Radiation Oncology最新文献

{"title":"FLASH radiotherapy for the treatment of symptomatic bone metastases in the thorax (FAST-02): protocol for a prospective study of a novel radiotherapy approach.","authors":"E C Daugherty, Y Zhang, Z Xiao, A E Mascia, M Sertorio, J Woo, C McCann, K J Russell, R A Sharma, D Khuntia, J D Bradley, C B Simone, J C Breneman, J P Perentesis","doi":"10.1186/s13014-024-02419-4","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s13014-024-02419-4","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>FLASH therapy is a treatment technique in which radiation is delivered at ultra-high dose rates (≥ 40 Gy/s). The first-in-human FAST-01 clinical trial demonstrated the clinical feasibility of proton FLASH in the treatment of extremity bone metastases. The objectives of this investigation are to assess the toxicities of treatment and pain relief in study participants with painful thoracic bone metastases treated with FLASH radiotherapy, as well as workflow metrics in a clinical setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-arm clinical trial is being conducted under an FDA investigational device exemption (IDE) approved for 10 patients with 1-3 painful bone metastases in the thorax, excluding bone metastases in the spine. Treatment will be 8 Gy in a single fraction administered at ≥ 40 Gy/s on a FLASH-enabled proton therapy system delivering a single transmission proton beam. Primary study endpoints are efficacy (pain relief) and safety. Patient questionnaires evaluating pain flare at the treatment site will be completed for 10 consecutive days post-RT. Pain response and adverse events (AEs) will be evaluated on the day of treatment and on day 7, day 15, months 1, 2, 3, 6, 9, and 12, and every 6 months thereafter. The outcomes for clinical workflow feasibility are the occurrence of any device issues as well as time on the treatment table.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This prospective clinical trial will provide clinical data for evaluating the efficacy and safety of proton FLASH for palliation of bony metastases in the thorax. Positive findings will support the further exploration of FLASH radiation for other clinical indications including patient populations treated with curative intent.</p><p><strong>Registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05524064.</p>","PeriodicalId":49639,"journal":{"name":"Radiation Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2024-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10935811/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140112000","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Protocol of a phase II study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of deep-inspiration breath-hold daily online adaptive radiotherapy for centrally located lung tumours (PUDDING study).","authors":"Noriko Kishi, Masahiro Yoneyama, Hiroyuki Inoo, Minoru Inoue, Hiraku Iramina, Akiyoshi Nakakura, Tomohiro Ono, Hideaki Hirashima, Takanori Adachi, Norimasa Matsushita, Makoto Sasaki, Takahiro Fujimoto, Mitsuhiro Nakamura, Yukinori Matsuo, Takashi Mizowaki","doi":"10.1186/s13014-024-02427-4","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s13014-024-02427-4","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Centrally located lung tumours present a challenge because of their tendency to exhibit symptoms such as airway obstruction, atelectasis, and bleeding. Surgical resection of these tumours often requires sacrificing the lungs, making definitive radiotherapy the preferred alternative to avoid pneumonectomy. However, the proximity of these tumours to mediastinal organs at risk increases the potential for severe adverse events. To mitigate this risk, we propose a dual-method approach: deep inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) radiotherapy combined with adaptive radiotherapy. The aim of this single-centre, single-arm phase II study is to investigate the efficacy and safety of DIBH daily online adaptive radiotherapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients diagnosed with centrally located lung tumours according to the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer recommendations, are enrolled and subjected to DIBH daily online adaptive radiotherapy. The primary endpoint is the one-year cumulative incidence of grade 3 or more severe adverse events, as classified by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE v5.0).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Delivering definitive radiotherapy for centrally located lung tumours presents a dilemma between ensuring optimal dose coverage for the planning target volume and the associated increased risk of adverse events. DIBH provides measurable dosimetric benefits by increasing the normal lung volume and distancing the tumour from critical mediastinal organs at risk, leading to reduced toxicity. DIBH adaptive radiotherapy has been proposed as an adjunct treatment option for abdominal and pelvic cancers. If the application of DIBH adaptive radiotherapy to centrally located lung tumours proves successful, this approach could shape future phase III trials and offer novel perspectives in lung tumour radiotherapy.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Registered at the Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (jRCT; https://jrct.niph.go.jp/ ); registration number: jRCT1052230085 ( https://jrct.niph.go.jp/en-latest-detail/jRCT1052230085 ).</p>","PeriodicalId":49639,"journal":{"name":"Radiation Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2024-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10921600/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140066126","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"\"sCT-Feasibility\" - a feasibility study for deep learning-based MRI-only brain radiotherapy.","authors":"Johanna Grigo, Juliane Szkitsak, Daniel Höfler, Rainer Fietkau, Florian Putz, Christoph Bert","doi":"10.1186/s13014-024-02428-3","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s13014-024-02428-3","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Radiotherapy (RT) is an important treatment modality for patients with brain malignancies. Traditionally, computed tomography (CT) images are used for RT treatment planning whereas magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) images are used for tumor delineation. Therefore, MRI and CT need to be registered, which is an error prone process. The purpose of this clinical study is to investigate the clinical feasibility of a deep learning-based MRI-only workflow for brain radiotherapy, that eliminates the registration uncertainty through calculation of a synthetic CT (sCT) from MRI data.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 54 patients with an indication for radiation treatment of the brain and stereotactic mask immobilization will be recruited. All study patients will receive standard therapy and imaging including both CT and MRI. All patients will receive dedicated RT-MRI scans in treatment position. An sCT will be reconstructed from an acquired MRI DIXON-sequence using a commercially available deep learning solution on which subsequent radiotherapy planning will be performed. Through multiple quality assurance (QA) measures and reviews during the course of the study, the feasibility of an MRI-only workflow and comparative parameters between sCT and standard CT workflow will be investigated holistically. These QA measures include feasibility and quality of image guidance (IGRT) at the linear accelerator using sCT derived digitally reconstructed radiographs in addition to potential dosimetric deviations between the CT and sCT plan. The aim of this clinical study is to establish a brain MRI-only workflow as well as to identify risks and QA mechanisms to ensure a safe integration of deep learning-based sCT into radiotherapy planning and delivery.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Compared to CT, MRI offers a superior soft tissue contrast without additional radiation dose to the patients. However, up to now, even though the dosimetrical equivalence of CT and sCT has been shown in several retrospective studies, MRI-only workflows have still not been widely adopted. The present study aims to determine feasibility and safety of deep learning-based MRI-only radiotherapy in a holistic manner incorporating the whole radiotherapy workflow.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>NCT06106997.</p>","PeriodicalId":49639,"journal":{"name":"Radiation Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2024-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10924348/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140066125","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Repeatability quantification of brain diffusion-weighted imaging for future clinical implementation at a low-field MR-linac","authors":"Moritz Rabe, Olaf Dietrich, Robert Forbrig, Maximilian Niyazi, Claus Belka, Stefanie Corradini, Guillaume Landry, Christopher Kurz","doi":"10.1186/s13014-024-02424-7","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13014-024-02424-7","url":null,"abstract":"Longitudinal assessments of apparent diffusion coefficients (ADCs) derived from diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) during intracranial radiotherapy at magnetic resonance imaging-guided linear accelerators (MR-linacs) could enable early response assessment by tracking tumor diffusivity changes. However, DWI pulse sequences are currently unavailable in clinical practice at low-field MR-linacs. Quantifying the in vivo repeatability of ADC measurements is a crucial step towards clinical implementation of DWI sequences but has not yet been reported on for low-field MR-linacs. This study assessed ADC measurement repeatability in a phantom and in vivo at a 0.35 T MR-linac. Eleven volunteers and a diffusion phantom were imaged on a 0.35 T MR-linac. Two echo-planar imaging DWI sequence variants, emphasizing high spatial resolution (“highRes”) and signal-to-noise ratio (“highSNR”), were investigated. A test–retest study with an intermediate outside-scanner-break was performed to assess repeatability in the phantom and volunteers’ brains. Mean ADCs within phantom vials, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), and four brain tissue regions were compared to literature values. Absolute relative differences of mean ADCs in pre- and post-break scans were calculated for the diffusion phantom, and repeatability coefficients (RC) and relative RC (relRC) with 95% confidence intervals were determined for each region-of-interest (ROI) in volunteers. Both DWI sequence variants demonstrated high repeatability, with absolute relative deviations below 1% for water, dimethyl sulfoxide, and polyethylene glycol in the diffusion phantom. RelRCs were 7% [5%, 12%] (CSF; highRes), 12% [9%, 22%] (CSF; highSNR), 9% [8%, 12%] (brain tissue ROIs; highRes), and 6% [5%, 7%] (brain tissue ROIs; highSNR), respectively. ADCs measured with the highSNR variant were consistent with literature values for volunteers, while smaller mean values were measured for the diffusion phantom. Conversely, the highRes variant underestimated ADCs compared to literature values, indicating systematic deviations. High repeatability of ADC measurements in a diffusion phantom and volunteers’ brains were measured at a low-field MR-linac. The highSNR variant outperformed the highRes variant in accuracy and repeatability, at the expense of an approximately doubled voxel volume. The observed high in vivo repeatability confirms the potential utility of DWI at low-field MR-linacs for early treatment response assessment.","PeriodicalId":49639,"journal":{"name":"Radiation Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2024-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140046546","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Consideration of image guidance in patterns of failure analyses of intensity-modulated radiotherapy for head and neck cancer: a systematic review.","authors":"Paul-Henry Mackeprang, Katarina Bryjova, Astrid E Heusel, Dominik Henzen, Melissa Scricciolo, Olgun Elicin","doi":"10.1186/s13014-024-02421-w","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s13014-024-02421-w","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) is considered standard of care for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). Improved conformity of IMRT and smaller margins, however, have led to concerns of increased rates of marginal failures. We hypothesize that while patterns of failure (PoF) after IMRT for HNSCC have been published before, the quality of patient positioning and image guided radiotherapy (IGRT) have rarely been taken into account, and their importance remains unclear. This work provides a systematic review of the consideration of IGRT in PoF studies after IMRT for HNSCC.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A systematic literature search according to PRISMA guidelines was performed on PubMed for HNSCC, IMRT and PoF terms and conference abstracts from ESTRO and ASTRO 2020 and 2021 were screened. Studies were included if they related PoF of HNSCC after IMRT to the treated volumes. Data on patient and treatment characteristics, IGRT, treatment adaptation, PoF and correlation of PoF to IGRT was extracted, categorized and analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One-hundred ten studies were included. The majority (70) did not report any information on IGRT. The remainder reported daily IGRT (18), daily on day 1-3 or 1-5, then weekly (7), at least weekly (12), or other schemes (3). Immobilization was performed with masks (78), non-invasive frames (4), or not reported (28). The most common PoF classification was \"in-field/marginal/out-of-field\", reported by 76 studies. Only one study correlated PoF in nasopharyngeal cancer patients to IGRT.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The impact of IGRT on PoF in HNSCC is severely underreported in existing literature. Only one study correlated PoF to IGRT measures and setup uncertainty. Further, most PoF studies relied on outdated terminology (\"in/out-of-field\"). A clearly defined and up-to-date PoF terminology is necessary to evaluate PoFs properly, as is systematic and preferably prospective data generation. PoF studies should consistently and comprehensively consider and report on IGRT.</p>","PeriodicalId":49639,"journal":{"name":"Radiation Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2024-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10916111/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140040721","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Multicenter analysis on the value of standard (chemo)radiotherapy in elderly patients with locally advanced adenocarcinoma of the esophagus or gastroesophageal junction.","authors":"Tilman Bostel, Eirini Nikolaidou, Daniel Wollschläger, Arnulf Mayer, Justus Kaufmann, Anne Hopprich, Alexander Rühle, Anca-Ligia Grosu, Jürgen Debus, Christian Fottner, Markus Moehler, Peter Grimminger, Heinz Schmidberger, Nils Henrik Nicolay","doi":"10.1186/s13014-024-02414-9","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s13014-024-02414-9","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To assess the tolerability and oncological results of chemoradiation in elderly patients with locally advanced adenocarcinoma of the esophagus or gastroesophageal junction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This multi-center retrospective analysis included 86 elderly patients (≥ 65 years) with esophageal or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (median age 73 years; range 65-92 years) treated with definitive or neoadjuvant (chemo)radiotherapy. The treatment was performed at 3 large comprehensive cancer centers in Germany from 2006 to 2020. Locoregional control (LRC), progression-free survival (PFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), overall survival (OS), and treatment-associated toxicities according to CTCAE criteria v5.0 were analyzed, and parameters potentially relevant to patient outcomes were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-three patients (38%) were treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiation followed by surgery, while the remaining patients received definitive (chemo)radiation. The delivery of radiotherapy without dose reduction was possible in 80 patients (93%). In 66 patients (77%), concomitant chemotherapy was initially prescribed; however, during the course of therapy, 48% of patients (n = 32) required chemotherapy de-escalation due to treatment-related toxicities and comorbidities. Twenty-nine patients (34%) experienced higher-grade acute toxicities and 14 patients (16%) higher-grade late toxicities. The 2-year LRC, DMFS, PFS, and OS amounted to 72%, 49%, 46%, and 52%, respectively. In multivariate analysis, neoadjuvant chemoradiation followed by surgery was shown to be associated with significantly better PFS (p = 0.006), DMFS (p = 0.006), and OS (p = 0.004) compared with all non-surgical treatments (pooled definitive radiotherapy and chemoradiation). No such advantage was seen over definitive chemoradiation. The majority of patients with neoadjuvant therapy received standard chemoradiotherapy without dose reduction (n = 24/33, 73%). In contrast, concurrent chemotherapy was only possible in 62% of patients undergoing definitive radiotherapy (n = 33/53), and most of these patients required dose-reduction or modification of chemotherapy (n = 23/33, 70%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In our analysis, omission of chemotherapy or adjustment of chemotherapy dose during definitive radiotherapy was necessary for the overwhelming majority of elderly esophageal cancer patients not eligible for surgery, and hence resulted in reduced PFS and OS. Therefore, optimization of non-surgical approaches and the identification of potential predictive factors for safe administration of concurrent chemotherapy in elderly patients with (gastro)esophageal adenocarcinoma is required.</p>","PeriodicalId":49639,"journal":{"name":"Radiation Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2024-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10910868/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140023110","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"High-volume prostate biopsy core involvement is not associated with an increased risk of cancer recurrence following 5-fraction stereotactic body radiation therapy monotherapy.","authors":"Jonathan W Lischalk, Astrid Sanchez, Vianca F Santos, Christopher Mendez, Meredith Akerman, Todd Carpenter, Moses Tam, David Byun, David R Wise, Anand Mahadevan, Andrew Evans, William Huang, Aaron Katz, Herbert Lepor, Jonathan A Haas","doi":"10.1186/s13014-023-02397-z","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s13014-023-02397-z","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Percentage of positive cores involved on a systemic prostate biopsy has been established as a risk factor for adverse oncologic outcomes and is a National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) independent parameter for unfavorable intermediate-risk disease. Most data from a radiation standpoint was published in an era of conventional fractionation. We explore whether the higher biological dose delivered with SBRT can mitigate this risk factor.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A large single institutional database was interrogated to identify all patients diagnosed with localized prostate cancer (PCa) treated with 5-fraction SBRT without ADT. Pathology results were reviewed to determine detailed core involvement as well as Gleason score (GS). High-volume biopsy core involvement was defined as ≥ 50%. Weighted Gleason core involvement was reviewed, giving higher weight to higher-grade cancer. The PSA kinetics and oncologic outcomes were analyzed for association with core involvement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 2009 to 2018, 1590 patients were identified who underwent SBRT for localized PCa. High-volume core involvement was a relatively rare event observed in 19% of our cohort, which was observed more in patients with small prostates (p < 0.0001) and/or intermediate-risk disease (p = 0.005). Higher PSA nadir was observed in those patients with low-volume core involvement within the intermediate-risk cohort (p = 0.004), which was confirmed when core involvement was analyzed as a continuous variable weighted by Gleason score (p = 0.049). High-volume core involvement was not associated with biochemical progression (p = 0.234).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>With a median follow-up of over 4 years, biochemical progression was not associated with pretreatment high-volume core involvement for patients treated with 5-fraction SBRT alone. In the era of prostate SBRT and MRI-directed prostate biopsies, the use of high-volume core involvement as an independent predictor of unfavorable intermediate risk disease should be revisited.</p>","PeriodicalId":49639,"journal":{"name":"Radiation Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2024-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10913228/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140029348","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Contouring practices and artefact management within a synthetic CT-based radiotherapy workflow for the central nervous system.","authors":"Elia Rossi, Sevgi Emin, Michael Gubanski, Giovanna Gagliardi, Mattias Hedman, Fernanda Villegas","doi":"10.1186/s13014-024-02422-9","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s13014-024-02422-9","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The incorporation of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in radiotherapy (RT) workflows improves contouring precision, yet it introduces geometrical uncertainties when registered with computed tomography (CT) scans. Synthetic CT (sCT) images could minimize these uncertainties and streamline the RT workflow. This study aims to compare the contouring capabilities of sCT images with conventional CT-based/MR-assisted RT workflows, with an emphasis on managing artefacts caused by surgical fixation devices (SFDs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study comprised a commissioning cohort of 100 patients with cranial tumors treated using a conventional CT-based/MR-assisted RT workflow and a validation cohort of 30 patients with grade IV glioblastomas treated using an MR-only workflow. A CE-marked artificial-intelligence-based sCT product was utilized. The delineation accuracy comparison was performed using dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and average Hausdorff distance (AHD). Artefacts within the commissioning cohort were visually inspected, classified and an estimation of thickness was derived using Hausdorff distance (HD). For the validation cohort, boolean operators were used to extract artefact volumes adjacent to the target and contrasted to the planning treatment volume.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The combination of high DSC (0.94) and low AHD (0.04 mm) indicates equal target delineation capacity between sCT images and conventional CT scans. However, the results for organs at risk delineation were less consistent, likely because of voxel size differences between sCT images and CT scans and absence of standardized delineation routines. Artefacts observed in sCT images appeared as enhancements of cranial bone. When close to the target, they could affect its definition. Therefore, in the validation cohort the clinical target volume (CTV) was expanded towards the bone by 3.5 mm, as estimated by HD analysis. Subsequent analysis on cone-beam CT scans showed that the CTV adjustment was enough to provide acceptable target coverage.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The tested sCT product performed on par with conventional CT in terms of contouring capability. Additionally, this study provides both the first comprehensive classification of metal artefacts on a sCT product and a novel method to assess the clinical impact of artefacts caused by SFDs on target delineation. This methodology encourages similar analysis for other sCT products.</p>","PeriodicalId":49639,"journal":{"name":"Radiation Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2024-02-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11320867/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139998099","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Predictive value of delta radiomics in xerostomia after chemoradiotherapy in patients with stage III-IV nasopharyngeal carcinoma.","authors":"Mengze Wang, Yuzhen Xi, Luoyu Wang, Haonan Chen, Feng Jiang, Zhongxiang Ding","doi":"10.1186/s13014-024-02417-6","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s13014-024-02417-6","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Xerostomia is one of the most common side effects in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients after chemoradiotherapy. To establish a Delta radiomics model for predicting xerostomia secondary to chemoradiotherapy for NPC based on magnetic resonance T1-weighted imaging (T1WI) sequence and evaluate its diagnostic efficacy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Clinical data and Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data before treatment and after induction chemotherapy (IC) of 255 NPC patients with stage III-IV were collected retrospectively. Within one week after CCRT, the patients were divided into mild (92 cases) and severe (163 cases) according to the grade of xerostomia. Parotid glands in T1WI sequence images before and after IC were delineated as regions of interest for radiomics feature extraction, and Delta radiomics feature values were calculated. Univariate logistic analysis, correlation, and Gradient Boosting Decision Tree (GBDT) methods were applied to reduce the dimension, select the best radiomics features, and establish pretreatment, post-IC, and Delta radiomics xerostomia grading predictive models. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and decision curve were drawn to evaluate the predictive efficacy of different models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Finally, 15, 10, and 12 optimal features were selected from pretreatment, post-IC, and Delta radiomics features, respectively, and a xerostomia prediction model was constructed with AUC values of 0.738, 0.751, and 0.843 in the training set, respectively. Only age was statistically significant in the clinical data of both groups (P < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Delta radiomics can predict the degree of xerostomia after chemoradiotherapy for NPC patients and it has certain guiding significance for clinical early intervention measures.</p>","PeriodicalId":49639,"journal":{"name":"Radiation Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2024-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10900635/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139991593","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Efficacy and safety of thoracic radiotherapy in extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer patients receiving first-line immunotherapy plus chemotherapy: a propensity score matched multicentre retrospective analysis","authors":"Yueyuan Yao, Butuo Li, Ruiting Song, Linlin Yang, Bing Zou, Linlin Wang","doi":"10.1186/s13014-024-02420-x","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13014-024-02420-x","url":null,"abstract":"Platinum-etoposide chemotherapy combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has been recommended as the first-line standard treatment for extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC). However, the effect of thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) on these patients is still unknown. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of TRT for ES-SCLC patients who responded to first-line ICIs and chemotherapy (CHT). Patients who received 4 to 6 cycles of ICIs and CHT as first-line therapy at three hospitals between 2018 and 2022 were included in the analysis. All patients were divided into two groups based on whether they received TRT as first-line treatment, and propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to ensure that the characteristics of two groups were well-balanced. The primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), and the secondary endpoint was toxic effects. A total of 276 patients were included, and the median follow-up time was 22.3 (range, 4.0-53.73) months. After PSM, 197 patients were further analysed, and 99 of whom received TRT. The baseline characteristics were well-balanced between patients in the TRT and non-TRT groups. There were significant differences in PFS between the TRT and non-TRT groups, with the median PFS of 10.76 and 7.63 months, respectively (P = 0.014). Significantly improved OS was observed in the TRT group (21.67 vs. 16.6 months, P = 0.009). In addition, the use of TRT was an independent prognostic factor for PFS and OS of ES-SCLC patients receiving ICIs plus CHT. In terms of safety, no significant increase of any grades adverse event (AE) (P = 0.874) and G3-4 AE (P = 0.909) was observed for patients receiving TRT. Radiation esophagitis, gastrointestinal and hematologic toxicities were the most common AEs in TRT group, which were tolerable. And high-dose radiotherapy was associated with higher incidence of pneumonitis. Addition of TRT showed significant survival benefits and well tolerability in ES-SCLC patients receiving platinum-etoposide CHT and ICIs, which could be a feasible first-line treatment strategy for ES-SCLC patients.","PeriodicalId":49639,"journal":{"name":"Radiation Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2024-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139981078","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}