Security Studies最新文献

{"title":"The Market for Foreign Bases","authors":"Renanah Miles Joyce, Brian Blankenship","doi":"10.1080/09636412.2023.2271387","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09636412.2023.2271387","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":47478,"journal":{"name":"Security Studies","volume":"53 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2023-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139267780","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Buying Survival: Why Do Leaders Hire Mercenaries?","authors":"Leonardo Gentil-Fernandes, Kelly Morrison, Jacob Otto","doi":"10.1080/09636412.2023.2268521","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09636412.2023.2268521","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":47478,"journal":{"name":"Security Studies","volume":"27 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2023-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139266762","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Is multi-method research more convincing than single-method research? An analysis of International Relations journal articles, 1980–2018","authors":"Anton Peez","doi":"10.1080/09636412.2023.2262388","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09636412.2023.2262388","url":null,"abstract":"While some social scientists see multi-method research (MMR) as a promising strategy for strong causal inference, others argue that it does little to strengthen the validity of research. This paper offers a systematic review of how MMR has been used in mainstream International Relations (IR) and specifically in security studies. Using the TRIP Journal Article Database and Web of Science citation data, I examine whether MMR has reached its full potential. MMR has grown in prominence since the 2000s. Scholars use it most often to examine domestic rather than interstate issues. They cite MMR articles less than they cite quantitative single-method articles and about as often as they cite qualitative single-method research. This suggests that MMR is not more influential, nor perceived as more persuasive. However, this gap has decreased in recent years. The study provides insights into IR at the research design and disciplinary levels, the utility of MMR, and knowledge accumulation in social science.","PeriodicalId":47478,"journal":{"name":"Security Studies","volume":"133 11‐12","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135392508","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"International Security and Black Politics: A Biographical Note Toward an Institutional Critique","authors":"Robbie Shilliam","doi":"10.1080/09636412.2023.2246874","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09636412.2023.2246874","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In this afterword, I claim that the distance that sets apart the study of black politics and international security is neither neutral nor natural but crafted through racism. Using the biography of John Herz, alongside other scholars, I shed light on an intellectual tradition that treats black politics and international security as mutually constitutive phenomena. I demonstrate, however, that during the Cold War their study was fractured into two discrete institutional configurations. I claim that academic institutions are entangled in the curtailment of the black freedom struggle in the US. To orient security studies towards the challenge posed by Black Lives Matter might require no less than an institutional reconfiguration of the field.","PeriodicalId":47478,"journal":{"name":"Security Studies","volume":"14 1","pages":"879 - 891"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2023-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139316156","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Three Approaches to the Study of Race and International Relations","authors":"Adom Getachew","doi":"10.1080/09636412.2023.2246896","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09636412.2023.2246896","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":47478,"journal":{"name":"Security Studies","volume":"28 1","pages":"871 - 878"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2023-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139316414","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Introducing the Special Issue on “Race and Security”","authors":"Ronald R. Krebs","doi":"10.1080/09636412.2023.2250231","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09636412.2023.2250231","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":47478,"journal":{"name":"Security Studies","volume":"56 1","pages":"589 - 592"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2023-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139316375","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"How Central is Race to International Relations?","authors":"Jack Snyder","doi":"10.1080/09636412.2023.2250718","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09636412.2023.2250718","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract While I agree that it is high time for more research on the conceptual and empirical questions of race raised in this special issue, I argue that mainstream approaches including realism and liberalism shed more light on the central mechanisms that drive international politics than do theories that put race in the central position. This is not because mainstream theories ignore identity politics, but because their theories of political identity are more closely tied to the powerful driving mechanisms of the nation-state and social modernization. Mainstream IR has, in recent decades, worked hard to understand the continuing power of nationalism and ethnicity using concepts that can also illuminate the category of race.","PeriodicalId":47478,"journal":{"name":"Security Studies","volume":"7 1","pages":"892 - 906"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2023-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139316229","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Intergenerational Immobility: A Legacy of Racial Violence","authors":"Adrian Arellano","doi":"10.1080/09636412.2023.2256664","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09636412.2023.2256664","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract What are the long-run consequences of racial violence on intergenerational mobility? Do its impacts extend to the broader community? Using newly available longitudinal data covering much of the US population from 1989–2015, this study documents two results. First, it establishes a statistical association between the severity of lynching of Black Americans and long-run economic outcomes across the Southern United States. Counties that experienced racial violence most intensely in the past have lower levels of Black upward mobility today. Second, although most lynch victims were Black males, their long-run consequences are equally observable for the current generation of both Black males and females. Living in counties that experienced lynchings in the 19th and 20th centuries reduces Black upwardly mobile in the 21st century. These findings demonstrate that collective violence may hinder long-term intergenerational mobility for the broader affected community, irrespective of temporal proximity or sex.","PeriodicalId":47478,"journal":{"name":"Security Studies","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135859058","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"The Bomb as God: a metaphor that impedes nuclear disarmament","authors":"Jacques E. C. Hymans","doi":"10.1080/09636412.2023.2256655","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09636412.2023.2256655","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract“Nuclear embeddedness” refers to a state’s persistent failure to reconsider its possession of a nuclear arsenal. The sedimentation of the metaphor of the Bomb as God in a state’s political culture consolidates “nuclear embeddedness.” Because metaphorizing something as God puts it beyond even boundedly rational calculation, the metaphor of the Bomb as God effectively blocks a state from seeing its way clear to nuclear renunciation. The article probes the plausibility of this hypothesis with historical analyses of the nuclear policies of the U.S., India, Pakistan, and North Korea, and with case studies of three high-level American, British, and French nuclear officials who ultimately turned against the Bomb. AcknowledgmentsThanks to Fiona Adamson, Lynn Eden, Robert English, Ron Hassner, Rieko Kage, Joshua Kertzer, Nancy Kokaz, Ronald Krebs, Richard Ned Lebow, Reid Pauly, Benoît Pelopidas, M. V. Ramana, Brian Rathbun, William Walker, Anna Weichselbraun, David Welch, participants at a 2019 conference at the Princeton Program on Science and Global Security, the 2020 Peace Science Society annual conference, an online seminar organized by Michal Smetana and Michal Onderco in 2021, and the Security Studies editors and reviewers for their helpful comments on earlier versions of this paper. Earlier talks at the Balsillie School of International Affairs, the Duke University political science department, and the Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs were also valuable experiences as I was trying to feel my way forward on the topic of nuclear disarmament. The USC Center for International Studies provided generous funding support.Notes1 William Walker, “On Nuclear Embeddedness and (Ir)Reversibility” (working paper, Program on Science and Global Security, Princeton University, February 2020): 7. [https://sgs.princeton.edu/sites/default/files/2020-02/walker-2020.pdf]2 Walker, “On Nuclear Embeddedness and (Ir)Reversibility,” 20.3 Toby Dalton and George Perkovich, “Thinking the Other Unthinkable: Disarmament in North Korea and Beyond.” Livermore Papers on Global Security No. 8 (July 2020): 7, 45. [https://cgsr.llnl.gov/content/assets/docs/CGSR-LivermorePaper8.pdf]4 Dalton and Perkovich, “Thinking the Other Unthinkable,” 10.5 “Disarmament” would be the standard word to use here, but “disarmament” could also mean mere nuclear arms reductions, so “renunciation” is clearer.6 Paul S. Boyer, By the Bomb’s Early Light: American Thought and Culture at the Dawn of the Atomic Age, 2nd ed. (Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press, 1994), 367.7 Harry Roberts and Emily Gibbs, “Nuclear Culture,” Oxford Bibliographies Online in Military History, 30 October 2019, doi: 10.1093/obo/9780199791279-0187; Justin Anderson and Amanda Moodie, “Weapons of Mass Destruction,” Oxford Bibliographies Online in International Relations, 3 June 2019, doi: 10.1093/obo/9780199743292-0221.8 Charles L. Glaser, “Was Nuclear Disarmament Ever Alive?” in Bård Nikolas Vik ","PeriodicalId":47478,"journal":{"name":"Security Studies","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135899709","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Hawks Become Us: The Sense of Power and Militant Foreign Policy Attitudes","authors":"Caleb Pomeroy","doi":"10.1080/09636412.2023.2252736","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09636412.2023.2252736","url":null,"abstract":"AbstractHow does power shape foreign policy attitudes? Drawing on advances in psychological research on power, I argue that the sense of relative state power explains foreign policy hawkishness. The intuitive sense that “our state” is stronger than “your state” activates militant internationalism, an orientation centered on the efficacy of force and deterrence to achieve state aims. Beyond general orientation towards the world, this sense of power explains discrete attitudes towards pressing security issues, from threat perception in the South China Sea to nuclear weapons use against Iran. Five original surveys across the US, China, and Russia, as well as an experiment fielded on the US public, lend support to these claims. The psychological effects of state power overshadow dispositional traits common in behavioral IR, like individuals’ personalities and moral proclivities. More surprisingly, power changes individuals, making hawks of even the most dovish. Taken together, the paper presents a “first image reversed” challenge to standard bottom-up accounts of foreign policy opinion and offers unique explanatory leverage in a potential era of US decline, China’s rise, and Russian belligerence. AcknowledgementsFor feedback and advice, the author thanks Polina Beliakova, Rick Herrmann, Kara Hooser, Yuji Idomoto, Josh Kertzer, Alex Yu-Ting Lin, David Peterson, Brian Rathbun, Randy Schweller, the anonymous reviewers, and audiences at Ohio State, USC, and ISA 2021. For funding assistance and/or survey space, the author thanks Ohio State’s Program for the Study of Realist Foreign Policy, Dartmouth College’s Dickey Center, USC’s Korean Studies Institute, and Elizabeth Cooksey and Ohio State’s CHRR. For translation assistance, the author is indebted to Evgeniia Iakhnis and Haoming Xiong. Finally, thanks to the Chicago Council on Global Affairs and the Levada Center for sharing their survey data. The paper’s original surveys were deemed exempt by the Institutional Review Boards at The Ohio State University (#2021E0239, #2021E0578, #2022E0350) and Dartmouth College (#00032660).Data Availability StatementThe data and materials that support the findings of this paper are available on Harvard Dataverse at https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/MVIVTWNotes1 For more on this surge of research, see Brian C. Rathbun, “Towards a Dual Process Model of Foreign Policy Ideology,” Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences 34 (August 2020): 211–16; Joshua D. Kertzer and Dustin Tingley, “Political Psychology in International Relations: Beyond the Paradigms,” Annual Review of Political Science 21, no. 1 (May 2018): 319–39.2 Joshua D. Kertzer, Kathleen E. Powers, Brian C. Rathbun, and Ravi Iyer, “Moral Support: How Moral Values Shape Foreign Policy Attitudes,” Journal of Politics 76, no. 3 (July 2014): 825–40; Brian C. Rathbun, Joshua D. Kertzer, Jason Reifler, Paul Goren, and Thomas J. Scotto, “Taking Foreign Policy Personally: Personal Values and Foreign Policy Attitudes,” Internationa","PeriodicalId":47478,"journal":{"name":"Security Studies","volume":"63 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135385748","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}