Philosophy & Public Affairs最新文献_第9页

Contractualism and Social Risk 契约主义与社会风险

IF 2.2 1区哲学

Philosophy & Public Affairs Pub Date : 2015-06-01 DOI: 10.1111/PAPA.12058

J. Frick

引用次数: 76

Wrongs, Rights, and Third Parties 错误、权利和第三方

IF 2.2 1区哲学

Philosophy & Public Affairs Pub Date : 2015-03-01 DOI: 10.1111/PAPA.12054

Nicholas Cornell

引用次数: 28

The Apologetic Stance 道歉的姿态

IF 2.2 1区哲学

Philosophy & Public Affairs Pub Date : 2015-03-01 DOI: 10.1111/PAPA.12053

Jeffrey S. Helmreich

引用次数: 17

Proportionality, Liability, and Defensive Harm 比例、责任和防御性损害

IF 2.2 1区哲学

Philosophy & Public Affairs Pub Date : 2015-03-01 DOI: 10.1111/PAPA.12056

J. Quong

引用次数: 15

Wrongful Intentions without Closeness 没有亲密的错误意图

IF 2.2 1区哲学

Philosophy & Public Affairs Pub Date : 2015-01-01 DOI: 10.1111/PAPA.12043

Victor Tadros

引用次数: 21

Risking and Wronging 风险与错误

IF 2.2 1区哲学

Philosophy & Public Affairs Pub Date : 2015-01-01 DOI: 10.1111/PAPA.12042

Rahul Kumar

引用次数: 52

Rule Over None II: Social Equality and the Justification of Democracy 统治无(2):社会平等与民主的正当性

IF 2.2 1区哲学

Philosophy & Public Affairs Pub Date : 2014-09-01 DOI: 10.1111/PAPA.12037

N. Kolodny

引用次数: 220

Democratic Equality and Political Authority 民主、平等和政治权威

IF 2.2 1区哲学

Philosophy & Public Affairs Pub Date : 2014-09-01 DOI: 10.1111/PAPA.12036

Daniel Viehoff

引用次数: 106

Against Elections: The Lottocratic Alternative 反对选举:彩票替代方案

IF 2.2 1区哲学

Philosophy & Public Affairs Pub Date : 2014-08-28 DOI: 10.1111/PAPA.12029

Alexander A. Guerrero

{"title":"Against Elections: The Lottocratic Alternative","authors":"Alexander A. Guerrero","doi":"10.1111/PAPA.12029","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/PAPA.12029","url":null,"abstract":"It is widely accepted that electoral representative democracy is better — along a number of different normative dimensions — than any other alternative lawmaking political arrangement. It is not typically seen as much of a competition: it is also widely accepted that the only legitimate alternative to electoral representative democracy is some form of direct democracy, but direct democracy — we are told — would lead to bad policy. This article makes the case that there is a legitimate alternative system — one that uses lotteries, not elections, to select political officials — that would be better than electoral representative democracy. Part I diagnoses two significant failings of modern-day systems of electoral representative government: the failure of responsiveness and the failure of good governance. The argument offered suggests that these flaws run deep, so that even significant and politically unlikely reforms with respect to campaign finance and election law would make little difference. Although my distillation of the argument is novel, the basic themes will likely be familiar. I anticipate the initial response to the argument may be familiar as well: the Churchillian shrug. Parts II, III, and IV of this article represent the beginning of an effort to move past that response, to think about alternative political systems that might avoid some of the problems with the electoral representative system without introducing new and worse problems. In the second and third parts of the article, I outline an alternative political system, the lottocratic system, and present some of the virtues of such a system. In the fourth part of the article, I consider some possible problems for the system. The overall aims of this article are to raise worries for electoral systems of government, to present the lottocratic system and to defend the view that this system might be a normatively attractive alternative, removing a significant hurdle to taking a non-electoral system of government seriously as a possible improvement to electoral democracy.","PeriodicalId":47999,"journal":{"name":"Philosophy & Public Affairs","volume":"42 1","pages":"135-178"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2014-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/PAPA.12029","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"63562666","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 160

Integration, Inequality, and Imperatives of Justice: A Review Essay 整合、不平等与正义的必要性:一篇评论文章

IF 2.2 1区哲学

Philosophy & Public Affairs Pub Date : 2014-06-01 DOI: 10.1111/PAPA.12034

Tommie Shelby

{"title":"Integration, Inequality, and Imperatives of Justice: A Review Essay","authors":"Tommie Shelby","doi":"10.1111/PAPA.12034","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/PAPA.12034","url":null,"abstract":"Black Americans continue to be a disadvantaged group in the United States. Compared to whites or Asians, they are, on average, significantly worse off with respect to wealth, income, educational achievement, employment, life expectancy, and other indicators of well-being. Some—for instance, those who reside in racially segregated and severely disadvantaged metropolitan neighborhoods (sometimes called “ghettos”)—are particularly bad off. These deep, pervasive, and longstanding inequalities also have negative repercussions for black political empowerment and civic inclusion. Despite such continuing and salient disadvantages, blacks’ charges of injustice are frequently dismissed as lacking merit. Racism and discrimination are widely viewed as no longer affecting black life chances, and blacks’ disadvantages are regularly attributed to the failings of blacks themselves. This trend toward postracial ideology notwithstanding, some people remain steadfast in their conviction that existing racial inequalities represent social injustices that urgently demand remedy. Among these are many who believe that aggressive enforcement of antidiscrimination laws, an expansion of economic and educational opportunities, a more equitable distribution of income and wealth, and","PeriodicalId":47999,"journal":{"name":"Philosophy & Public Affairs","volume":"42 1","pages":"253-285"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2014-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/PAPA.12034","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"63562751","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 50