Critical Social Policy最新文献_第2页

Multiple barriers to the Dutch welfare state. Black Feminists’ intersectional claims to social citizenship in the 1980s 荷兰福利国家的多重障碍。20 世纪 80 年代黑人女权主义者对社会公民权的交叉主张

IF 2.3 2区社会学

Critical Social Policy Pub Date : 2023-12-06 DOI: 10.1177/02610183231215232

E. Westra

引用次数: 0

Book Review: Hidden Voices Lived Experiences in the Irish Welfare Space by Joe Whelan 书评：乔-惠兰（Joe Whelan）的《隐藏的声音--爱尔兰福利空间中的生活经历

IF 2.3 2区社会学

Critical Social Policy Pub Date : 2023-11-19 DOI: 10.1177/02610183231213526

Iain Ferguson

引用次数: 0

Book Review: Uncovering Food Poverty in Ireland: A Hidden Deprivation by Michael Drew 书评:《揭露爱尔兰的食物贫困:隐藏的剥夺》，作者:迈克尔·德鲁

2区社会学

Critical Social Policy Pub Date : 2023-11-13 DOI: 10.1177/02610183231213519

Joe Whelan

引用次数: 0

Book review: Social Work's Histories of Complicity and Resistance: A Tale of Two Professions by Vasilios Ioakimidis and Aaron Wyllie 书评:《社会工作的串通与反抗史:两种职业的故事》，作者:Vasilios Ioakimidis和Aaron wylie

2区社会学

Critical Social Policy Pub Date : 2023-11-13 DOI: 10.1177/02610183231213517

Steve Rogowski

引用次数: 0

Book Review: Systems of Suffering: Dispersal and the Denial of Asylum by Jonathan Darling 书评:乔纳森·达林的《苦难体系:分散与拒绝庇护》

2区社会学

Critical Social Policy Pub Date : 2023-11-13 DOI: 10.1177/02610183231213518

Norman Ginsburg

引用次数: 0

Book review: Women, Welfare and Productivism in East Asia and Europe by Ruby CM Chau and Sam WK Yu 书评:《东亚与欧洲的妇女、福利与生产主义》，作者:周星驰、余国强

2区社会学

Critical Social Policy Pub Date : 2023-11-09 DOI: 10.1177/02610183231213522

Sung-Hee Lee

引用次数: 0

Book review: Making a Mindful Nation: Mental Health and Governance in the Twenty-first Century by Joanna Cook 书评:乔安娜·库克的《建立一个正念的国家:21世纪的心理健康与治理》

2区社会学

Critical Social Policy Pub Date : 2023-11-09 DOI: 10.1177/02610183231213520

Jijian Voronka

引用次数: 0

Who deserves exceptions in times of crisis? A comparison of policy responses to mitigate negative consequences for unemployed people and immigrants during the COVID-19 pandemic 在危机时刻，谁应该得到例外?2019冠状病毒病大流行期间减轻失业人员和移民负面影响的政策对策比较

2区社会学

Critical Social Policy Pub Date : 2023-09-12 DOI: 10.1177/02610183231199656

Vilde Hernes, Anne Balke Staver

{"title":"Who deserves exceptions in times of crisis? A comparison of policy responses to mitigate negative consequences for unemployed people and immigrants during the COVID-19 pandemic","authors":"Vilde Hernes, Anne Balke Staver","doi":"10.1177/02610183231199656","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02610183231199656","url":null,"abstract":"The boundaries for whom the welfare state should protect during times of crisis are not necessarily obvious. Deservingness studies have identified unemployed people and immigrants as groups perceived as 'less deserving' of welfare state support than other groups in need during ‘normal’ times. These two groups have in recent years been subject to more conditional requirements and an incentivizing rationale. In this article, we compare the policy responses for 1) unemployed people and 2) immigrants during the COVID-19 pandemic in Norway form 2020–2022. We ask: Who deserves exceptions in times of crisis? We find that a cross-partisan parliament introduced extensive economic relief packages and temporary regulations to mitigate negative financial consequences for unemployed persons and furloughed workers. Politicians argued that individuals were not to blame for their unfortunate financial circumstances during the pandemic, and that the welfare state had to take the larger share of the burden. However, the government chose not to make temporary exemptions from economic requirements for permanent residence or family reunification. It was explicitly stated that there was no reason to deviate (temporarily) from the general economic requirements during the pandemic, referring to the potential strain on the Norwegian welfare state if immigrants were not self-sufficient. We argue that the political rationale of incentives underlying these requirements falls short during economic crises and that this non-policy response illustrate new forms of welfare state chauvinism.","PeriodicalId":47685,"journal":{"name":"Critical Social Policy","volume":"63 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135884200","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

A constant threat? A narrative exploration of the relationship between benefit receipt, mental distress and the threat of homelessness 持续的威胁?对福利领取、精神痛苦和无家可归威胁之间关系的叙事探索

2区社会学

Critical Social Policy Pub Date : 2023-09-12 DOI: 10.1177/02610183231199674

UISCE JORDAN, DANIEL SAGE

{"title":"A constant threat? A narrative exploration of the relationship between benefit receipt, mental distress and the threat of homelessness","authors":"UISCE JORDAN, DANIEL SAGE","doi":"10.1177/02610183231199674","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02610183231199674","url":null,"abstract":"Resistance to housing and welfare reforms on economic, ‘practical’ grounds was shattered by the covid-19 pandemic, which demonstrated that where there is a will there is a way when it comes to providing housing. Despite a purported ‘right’ to adequate housing, many people in the UK face profound challenges accessing stable accommodation. Drawing from a biographical-narrative study, this article details experiences of men who have the right to adequate housing denied and thus experience housing insecurity. Subsequently, it explores how such insecurity exacerbates pre-existing mental health problems. The core argument of the article is that welfare reforms produced the sense of a constant threat of homelessness and destitution for the 17 male participants in the study who claimed sickness benefits. This sense of constant threat manifested itself through (a) the production of present homelessness at the time of the research and (b) and underlying anxiety, fear and threat of homelessness. The article contends that the UK social security system perpetuates the structural and emotional drivers of mental distress, creating a deleterious cycle of poverty, insecurity and ill-health, concluding that the provision of stable housing is an upstream intervention to improve mental health and reduce social exclusion.","PeriodicalId":47685,"journal":{"name":"Critical Social Policy","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135884531","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Co-production in syringe service programs: Implementation in a changing organisational field 注射器服务项目的合作生产:在不断变化的组织领域的实施

2区社会学

Critical Social Policy Pub Date : 2023-09-11 DOI: 10.1177/02610183231199667

THERESA ANASTI

{"title":"Co-production in syringe service programs: Implementation in a changing organisational field","authors":"THERESA ANASTI","doi":"10.1177/02610183231199667","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02610183231199667","url":null,"abstract":"Co-production in the human services is a way of working that includes the expertise of service users in service implementation. While co-production is often considered a net positive for the co-producing organisation, this can depend on how, with whom, and to what extent co-production is conducted. This study uses qualitative interview data from 26 employees at syringe service programs (SSPs) in a midwestern US state to examine how SSPs implement co-production, and how this challenges or maintains current power dynamics. As the structure of SSPs has been changing from a grassroots, peer-based model to one that includes the expertise of professional medical staff, it is important to consider what these changes might mean for co-production in the field. SSPs have a rich history of being peer-led, and this project uses interviews with SSP staff to determine how the transition into professional and bureaucratic organisations has affected co-production, and in turn, organisational power dynamics. Findings show that respondents reiterate the importance of co-producing services, although there are significant challenges in implementing co-production in an equitable and liberatory way. Staff (both peer providers and non-peer providers alike) remain enthusiastic about the role that peers play in the organisation and are able to acknowledge barriers in collaborative efforts. Implications for the use of co-production in rapidly changing fields is discussed.","PeriodicalId":47685,"journal":{"name":"Critical Social Policy","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"136024460","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0