Bone & Joint Journal最新文献

{"title":"IlluminOss photodynamic bone stabilization system improves pain and function in the treatment of humeral metastatic disease.","authors":"Richard M Terek, Richard McGough, Nicola Fabbri, Felix Cheung, Brian Brigman, James Wittig, Cynthia Emory, Albert Aboulafia, Raffi Avedian, Joel Mayerson, Robert Henshaw, Nickolas Reimer, William Eward, Kurt Weiss, John Healey, David Mohler, Brock Adams","doi":"10.1302/0301-620X.106B12.BJJ-2023-1089.R2","DOIUrl":"10.1302/0301-620X.106B12.BJJ-2023-1089.R2","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>The aim of the LightFix Trial was to evaluate the clinical outcomes for one year after the treatment of impending and completed pathological fractures of the humerus using the IlluminOss System (IS), and to analyze the performance of this device.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 81 patients with an impending or completed pathological fracture were enrolled in a multicentre, open label single cohort study and treated with IS. Inclusion criteria were visual analogue scale (VAS) Pain Scores > 60 mm/100 mm and Mirels' Score ≥ 8. VAS pain, Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) Upper Limb Function, and The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QoL Group Bone Metastases Module (QLQ-BM22) scores were all normalized to 100, and radiographs were obtained at baseline and at 14, 30, 90, 180, and 360 days postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean VAS pain score decreased significantly from 84 (SD 15) to 50 (SD 29), 38 (SD 30), 31 (SD 29), 31 (SD 29), and 21 (SD 23) between the baseline and follow-up times (p < 0.001). The mean MSTS function scores significantly increased from 27 (SD 19) to 52 (SD 22), 60 (23), 67 (SD 23), 72 (SD 26), and 83 (SD 14) (p < 0.001). The pain and functional subscales of the QLQ-BM22 also significantly improved at most times. A total of 12 devices broke, giving an unadjusted device fracture rate of 15%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Stabilization with the IS decreased pain and improved function with consistent results during the first postoperative year. IS is a new, minimally invasive type of internal fixation. The use of the IS alone may be better for impending rather than completed pathological fractures, and may be better in completed fractures if an added plate or more than the usual number of locking screws is required. Caution is warranted regarding its use alone in patients with a completed pathological fracture due to the rate of breakage of the device.</p>","PeriodicalId":48944,"journal":{"name":"Bone & Joint Journal","volume":"106-B 12","pages":"1485-1492"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142773919","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Comparing surgical readmission, in-hospital complications, and charges between total hip arthroplasty and hemiarthroplasty for geriatric femoral neck fractures.","authors":"Yuqing Wang, Liusong Shen, Dongxing Xie, Huizhong Long, Hu Chen, Jie Wei, Chao Zeng, Guanghua Lei","doi":"10.1302/0301-620X.106B12.BJJ-2024-0321.R1","DOIUrl":"10.1302/0301-620X.106B12.BJJ-2024-0321.R1","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>For displaced femoral neck fractures (FNFs) in geriatric patients, there remains uncertainty regarding the effect of total hip arthroplasty (THA) compared with hemiarthroplasty (HA) in the guidelines. We aimed to compare 90-day surgical readmission, in-hospital complications, and charges between THA and HA in these patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Hospital Quality Monitoring System was queried from 1 January 2013 to 31 December 2019 for displaced FNFs in geriatric patients treated with THA or HA. After propensity score matching, which identified 33,849 paired patients, outcomes were compared between THA and HA using logistic and linear regression models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The HA group had a lower incidence of 90-day surgical readmission than the THA group (odds ratio (OR) 0.75 (95% CI 0.68 to 0.83)). Meanwhile, the HA group had lower incidence of dislocation (OR 0.42 (95% CI 0.33 to 0.52)), aseptic loosening (OR 0.50 (95% CI 0.38 to 0.66)), and joint pain (OR 0.63 (95% CI 0.40 to 0.98)), but a higher incidence of periprosthetic fracture (OR 1.41 (95% CI 1.07 to 1.87)) for readmission, compared to the THA group. The incidence of in-hospital complications did not differ significantly between the two groups. Moreover, the HA group had lower mean charges than the THA group (47,578.29 Chinese Yuan (CNY) (SD 20,069.71) vs 57,641.00 CNY (SD 21,524.07)).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>When considering 90-day surgical readmission rate, in-hospital complications, and mortality, HA resulted in a significantly lower surgical readmission rate within 90 days compared to THA, despite the patients being older and having a higher Charlson Comorbidity Index.</p>","PeriodicalId":48944,"journal":{"name":"Bone & Joint Journal","volume":"106-B 12","pages":"1477-1484"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142773977","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Optimizing debridement and implant retention in acute periprosthetic joint infections.","authors":"Andreas Fontalis, Adam T Yasen, Dia E Giebaly, Tianyi D Luo, Ahmed Magan, Fares S Haddad","doi":"10.1302/0301-620X.106B12.BJJ-2024-0282.R1","DOIUrl":"10.1302/0301-620X.106B12.BJJ-2024-0282.R1","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) represents a complex challenge in orthopaedic surgery associated with substantial morbidity and healthcare expenditures. The debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR) protocol is a viable treatment, offering several advantages over exchange arthroplasty. With the evolution of treatment strategies, considerable efforts have been directed towards enhancing the efficacy of DAIR, including the development of a phased debridement protocol for acute PJI management. This article provides an in-depth analysis of DAIR, presenting the outcomes of single-stage, two-stage, and repeated DAIR procedures. It delves into the challenges faced, including patient heterogeneity, pathogen identification, variability in surgical techniques, and antibiotics selection. Moreover, critical factors that influence the decision-making process between single- and two-stage DAIR protocols are addressed, including team composition, timing of the intervention, antibiotic regimens, and both anatomical and implant-related considerations. By providing a comprehensive overview of DAIR protocols and their clinical implications, this annotation aims to elucidate the advancements, challenges, and potential future directions in the application of DAIR for PJI management. It is intended to equip clinicians with the insights required to effectively navigate the complexities of implementing DAIR strategies, thereby facilitating informed decision-making for optimizing patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":48944,"journal":{"name":"Bone & Joint Journal","volume":"106-B 12","pages":"1377-1384"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142774015","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Looking after patients with hip fracture in low- and middle-income countries.","authors":"Irewin Tabu, Rebecca Ivers, Matt L Costa","doi":"10.1302/0301-620X.106B12.BJJ-2024-0652","DOIUrl":"10.1302/0301-620X.106B12.BJJ-2024-0652","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In the UK, multidisciplinary teamwork for patients with hip fracture has been shown to reduce mortality and improves health-related quality of life for patients, while also reducing hospital bed days and associated healthcare costs. However, despite rapidly increasing numbers of fragility fractures, multidisciplinary shared care is rare in low- and middle-income countries around the world. The HIPCARE trial will test the introduction of multidisciplinary care pathways in five low- and middle-income countries in South and Southeast Asia, with the aim to improve patients' quality of life and reduce healthcare costs.</p>","PeriodicalId":48944,"journal":{"name":"Bone & Joint Journal","volume":"106-B 12","pages":"1369-1371"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142773948","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Considerations of morphometry and phenotypes in modern knee arthroplasty.","authors":"Darren B Chen, Jil A Wood, William Griffiths-Jones, Johan Bellemans, Fares S Haddad, Samuel J MacDessi","doi":"10.1302/0301-620X.106B12.BJJ-2023-1269.R1","DOIUrl":"10.1302/0301-620X.106B12.BJJ-2023-1269.R1","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>As advancements in total knee arthroplasty progress at an exciting pace, two areas are of special interest, as they directly impact implant design and surgical decision making. Knee morphometry considers the three-dimensional shape of the articulating surfaces within the knee joint, and knee phenotyping provides the ability to categorize alignment into practical groupings that can be used in both clinical and research settings. This annotation discusses the details of these concepts, and the ways in which they are helping us better understand the individual subtleties of each patient's knee.</p>","PeriodicalId":48944,"journal":{"name":"Bone & Joint Journal","volume":"106-B 12","pages":"1363-1368"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142773980","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Can blood flow restriction therapy improve quality of life and function in dissatisfied knee arthroplasty patients?","authors":"Lenka Stroobant, Ewoud Jacobs, Nele Arnout, Stefaan Van Onsem, Thomas Tampere, Arne Burssens, Erik Witvrouw, Jan Victor","doi":"10.1302/0301-620X.106B12.BJJ-2024-0553.R1","DOIUrl":"10.1302/0301-620X.106B12.BJJ-2024-0553.R1","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Approximately 10% to 20% of knee arthroplasty patients are not satisfied with the result, while a clear indication for revision surgery might not be present. Therapeutic options for these patients, who often lack adequate quadriceps strength, are limited. Therefore, the primary aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical effect of a novel rehabilitation protocol that combines low-load resistance training (LL-RT) with blood flow restriction (BFR).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between May 2022 and March 2024, we enrolled 45 dissatisfied knee arthroplasty patients who lacked any clear indication for revision to this prospective cohort study. All patients were at least six months post-surgery and had undergone conventional physiotherapy previously. The patients participated in a supervised LL-RT combined with BFR in 18 sessions. Primary assessments included the following patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs): Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS); Knee Society Score: satisfaction (KSSs); the EuroQol five-dimension five-level questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L); and the pain catastrophizing scale (PCS). Functionality was assessed using the six-minute walk Test (6MWT) and the 30-second chair stand test (30CST). Follow-up timepoints were at baseline, six weeks, three months, and six months after the start.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six weeks of BFR with LL-RT improved all the PROMs except the sports subscale of the KOOS compared to baseline. Highest improvements after six weeks were found for quality of life (QoL) (mean 28.2 (SD 17.2) vs 19 (SD 14.7); p = 0.002), activities of daily living (mean 54.7 (SD 18.7) vs 42.9 (SD 17.3); p < 0.001), and KSSs (mean 17.1 (SD 8.8) vs 12.8 (SD 6.7); p < 0.001). PROMs improvements continued to be present at three-month and six-month follow-up compared to baseline. However, no significant differences were observed in the paired comparisons of the six-week, three-month, and six-month follow-up. The same trends are observed for the 6MWT and 30CST.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The reported regime demonstrates improved QoL and function of dissatisfied knee arthroplasty patients. In light of this, the pathway described may provide a valuable and safe treatment option for dissatisfied knee arthroplasty patients for whom therapeutic options are limited.</p>","PeriodicalId":48944,"journal":{"name":"Bone & Joint Journal","volume":"106-B 12","pages":"1416-1425"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142773871","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Willingness to participate in placebo-controlled surgical trials of the knee.","authors":"Laura Wall, Samantha Bunzli, Elizabeth Nelson, Lyndon J Hawke, Mesfin Genie, Madeleine Hinwood, Danielle Lang, Michelle M Dowsey, Phillip Clarke, Peter F Choong, Zsolt J Balogh, L S Lohmander, Francesco Paolucci","doi":"10.1302/0301-620X.106B12.BJJ-2023-1266.R2","DOIUrl":"10.1302/0301-620X.106B12.BJJ-2023-1266.R2","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Surgeon and patient reluctance to participate are potential significant barriers to conducting placebo-controlled trials of orthopaedic surgery. Understanding the preferences of orthopaedic surgeons and patients regarding the design of randomized placebo-controlled trials (RCT-Ps) of knee procedures can help to identify what RCT-P features will lead to the greatest participation. This information could inform future trial designs and feasibility assessments.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study used two discrete choice experiments (DCEs) to determine which features of RCT-Ps of knee procedures influence surgeon and patient participation. A mixed-methods approach informed the DCE development. The DCEs were analyzed with a baseline category multinomial logit model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The proportion of respondents (surgeons n = 103; patients n = 140) who would not participate in any of the DCE choice sets (surgeons = 31%; patients = 40%), and the proportion who would participate in all (surgeons = 18%; patients = 30%), indicated strong views regarding the conduct of RCT-Ps. There were three main findings: for both surgeons and patients, studies which involved an arthroscopic procedure were more likely to result in participation than those with a total knee arthroplasty; as the age (for patients) and years of experience (for surgeons) increased, the overall likelihood of participation decreased; and, for surgeons, offering authorship and input into the RCT-P design was preferred for less experienced surgeons, while only completing the procedure was preferred by more experienced surgeons.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients and surgeons have strong views regarding participation in RCT-Ps. However, understanding their preferences can inform future trial designs and feasibility assessments with regard to recruitment rates.</p>","PeriodicalId":48944,"journal":{"name":"Bone & Joint Journal","volume":"106-B 12","pages":"1408-1415"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142774019","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Clinical outcomes validate the RAND/UCLA appropriateness criteria algorithm for anatomical total shoulder arthroplasty for streamlining the clinical decision-making process.","authors":"Krishna Mandalia, Stephen Le Breton, Christopher Roche, Sarav S Shah","doi":"10.1302/0301-620X.106B12.BJJ-2023-1459.R1","DOIUrl":"10.1302/0301-620X.106B12.BJJ-2023-1459.R1","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>A recent study used the RAND Corporation at University of California, Los Angeles (RAND/UCLA) method to develop anatomical total shoulder arthroplasty (aTSA) appropriateness criteria. The purpose of our study was to determine how patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) vary based on appropriateness.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Clinical data from a multicentre database identified patients who underwent primary aTSA from November 2004 to January 2023. A total of 390 patients (mean follow-up 48.1 months (SD 42.0)) were included: 97 (24.9%) were classified as appropriate, 218 (55.9%) inconclusive, and 75 (19.2%) inappropriate. Patients were classified as \"appropriate\", \"inconclusive\", or \"inappropriate\", using a modified version of an appropriateness algorithm, which accounted for age, rotator cuff status, mobility, symptomatology, and Walch classification. Multiple pre- and postoperative scores were analyzed using Pearson's chi-squared test and one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). Postoperative complications were also analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All groups achieved significant improvement in mean PROM scores postoperatively. \"Appropriate\" patients experienced significantly greater improvement in visual analogue scale (VAS) and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score compared to \"inconclusive\" and \"inappropriate\". The appropriate group had a significantly greater proportion of patients who achieved minimal clinically important difference (MCID) (95.8%; n = 93) and substantial clinical benefit (SCB) (92.6%; n = 89). Overall, 13 patients had postoperative complications. No significant differences in postoperative complications among classifications were found.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our data clinically validate the RAND/UCLA aTSA appropriateness criteria algorithm, allowing for more rapid and reliable determination of aTSA candidacy. \"Appropriate\" patients were more likely to achieve MCID and SCB for ASES scores compared to \"inappropriate\" patients. Among \"appropriate\" patients who did not achieve SCB, 50% (n = 4) had a postoperative complication. There was a significantly higher proportion of postoperative complications among those who did not achieve SCB across all three groups. Only 7.1% (n = 1) of patients who did not achieve SCB in the inappropriate group had a postoperative complication. Thus, it can be inferred that the failure to reach SCB in the appropriate group was likely to be due to a postoperative complication, whereas for patients deemed \"inappropriate\", failure to reach SCB may be secondary to factors accounted for within our algorithm.</p>","PeriodicalId":48944,"journal":{"name":"Bone & Joint Journal","volume":"106-B 12","pages":"1451-1460"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142773973","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Corrigendum.","authors":"Sohail Nisar, Jonathan Lamb, Antony Johansen, Robert West, Hemant Pandit","doi":"10.1302/0301-620X.106B12.BJJ-2024-00052","DOIUrl":"10.1302/0301-620X.106B12.BJJ-2024-00052","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":48944,"journal":{"name":"Bone & Joint Journal","volume":"106-B 12","pages":"1494"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142773986","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"The National Joint Registry Data Quality Audit of elbow arthroplasty.","authors":"Zaid Hamoodi, Joanne Shapiro, Adrian Sayers, Michael R Whitehouse, Adam C Watts, Jennifer Abbott, Sarah Abbott, Oliver Adebayo, Kashif Ahmad, Philip Ahrens, Michael Akinfala, Nawfal Al-Hadithy, Majed Al-Najjar, Rouin Amirfeyz, Sudhi Ankarath, Fiona Ashton, Kelly Aulton, Sunil Auplish, Jane Austin, Segun Ayeko, Raja Azhar, Rish Bahia, Steven Baines, Marisol Baldomir, Sneha Barai, Benjamin Barkham, Emily Barrett, Timothy Batten, Luckshman Bavan, Jonathan Baxter, Sera Beaumont, James Bentley, Gev Bhabra, Mahendar Bhat, Ankit Bhatt, Mahmoud Bhingraj, Aqeel Bhutta, Samuel Bingham, Jenny Blastland, David Boardman, Michael Boateng, Kasia Bojarska, Khalis Boksh, Simon Booker, Sebastian Borreshi, Michael Bould, Lesley Boulton, Linda Brannan, Zarina Breidaka, Rachel Brereton, Mark Brinsden, Joanne Brooker, Sabine Brookes, Cheryl Broux, Elke Brown, Jacqueline Browne, Richard Bryant, James Buchanan, Lisa Buck, Karen Burnett, Melanie Burrows, Jill Burt, David Burton, Usman Butt, Barry Campaner, Jaime Candal-Couto, Hannah Carvell, Jagannath Chakravarthy, Somashree Chatterji, Salma Chaudhury, Govind S Chauhan, Adrian Chojnowski, Janani Cittambalam, David Clark, Malgorzata Gosia Clarke, Ben Clarke, Andrew Clelland, Roz Cochrane, Karen Colbridge, Hayley Cook, Becky Cooper, Elizabeth Correa, Joanna Craven, Jason Crawford, Sherri Curtis, Rory Cuthbert, Jeremy Dainton, Lisa Dale, Sammy Davies, Joanne Davis, Vicky Davis, Ben Dean, Tom Dehler, Sonu Dennis, Jacob Der Tavitian, Aravind Desai, Sukhraj S Dhillon, Richard Dias, Graham Dickinson, Margo Dirckx, Oliver Dixon, Charles Docker, Ronald Dodenhoff, Peter Domos, Kingsleypaul Draviaraj, Steven Drew, Caroline Duff, Sarah Duffin, Paula Durham, Kirstie Earnshaw, Jefin Edakalathur, Michelle Edwards, Zain Elahi, Samantha Else, Moustafa Emara, Khemerin Eng, Alireza Esfandiari, Colin Esler, Jon Evans, Alicia Everall, Alistair Eyre-Brook, Muhamed Farhan-Alanie, Simon Federer, Sharon Ferdinandus, Marie Finch, Jochen Fischer, Catherine Flood, Christine Forde, Justin Forder, Lisa Fowler, Marieta Franklin, Hamez Gacaferi, David Gamble, Sunil Garg, Vicki Gill, Jean Ginley, Emma Glancey, Gemma Glanville, Aimen Gmati, Karen Goddard, Jay Goel, Carly Goldsmith, Ben Gooding, Fiona Goodwin, Benjamin Goring, Will Goude, Paul Guyver, Samuel Haines, Aziz Haque, Thomas Hardley, Susan Haritonow, Louise Harnett, Joanna Harris, Margaret Harris, Jane Harrison, Isabelle Hauffe, Archie Hawken, Dave Hawkes, Stuart Hay, Mia Haywood, Siddhant Hedge, Susan Hickey, Anne Hickinson, Deborah Higgs, Richard Hill, Sharyn Hill, Jamie Hind, Maria Hitchcock, Terry Holdcroft, Emily Holdcroft, Ann Holliday, Siobhan Hudson, Hazel Hughes, Rabia Imtiaz, Sheeraz Iqbal, Yamen Jabr, Crystal Jackson, Jackie Jameson, Odette Jayme, Andrew Jennings, Cara Jenvey, Elizabeth Jewitt, Andreea Jimenez, John Joby, Adrian Jones, Neil Jones, Jadranka Jovanovic, Vanessa Kabala, Niel Kang, Gulnaz Kausor, Sarah Kaynes, Conal Keane, Lauren Keen, Gaynor Kelly, Matthew Kent, Jonathan Kent, Carla Kerr, Julie Kerr, Christina King, Anthony Kinnair, Gemma Kinsley, Alastair Konarski, Jacqueline Kord, Hari Kumar, Sachin Kumar, Rebecca Lafferty, Patrick Lancaster, William Levitt, Alexandria Lewin, Yueyang Li, Ignatius Liew, Martin Yizhe Lim, Stephen Lipscombe, Edith Lynch, Scott MacInnes, Paula Madden, Nick Maddocks, Ravindra Mahajan, Rachel Mahoney, Sheraz Malik, Syed Mannan, Alexandros Maris, Michael Markey, Christy Martin, Rebecca Martin, Stanley Masunda, George Mazis, Anne-Marie Mcauliffe, Tim McBride, Amy McGowan, Nicolee Mckeown, George McLauchlan, Debbie McNally, Joel Melton, Jane Miller, Cathy Millyard, Claire Mitchell, Foad Mohamed, Abdalla Mohamed, Helen Charlotte Montgomery, Darren Munn, John Mutimer, Rajesh Nanda, Daniel Neen, Lynne Newton, Ashley Newton, Aly Nicholl, Jessica Nightingale, Emma Ogden, Peter Orton, Lynda Oswald, Kelly Page, Maria Paius, Madhavan Papanna, Neelam Patel, Claudia Paul, Chris Peach, Derek Pegg, Sue Penfold, Eleanore Phillips, Greg Pickering, Christos Plakogiannis, Julie Platt, Craig Pole, Richard Potter, Kate Povall, Riten Pradhan, Ganesh Prasad, Karen Price, Julie Pride, Afnan Prins, Layth Qazzaz, Ajay Radhakrishnan, Ashwanth Ramesh, Adil Rashid, Abbas Rashid, Damir Rasidovic, Emily Ratford, Jan Rayner, Jae Rhee, Matthew Rice-Evans, Martha Ricketts, Deborah Roach, Eve R Waters, Simon Robinson, Paul Robinson, Samantha Rodgers, Emma Rogers, Aaron Rooney, Dan Rossouw, Bibhas Roy, Maseh Sadiqi, Markus Sagmeister, David Samy, Paige Sanders, Kelly Sanderson, Dilraj Sandher, Nastaran Sargazi, Mark Saunders, Nicky Saunders, Kim Savage, Seif Sawalha, Melissa Schouw, Gareth Scott, Gunther Selzer, Lucia Sepesiova, Sohan Shah, Shantanu Shahane, Grant Shaw, Suzani Shrestha, John Shutt, Nashat Siddiqui, Sijin Sidharthan, Adrian Simons, Vera Simpson, Pierre Sinclair, Paul Siney, Jagwant Singh, Bijayendra Singh, Harvinder Singh, Apurv Sinha, Callum Smith, Christopher Smith, Kerry Smith, Brinda Somanchi, Muhab Soufan, Cynthia Southgate, Jeremy Southgate, Nicola Spearpoint, Rebecca Stainer, Richard Stevens, Batya Stimler, Andrew Stone, Danielle Suter, Charlie Talbot, Tareq Tareef, Kanthan Theivendran, Beverely Thomas, William Thomas, Andrew Thompson, Jackie Thompson, Elizabeth Thornhill, Andrew Titchener, Michael Townley, Tina Tozer, Jennie Truman, Adam Truss, Rob Turner, Lee Van Rensburg, Vinayak Venugopal, Sam Vollans, Louise Waller, Anna Walsh, Aleena Waraich, Nicholas Wei, William James White, Mark Wilkinson, Daniel Williams, Philip Williams, Nicola Williams, Stephanie Wilson, David Wood, Shirley Yadu, Tejas Yarashi, Julian Zeolla, Nasri H Zreik, Ben Ollivere","doi":"10.1302/0301-620X.106B12.BJJ-2023-1372.R1","DOIUrl":"10.1302/0301-620X.106B12.BJJ-2023-1372.R1","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>The aim of this audit was to assess and improve the completeness and accuracy of the National Joint Registry (NJR) dataset for arthroplasty of the elbow.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>It was performed in two phases. In Phase 1, the completeness was assessed by comparing the NJR elbow dataset with the NHS England Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) data between April 2012 and April 2020. In order to assess the accuracy of the data, the components of each arthroplasty recorded in the NJR were compared to the type of arthroplasty which was recorded. In Phase 2, a national collaborative audit was undertaken to evaluate the reasons for unmatched data, add missing arthroplasties, and evaluate the reasons for the recording of inaccurate arthroplasties and correct them.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Phase 1 identified 5,539 arthroplasties in HES which did not match an arthroplasty on the NJR, and 448 inaccurate arthroplasties from 254 hospitals. Most mismatched procedures (3,960 procedures; 71%) were radial head arthroplasties (RHAs). In Phase 2, 142 NHS hospitals with 3,640 (66%) mismatched and 314 (69%) inaccurate arthroplasties volunteered to assess their records. A large proportion of the unmatched data (3,000 arthroplasties; 82%) were confirmed as being missing from the NJR. The overall rate of completeness of the NJR elbow dataset improved from 63% to 83% following phase 2, and the completeness of total elbow arthroplasty data improved to 93%. Missing RHAs had the biggest impact on the overall completeness, but through the audit the number of RHAs in the NJR nearly doubled and completeness increased from 35% to 70%. The accuracy of data was 94% and improved to 98% after correcting 212 of the 448 inaccurately recorded arthroplasties.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The rate of completeness of the NJR total elbow arthroplasty dataset is currently 93% and the accuracy is 98%. This audit identified challenges of data capture with regard to RHAs. Collaboration with a trauma and orthopaedic trainees through the British Orthopaedic Trainee Association improved the completeness and accuracy of the NJR elbow dataset, which will improve the validity of the reports and of the associated research.</p>","PeriodicalId":48944,"journal":{"name":"Bone & Joint Journal","volume":"106-B 12","pages":"1461-1468"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142774018","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}