{"title":"Lawyers and the Conservative Counterrevolution","authors":"Ann Southworth","doi":"10.1111/lsi.12363","DOIUrl":"10.1111/lsi.12363","url":null,"abstract":"<p>What roles have lawyers played in the conservative counterrevolution in US law and public policy? Two recent books, Jefferson Decker's <i>The Other Rights Revolution: Conservative Lawyers and the Remaking of American Government</i> (2016), and Amanda Hollis-Brusky's <i>Ideas with Consequences: The Federalist Society and the Conservative Counterrevolution</i> (2015), speak to the question. This essay explores how these books relate to a larger story of the conservative legal movement and the roles that lawyers and their organizations and networks have played in the conservative turn in American law and politics. It highlights four interrelated threads of the movement's development: creating a support structure for conservative legal advocacy; remaking the judiciary and holding judges accountable; generating, legitimizing, and disseminating ideas to support legal change; and embracing legal activism to roll back government. The essay then considers a continuing challenge for the movement: managing tensions among its several constituencies. Finally, it suggests how this story has played out in litigation to challenge campaign finance regulation.</p>","PeriodicalId":47418,"journal":{"name":"Law and Social Inquiry-Journal of the American Bar Foundation","volume":"43 4","pages":"1698-1728"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2018-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/lsi.12363","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"130609706","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"What Is a Social Group in the Eyes of the Law? Knowledge Work in Refugee-Status Determination","authors":"B. Robert Owens","doi":"10.1111/lsi.12369","DOIUrl":"10.1111/lsi.12369","url":null,"abstract":"This article explores the settling and unsettling of legal concepts in relation to refugee-status determination. To gain admission to the United States, asylum seekers are required to demonstrate a well-founded fear of persecution on the basis of one of five protected grounds: race, religion, nationality, political opinion, or membership in a particular social group. Accordingly, many political asylum claims turn on the interpretation of “particular social group.” This article examines case law disputes in the federal courts of appeals over the meaning of that phrase and describes how statutory interpretation by judges has contributed to the persistence of such disputes over several decades since the passage of the 1980 Refugee Act. My analysis reveals the tensions between different forms of rationality at play in judicial statutory interpretation and applies the concept of legal settling to a new empirical domain.","PeriodicalId":47418,"journal":{"name":"Law and Social Inquiry-Journal of the American Bar Foundation","volume":"43 4","pages":"1257-1278"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2018-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/lsi.12369","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"114977488","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Review Section","authors":"Howard S. Erlanger","doi":"10.1111/lsi.12370","DOIUrl":"10.1111/lsi.12370","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":47418,"journal":{"name":"Law and Social Inquiry-Journal of the American Bar Foundation","volume":"43 3","pages":"1092"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2018-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/lsi.12370","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"128583554","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"A Welcome Conversation: Toward a New Historiography of Intellectual Property","authors":"Kali Murray","doi":"10.1111/lsi.12368","DOIUrl":"10.1111/lsi.12368","url":null,"abstract":"<p>This essay considers what tools should be used to study the legal history of intellectual property. I identify three historiographical strategies: narration, contest, and formation. <i>Narration</i> identifies the diverse “narrative structures” that shape the field of intellectual property history. <i>Contest</i> highlights how the inherent instability of intellectual property as a legal concept prompts recurrent debates over its meaning. <i>Formation</i> recognizes how intellectual property historians can offer insight into broader legal history debates over how to consider the relationship between informal social practices and formalized legal mechanisms. I consider Kara W. Swanson's <i>Banking on the Body: The Market in Blood, Milk and Sperm in Modern America</i> (2014) in light of these historiographical strategies and conclude that Swanson's book guides us to a new conversation in the legal history of intellectual property law.</p>","PeriodicalId":47418,"journal":{"name":"Law and Social Inquiry-Journal of the American Bar Foundation","volume":"43 3","pages":"1113-1129"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2018-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/lsi.12368","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"125579333","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Book Notes†","authors":"","doi":"10.1111/lsi.12364","DOIUrl":"10.1111/lsi.12364","url":null,"abstract":"CIVIL RIGHTS.................................................................................................................... 1131 CONSTITUTIONAL THEORY AND HISTORY ........................................................................... 1131 COURTS AND JUDGES......................................................................................................... 1131 CRIMINAL JUSTICE AND SOCIAL CONTROL.......................................................................... 1131 HUMAN RIGHTS ................................................................................................................ 1133 JURISPRUDENCE AND SOCIOLEGAL THEORY.......................................................................... 1133 JUSTICE AND THE UNIVERSITY ............................................................................................ 1134 LAW AND FAMILY RELATIONSHIPS ...................................................................................... 1134 LAW AND IMMIGRATION .................................................................................................... 1134 LAW AND INDIGENOUS PEOPLES ......................................................................................... 1134 LAW AND ISLAM................................................................................................................ 1135 LAW AND MARKETS .......................................................................................................... 1135 LAW AND MEDICINE .......................................................................................................... 1135 LAW AND MENTAL HEALTH .............................................................................................. 1136 LAW AND MYTH MAKING ................................................................................................. 1136 LAW AND POLITICS............................................................................................................ 1136 LAW AND PROPERTY .......................................................................................................... 1136 LAW AND RACE ................................................................................................................ 1137 LAW AND REDRESS OF INJURY ............................................................................................ 1137 LAW AND SLAVERY............................................................................................................ 1138 LAW AND TORTURE........................................................................................................... 1138 LAW AND WOMEN ............................................................................................................ 1138 LEGAL PROFESSION ............................................................................................................ 1139 TRANSFORMATION OF LEGAL SYSTEMS .........................................................................","PeriodicalId":47418,"journal":{"name":"Law and Social Inquiry-Journal of the American Bar Foundation","volume":"43 3","pages":"1130-1140"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2018-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/lsi.12364","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"63398454","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Review Section","authors":"Howard S. Erlanger","doi":"10.1111/lsi.12362","DOIUrl":"10.1111/lsi.12362","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":47418,"journal":{"name":"Law and Social Inquiry-Journal of the American Bar Foundation","volume":"43 2","pages":"527"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2018-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/lsi.12362","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"126662568","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Legal Theory for Legal Empiricists","authors":"Hanoch Dagan, Roy Kreitner, Tamar Kricheli-Katz","doi":"10.1111/lsi.12357","DOIUrl":"10.1111/lsi.12357","url":null,"abstract":"<p>There is a widespread view that one does either theory or empirical work, and that theory and empiricism represent distant concerns, opposing worldviews, and perhaps distinct mentalities or personalities. This prevalent view has deep roots and is also the result of pragmatic and understandable tendencies toward division of intellectual labor. Against this view, this essay suggests that the relations between theory and empirical study ought to be understood as more intimate and that making legal theory an explicit focus can improve empirical scholarship. We pursue this claim by articulating a basis for legal theory and by showing how that basis illuminates both the application and design of empirical research on law. Legal theory, we argue, follows jurisprudence in interrogating the law as a set of coercive normative institutions. The upshot of this approach is a recognition that an interdisciplinary analysis of law must rely on both a theory (explicit or implicit) of the way law's power and its normativity align and an account of the way in which this discursive cohabitation manifests itself institutionally. We thus argue that legal theory is necessary in order to draw fruitfully on empirical research and further claim that legal theory provides guidance both for setting up an empirical research agenda on law and for designing research into specific topics.</p>","PeriodicalId":47418,"journal":{"name":"Law and Social Inquiry-Journal of the American Bar Foundation","volume":"43 2","pages":"292-318"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2018-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/lsi.12357","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"125616273","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Body Cameras, Big Data, and Police Accountability","authors":"Mary D. Fan","doi":"10.1111/lsi.12354","DOIUrl":"10.1111/lsi.12354","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The increase in data from police-worn body cameras can illuminate formerly opaque practices. This article discusses using audiovisual big data from police-worn body cameras, citizen recordings, and other sources to address blind spots in police oversight. Based on body camera policies in America's largest cities, it discusses two possible roadblocks: (1) data retention and deletion, and (2) limits on use for evaluation and discipline. Although recordings are retained for criminal prosecutions, retention for oversight and accountability is overlooked or is contentious. Some departments have no policy on videos concerning civil suits against the police. The retention time for non-evidentiary recordings is also much shorter. Some policies limit their use for evaluation and discipline. Transactional myopia—seeing at the case rather than the systemic level—leads to a focus on specific footage for particular cases, rather than the potential of aggregated body camera big data to reveal important systemic information and to prevent the escalation of problems.</p>","PeriodicalId":47418,"journal":{"name":"Law and Social Inquiry-Journal of the American Bar Foundation","volume":"43 4","pages":"1236-1256"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2018-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/lsi.12354","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"114360539","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Computer Vision and Machine Learning for Human Rights Video Analysis: Case Studies, Possibilities, Concerns, and Limitations","authors":"Jay D. Aronson","doi":"10.1111/lsi.12353","DOIUrl":"10.1111/lsi.12353","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Citizen video and other publicly available footage can provide evidence of human rights violations and war crimes. The ubiquity of visual data, however, may overwhelm those faced with preserving and analyzing it. This article examines how machine learning and computer vision can be used to make sense of large volumes of video in advocacy and accountability contexts. These technologies can enhance the efficiency and effectiveness of human rights advocacy and accountability efforts, but only if human rights organizations can access the technologies themselves and learn how to use them to promote human rights. As such, computer scientists and software developers working with the human rights community must understand the context in which their products are used and act in solidarity with practitioners. By working together, practitioners and scientists can level the playing field between the human rights community and the entities that perpetrate, tolerate, or seek to cover up violations.</p>","PeriodicalId":47418,"journal":{"name":"Law and Social Inquiry-Journal of the American Bar Foundation","volume":"43 4","pages":"1188-1209"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2018-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/lsi.12353","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"131201484","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}