and the longer-term maintenance of improved sleep.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review of our institution's shoulder and elbow repository identified patients who underwent primary arthroscopic rotator cuff repair from 2012 - 2021 and reported sleep disturbance preoperatively. Patients were evaluated using sleep-related questions from the Simple Shoulder Test and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score. Sleep outcomes were compared from a preoperative visit to 3-month, 6-month, 12-month, and most recent follow-ups to evaluate efficacy of treatment, speed of recovery and improvement plateaus.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 677 RCR patients, 95.7% (648/677) reported sleep disturbance preoperatively. A total of 474 met inclusion criteria with median follow-up of 4.1 years (IQR, 2.1-6.1). At most recent follow-up, 81.8% were able to sleep comfortably and 65.7% were able to sleep on the affected side. A plateau in the ability to sleep comfortably was seen at 6 months while no plateau was observed in the ability to sleep on the affected side. More rapid improvement in the ability to sleep comfortably occurred during the first 3 months and from 3 - 6 months for the ability to sleep on the affected side.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The majority of patients with sleep disturbance who undergo RCR, report significant, rapid, and lasting improvement in the ability to sleep comfortably and the ability to sleep on the affected side.</p>","PeriodicalId":50051,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2024-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141749551","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Evaluation of the Scapulohumeral Distraction (SHD) technique for anterior shoulder dislocation. A randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Georgios Kalinterakis, Georgios Velivasakis, Konstantinos Balaouras, Georgios Psilomanousakis, Emmanouil Daskalogiannakis, Konstantinos Mastrantonakis","doi":"10.1016/j.jse.2024.05.044","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2024.05.044","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Shoulder dislocation is a common injury presenting in emergency Department. Numerous methods have been described in the literature for glenohumeral reduction. These methods can be divided into two groups: traction maneuvers and the combination of traction with scapula manipulation techniques. In this article, we introduced a new maneuver for shoulder reduction, namely, the combination of traction with handling the scapula (scapulohumeral distraction, SHD) and compare it to the Hippocratic Method (HT).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The study took place from November 2021 to September 2023. A total of 96 patients with acute anterior shoulder dislocation were enrolled in the study. Eighty-seven patients, who met all inclusion criteria, were randomly assigned to one of the two groups (SHD and HM). We evaluated each method for success rate, time to relocation, complications over a follow-up period of one month, patients' satisfaction and pain level during the procedure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both methods had comparable success rates (SHD 95.3% vs. HM 93.2%, p=.833) while no complications where observed. However, SHD method required significantly less procedure time (p=.001). Moreover, patients in SHD group reported significantly less pain (p=.012) and greater satisfaction (p=.003) levels. Furthermore, when we assessed relocation time, pain and patient satisfaction as a function of recurrence, there were no statistically significant differences between the 2 techniques. Similarly, the evaluation of relocation time for both techniques as a function of BMI and age did not indicate statistically significant differences.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Scapulohumeral distraction technique (SHD) represents a safe, anatomically based and simple method for shoulder reduction. It showed a statistically significant decrease in relocation time and pain, with patients mentioned higher satisfaction rates compared to the classical Hippocratic method. Nonetheless, there were no statistically significant differences between the two techniques regarding success rate.</p>","PeriodicalId":50051,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2024-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141749550","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Response to Sahu et al: A type II error likely exists due to the low sample size.","authors":"Kyong S Min","doi":"10.1016/j.jse.2024.05.032","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jse.2024.05.032","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":50051,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2024-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141749552","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}