Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science最新文献

{"title":"Origins of US Government Principles for the Utilization and Care of Vertebrate Animals Used in Testing, Research, and Training.","authors":"David K Johnson, Louis J DeTolla, Paul W Houghton, George L Clarke, James F Taylor, Robert A Whitney","doi":"10.30802/AALAS-JAALAS-22-000118","DOIUrl":"10.30802/AALAS-JAALAS-22-000118","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The US Government Principles for the use of animals in research are a landmark statement of ethical values and guidance for the biomedical research community. However, when The Principles were introduced, a context was not provided for their source or foundation. The US Government Principles were formulated with input from the Council of Europe, World Health Organization, and US Interagency Research Animal Committee. The Principles continue to provide an ethical foundation for the biomedical research community.</p>","PeriodicalId":50019,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2023-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10434746/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10022011","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Benchmarking Enrichment Efforts in the US & Canada Across Species and Enrichment Categories.","authors":"Megan R LaFollette, Sylvie Cloutier, Colleen M Brady, Marguerite E O Haire, Brianna N Gaskill","doi":"10.30802/AALAS-JAALAS-22-000071","DOIUrl":"10.30802/AALAS-JAALAS-22-000071","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Enrichment is important for animal welfare and data quality. Provision of enrichment opportunities varies between species and enrichment category. However, data benchmarking these differences does not exist. Our objective was to characterize enrichment provision and associated factors across species in the US and Canada. Personnel who work with research animals (n = 1098) in the US and Canada voluntarily responded to online promotions and completed a survey about enrichment used for the species they worked with most, their control of and wish for more enrichment, stress or pain in the animals they worked the most with, and demographics. All participants (except those working with rats) received the same questionnaire regardless of species to allow objectivity, as the effects of many enrichment items on some species have not yet been determined. The questionnaire asked about enrichments that were beneficial to at least one species. The provision of enrichment was allocated into 2 outcome variables: diversity and frequency per enrichment category. Results showed a significant interaction between enrichment category and species. Generally, physical, nutritional, and sensory enrichments were provided less often than social enrichment. In addition, nonhuman primates received more diverse and more frequent enrichment than did other species (twice as much as rats and mice). Enrichment was provided less frequently by personnel who wished they could do more than the status quo. Both enrichment frequency and diversity were higher in respondents from Canada, those who had more control over provision, and those who had been in the field longer. While our results cannot be used to determine the quality of enrichment provided to various species, they do provide information on current enrichment practices in the US and Canada and identify differences in implementation by species and enrichment category. The data also indicate provision of enrichment is influenced by factors such as country and individual control over enrichment. This information can also be used to identify areas for greater enrichment efforts for some species (for example, rats and mice) and categories, with the ultimate goal of improving animal welfare.</p>","PeriodicalId":50019,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2023-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10434742/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10021996","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Opinion: Common Errors, Omissions, and Presentation Problems in the Conduct and Reporting of Animal-based Research.","authors":"Linda A Toth, Naomi M Gades, Brianna N Gaskill, George DeMarco, Elizabeth A Tolley","doi":"10.30802/AALAS-JAALAS-23-000049","DOIUrl":"10.30802/AALAS-JAALAS-23-000049","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>As experienced authors, statisticians, editors, and scientists, we present the following comments to highlight some usages or omissions that are common in research manuscripts. Consideration of these comments will improve practices of data analysis and reporting.</p>","PeriodicalId":50019,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2023-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10434744/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10024748","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Evaluation of a Behavioral Test for Sickness Behavior Associated with <i>Fusarium</i> Mycotoxin Ingestion in Female Beagle Dogs (<i>Canis familiaris</i>).","authors":"Michael W Brunt, Patricia V Turner, Maxwell C K Leung, Suzanne T Millman","doi":"10.30802/AALAS-JAALAS-22-000104","DOIUrl":"10.30802/AALAS-JAALAS-22-000104","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Animals exhibit behavioral changes during illness, including lethargy, anorexia, fever, adipsia, and anhedonia, which are believed to comprise an adaptive evolutionary strategy. Exploratory and social behaviors generally decrease during illness, but behavioral changes of dogs during illness have not been described. The objective of this study was to evaluate a novel canine behavior test during subclinical illness induced by dietary <i>Fusarium</i> mycotoxin. Twelve mature female beagle dogs received 3 treatment diets: a control diet (control), a diet formulated with grains contaminated with Fusarium mycotoxin (toxin), and the toxin diet together with a toxin binding agent (binder). All dogs received each diets for 14 d in a Latin square design with a 7-d washout period between diet trials. The test consisted of individually releasing dogs into the center aisle of the housing room for 4 min per day, during which interactions with familiar dogs in adjacent kennels were recorded by an observer outside the room who was blind to treatment groups. Total interactions, orientation, and attempted physical contact with other dogs were less frequent during the toxin and binder diet treatments. Conversely, frequencies of physical proximity and olfactory contact with familiar dogs in adjacent kennels were not associated with diet. In conclusion, induction of subclinical gastrointestinal illness influenced aspects of social interactions in beagle dogs. A clinical assessment sheet integrating these findings was developed to aid in early identification of subclinical illness in research dogs based on behavior.</p>","PeriodicalId":50019,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2023-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10434750/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10380483","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Introducing Graduate Students in Biomedical Sciences to an Institutional Animal Research Program.","authors":"Madeline L Budda","doi":"10.30802/AALAS-JAALAS-23-000001","DOIUrl":"10.30802/AALAS-JAALAS-23-000001","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>At the University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, graduate students enrolled in biomedical science programs comprise a significant portion of personnel working with research animals. Although the University requires that all personnel receive appropriate training before working with animals, veterinarians and research mentors agreed students would benefit from additional training. As a result, a course entitled \"Laboratory Animal Use and Concepts\" was added to the curriculum of the University's largest graduate program in biomedical sciences starting in 2017. The course introduces students to a number of topics relevant to the use of animals in biomedical research, with an emphasis on mice. Here we present a summary of the course and an assessment of its impact during the initial 5 y, from 2017-2021. Enrollment, student outcomes, and student evaluation surveys were included in this assessment. The course was offered to 6 classes totaling more than 120 students during this period. After completing the course, nearly 80% of students used animals as part of their graduate training. Among those, at least 21% sought additional training through formal workshops that offered supplemental opportunities to practice animal handling techniques. Student feedback suggested strong satisfaction with the course content and an appreciation for wet lab sessions. Providing enhanced training for incoming graduate students through this structured course appears to help students improve knowledge, skills, and attitudes that facilitate the responsible and ethical use of animals in biomedical research.</p>","PeriodicalId":50019,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2023-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10434749/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10399871","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Opinion: <i>Laboratory</i> Animals, <i>Animal Models</i>, or Just <i>Animals</i>?","authors":"Linda A Toth","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":50019,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10230533/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9563931","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Pathogen Prevalence Estimates and Diagnostic Methodology Trends in Laboratory Mice and Rats from 2003 to 2020.","authors":"Theresa M Albers, Kenneth S Henderson, Guy B Mulder, William R Shek","doi":"10.30802/AALAS-JAALAS-22-000097","DOIUrl":"10.30802/AALAS-JAALAS-22-000097","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Rodents used in biomedical research are maintained as specific pathogen-free (SPF) by employing biosecurity measures that eliminate and exclude adventitious infectious agents known to confound research. The efficacy of these practices is assessed by routine laboratory testing referred to as health monitoring (HM). This study summarizes the results of HM performed at Charles River Research Animal Diagnostic Services (CR-RADS) on samples submitted by external (non-Charles River) clients between 2003 and 2020. Summarizing this vast amount of data has been made practicable by the recent introduction of end-user business intelligence tools to Excel. HM summaries include the number of samples tested and the percent positive by diagnostic methodology, including direct examination for parasites, cultural isolation and identification for bacteria, serology for antibodies to viruses and fastidious microorganisms, and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays for pathogen-specific genomic sequences. Consistent with comparable studies, the percentages of pathogen-positive samples by diagnostic methodology and year interval are referred to as period prevalence estimates (%P_E). These %P_E substantiate the elimination of once common respiratory pathogens, such as Sendai virus, and reductions in the prevalence of other agents considered common, such as the rodent coronaviruses and parvoviruses. Conversely, the %P_E of certain pathogens, for example, murine norovirus (MNV), <i>Helicobacter</i>, <i>Rodentibacter</i>, and parasites remain high, perhaps due to the increasing exchange of genetically engineered mutant (GEM) rodents among researchers and the challenges and high cost of eliminating these agents from rodent housing facilities. Study results also document the growing role of PCR in HM because of its applicability to all pathogen types and its high specificity and sensitivity; moreover, PCR can detect pathogens in samples collected antemortem directly from colony animals and from the environment, thereby improving the detection of host-adapted, environmentally unstable pathogens that are not efficiently transmitted to sentinels by soiled bedding.</p>","PeriodicalId":50019,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10230541/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9551786","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Assessing Reuse of Hypodermic Needles in Mice by means of Digital Imaging, Photomicrography, Bacterial Culture, Analysis of Nest Building, and Animal Vocalization.","authors":"Terese E Bennett,&nbsp;Jason Rizzo,&nbsp;Sharon Yang,&nbsp;Edward Rosfjord","doi":"10.30802/AALAS-JAALAS-22-000094","DOIUrl":"10.30802/AALAS-JAALAS-22-000094","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Hypodermic needles are sometimes reused in animal research settings to preserve the viability of and to conserve limited quantities of injected material. However, the reuse of needles is strongly discouraged in human medicine to prevent inju- ries and the spread of infectious disease. No official guidelines prohibit needle reuse in veterinary medicine, although the practice may be discouraged. We hypothesized that reused needles would be significantly more blunt than unused needles and that reuse for additional injections would cause more animal stress. To test these ideas, we evaluated mice that were injected subcutaneously in the flank or mammary fat pad to generate cell line xenograft and mouse allograft models. Needles were reused up to 20 times, based on an IACUC-approved protocol. A subset of reused needles was digitally imaged to determine needle dullness based on the area of deformation from the secondary bevel angle; this parameter was not different between new needles and needles that had been reused 20 times. In addition, the number of times a needle was reused was not significantly related to audible mouse vocalization during injection. Finally, nest building scores for mice that were injected with a needle used 0 through 5 times were similar to those of mice injected with a needle had been used 16 through 20 times. Among the 37 reused needles that were tested, 4 were positive for bacterial growth; the only organisms cultured were <i>Staphylococcus</i> spp. Contrary to our hypothesis, reusing needles for subcutaneous injections did not increase animal stress based on analysis of vocalization or nest building.</p>","PeriodicalId":50019,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10230537/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9930689","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"The Pharmacokinetics of Subcutaneous Methylnaltrexone Bromide in Rhesus Macaques (<i>Macaca mulatta</i>).","authors":"Sarah Jepkes, Marie Josee-Lemoy, Heather Knych, Thiago de Lucena, Amir Ardeshir, Diane E Stockinger","doi":"10.30802/AALAS-JAALAS-22-000111","DOIUrl":"10.30802/AALAS-JAALAS-22-000111","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Opioids are an integral component of pain management for nonhuman primates. These potent analgesics also adverse gastrointestinal (GI) effects that include constipation, bloating, and delayed gastric emptying. Methylnaltrexone bromide (MNTX) is a selective, peripherally acting μ- and κ-opioid receptor antagonist that can be used to mitigate the GI effects associated with opioid administration. Unlike naltrexone, a similar drug in this class, MNTX possesses an N-methyl-quaternary amine group that prevents it from crossing the blood brain barrier. This blockage allows inhibition of peripheral GI opioid receptors without affecting opioid-mediated analgesia in the central nervous system. We conducted a pharmacokinetic analysis of MNTX in serum and CSF of 6 healthy juvenile male rhesus macaques after subcutaneous administration of a 0.15-mg/kg dose. We hypothesized that the macaques would demonstrate a T_max of 0.5 h, similar to that of humans, and that no MNTX would be detected in the CSF. This treatment resulted in a peak serum concentration of 114 ± 44 ng/mL at 0.25 ± 0.00 h; peak CSF at concentrations were 0.34 ± 0.07 ng/mL at the T_max. These data show that subcutaneous administration of MNTX to rhesus macaques may block peripheral adverse effects of opioids without interfering with their central analgesic effects.</p>","PeriodicalId":50019,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10230534/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9559875","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Perceptions of Veterinary Students at North Carolina State University about the Use of Animals in Teaching and Research.","authors":"Kelsey R Finnie,&nbsp;David G Schlundt,&nbsp;Logan K France","doi":"10.30802/AALAS-JAALAS-22-000098","DOIUrl":"10.30802/AALAS-JAALAS-22-000098","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Teaching through the use of animals is an integral part of veterinary education. In addition to interactions with privately owned animals, veterinary students often learn using cadavers and institutionally owned animals. Veterinary students also frequently participate in research involving animals. Animal-based research is essential for the development of therapies and techniques that improve the lives of both animals and people. To investigate the perceptions of veterinary students at the North Carolina State University, College of Veterinary Medicine (NCSU-CVM) toward the use of animals in teaching and research, an anonymous survey was provided to current and recently graduated veterinary students. The aims of the study were to 1) gain a general understanding of veterinary student perceptions surrounding the use of animals in research and teaching, 2) determine if providing simple facts about the contributions of animals to medical advancements would increase the acceptance of animal use for teaching and research, and 3) determine if general perceptions regarding the use of animals in teaching and research change over the course of completing the veterinary curriculum. Descriptive statistics and frequency distributions were calculated for applicable response types. χ² tests were used to identify factors that influenced perceptions of the use of animals in teaching and research. A change-indicator variable was created, and binary logistic regression was used to compare responses before and after completion of the educational component of the survey. Of 141 total survey respondents, 78% were accepting of the use of animals in teaching and research, with no significant difference in the overall acceptance after reading 6 facts about animal research. In addition, 24% of respondents stated that their perceptions had changed during the course of their veterinary education. Overall, veterinary students surveyed had a high acceptance of the use of animals in teaching and research.</p>","PeriodicalId":50019,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10230538/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9914895","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}