Research in Engineering Design最新文献_第10页

Impact of missing attributes on the novelty metric of Shah et al. 缺失属性对Shah等人新颖性度量的影响。

IF 3.2 3区工程技术

Research in Engineering Design Pub Date : 2020-03-04 DOI: 10.1007/s00163-020-00332-x

Lorenzo Fiorineschi, F. S. Frillici, F. Rotini

引用次数: 18

Optimal resource allocation for dynamic product development process via convex optimization 基于凸优化的动态产品开发过程资源优化配置

IF 3.2 3区工程技术

Research in Engineering Design Pub Date : 2020-02-20 DOI: 10.1007/s00163-020-00346-5

Chengyan Zhao, Masaki Ogura, M. Kishida, A. Yassine

引用次数: 3

Design structure network (DSN): a method to make explicit the product design specification process for mass customization 设计结构网络(DSN):一种明确大规模定制产品设计规范过程的方法

IF 3.2 3区工程技术

Research in Engineering Design Pub Date : 2020-02-18 DOI: 10.1007/s00163-020-00331-y

Guilherme Branco Loureiro, J. C. E. Ferreira, P. H. M. Messerschmidt

引用次数: 1

Integration of robust and tolerance design in early stages of the product development process 在产品开发过程的早期阶段整合稳健和公差设计

IF 3.2 3区工程技术

Research in Engineering Design Pub Date : 2020-02-08 DOI: 10.1007/s00163-019-00328-2

S. Goetz, B. Schleich, S. Wartzack

引用次数: 14

The coronavirus pandemic: How can design help? 冠状病毒大流行:设计如何提供帮助?

IF 3.2 3区工程技术

Research in Engineering Design Pub Date : 2020-01-01 Epub Date: 2020-04-01 DOI: 10.1007/s00163-020-00337-6

Yoram Reich

引用次数: 7

Socialized and self-organized collaborative designer community-resilience modeling and assessment 社会化和自我组织的协同设计师社区复原力建模和评估

IF 3.2 3区工程技术

Research in Engineering Design Pub Date : 2019-11-19 DOI: 10.1007/s00163-019-00325-5

Maolin Yang, P. Jiang

引用次数: 16

Prototyping for context: exploring stakeholder feedback based on prototype type, stakeholder group and question type. 背景原型:根据原型类型、利益相关者群体和问题类型探索利益相关者的反馈。

IF 3.2 3区工程技术

Research in Engineering Design Pub Date : 2019-10-01 Epub Date: 2019-06-18 DOI: 10.1007/s00163-019-00317-5

Michael Deininger, Shanna R Daly, Jennifer C Lee, Colleen M Seifert, Kathleen H Sienko

{"title":"Prototyping for context: exploring stakeholder feedback based on prototype type, stakeholder group and question type.","authors":"Michael Deininger, Shanna R Daly, Jennifer C Lee, Colleen M Seifert, Kathleen H Sienko","doi":"10.1007/s00163-019-00317-5","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00163-019-00317-5","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Engineering designers frequently use prototypes to gather input from stakeholders. Design guidelines recommend the use of quick and simple prototypes early and often in a design process. However, the type and quality of a prototype can influence how stakeholders perceive a new design concept and can therefore impact their responses. Additionally, different levels of experience, expertise, and preparedness for providing input to designers may lead stakeholders from different geographical or cultural settings to provide different responses, making the format of a prototype even more influential. Although design practitioners are known to intentionally align their prototyping approach with the specific design question to be answered, it is unclear the extent to which prototyping approaches should vary based on the stakeholders, context, and setting of a design project. To investigate how the format and quality of prototypes influence stakeholders' responses, we conducted a field study with various medical professionals in Ghana. We presented prototypes for a medical device in different formats to stakeholders and collected responses to the design through semi-structured interviews. We found that professional expertise, prototype format, and question type influenced the types of responses that stakeholders provided. These findings suggest that designers seeking input from stakeholders on new concepts should consider context-specific prototyping strategies, especially when designing at distance and across cultures.</p>","PeriodicalId":49629,"journal":{"name":"Research in Engineering Design","volume":"30 4","pages":"453-471"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2019-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s00163-019-00317-5","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"38324822","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

Process models: plans, predictions, proclamations or prophecies? 流程模型：计划、预测、公告还是预言？

IF 3.2 3区工程技术

Research in Engineering Design Pub Date : 2019-09-24 DOI: 10.1007/s00163-019-00322-8

M. Stacey, C. Eckert, R. Hillerbrand

引用次数: 8

A practical methodology to project the design of more sustainable products in the production stage 一个实用的方法，以项目设计更可持续的产品在生产阶段

IF 3.2 3区工程技术

Research in Engineering Design Pub Date : 2019-07-29 DOI: 10.1007/s00163-019-00320-w

J. Santolaya, E. Lacasa, A. Biedermann, N. Muñoz

引用次数: 19

Overspecified vessel design solutions in multi-stakeholder design problems 多利益相关方设计问题中的超规定化船舶设计解决方案

IF 3.2 3区工程技术

Research in Engineering Design Pub Date : 2019-07-18 DOI: 10.1007/s00163-019-00319-3

Jose J. Garcia, S. S. Pettersen, C. Rehn, S. O. Erikstad, P. O. Brett, B. Asbjørnslett

引用次数: 5