International & Comparative Law Quarterly最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
REVISITING THE LEGALITY OF TRAVEL RESTRICTIONS UNDER INTERNATIONAL LAW DURING COVID-19 新冠肺炎期间根据国际法修订旅行限制的法律效力
IF 2 2区 社会学
International & Comparative Law Quarterly Pub Date : 2022-07-01 DOI: 10.1017/s0020589322000240
L. Forman, Roojin Habibi
{"title":"REVISITING THE LEGALITY OF TRAVEL RESTRICTIONS UNDER INTERNATIONAL LAW DURING COVID-19","authors":"L. Forman, Roojin Habibi","doi":"10.1017/s0020589322000240","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0020589322000240","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Under the International Health Regulations (IHR), States must consider decision-making criteria in applying travel restrictions during a public health emergency of international concern. Interpretation on the legal parameters of such restrictions varies widely. This article considers whether and how the permissibility of travel restrictions under the IHR may have changed given recent developments, including evolving scientific evidence about their efficacy and shifting World Health Organization (WHO) advice. It is argued that such determinations must conform to the principles of necessity and proportionality as articulated by the IHR, and must also be accompanied by the correlative IHR duties of collaboration and assistance rooted substantively in global solidarity.","PeriodicalId":47350,"journal":{"name":"International & Comparative Law Quarterly","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43683448","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
THE FINAL FRONTIER OF CYBERSPACE: THE SEABED BEYOND NATIONAL JURISDICTION AND THE PROTECTION OF SUBMARINE CABLES 网络空间的最后边界:国家管辖范围之外的海底与海底电缆的保护
IF 2 2区 社会学
International & Comparative Law Quarterly Pub Date : 2022-07-01 DOI: 10.1017/s0020589322000227
D. Guilfoyle, T. Paige, R. McLaughlin
{"title":"THE FINAL FRONTIER OF CYBERSPACE: THE SEABED BEYOND NATIONAL JURISDICTION AND THE PROTECTION OF SUBMARINE CABLES","authors":"D. Guilfoyle, T. Paige, R. McLaughlin","doi":"10.1017/s0020589322000227","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0020589322000227","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Cyberspace is now acknowledged not only as the newest domain of warfare, but also as a space vital to economic, educational and cultural development for all States. This thin consensus ignores the fundamental fact that the backbone of cyber infrastructure—submarine telecommunication cables—is not (for the large part) located within sovereign territorial jurisdiction. The radically increased reliance of States upon submarine data cables emphasises their vulnerability to damage by malicious acts, accidents, or natural phenomena. Faced with these problems, legal analysis has tended to identify gaps or deficiencies in the law, and propose the creation of new legal instruments. The contribution of this article is twofold. First, it expands the frame of analysis to include deliberate damage to cables not only in peacetime but under the law of armed conflict. Second, rather than treating the legal framework as inherently deficient, it considers the extent to which existing rules and principles can be progressively developed, interpreted, or creatively applied to close perceived gaps. This article surveys the existing law specific to the protection of submarine cables and assesses how general principles of the law of the sea, State responsibility, the law on the use of force, and the law of armed conflict apply to this problem. It thus considers in turn the applicable ‘law of peace’, the jus ad bellum and the jus in bello.","PeriodicalId":47350,"journal":{"name":"International & Comparative Law Quarterly","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47985705","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
SOVEREIGNTY FICTIONS IN THE UNITED KINGDOM'S TRADE AGENDA 英国贸易议程中的主权虚构
IF 2 2区 社会学
International & Comparative Law Quarterly Pub Date : 2022-07-01 DOI: 10.1017/S0020589322000173
C. Gammage, P. Syrpis
{"title":"SOVEREIGNTY FICTIONS IN THE UNITED KINGDOM'S TRADE AGENDA","authors":"C. Gammage, P. Syrpis","doi":"10.1017/S0020589322000173","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020589322000173","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This article explores how sovereignty fictions have been used to advance different legal, political and economic aims in the articulation of the United Kingdom's future approach to global regulation. By mapping the transformative shifts in sovereignty paradigms, this article highlights the disconnect between the absolutist sovereignty popularised in the UK government's political rhetoric and the concept of regulatory sovereignty that underpins the UK's future trading strategy. To maintain its status as a global leader in regulation and standards-setting, the UK government will need to diffuse power and delegate autonomy through networked orders of public and private actors. These competing sovereignty paradigms are analysed with reference to European Union (EU) law and practice, to highlight the opportunities and challenges for the UK as an independent trade actor. This article concludes by evaluating how sovereignty fictions can disrupt the objectives of the UK's proposed ‘common law’ approach to regulatory governance and discusses the policy interventions that may be required to enable the UK to harness its potential as a regulatory leader.","PeriodicalId":47350,"journal":{"name":"International & Comparative Law Quarterly","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45135182","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
INTERNATIONAL LAW BEFORE UNITED KINGDOM COURTS: A QUIET REVOLUTION 英国法庭面前的国际法:一场静悄悄的革命
IF 2 2区 社会学
International & Comparative Law Quarterly Pub Date : 2022-07-01 DOI: 10.1017/s0020589322000239
Lord Lloyd-Jones
{"title":"INTERNATIONAL LAW BEFORE UNITED KINGDOM COURTS: A QUIET REVOLUTION","authors":"Lord Lloyd-Jones","doi":"10.1017/s0020589322000239","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0020589322000239","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In the 36 years since Francis Mann published Foreign Affairs in English Courts, the engagement of the United Kingdom courts with issues of international law has greatly increased. This article addresses the reasons underlying this trend and identifies four key developments: first, the nature of international law has evolved to embrace individuals as subjects; second, the Human Rights Act 1998 has had a profound influence, often requiring domestic courts to rule on matters of international law in order to give effect to the European Convention on Human Rights; third, in recent decades there has been a growing willingness on the part of courts in the United Kingdom to address and investigate the conduct of foreign States and issues of public international law; and fourth, these developments have been accompanied by a shift in attitudes to the relationship between customary international law and the common law.","PeriodicalId":47350,"journal":{"name":"International & Comparative Law Quarterly","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48185657","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
DETERMINING THE APPROPRIATE FORUM BY THE APPLICABLE LAW 根据适用法律确定适当的法院地
IF 2 2区 社会学
International & Comparative Law Quarterly Pub Date : 2022-06-22 DOI: 10.1017/S0020589322000203
Richard L. Garnett
{"title":"DETERMINING THE APPROPRIATE FORUM BY THE APPLICABLE LAW","authors":"Richard L. Garnett","doi":"10.1017/S0020589322000203","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020589322000203","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The concepts of jurisdiction and applicable law have been traditionally regarded as separate inquiries in private international law: a court only considers the applicable law once it has decided to adjudicate a matter. While such an approach still generally applies in civil law jurisdictions, in common law countries the concepts are increasingly intertwined. This article examines the relationship between jurisdiction and applicable law in two key areas: applications to stay proceedings on the ground of forum non conveniens and to enforce foreign exclusive jurisdiction agreements. While courts generally apply the principle that jurisdiction and applicable law should coincide where possible, there are circumstances where a court may retain jurisdiction despite a foreign governing law or may ‘trust’ a foreign tribunal to apply the law of the forum. This article seeks to establish a framework by which courts may assess the role of the applicable law in forum determinations.","PeriodicalId":47350,"journal":{"name":"International & Comparative Law Quarterly","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2022-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45695241","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
European Constitutional Courts Towards Data Retention Laws, edited by Marek Zubik, Jan Podkowik and Robert Rybski [Springer, Switzerland, 2021, 384pp, ISBN: 978-3-030-57188-7, £109.99 (h/bk), £59.99 (ebook)] 《欧洲宪法法院走向数据保留法》,Marek Zubik、Jan Podkowik和Robert Rybski编辑【瑞士施普林格,2021,384页,ISBN:978-3-030-57188-7,109.99英镑(h/bk),59.99英镑(电子书)】
IF 2 2区 社会学
International & Comparative Law Quarterly Pub Date : 2022-06-14 DOI: 10.1017/s0020589322000161
Arianna Vedaschi
{"title":"European Constitutional Courts Towards Data Retention Laws, edited by Marek Zubik, Jan Podkowik and Robert Rybski [Springer, Switzerland, 2021, 384pp, ISBN: 978-3-030-57188-7, £109.99 (h/bk), £59.99 (ebook)]","authors":"Arianna Vedaschi","doi":"10.1017/s0020589322000161","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0020589322000161","url":null,"abstract":"[...]data retention can seriously interfere with privacy and rights of data protection, engaging the delicate balance between rights and freedoms, on the one hand, and security, on the other, which in turn impacts the very foundations of democracy. [...]data retention—and surveillance in general—engages a third ‘actor’ in the rights–security relationship, this being technology. After setting out the domestic legislation implementing the 2006 EU data retention directive in each State, the authors consider whether such national measures had already been the subject of any constitutional or supreme court decisions before the European Court of Justice (ECJ) ruled the data retention directive invalid in 2014. [...]there is no doubt that this book provides a valuable overview of the evolution of European surveillance law (and related case law) in the first two decades after the 9/11 attacks.","PeriodicalId":47350,"journal":{"name":"International & Comparative Law Quarterly","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2022-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43195563","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
AN INTERNATIONAL CONVENTION ON EXPERT DETERMINATION AND DISPUTE BOARDS? 关于专家裁决和争端委员会的国际公约?
IF 2 2区 社会学
International & Comparative Law Quarterly Pub Date : 2022-06-14 DOI: 10.1017/s0020589322000185
D. Saidov
{"title":"AN INTERNATIONAL CONVENTION ON EXPERT DETERMINATION AND DISPUTE BOARDS?","authors":"D. Saidov","doi":"10.1017/s0020589322000185","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0020589322000185","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This article makes a case for an international convention on expert determination (ED) and Dispute Boards (DBs) that would require its Contracting States to recognise agreements on ED/DBs and enforce ED/DB decisions. Whilst strong, the case for the convention may not be compelling as there are arguments against it. But at least the time has come for the international legal community to start thinking about and debating the need for such an international regime. This article takes the first step towards imagining this international regime by evaluating a number of key issues relating to its scope of application.","PeriodicalId":47350,"journal":{"name":"International & Comparative Law Quarterly","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2022-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46252820","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A CONTEXTUAL ANALYSIS OF ARTICLE 16 OF THE IRELAND–NORTHERN IRELAND PROTOCOL 对《爱尔兰-北爱尔兰议定书》第16条的背景分析
IF 2 2区 社会学
International & Comparative Law Quarterly Pub Date : 2022-05-27 DOI: 10.1017/S002058932200015X
Billy Melo Araujo
{"title":"A CONTEXTUAL ANALYSIS OF ARTICLE 16 OF THE IRELAND–NORTHERN IRELAND PROTOCOL","authors":"Billy Melo Araujo","doi":"10.1017/S002058932200015X","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S002058932200015X","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Article 16 of the Ireland–Northern Ireland Protocol annexed to the EU–UK Withdrawal Agreement is an escape clause which allows the parties to deviate from their obligations under certain conditions. This article maps out the main features of the safeguards provision in the Protocol in light of international trade law and international relations literature on treaty design. It provides a detailed examination of the safeguards provision in the Protocol and highlights the key design flaws associated with this regime as well as some potential solutions to such flaws.","PeriodicalId":47350,"journal":{"name":"International & Comparative Law Quarterly","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2022-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44838350","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
THE ROLE OF THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY IN DETERMINING THE LEGITIMACY OF GOVERNMENTS 大会在确定政府合法性方面的作用
IF 2 2区 社会学
International & Comparative Law Quarterly Pub Date : 2022-05-19 DOI: 10.1017/s0020589322000148
R. Barber
{"title":"THE ROLE OF THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY IN DETERMINING THE LEGITIMACY OF GOVERNMENTS","authors":"R. Barber","doi":"10.1017/s0020589322000148","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0020589322000148","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In 2021, unconstitutional transfers of power in Myanmar and Afghanistan highlighted that while States may desire a coherent response to questions about the status of governments, and may look for international guidance in such regard, there is no established process for providing such guidance. Thus, attention focuses on the General Assembly's credentials process, designed to assess the eligibility of delegates to represent their States at the UN. This article proposes that rather than the credentials process being stretched in this way, greater use should be made of the Assembly's competence to pass determinative resolutions on government legitimacy.","PeriodicalId":47350,"journal":{"name":"International & Comparative Law Quarterly","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2022-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46161230","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
ASYMMETRIC JURISDICTION CLAUSES AND THE ANOMALY CREATED BY ARTICLE 31(2) OF THE BRUSSELS I RECAST REGULATION 不对称管辖权条款和《布鲁塞尔一号》第31(2)条造成的异常现象重新制定了法规
IF 2 2区 社会学
International & Comparative Law Quarterly Pub Date : 2022-04-21 DOI: 10.1017/s0020589322000094
Brooke Marshall
{"title":"ASYMMETRIC JURISDICTION CLAUSES AND THE ANOMALY CREATED BY ARTICLE 31(2) OF THE BRUSSELS I RECAST REGULATION","authors":"Brooke Marshall","doi":"10.1017/s0020589322000094","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0020589322000094","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 The English Court of Appeal and German Bundesgerichtshof recently decided that Article 31(2) of the Brussels I Recast Regulation applies to asymmetric jurisdiction clauses. This article contends that while this conclusion is sound, separating the ‘clause’ into two ‘agreements’ to reach it is not. This disaggregation prevents a solution to the anomaly that Article 31(2) creates for asymmetric clauses, where a lender sues under its option and the borrower subsequently sues in the anchor court. This article proposes a solution, based on a uniform characterisation of the clause as a whole, which protects the lender's option and mitigates the risk of parallel proceedings.","PeriodicalId":47350,"journal":{"name":"International & Comparative Law Quarterly","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2022-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42565345","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信