{"title":"Factors associated with joint survival after transposition osteotomy of the acetabulum in patients with Tönnis grade 2 osteoarthritis secondary to hip dysplasia.","authors":"Shiori Tanaka, Masanori Fujii, Syunsuke Kawano, Masaya Ueno, Satomi Nagamine, Masaaki Mawatari","doi":"10.1302/0301-620X.106B8.BJJ-2024-0196.R1","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.106B8.BJJ-2024-0196.R1","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>The aim of this study was to determine the clinical outcomes and factors contributing to failure of transposition osteotomy of the acetabulum (TOA), a type of spherical periacetabular osteotomy, for advanced osteoarthritis secondary to hip dysplasia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We reviewed patients with Tönnis grade 2 osteoarthritis secondary to hip dysplasia who underwent TOA between November 1998 and December 2019. Patient demographic details, osteotomy-related complications, and the modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS) were obtained via medical notes review. Radiological indicators of hip dysplasia were assessed using preoperative and postoperative radiographs. The cumulative probability of TOA failure (progression to Tönnis grade 3 or conversion to total hip arthroplasty) was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier product-limited method. A multivariate Cox proportional hazards model was used to identify predictors of failure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study included 127 patients (137 hips). Median follow-up period was ten years (IQR 6 to 15). The median mHHS improved from 59 (IQR 52 to 70) preoperatively to 90 (IQR 73 to 96) at the latest follow-up (p < 0.001). The survival rate was 90% (95% CI 82 to 95) at ten years, decreasing to 21% (95% CI 7 to 48) at 20 years. Fair joint congruity on preoperative hip abduction radiographs and a decreased postoperative anterior wall index (AWI) were identified as independent risk factors for failure. The survival rate for the 42 hips with good preoperative joint congruity and a postoperative AWI ≥ 0.30 was 100% at ten years, and remained at 83% (95% CI 38 to 98) at 20 years.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although the overall clinical outcomes of TOA in patients with advanced osteoarthritis are suboptimal, favourable results can be achieved in selected cases with good preoperative joint congruity and adequate postoperative anterior acetabular coverage.</p>","PeriodicalId":48944,"journal":{"name":"Bone & Joint Journal","volume":"106-B 8","pages":"783-791"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141861314","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Bone & Joint JournalPub Date : 2024-07-09DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.106B.BJJ-2024-0371.R1
Alex J Trompeter, Matt L Costa
{"title":"Defining accurate terminology for post-injury weightbearing instructions - a multidisciplinary, nationally approved consensus policy.","authors":"Alex J Trompeter, Matt L Costa","doi":"10.1302/0301-620X.106B.BJJ-2024-0371.R1","DOIUrl":"10.1302/0301-620X.106B.BJJ-2024-0371.R1","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Weightbearing instructions after musculoskeletal injury or orthopaedic surgery are a key aspect of the rehabilitation pathway and prescription. The terminology used to describe the weightbearing status of the patient is variable; many different terms are used, and there is recognition and evidence that the lack of standardized terminology contributes to confusion in practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A consensus exercise was conducted involving all the major stakeholders in the patient journey for those with musculoskeletal injury. The consensus exercise primary aim was to seek agreement on a standardized set of terminology for weightbearing instructions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A pre-meeting questionnaire was conducted. The one-day consensus meeting, including patient representatives, identified three agreed terms only to be used in defining the weightbearing status of the patient: 1) non-weightbearing; 2) limited weightbearing; and 3) unrestricted weightbearing.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study represents the first and only exercise in standardizing rehabilitation terminology in orthopaedics, as agreed by all major stakeholders in the patient pathway and the patients themselves. The standardization of language allows for higher-quality and more accurate research to be conducted, and is one small part of the bigger picture in increasing the mobility of patients after orthopaedic injury or surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":48944,"journal":{"name":"Bone & Joint Journal","volume":"106-B ","pages":"xxx"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9,"publicationDate":"2024-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141560125","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Bone & Joint JournalPub Date : 2024-07-09DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.106B.BJJ-2024-0371.R1
Alex J Trompeter, Matt L Costa
{"title":"Defining accurate terminology for post-injury weightbearing instructions.","authors":"Alex J Trompeter, Matt L Costa","doi":"10.1302/0301-620X.106B.BJJ-2024-0371.R1","DOIUrl":"10.1302/0301-620X.106B.BJJ-2024-0371.R1","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Weightbearing instructions after musculoskeletal injury or orthopaedic surgery are a key aspect of the rehabilitation pathway and prescription. The terminology used to describe the weightbearing status of the patient is variable; many different terms are used, and there is recognition and evidence that the lack of standardized terminology contributes to confusion in practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A consensus exercise was conducted involving all the major stakeholders in the patient journey for those with musculoskeletal injury. The consensus exercise primary aim was to seek agreement on a standardized set of terminology for weightbearing instructions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A pre-meeting questionnaire was conducted. The one-day consensus meeting, including patient representatives, identified three agreed terms only to be used in defining the weightbearing status of the patient: 1) non-weightbearing; 2) limited weightbearing; and 3) unrestricted weightbearing.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study represents the first and only exercise in standardizing rehabilitation terminology in orthopaedics, as agreed by all major stakeholders in the patient pathway and the patients themselves. The standardization of language allows for higher-quality and more accurate research to be conducted, and is one small part of the bigger picture in increasing the mobility of patients after orthopaedic injury or surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":48944,"journal":{"name":"Bone & Joint Journal","volume":"106-B 9","pages":"1016-1020"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9,"publicationDate":"2024-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142113831","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Bone & Joint JournalPub Date : 2024-07-01DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.106B7.BJJ-2024-0014.R1
Britt Barvelink, Max Reijman, Sanne Smidt, Pedro Miranda Afonso, Jan A N Verhaar, Joost W Colaris, Flip van Beek, Marna G Bouwhuis, Milko M M Bruijninckx, Alexander P A Greeven, Taco Gosens, Mirte J Kok, Marike C Kokke, Gerald A Kraan, Kevin van Lakwijk, Michiel Leijnen, Merel van Loon, Daphne A van Rijssel, Niels W L Schep, Lenneke Scholtens, Mathieu M E Wijffels, Ninka Slebioda, Peer van der Zwaal, Egon Zwets
{"title":"Redisplacement of reduced distal radius fractures in adults: does the type of casting play a role? The CAST study, a multicentre cluster randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Britt Barvelink, Max Reijman, Sanne Smidt, Pedro Miranda Afonso, Jan A N Verhaar, Joost W Colaris, Flip van Beek, Marna G Bouwhuis, Milko M M Bruijninckx, Alexander P A Greeven, Taco Gosens, Mirte J Kok, Marike C Kokke, Gerald A Kraan, Kevin van Lakwijk, Michiel Leijnen, Merel van Loon, Daphne A van Rijssel, Niels W L Schep, Lenneke Scholtens, Mathieu M E Wijffels, Ninka Slebioda, Peer van der Zwaal, Egon Zwets","doi":"10.1302/0301-620X.106B7.BJJ-2024-0014.R1","DOIUrl":"10.1302/0301-620X.106B7.BJJ-2024-0014.R1","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>It is not clear which type of casting provides the best initial treatment in adults with a distal radial fracture. Given that between 32% and 64% of adequately reduced fractures redisplace during immobilization in a cast, preventing redisplacement and a disabling malunion or secondary surgery is an aim of treatment. In this study, we investigated whether circumferential casting leads to fewer the redisplacement of fewer fractures and better one-year outcomes compared with plaster splinting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a pragmatic, open-label, multicentre, two-period cluster-randomized superiority trial, we compared these two types of casting. Recruitment took place in ten hospitals. Eligible patients aged ≥ 18 years with a displaced distal radial fracture, which was acceptably aligned after closed reduction, were included. The primary outcome measure was the rate of redisplacement within five weeks of immobilization. Secondary outcomes were the rate of complaints relating to the cast, clinical outcomes at three months, patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) (using the numerical rating scale (NRS), the abbreviated version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH), and Patient-Rated Wrist/Hand Evaluation (PRWHE) scores), and adverse events such as the development of compartment syndrome during one year of follow-up. We used multivariable mixed-effects logistic regression for the analysis of the primary outcome measure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 420 patients. There was no significant difference between the rate of redisplacement of the fracture between the groups: 47% (n = 88) for those treated with a plaster splint and 49% (n = 90) for those treated with a circumferential cast (odds ratio 1.05 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.65 to 1.70); p = 0.854). Patients treated in a plaster splint reported significantly more pain than those treated with a circumferential cast, during the first week of treatment (estimated mean NRS 4.7 (95% CI 4.3 to 5.1) vs 4.1 (95% CI 3.7 to 4.4); p = 0.014). The rate of complaints relating to the cast, clinical outcomes and PROMs did not differ significantly between the groups (p > 0.05). Compartment syndrome did not occur.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Circumferential casting did not result in a significantly different rate of redisplacement of the fracture compared with the use of a plaster splint. There were comparable outcomes in both groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":48944,"journal":{"name":"Bone & Joint Journal","volume":"106-B 7","pages":"696-704"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141471873","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Bone & Joint JournalPub Date : 2024-07-01DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.106B7.BJJ-2023-1258.R1
Yael Gelfer, Sean E Cavanagh, Anna Bridgens, Elizabeth Ashby, Maryse Bouchard, Donato G Leo, Deborah M Eastwood
{"title":"The Core outcome Clubfoot (CoCo) study: relapse, with poorer clinical and quality of life outcomes, affects 37% of idiopathic clubfoot patients.","authors":"Yael Gelfer, Sean E Cavanagh, Anna Bridgens, Elizabeth Ashby, Maryse Bouchard, Donato G Leo, Deborah M Eastwood","doi":"10.1302/0301-620X.106B7.BJJ-2023-1258.R1","DOIUrl":"10.1302/0301-620X.106B7.BJJ-2023-1258.R1","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>There is a lack of high-quality research investigating outcomes of Ponseti-treated idiopathic clubfeet and correlation with relapse. This study assessed clinical and quality of life (QoL) outcomes using a standardized core outcome set (COS), comparing children with and without relapse.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 11 international centres participated in this institutional review board-approved observational study. Data including demographics, information regarding presentation, treatment, and details of subsequent relapse and management were collected between 1 June 2022 and 30 June 2023 from consecutive clinic patients who had a minimum five-year follow-up. The clubfoot COS incorporating 31 parameters was used. A regression model assessed relationships between baseline variables and outcomes (clinical/QoL).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 293 patients (432 feet) with a median age of 89 months (interquartile range 72 to 113) were included. The relapse rate was 37%, with repeated relapse in 14%. Treatment considered a standard part of the Ponseti journey (recasting, repeat tenotomy, and tibialis anterior tendon transfer) was performed in 35% of cases, with soft-tissue release and osteotomies in 5% and 2% of cases, respectively. Predictors of relapse included duration of follow-up, higher initial Pirani score, and poor Evertor muscle activity. Relapse was associated with poorer outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This is the first multicentre study using a standardized COS following clubfoot treatment. It distinguishes patients with and without relapse in terms of clinical outcomes and QoL, with poorer outcomes in the relapse group. This tool allows comparison of treatment methods and outcomes, facilitates information sharing, and sets family expectations. Predictors of relapse encourage us to create appropriate treatment pathways to reduce relapse and improve outcome.</p>","PeriodicalId":48944,"journal":{"name":"Bone & Joint Journal","volume":"106-B 7","pages":"735-743"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141471874","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Bone & Joint JournalPub Date : 2024-07-01DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.106B7.BJJ-2023-1169.R1
Ayesha Saeed, Catharine S Bradley, Yashvi Verma, Simon P Kelley
{"title":"Resolving residual acetabular dysplasia following successful brace treatment for developmental dysplasia of the hip in infants.","authors":"Ayesha Saeed, Catharine S Bradley, Yashvi Verma, Simon P Kelley","doi":"10.1302/0301-620X.106B7.BJJ-2023-1169.R1","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.106B7.BJJ-2023-1169.R1","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Radiological residual acetabular dysplasia (RAD) has been reported in up to 30% of children who had successful brace treatment of infant developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH). Predicting those who will resolve and those who may need corrective surgery is important to optimize follow-up protocols. In this study we have aimed to identify the prevalence and predictors of RAD at two years and five years post-bracing.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a single-centre, prospective longitudinal cohort study of infants with DDH managed using a published, standardized Pavlik harness protocol between January 2012 and December 2016. RAD was measured at two years' mean follow-up using acetabular index-lateral edge (AI-L) and acetabular index-sourcil (AI-S), and at five years using AI-L, AI-S, centre-edge angle (CEA), and acetabular depth ratio (ADR). Each hip was classified based on published normative values for normal, borderline (1 to 2 standard deviations (SDs)), or dysplastic (> 2 SDs) based on sex, age, and laterality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 202 infants who completed the protocol, 181 (90%) had two and five years' follow-up radiographs. At two years, in 304 initially pathological hips, the prevalence of RAD (dysplastic) was 10% and RAD (borderline) was 30%. At five years, RAD (dysplastic) decreased to 1% to 3% and RAD (borderline) decreased to < 1% to 2%. On logistic regression, no variables were predictive of RAD at two years. Only AI-L at two years was predictive of RAD at five years (p < 0.001). If both hips were normal at two years' follow-up (n = 96), all remained normal at five years. In those with bilateral borderline hips at two years (n = 21), only two were borderline at five years, none were dysplastic. In those with either borderline-dysplastic or bilateral dysplasia at two years (n = 26), three (12%) were dysplastic at five years.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The majority of patients with RAD at two years post-brace treatment, spontaneously resolved by five years. Therefore, children with normal radiographs at two years post-brace treatment can be discharged. Targeted follow-up for those with abnormal AI-L at two years will identify the few who may benefit from surgical correction at five years' follow-up.</p>","PeriodicalId":48944,"journal":{"name":"Bone & Joint Journal","volume":"106-B 7","pages":"744-750"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141471883","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Bone & Joint JournalPub Date : 2024-07-01DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.106B7.BJJ-2023-1160.R2
Thomas Karlsson, Peter Försth, Patrik Öhagen, Karl Michaëlsson, Bengt Sandén
{"title":"Decompression alone or decompression with fusion for lumbar spinal stenosis: five-year clinical results from a randomized clinical trial.","authors":"Thomas Karlsson, Peter Försth, Patrik Öhagen, Karl Michaëlsson, Bengt Sandén","doi":"10.1302/0301-620X.106B7.BJJ-2023-1160.R2","DOIUrl":"10.1302/0301-620X.106B7.BJJ-2023-1160.R2","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>We compared decompression alone to decompression with fusion surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis, with or without degenerative spondylolisthesis (DS). The aim was to evaluate if five-year outcomes differed between the groups. The two-year results from the same trial revealed no differences.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Swedish Spinal Stenosis Study was a multicentre randomized controlled trial with recruitment from September 2006 to February 2012. A total of 247 patients with one- or two-level central lumbar spinal stenosis, stratified by the presence of DS, were randomized to decompression alone or decompression with fusion. The five-year Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) was the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes were the EuroQol five-dimension questionnaire (EQ-5D), visual analogue scales for back and leg pain, and patient-reported satisfaction, decreased pain, and increased walking distance. The reoperation rate was recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five-year follow-up was completed by 213 (95%) of the eligible patients (mean age 67 years; 155 female (67%)). After five years, ODI was similar irrespective of treatment, with a mean of 25 (SD 18) for decompression alone and 28 (SD 22) for decompression with fusion (p = 0.226). Mean EQ-5D was higher for decompression alone than for fusion (0.69 (SD 0.28) vs 0.59 (SD 0.34); p = 0.027). In the no-DS subset, fewer patients reported decreased leg pain after fusion (58%) than with decompression alone (80%) (relative risk (RR) 0.71 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.53 to 0.97). The frequency of subsequent spinal surgery was 24% for decompression with fusion and 22% for decompression alone (RR 1.1 (95% CI 0.69 to 1.8)).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Adding fusion to decompression in spinal stenosis surgery, with or without spondylolisthesis, does not improve the five-year ODI, which is consistent with our two-year report. Three secondary outcomes that did not differ at two years favoured decompression alone at five years. Our results support decompression alone as the preferred method for operating on spinal stenosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":48944,"journal":{"name":"Bone & Joint Journal","volume":"106-B 7","pages":"705-712"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141471871","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Bone & Joint JournalPub Date : 2024-07-01DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.106B7.BJJ-2023-0943.R2
Fabio Mancino, Andreas Fontalis, Tarani S P Grandhi, Ahmed Magan, Ricci Plastow, Babar Kayani, Fares S Haddad
{"title":"Robotic arm-assisted conversion of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty to total knee arthroplasty.","authors":"Fabio Mancino, Andreas Fontalis, Tarani S P Grandhi, Ahmed Magan, Ricci Plastow, Babar Kayani, Fares S Haddad","doi":"10.1302/0301-620X.106B7.BJJ-2023-0943.R2","DOIUrl":"10.1302/0301-620X.106B7.BJJ-2023-0943.R2","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Robotic arm-assisted surgery offers accurate and reproducible guidance in component positioning and assessment of soft-tissue tensioning during knee arthroplasty, but the feasibility and early outcomes when using this technology for revision surgery remain unknown. The objective of this study was to compare the outcomes of robotic arm-assisted revision of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) to total knee arthroplasty (TKA) versus primary robotic arm-assisted TKA at short-term follow-up.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective study included 16 patients undergoing robotic arm-assisted revision of UKA to TKA versus 35 matched patients receiving robotic arm-assisted primary TKA. In all study patients, the following data were recorded: operating time, polyethylene liner size, change in haemoglobin concentration (g/dl), length of inpatient stay, postoperative complications, and hip-knee-ankle (HKA) alignment. All procedures were performed using the principles of functional alignment. At most recent follow-up, range of motion (ROM), Forgotten Joint Score (FJS), and Oxford Knee Score (OKS) were collected. Mean follow-up time was 21 months (6 to 36).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no differences between the two treatment groups with regard to mean change in haemoglobin concentration (p = 0.477), length of stay (LOS, p = 0.172), mean polyethylene thickness (p = 0.065), or postoperative complication rates (p = 0.295). At the most recent follow-up, the primary robotic arm-assisted TKA group had a statistically significantly improved OKS compared with the revision UKA to TKA group (44.6 (SD 2.7) vs 42.3 (SD 2.5); p = 0.004) but there was no difference in the overall ROM (p = 0.056) or FJS between the two treatment groups (86.1 (SD 9.6) vs 84.1 (4.9); p = 0.439).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Robotic arm-assisted revision of UKA to TKA was associated with comparable intraoperative blood loss, early postoperative rehabilitation, functional outcomes, and complications to primary robotic TKA at short-term follow-up. Robotic arm-assisted surgery offers a safe and reproducible technique for revising failed UKA to TKA.</p>","PeriodicalId":48944,"journal":{"name":"Bone & Joint Journal","volume":"106-B 7","pages":"680-687"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141471906","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Clinical characteristics and outcomes associated with culture-negative status in limb osteomyelitis patients.","authors":"Hongri Wu, Xiaohua Wang, Jie Shen, Zhiyuan Wei, Shulin Wang, Tianming Xu, Fei Luo, Zhao Xie","doi":"10.1302/0301-620X.106B7.BJJ-2023-0778.R2","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.106B7.BJJ-2023-0778.R2","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>This study aimed to investigate the clinical characteristics and outcomes associated with culture-negative limb osteomyelitis patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 1,047 limb osteomyelitis patients aged 18 years or older who underwent debridement and intraoperative culture at our clinic centre from 1 January 2011 to 31 December 2020 were included. Patient characteristics, infection eradication, and complications were analyzed between culture-negative and culture-positive cohorts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of these patients, 264 (25.2%) had negative cultures. Patients with a culture-negative compared with a culture-positive status were more likely to have the following characteristics: younger age (≤ 40 years) (113/264 (42.8%) vs 257/783 (32.8%); p = 0.004), a haematogenous aetiology (75/264 (28.4%) vs 150/783 (19.2%); p = 0.002), Cierny-Mader host A (79/264 (29.9%) vs 142/783 (18.1%); p < 0.001), antibiotic use before sampling (34/264 (12.9%) vs 41/783 (5.2%); p<0.001), fewer taken samples (n<3) (48/264 (18.2%) vs 60/783 (7.7%); p<0.001), and less frequent presentation with a sinus (156/264 (59.1%) vs 665/783 (84.9%); p < 0.001). After initial treatments of first-debridement and antimicrobial, infection eradication was inferior in culture-positive osteomyelitis patients, with a 2.24-fold increase (odds ratio 2.24 (95% confidence interval 1.42 to 3.52)) in the redebridement rate following multivariate analysis. No statistically significant differences were found in long-term recurrence and complications within the two-year follow-up.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We identified several factors being associated with the culture-negative result in osteomyelitis patients. In addition, the data also indicate that culture negativity is a positive prognostic factor in early infection eradication. These results constitute the basis of optimizing clinical management and patient consultations.</p>","PeriodicalId":48944,"journal":{"name":"Bone & Joint Journal","volume":"106-B 7","pages":"720-727"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141471868","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Bone & Joint JournalPub Date : 2024-07-01DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.106B7.BJJ-2023-1334.R1
Mohammed S Patel, Siddharth Shah, Mohamed K Elkazaz, Masood Shafafy, Michael P Grevitt
{"title":"Predictive factors for critical care dependency after posterior spinal fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.","authors":"Mohammed S Patel, Siddharth Shah, Mohamed K Elkazaz, Masood Shafafy, Michael P Grevitt","doi":"10.1302/0301-620X.106B7.BJJ-2023-1334.R1","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.106B7.BJJ-2023-1334.R1","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Historically, patients undergoing surgery for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) have been nursed postoperatively in a critical care (CC) setting because of the challenges posed by prone positioning, extensive exposures, prolonged operating times, significant blood loss, major intraoperative fluid shifts, cardiopulmonary complications, and difficulty in postoperative pain management. The primary aim of this paper was to determine whether a scoring system, which uses Cobb angle, forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), and number of levels to be fused, is a valid method of predicting the need for postoperative critical care in AIS patients who are to undergo scoliosis correction with posterior spinal fusion (PSF).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively reviewed all AIS patients who had undergone PSF between January 2018 and January 2020 in a specialist tertiary spinal referral centre. All patients were assessed preoperatively in an anaesthetic clinic. Postoperative care was defined as ward-based (WB) or critical care (CC)<i>,</i> based on the preoperative FEV1, FVC, major curve Cobb angle, and the planned number of instrumented levels.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 105 patients were enrolled. Their mean age was 15.5 years (11 to 25) with a mean weight of 55 kg (35 to 103). The mean Cobb angle was 68° (38° to 122°). Of these, 38 patients were preoperatively scored to receive postoperative CC. However, only 19% of the cohort (20/105) actually needed CC-level support. Based on these figures, and an average paediatric intensive care unit stay of one day before stepdown to ward-based care, the potential cost-saving on the first postoperative night for this cohort was over £20,000. There was no statistically significant difference between the Total Pathway Score (TPS), the numerical representation of the four factors being assessed, and the actual level of care received (p = 0.052) or the American Society of Anesthesiologists grade (p = 0.187). Binary logistic regression analysis of the TPS variables showed that the preoperative Cobb angle was the only variable which significantly predicted the need for critical care.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Most patients undergoing posterior fusion surgery for AIS do not need critical care. Of the readily available preoperative measures, the Cobb angle is the only predictor of the need for higher levels of care, and has a threshold value of 74.5°.</p>","PeriodicalId":48944,"journal":{"name":"Bone & Joint Journal","volume":"106-B 7","pages":"713-719"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141471872","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}