International Journal for the Psychology of Religion最新文献_第9页

Commentary on “Does Spirituality or Religion Positively Affect Mental Health?” 《精神或宗教对心理健康有积极影响吗?》

IF 2.2 2区哲学

International Journal for the Psychology of Religion Pub Date : 2020-07-07 DOI: 10.1080/10508619.2020.1766868

H. Koenig, Terrence D. Hill, S. Pirutinsky, D. Rosmarin

引用次数: 17

Neuroscience, Selflessness, and Spiritual Experience: Explaining the Science of Transcendence 神经科学、无私与精神体验：超越科学的解释

IF 2.2 2区哲学

International Journal for the Psychology of Religion Pub Date : 2020-07-02 DOI: 10.1080/10508619.2019.1707613

Heekyeong Park

引用次数: 5

Understanding Nonbelievers’ Prejudice toward Ideological Opponents: The Role of Self-Expression Values and Other-Oriented Dispositions 理解非信仰者对意识形态对手的偏见:自我表达价值观和他者取向的作用

IF 2.2 2区哲学

International Journal for the Psychology of Religion Pub Date : 2020-07-02 DOI: 10.1080/10508619.2019.1696498

Filip Uzarevic, V. Saroglou

{"title":"Understanding Nonbelievers’ Prejudice toward Ideological Opponents: The Role of Self-Expression Values and Other-Oriented Dispositions","authors":"Filip Uzarevic, V. Saroglou","doi":"10.1080/10508619.2019.1696498","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10508619.2019.1696498","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Research adopting the ideological-conflict hypothesis indicates that low religiosity, nonbelief, and antireligious sentiments predict prejudice toward ideological opponents. How to understand this, from an individual differences perspective, given that nonbelievers are typically open-minded and low in authoritarianism? We investigated, among 422 UK adults, social distance from antiliberals (antigay activists), fundamentalists, and religionists of major world religions (Catholicism, Islam, and Buddhism). Nonbelievers showed prejudice toward all religious targets – but not toward an ethnic outgroup (Chinese). Furthermore, antireligious sentiment implied (1) valuing rationality and, in turn, social distance from fundamentalists and (2) low empathy and low belief in the benevolence of others and the world and, in turn, social distance from religionists. Finally, (3) valuing liberty predicted social distance from antiliberals but failed to mediate the effect of antireligious sentiment. Though general processes (e.g., perceived threat) explain all prejudices, specific individual differences seem to distinguish nonbelievers’ and believers’ prejudice toward each other.","PeriodicalId":47234,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for the Psychology of Religion","volume":"30 1","pages":"161 - 177"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2020-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10508619.2019.1696498","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42557784","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 3

Psychology and Religion within an Ideological Surround 意识形态语境中的心理学与宗教

IF 2.2 2区哲学

International Journal for the Psychology of Religion Pub Date : 2020-06-16 DOI: 10.1080/10508619.2020.1771978

Peter C. Hill

引用次数: 2

Beyond the Socially Desirable: Longitudinal Evidence on Individual Prayer-Wellbeing Associations 超越社会期望:个人祈祷-幸福关联的纵向证据

IF 2.2 2区哲学

International Journal for the Psychology of Religion Pub Date : 2020-05-27 DOI: 10.1080/10508619.2020.1753330

Anne Buch Møller, H. F. Pedersen, E. Ørnbøl, J. Søndergaard Jensen, B. Purzycki, U. Schjoedt

{"title":"Beyond the Socially Desirable: Longitudinal Evidence on Individual Prayer-Wellbeing Associations","authors":"Anne Buch Møller, H. F. Pedersen, E. Ørnbøl, J. Søndergaard Jensen, B. Purzycki, U. Schjoedt","doi":"10.1080/10508619.2020.1753330","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10508619.2020.1753330","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The often touted positive association between religion and wellbeing is mainly based on evidence from cross-sectional studies. This is problematic because such studies tend to draw conclusions at the individual level despite reporting associations at the group level. In addition to this fallacy, inferences at the group level are also likely to be inflated by the social desirability effect, which may further exacerbate misrepresentations of the individual level. To avoid these pitfalls, we examined prayer-wellbeing (P-WB) associations and social desirability effects at both levels, using single-level and multilevel regression analysis on a longitudinal dataset. Weekly reports of prayer and wellbeing from 282 frequently praying Danish Christians, totaling 4254 complete responses, were combined with a comprehensive background questionnaire featuring a social desirability measure targeting the religious domain. A typical weak positive P-WB association was observed at the group level, which disappeared when controlling for social desirability. At the individual level, the average association across individuals was positive after controlling for social desirability. This overall relationship, however, conceals considerable individual variance with almost a fourth of the estimated individual P-WB associations going in the negative direction, emphasizing the need to be cautious when extrapolating group-level data to the individual level. These findings suggest that cross-sectional studies may oversimplify the P-WB relationship, especially, if the social desirability effect is ignored.","PeriodicalId":47234,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for the Psychology of Religion","volume":"30 1","pages":"275 - 287"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2020-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10508619.2020.1753330","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42875002","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 2

Nonreligious Identity in Three Western European Countries: A Closer Look at Nonbelievers’ Self-identifications and Attitudes Towards Religion 西欧三个国家的非宗教身份——兼论非信徒的自我认同与宗教态度

IF 2.2 2区哲学

International Journal for the Psychology of Religion Pub Date : 2020-05-27 DOI: 10.1080/10508619.2020.1746984

M. Lindeman, Pinja Marin, U. Schjoedt, M. van Elk

{"title":"Nonreligious Identity in Three Western European Countries: A Closer Look at Nonbelievers’ Self-identifications and Attitudes Towards Religion","authors":"M. Lindeman, Pinja Marin, U. Schjoedt, M. van Elk","doi":"10.1080/10508619.2020.1746984","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10508619.2020.1746984","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The growing secularism generates considerable interest in the manifestations of religious unbelief. In this study, conducted in Finland, Denmark, and the Netherland (N = 4404), we asked participants which of the following terms best describes their religious/spiritual identity: religious believer, spiritual but not religious, spiritual seeker, atheist, anti-religious, agnostic, nonbeliever, secular, or other. We also examined the participants’ God beliefs and their attitudes toward religion. While connotations of identity terms varied considerably across individuals and countries, the nonreligious identification groups consistently differed in the strength and certainty of God belief, and by the valence, ambivalence, importance, and reflection of the attitudes toward religion. The anti-religious had the most negative and unequivocal attitudes, and the agnostics, seculars, and spiritual seekers had the most uncertain God beliefs. By associating distinct attitude profiles with non-religious self-identification labels, the findings improve our understanding of why people choose a specific label in surveys on non-religiosity.","PeriodicalId":47234,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for the Psychology of Religion","volume":"30 1","pages":"288 - 303"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2020-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10508619.2020.1746984","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42361471","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 6

Effects of Religious Service Attendance and Religious Importance on Depression: Examining the Meta-analytic Evidence 参加宗教仪式和宗教重要性对抑郁症的影响：元分析证据检验

IF 2.2 2区哲学

International Journal for the Psychology of Religion Pub Date : 2020-04-27 DOI: 10.1080/10508619.2020.1748932

T. VanderWeele

引用次数: 12

The Role of Religious Orientation in Worldview Conflict 宗教取向在世界观冲突中的作用

IF 2.2 2区哲学

International Journal for the Psychology of Religion Pub Date : 2020-04-23 DOI: 10.1080/10508619.2020.1744317

D. V. Van Tongeren, Emily Kubin, Jarret T. Crawford, M. Brandt

{"title":"The Role of Religious Orientation in Worldview Conflict","authors":"D. V. Van Tongeren, Emily Kubin, Jarret T. Crawford, M. Brandt","doi":"10.1080/10508619.2020.1744317","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10508619.2020.1744317","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Worldview conflict is a regular part of life. We typically encounter information that disagrees with or disconfirms the way we understand and make sense of the world. People usually respond negatively to such experiences; however, do responses depend, in part, on people’s individual religious beliefs or orientations? We tested whether religious orientation (i.e., intrinsic, quest, religious fundamentalism) and religious involvement moderated the effects of worldview disagreement. Employing an experience sampling design, participants (N = 328) from three institutions across two countries completed responses five times per day for three days. They indicated whether or not they had experienced any religious or political worldview disagreement and completed indicators of their emotional responses, well-being, and humanity-esteem. Results indicated that across most indicators, religious orientation does not moderate the effects of worldview disagreement. Rather, regardless of religious orientation, people responded similarly. We discuss implications and suggestions for future research.","PeriodicalId":47234,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for the Psychology of Religion","volume":"30 1","pages":"231 - 242"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2020-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10508619.2020.1744317","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"59730686","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 3

Attachment to God and Religious Coping as Mediators in the Relation between Immigration Distress and Life Satisfaction among Korean Americans 对上帝的依恋与宗教应对在韩裔美国人移民困境与生活满意度关系中的中介作用

IF 2.2 2区哲学

International Journal for the Psychology of Religion Pub Date : 2020-04-23 DOI: 10.1080/10508619.2020.1748295

C. Kim, Sangwon Kim, Fran C. Blumberg

{"title":"Attachment to God and Religious Coping as Mediators in the Relation between Immigration Distress and Life Satisfaction among Korean Americans","authors":"C. Kim, Sangwon Kim, Fran C. Blumberg","doi":"10.1080/10508619.2020.1748295","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10508619.2020.1748295","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT We investigated the effect of immigration distress on Korean Americans’ life satisfaction, using attachment to God and religious coping as mediators. A sample of 214 participants was recruited from urban ethnic churches in various states, and they responded to online or offline surveys. There were two serial multiple mediation models (Models A and B) developed based on the attachment system activation model and empirical evidence. Each of the models included a pair of the two mediators: avoidant attachment to God and positive religious coping for Model A, and anxious attachment to God and negative religious coping for Model B. We initially examined the overall model fit as well as the direct and indirect effects using AMOS 21. Upon finding significant aggregated indirect effects, we examined individual indirect effects using the PROCESS macro for SPSS. Results demonstrated that Model A showed a poor model fit and Model B showed a good model fit to the observed data. Serial multiple mediation analyses provided some support for our conceptualization that distress activates the attachment to God system as an internal working model that is translated into religious coping as attachment behavior. As expected in Model B, distress was inversely associated with life satisfaction through anxious attachment to God and negative religious coping. Model A demonstrated rather complicated relations. The implications of cultural, theoretical, and methodological issues, with special regard to attachment to God and religious coping in Korean Americans as immigrants, were discussed.","PeriodicalId":47234,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for the Psychology of Religion","volume":"30 1","pages":"304 - 321"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2020-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10508619.2020.1748295","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42514607","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 4

The Memorability of Supernatural Concepts: Effects of Minimal Counterintuitiveness, Moral Valence, and Existential Anxiety on Recall 超自然概念的记忆:最小反直觉性、道德效价和存在焦虑对回忆的影响

IF 2.2 2区哲学

International Journal for the Psychology of Religion Pub Date : 2020-04-20 DOI: 10.31234/osf.io/qdh8y

J. Beebe, Leigh Duffy

{"title":"The Memorability of Supernatural Concepts: Effects of Minimal Counterintuitiveness, Moral Valence, and Existential Anxiety on Recall","authors":"J. Beebe, Leigh Duffy","doi":"10.31234/osf.io/qdh8y","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/qdh8y","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Within the cognitive science of religion, some scholars hypothesize (1) that minimally counterintuitive (MCI) concepts enjoy a transmission advantage over both intuitive and highly counterintuitive concepts, (2) that religions concern counterintuitive agents, objects, or events, and (3) that the transmission advantage of MCI concepts makes them more likely to be found in the world’s religions than other kinds of concepts. We hypothesized that the memorability of many MCI supernatural concepts was due in large part to other characteristics they possess, such as their frequent and salient association with moral concerns and the alleviation of existential anxieties, and that without such characteristics they would fail to be memorable. We report the results of three experiments designed to test the relative contributions of minimal counterintuitiveness, moral valence, and existential anxiety to the memorability of supernatural ideas. We observed no main effects for minimal counterintuitiveness but did observe main effects for both moral valence and existential anxiety. We also found that these effects did not seem to stem from the greater visualizability of morally valenced concepts or concepts that concerned existential anxieties. These findings challenge important claims made by leading researchers regarding MCI concepts within the cognitive science of religion.","PeriodicalId":47234,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for the Psychology of Religion","volume":"30 1","pages":"322 - 341"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2020-04-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41780000","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 3