{"title":"“This Automaton of Flesh”: Mary Shelley’s\u0000 The Last Man\u0000 , the Paradox of the Moderns, and Romantic Ecohorror","authors":"Allison Dushane","doi":"10.3828/eir.2024.31.1.6","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3828/eir.2024.31.1.6","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 This essay reads Mary Shelley’s\u0000 The Last Man\u0000 alongside Bruno Latour’s\u0000 We Have Never Been Modern\u0000 and his later work addressing the climate crisis, exploring how the novel instantiates and critiques the complex relationship between nature, culture, science, and politics that Latour refers to as the “modern Constitution.” As it dramatizes the tensions within Romantic-era sciences and the wider discourse of philosophical vitalism in Romanticism,\u0000 The Last Man\u0000 performs an extended meditation on materiality that prefigures Latour’s insistence that facing the future in a time of climate crisis depends upon letting go of the conception of nature inherited by the Moderns as an organizing cultural concept. I situate this reading within critical conversations about contemporary apocalyptic fiction and ecohorror in order to argue that the\u0000 The Last Man\u0000 —and by extension, Romanticism—offers opportunities to imagine how human and nonhuman forms of agency could work together to compose different stories about life in the Anthropocene.\u0000","PeriodicalId":476784,"journal":{"name":"Essays in Romanticism","volume":"13 30","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140745945","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}