Critical Social Policy最新文献_第2页

Barriers to safe and secure housing in the US section 8 voucher programme post-Dobbs 多布斯之后美国第 8 款住房券计划中安全和有保障住房的障碍

IF 2.3 2区社会学

Critical Social Policy Pub Date : 2023-12-17 DOI: 10.1177/02610183231217672

Kaitlyn M Sims, Nicole Meyer, Kate Walsh

引用次数: 0

Risks and representations: Creating consensus narratives about risk with pregnant women involved with child protection systems in Aotearoa New Zealand and Scotland 风险与表述：与新西兰奥特亚罗瓦和苏格兰儿童保护系统中的孕妇建立关于风险的共识叙事

IF 2.3 2区社会学

Critical Social Policy Pub Date : 2023-12-10 DOI: 10.1177/02610183231215231

Ariane Critchley, Emily Keddell

{"title":"Risks and representations: Creating consensus narratives about risk with pregnant women involved with child protection systems in Aotearoa New Zealand and Scotland","authors":"Ariane Critchley, Emily Keddell","doi":"10.1177/02610183231215231","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02610183231215231","url":null,"abstract":"Social work aspires to empowerment ideals, including taking a ‘non-expert’ position of professional curiosity, and validating the perspectives of people in contact with services. Yet in child protection, social workers are involved in practice that refutes the views and opinions of people and are positioned by their role as an identifier of abuse and risk manager. Social workers and people who are subject to child protection services can be locked into meaning battles regarding the effect of parental behaviour and the representation of risks to children. These negotiations over meanings are especially difficult in the pre and perinatal period, where who controls the representation of the baby's voice or best interests is fundamental to decision outcomes. Using Fricker's concept of ‘testimonial injustice’ as an analytical lens, this article draws on studies in two different contexts: Aotearoa New Zealand and Scotland, to examine the implications of the intense mediation of meanings that affect child protection practice. We find that concepts relating to the importance of mothering, love for children, and extended family relationships were sources of mother's disagreements with professional views of risk, but that through qualified agreement or advocacy from community workers, a shared risk narrative could be constructed.","PeriodicalId":47685,"journal":{"name":"Critical Social Policy","volume":"580 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2023-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138982998","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Multiple barriers to the Dutch welfare state. Black Feminists’ intersectional claims to social citizenship in the 1980s 荷兰福利国家的多重障碍。20 世纪 80 年代黑人女权主义者对社会公民权的交叉主张

IF 2.3 2区社会学

Critical Social Policy Pub Date : 2023-12-06 DOI: 10.1177/02610183231215232

E. Westra

引用次数: 0

Book Review: Hidden Voices Lived Experiences in the Irish Welfare Space by Joe Whelan 书评：乔-惠兰（Joe Whelan）的《隐藏的声音--爱尔兰福利空间中的生活经历

IF 2.3 2区社会学

Critical Social Policy Pub Date : 2023-11-19 DOI: 10.1177/02610183231213526

Iain Ferguson

引用次数: 0

Book Review: Uncovering Food Poverty in Ireland: A Hidden Deprivation by Michael Drew 书评:《揭露爱尔兰的食物贫困:隐藏的剥夺》，作者:迈克尔·德鲁

2区社会学

Critical Social Policy Pub Date : 2023-11-13 DOI: 10.1177/02610183231213519

Joe Whelan

引用次数: 0

Book review: Social Work's Histories of Complicity and Resistance: A Tale of Two Professions by Vasilios Ioakimidis and Aaron Wyllie 书评:《社会工作的串通与反抗史:两种职业的故事》，作者:Vasilios Ioakimidis和Aaron wylie

2区社会学

Critical Social Policy Pub Date : 2023-11-13 DOI: 10.1177/02610183231213517

Steve Rogowski

引用次数: 0

Book Review: Systems of Suffering: Dispersal and the Denial of Asylum by Jonathan Darling 书评:乔纳森·达林的《苦难体系:分散与拒绝庇护》

2区社会学

Critical Social Policy Pub Date : 2023-11-13 DOI: 10.1177/02610183231213518

Norman Ginsburg

引用次数: 0

Book review: Women, Welfare and Productivism in East Asia and Europe by Ruby CM Chau and Sam WK Yu 书评:《东亚与欧洲的妇女、福利与生产主义》，作者:周星驰、余国强

2区社会学

Critical Social Policy Pub Date : 2023-11-09 DOI: 10.1177/02610183231213522

Sung-Hee Lee

引用次数: 0

Book review: Making a Mindful Nation: Mental Health and Governance in the Twenty-first Century by Joanna Cook 书评:乔安娜·库克的《建立一个正念的国家:21世纪的心理健康与治理》

2区社会学

Critical Social Policy Pub Date : 2023-11-09 DOI: 10.1177/02610183231213520

Jijian Voronka

引用次数: 0

Who deserves exceptions in times of crisis? A comparison of policy responses to mitigate negative consequences for unemployed people and immigrants during the COVID-19 pandemic 在危机时刻，谁应该得到例外?2019冠状病毒病大流行期间减轻失业人员和移民负面影响的政策对策比较

2区社会学

Critical Social Policy Pub Date : 2023-09-12 DOI: 10.1177/02610183231199656

Vilde Hernes, Anne Balke Staver

{"title":"Who deserves exceptions in times of crisis? A comparison of policy responses to mitigate negative consequences for unemployed people and immigrants during the COVID-19 pandemic","authors":"Vilde Hernes, Anne Balke Staver","doi":"10.1177/02610183231199656","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02610183231199656","url":null,"abstract":"The boundaries for whom the welfare state should protect during times of crisis are not necessarily obvious. Deservingness studies have identified unemployed people and immigrants as groups perceived as 'less deserving' of welfare state support than other groups in need during ‘normal’ times. These two groups have in recent years been subject to more conditional requirements and an incentivizing rationale. In this article, we compare the policy responses for 1) unemployed people and 2) immigrants during the COVID-19 pandemic in Norway form 2020–2022. We ask: Who deserves exceptions in times of crisis? We find that a cross-partisan parliament introduced extensive economic relief packages and temporary regulations to mitigate negative financial consequences for unemployed persons and furloughed workers. Politicians argued that individuals were not to blame for their unfortunate financial circumstances during the pandemic, and that the welfare state had to take the larger share of the burden. However, the government chose not to make temporary exemptions from economic requirements for permanent residence or family reunification. It was explicitly stated that there was no reason to deviate (temporarily) from the general economic requirements during the pandemic, referring to the potential strain on the Norwegian welfare state if immigrants were not self-sufficient. We argue that the political rationale of incentives underlying these requirements falls short during economic crises and that this non-policy response illustrate new forms of welfare state chauvinism.","PeriodicalId":47685,"journal":{"name":"Critical Social Policy","volume":"63 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135884200","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0