Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery最新文献

{"title":"Surgical options and clinical outcomes following a failed Latarjet procedure: a systematic review.","authors":"Neil Sarna, Jaydeep Dhillon, James A Maguire, Anthony J Scillia, Matthew J Kraeutler","doi":"10.1016/j.jse.2024.07.031","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jse.2024.07.031","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A failed prior Latarjet procedure can be a challenging situation for both patients and surgeons. The purpose of this study was to report on the techniques and outcomes of patients undergoing revision surgery for the treatment of recurrent anterior shoulder instability after a failed Latarjet procedure.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review was performed by searching PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and Embase to identify clinical studies which reported on surgical techniques for a failed Latarjet procedure with reporting of clinical outcomes. The search terms used were Latarjet failed. Patients were evaluated based on revision method, patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), reoperation rates, recurrent instability, overall satisfaction, and return to sports and work.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirteen studies (all Level IV evidence) met inclusion criteria, including a total of 293 shoulders with a mean age of 28.3 years (range, 16-55 years) at the time of surgery. The mean follow-up time was 50.4 months (range, 14.0-208.0 months) and males accounted for 78.6% of all patients. Revision procedures included open and arthroscopic Eden-Hybinette, distal tibial allograft, iliac crest autograft, osteochondral glenoid allograft, and Bankart repair and/or capsular plication. These may all be viable techniques for revision surgery for a failed Latarjet procedure. All revision procedures showed improvements in PROMs including the Visual Analogue Scale, Constant score, subjective shoulder value, Walch-Duplay, and Rowe scores. Return to sports ranged from 46.1% to 94%. Recurrent instability rates ranged from 0% to 43.8%. Reoperation rates ranged from 0% to 31.3%. Overall satisfaction following a revision procedure ranged from 80% to 100%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A failed Latarjet procedure can be treated with various revision procedures such as open and arthroscopic Eden-Hybinette, distal tibial allograft, iliac crest autograft, osteochondral glenoid allograft, and Bankart repair and/or capsular plication. Overall, surgical management of the failed Latarjet results in improvements in PROMs, pain, return to sports, and decreased recurrent instability with a moderate complication rate.</p>","PeriodicalId":50051,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142156510","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Preoperative Planning for Shoulder Arthroplasty is Feasible with Computed Tomography at Lower-Than-Conventional Radiation Doses.","authors":"Kaitlyn Rodriguez, Jay Levin, Justin Solomon, Eoghan T Hurley, Daniel Lorenzana, Ehsan Samei, Yaw Boachie-Adjie, Robert French, Oke Anakwenze, Christopher Klifto","doi":"10.1016/j.jse.2024.08.038","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2024.08.038","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Computed tomography (CT) offers a detailed assessment of the shoulder for preoperative shoulder arthroplasty planning; however, this technique exposes the patient to ionizing radiation. The purpose of this study was to prospectively evaluate the practicality of reducing the CT radiation dose compared to conventional dose levels for manual and preoperative planning software measurements for shoulder arthroplasty.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 10 shoulder CT examinations were performed for preoperative planning purposes on a dual x-ray source CT scanner. A specialized dose-split scan technique was utilized to reconstruct CT images corresponding to 100%, 70%, and 30% radiation dose relative to our institution's standard of care imaging protocol. Glenoid version, inclination, and humeral head subluxation were measured manually by three authors and by commercially available software platforms. These measurements were analyzed for agreement between the 100%, 70%, and 30% dose levels for each patient. Tolerances of 5° of glenoid version, 5° of glenoid inclination, and 10% humeral head subluxation were used as equivalent for preoperative planning.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Automated measurements of 70% dose images were within 5° of version, 5° of inclination, and 10% subluxation in 95.0% of cases. Manual measurements of 70% RD images were within 5° of version for 90.0% of cases, 5° of inclination in 86.7% of cases, and 10% subluxation in 100% of cases. Automated measurements from the 30% dose images were within 5° of version, 5° of inclination, and 10% subluxation for 100% of cases. Manual measurements from the 30% dose images were within 5° of version for 86.7% of cases, 5° of inclination in 76.7% of cases, and 10% subluxation in 100% of cases. The mean absolute difference in software measurement of glenoid version (p = 0.96), glenoid inclination (p = 0.64), or humeral head subluxation (p = 0.09) or in aggregated manual mean absolute difference of version (p = 0.22), inclination (p = 0.31), or humeral head subluxation (p = 0.56) was not significant. Good to excellent reliability was determined by interclass correlation coefficients among the manual observers and automatic software platforms for measurements at all doses (P<0.001) CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate that both preoperative planning software platforms and human observers produced similar measurements of glenoid version, inclination, and humeral head subluxation from reduced-dose images compared to standard of care doses. By implementing reduced dose techniques in preoperative shoulder CT, the potential risks associated with radiation exposure could be reduced for patients undergoing shoulder arthroplasty.</p>","PeriodicalId":50051,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2024-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142512000","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Non-Invasive Bracing of Acromioclavicular Joint Dislocations is not Superior to Early Functional Rehabilitation and not Inferior to Surgical Stabilization in Rockwood type III and V Injuries.","authors":"Tazio Maleitzke, Nicolas Barthod-Tonnot, Nina Maziak, Natascha Kraus, Mark Tauber, Alexander Hildebrandt, Jonas Pawelke, Larissa Eckl, Lukas Mödl, Kathi Thiele, Doruk Akgün, Philipp Moroder","doi":"10.1016/j.jse.2024.08.040","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2024.08.040","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Treatment of acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) separations remains controversial. Yet, conservative treatment has become more common even for high-grade injuries. Available conservative treatment does to date however not address the loss of anatomical joint integrity in Rockwood (RW) III and V injuries. In a recent case report, we outlined the concept of restoring ACJ integrity by non-invasively bracing a RW V injury.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>The purpose of this study was to prospectively evaluate the clinical and radiological efficacy of a modern Kenny-Howard splint like brace and compare it to early functional rehabilitation or surgery for RW III and V injuries after a minimum of 12 months.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with acute RW III injuries (n=18) and patients with RW V injuries who refused surgery (n=7) were prospectively enrolled and treated with an ACJ brace and followed up clinically and radiologically for 12 months. Endpoint results were compared to injury grade-, sex-, age-, and follow-up-period-matched patients treated with early functional rehabilitation (n=23) and surgical TightRope stabilization (n=23). Clinical outcomes included Constant Score (CS), Subjective Shoulder Value (SSV), Taft Score (TS), and modified Acromioclavicular Joint Instability Score (mAJIS) and radiological outcome included coracoclavicular (CC) index.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>CS, SSV, TS, and mAJIS improved in RW III and CS and SSV in RW V patients treated with the ACJ brace. Significance was only reached in RW III patients (p < 0.001). Radiological indices did not improve over time in RW III and V patients. No differences were found when comparing functional and cosmetic outcomes (CS, SSV, TS, mAJIS) after a minimum of 12 months between bracing, surgery, and early functional rehabilitation in RW III and V patients. The CC index was most improved in patients treated by surgery compared to bracing after a minimum of 12 months (p=0.0011 for RW III).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Brace treatment led to comparable clinical and cosmetic outcomes as early functional rehabilitation or surgery in patients with high grade ACJ injuries after a minimum of 12 months. However, no sustainably improved reduction of the ACJ resulted from bracing, when compared to early functional rehabilitation, thus questioning its utility. While surgery ensured radiological improvement compared to bracing, no benefit was seen over early functional rehabilitation.</p>","PeriodicalId":50051,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2024-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142511999","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Fracture Patterns, Outcomes, and Complications of Terrible Triad Injury in Elderly Patients.","authors":"Yaiza Lopiz, Gabriel Ciller, Virginia Ponz-Lueza, Marta Echevarria, Susana Donadeu, Andres Bartrina, Carlos García-Fernandez, Fernando Marco","doi":"10.1016/j.jse.2024.08.043","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2024.08.043","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>The aim of this study was to describe the fracture patterns of terrible triad elbow injury (TTEI) and to evaluate complications, functional and radiographic outcomes in mid-term follow-up in patients older than 65 years.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective study of 29 patients, mean follow-up of 48.7±4.6 months (range 65-78). Fractures were classified according to the Mason and Regan-Morrey classifications. All patients were evaluated by the Mayo Elbow Performance Scale (MEPS), Quick-Dash, EQVAS, EQ5D scores, and ROM measurement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age was 72.3 years and 79% were women. Mason Type III (72%) and Reagan-Morrey type II (69%) were the most frequent fracture type. All patients were managed with a lateral approach consisting of repair or replacement of the radial head and repair of the lateral ulnar collateral ligament (LUCL); of these patients, 19 underwent re-attachment of the coronoid process or anterior capsule. Mean functional scores were MEPS 90.3±7.5, Quick-DASH 18.4±4.6, EQ5D .89± 0.33, EQ-VAS 86.2 ± 21, and VAS 2.2± 1.5. Mean postoperative flexo-extension arc of elbow motion was 105º (range, 65º-145º). Two patients (7%) required revision surgery. We did not observe any joint instability in the elbow after surgery.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients over 65 years old with a terrible triad elbow injury (TTEI) are at substantial risk of complex fracture patterns, particularly Mason type III radial head fractures and Regan-Morrey type II coronoid fractures. Complications such as joint stiffness and heterotopic ossification are infrequent, while associated capitellum fractures are not rare and should be considered in the assessment as they can impact elbow stability. Despite these challenges, surgical management generally achieves favorable functional outcomes with low complication and reoperation rates.</p>","PeriodicalId":50051,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2024-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142511997","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Low Socioeconomic Indicators Correlate with Critical Pre-Operative Glenoid Bone Loss and Care Delays.","authors":"Benjamin E Neubauer, Christopher M Kuenze, Rachel E Cherelstein, Mitchell A Nader, Albert Lin, Edward S Chang","doi":"10.1016/j.jse.2024.08.039","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2024.08.039","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Chronic and recurrent shoulder dislocations prior to stabilization can increase the risk of glenoid bone loss. Glenoid bone loss exceeding critical levels can lead to further instability and decreased outcomes following arthroscopic labral repair. Indicators of low socioeconomic status (SES), such as high Area Deprivation Index (ADI) and non-commercial insurance, are related to generalized delays to orthopedic care, which can cause recurrent instability and increase glenoid bone loss.</p><p><strong>Hypothesis/purpose: </strong>Higher national ADI and non-commercial insurance would be associated with greater levels of radiographic glenoid bone loss after glenoid instability.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective study was performed with patients who underwent anterior labral repair. Chart review included demographics, course of care data, preoperative instability data, national ADI, and insurance status. The Neighborhood Atlas Website and patients' home addresses were used to obtain national ADI. Glenoid bone loss was measured using the Best-fit circle Pico method on three-dimensionally aligned magnetic resonance images (MRIs). Researchers were blinded to SES indicators during radiographic analysis. Glenoid bone loss was compared between SES indicators using one-way ANOVAs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>146 patients met inclusion criteria and had complete datasets (23.3% female; 22.4±7.0-years-old; national ADI=16.1±15.3). Patients experienced on average 9.12±6.63% glenoid bone loss. A curve fitting tool determined a quadratic non-linear regression best characterized the association of glenoid bone loss and ADI (R² = 0.392, p < 0.001). Individuals with commercial insurance experienced 8.58%±6.69% glenoid bone loss as compared to 11.78%±6.30% in individuals with Medicaid insurance (p=0.03). Critical bone loss at a threshold of 13.5% was more likely with higher national ADI (p<0.001) and Medicaid insurance (OR=2.49, CI=1.02-6.09). However, only national ADI was predictive of subcritical bone loss at a threshold of 10% (p<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients with greater national ADI and Medicaid insurance status had greater rates of critical preoperative glenoid bone loss at a threshold of 13.5%. Greater national ADI is also predictive of subcritical glenoid bone loss at a threshold of 10% and overall glenoid bone loss. Further study is needed to assess the postoperative implications of these findings in this population.</p>","PeriodicalId":50051,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2024-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142511998","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Comparing optimum prosthesis combinations of total stemmed, stemless and reverse shoulder arthroplasty revision rates for men and women with glenohumeral osteoarthritis.","authors":"David R J Gill, Sophia Corfield, Dylan Harries, Richard S Page BMedSci","doi":"10.1016/j.jse.2024.08.033","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2024.08.033","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study investigated prostheses from a large national arthroplasty registry with the lowest rates of revision, defined as optimum. We compared optimum shoulder arthroplasty revision rates for osteoarthritis (OA) to determine the most suitable/effective procedure for men and women.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>There were three cohort groups of optimum primary shoulder arthroplasties for OA undertaken between 1st January 2008 and 31 December 2022: stemless shoulder arthroplasty with cemented polyethylene glenoids (slTSA), stemmed shoulder arthroplasty with modified central peg polyethylene glenoids (stTSA), and cementless reverse shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA). The cumulative percent revision (CPR) was determined using Kaplan-Meier estimates of survivorship and hazard ratios (HR) from Cox proportional hazard models adjusted for age, gender, humeral head/glenosphere size, polyethylene type, and surgeon volume. Possible interactions were examined. A sub-analysis from 1 January 2017 captured additional patient demographics, ASA score, BMI and glenoid morphology.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The CPR at 7 years was 4.0%(95% confidence interval (CI) 3.1, 5.1) for slTSA (n=3,041), 3.8%(95%CI 2.7, 5.5) for stTSA (n=1,259) and 4.1%(95%CI 3.7, 4.6) for rTSA (n=12,341). slTSA had a higher rate of revision compared to rTSA after the first 9 months (p<0.001). rTSA had a lower revision rate compared to stTSA from 3 months on (p=0.004). After adjusting for other confounders, prosthesis type and gender were associated with revision rates (p<0.001) whereas surgeon volume was not. Additionally, gender and prosthesis type strongly interacted (p=0.013) and the combined model exhibited greater predictive performance when including this interaction. Women had lower rates of revision than men for both stTSA and rTSA, but not slTSA. Most revisions were for infection in men, especially rTSA. After 3 months, the rate of revision for slTSA vs rTSA for women was increased (p<0.001) and revision rates for men did not significantly differ. However, in a sub-analysis of procedures in males since 2017 with additional adjustments, slTSA had a lower revision rate than stTSA (p=0.010).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The optimum shoulder arthroplasty revision rates vary for both the gender and implant type for the diagnosis of OA. A model combining optimum prostheses and gender predicted revision better than optimum implants alone. After 3 months, rTSA was associated with lower revision rates compared to slTSA in women, whereas there were no significant differences between optimum prostheses in men. However, surgeons may also consider lower revision risk of optimum slTSA at sub analysis and increased cumulative incidence of infection for rTSA requiring revision to resolve decision making for male patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":50051,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2024-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142479320","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Does concomitant thyroid disorder lead to worse outcomes in frozen shoulder? - A systematic review.","authors":"Sean Kean Ann Phua, Rachel Si Ning Loh, Bryan Yijia Tan, Sean Wei Loong Ho","doi":"10.1016/j.jse.2024.08.032","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2024.08.032","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Frozen shoulder is a common pathology characterized by significant shoulder pain, range of motion limitation and physical disability. There exists a clear association between the prevalence of frozen shoulder and thyroid disease. However, the effects of concomitant thyroid disease on clinical outcomes of frozen shoulder are less well established. This study aims to evaluate if the presence of thyroid disease predisposes to poorer clinical outcomes in patients with frozen shoulder.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>The study was performed according to PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines and registered with PROSPERO. Two databases (PubMed and Embase) were searched from date of inception to 9 January 2024. Human studies reporting clinical outcomes of patients with concomitant thyroid disorder and frozen shoulder were included. Risk of bias was assessed based on the Quality In Prognosis Studies (QUIPS) tool and quality of evidence was judged based on the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) framework in the domains of range of motion, responsiveness to treatment or timeliness of recovery, and multidimensional scoring systems.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seven studies comprising 167,397 subjects (mean age 52.7 to 58 years, female proportion 67.1%), including 49,314 patients with concomitant thyroid disorder and frozen shoulder were included. Amongst the seven included studies: one study reported improved clinical outcomes in patients with concomitant frozen shoulder and hypothyroidism, one study reported that presence of thyroid disorder led to worse outcomes, while the remaining five studies did not demonstrate evidence of statistically worse outcomes in patients with concomitant thyroid disorder. Based on the GRADE framework, there was no consistent prognostic association between thyroid disorder and frozen shoulder in the domains of range of motion, responsiveness to treatment or timeliness of recovery, and multidimensional scoring systems, and the quality of evidence ranged from 'Very Low' to 'Low'.</p><p><strong>Risk of bias assessment: </strong>Based on the QUIPS tool, three studies were assessed to have low risk of bias, while four studies were assessed to have moderate risk of bias.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Though there exists an association between the prevalence of frozen shoulder and thyroid disorder, there is no consistent evidence in available literature to suggest that concomitant thyroid disorder predisposes to worse clinical outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":50051,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2024-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142479322","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty for Proximal Humerus Fractures and Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty for Elective Indications Should Have Separate Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) Codes.","authors":"Amir M Boubekri, Michael Scheidt, Hassan Farooq, William Oetojo, Krishin Shivdasani, Nickolas Garbis, Dane Salazar","doi":"10.1016/j.jse.2024.08.037","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2024.08.037","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) for fracture currently shares a single current procedural terminology (CPT) code with RSA for arthropathy despite potential differences in patient factors, procedural demands, postoperative care and needs, and overall hospital systems' resource utilization. We hypothesize that patients indicated for RSA for fracture will have greater medical complexity, require longer operative duration, have higher complication rates, demonstrate inferior functional outcomes, and require greater healthcare cost expenditures compared to a cohort undergoing RSA for rotator cuff arthropathy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>383 RSAs were retrospectively reviewed from January 2011 to December 2020. Demographics, comorbidities, operative time, financial charge and cost data, length of stay (LOS), discharge disposition, and all-cause revisions were assessed. Visual analog scale (VAS) pain score and active range of motion (AROM) were evaluated at 2, 6, and 12 months postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>197 total RSA were included with 28 for fracture and 169 for arthropathy indications after exclusions. RSA operative time was longer for fractures with an average of 143.2±33.7 minutes compared to 108.2±33.9 minutes for arthropathy (p=0.001). Average cost per patient for RSA for proximal humerus fracture was $2,489 greater than cost for RSA for elective indications; however, no statistically significant difference was noted between average costs (p=0.126). LOS was longer for RSA for fracture compared to arthropathy with a mean of 4.0 ± 3.6 days versus 1.8 ± 2.3 days (p=0.004). The fracture group was 3.6 times more likely to be discharged to a skilled nursing facility or inpatient rehab (32% versus 9%, p=0.002). Early and late all-cause revisions were similar between groups. Differences in postoperative AROM for fracture versus arthropathy were significant for active forward flexion (aFF) at 2 months (95.5±36.7°, 117.0±32.3°) and 6 months (110.9±35.2°, 129.2±28.3°) (p=0.020) as well as active adducted external rotation (aER) at 6 months (20.0±20.9°, 33.1±12.3°) (p=0.007) and at 12 months (23.3±18.1°, 34.5±13.8°) (p=0.012). No difference in VAS pain scores were noted between fracture and arthropathy groups at any time point.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>RSA for fractures versus arthropathy have substantial differences in patient characteristics, surgical complexity, and hospital resource utilization. This is of importance given the currently available CPT code does not differentiate indications for RSA, especially if intending to accurately document surgical care delivered.</p>","PeriodicalId":50051,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2024-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142479331","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Early Postoperative Pain is Similar after Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair versus Short-Stay Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Prospective Study.","authors":"Ryan Lopez, Corey Schiffman, Jaspal Singh, Jie Yao, Alayna Vaughan, Raymond Chen, Mark Lazarus, Surena Namdari","doi":"10.1016/j.jse.2024.08.031","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2024.08.031","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>One of the barriers to counseling patients for shoulder arthroplasty (SA) is the anticipated pain after surgery. This can be contrasted with the common perception of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (RCR) surgery being less painful due to the less invasive nature of the procedure. We conducted a prospective study comparing postoperative pain levels and narcotic consumption after SA compared to those after RCR.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective study enrolled 102 patients undergoing short-stay SA and RCR at a single hospital. 50 patients underwent RCR and 52 underwent SA. All participants received a multimodal pain regimen consisting of an interscalene block with liposomal bupivacaine and one of two oral pain medication regimens. Patients were provided a daily pain diary to be completed for 14 postoperative days that tracked pain levels, narcotic consumption, and pain location. Patients were excluded for age <40, revision surgery, SA for fracture, history of chronic opioid use, or an inability to adhere to study protocol. Demographics, visual analogue scale (VAS) scores, and pain sensitivity questionnaires (PSQ) were collected preoperatively. Primary study outcomes were daily VAS pain scores and narcotic consumption during the 14 days after surgery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>RCR patients were younger (60.6 vs. 68.9 years; p<0.01) but other demographics, preoperative pain, and PSQ scores were similar between groups. Peak mean VAS pain levels for RCR and SA each occurred on postoperative (POD) 2 and were 4.4 ± 3.1 and 5.1 ± 2.7 respectively (p=0.214). There was no significant difference in VAS pain during the 14-day postoperative period between RCR and SA patients (p>0.05) or between anatomic SA and reverse SA (p>0.05). Narcotic usage was greater for RCR patients at POD 7 (0.5 vs. 0.2 tablets; p=0.039) and 8 (0.5 vs. 0.2 tablets; p=0.015) compared to SA patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study demonstrated that postoperative pain levels do not significantly differ between RCR and short-stay SA, with greater narcotic usage observed for RCR at one week after surgery. These findings support the notion that despite the increased invasiveness of SA, early postoperative pain is comparable with early pain after RCR.</p>","PeriodicalId":50051,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2024-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142479323","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Do Constrained Liners (in a 145° onlay implant) Provide Any Benefit? A Matched Retrospective Study.","authors":"Samuel Lorentz, Caroline N Park, Christopher P Roche, Christopher S Klifto, Oke A Anakwenze","doi":"10.1016/j.jse.2024.08.042","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2024.08.042","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The purpose of this study was to compare the outcomes of primary reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) using constrained liners (in a 145° onlay implant, Exactech, Equinoxe) with primary rTSA using standard liners with a minimum 1-year follow-up.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 836 primary rTSA patients were analyzed in this study. Patients treated with constrained liners (n=209) were cross-matched 1:3 for age, gender, glenosphere diameter, and follow-up duration, and compared with 627 patients who underwent primary rTSA with standard liners. Study endpoint was at one year. Outcomes were analyzed preoperatively and at the latest follow-up. Patient characteristics, postoperative range of motion (ROM), patient reported outcomes (PROs), complications and revisions were recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was no statistically significant changes in improvement in pain (-4.9 vs -5.1; p=0.356), ROM (abduction, 45.7° vs 47.9°; p=0.522) (forward elevation, 44.0 vs 50.8°; p=0.057) (internal rotation score 1.0 vs 1.1; p=0.709) (external rotation, 17.9° vs 16.7°; p=0.543), or PROs (American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Score, 44.5 vs 43.7; p=0.107) (Shoulder Arthroplasty Smart score, 27.5 vs 30.0; p=0.052) between the constrained and standard liner cohorts at minimum 1 year follow-up. However, the constrained liner rTSA cohort had a significantly higher rate of adverse events (6.2% vs. 2.7%; p=0.012), including a higher rate of scapular notching (15.6% vs. 8.8%; p=0.015).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The utilization of constrained liners in primary rTSA demonstrated no significant difference in the change in pain, abduction, forward elevation, ER and IR scores, ASES scores, and SAS scores at minimum 1-year follow-up. There was no significant difference in forward elevation or abduction compared to standard liners. However, we observed that the overall rate of adverse events, including scapular notching were significantly higher in the constrained liner cohort. Long-term clinical and radiographic follow-up is necessary to fully elucidate the durability of these results. At this time, it is unclear if constrained liners have any benefit in rTSA.</p>","PeriodicalId":50051,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2024-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142479321","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}