Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis最新文献_第5页

Capacity Building as an Instrument of Institutional Reform: Improving the Quality of Higher Education through Academic Audits in the UK, New Zealand, Sweden, and Hong Kong 能力建设作为机构改革的工具:通过英国、新西兰、瑞典和香港的学术审计提高高等教育质量

IF 3.3 3区管理学

Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis Pub Date : 2000-10-01 DOI: 10.1080/13876980008412643

D. Dill

引用次数: 64

The Rhetoric of Educational Reform 教育改革的修辞

IF 3.3 3区管理学

Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis Pub Date : 2000-10-01 DOI: 10.1080/13876980008412642

B. Levin, Jonathan C. Young

引用次数: 21

Information and Environmental Policy: A Tale of Two Agencies 信息与环境政策:两个机构的故事

IF 3.3 3区管理学

Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis Pub Date : 2000-10-01 DOI: 10.1080/13876980008412641

John A. Hoornbeek

引用次数: 16

Examining Changes in Settlement Policies for Immigrants: The Israeli Case 审视移民定居政策的变化:以以色列为例

IF 3.3 3区管理学

Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis Pub Date : 2000-08-23 DOI: 10.1080/13876980008412644

J. Gal, Elazer Leshem

{"title":"Examining Changes in Settlement Policies for Immigrants: The Israeli Case","authors":"J. Gal, Elazer Leshem","doi":"10.1080/13876980008412644","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13876980008412644","url":null,"abstract":"Settlement policies for immigrants seek to provide services for the needs of the newcomers during their initial stay in their new country. These services can be differentiated by the degree of discretion clients have over the manner in which the services are provided, i.e., in the form of in-kind or cash benefits, and by the conditions linked to receipt of these services. In recent years, the Israeli government has implemented an unusually liberal and relatively generous settlement policy that provides virtually unconditional cash benefits to immigrants. An examination of the decision-making process surrounding the adoption of this unique policy indicates that it can be linked to the need to deal with the mass influx of Soviet Jews during the early 1990s, power struggles between the agencies charged with immigrant integration, and the dominant Zionist and free market values of the decision-makers. This study of the settlement policy adopted in Israel during the 1990s not only can contribute to a better understanding of the decision-making process involved in social policy formulation but, on a more practical level, can serve as a model of dealing with immigrants that may be of relevance to other welfare states.","PeriodicalId":47229,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis","volume":"2 1","pages":"235-255"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2000-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/13876980008412644","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"60015100","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 9

Arenas as Institutional Sites for Policymaking: Patterns and Effects in Comparative Perspective 竞技场作为政策制定的制度场所:比较视角下的模式与效果

IF 3.3 3区管理学

Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis Pub Date : 2000-04-27 DOI: 10.1080/13876980108412665

A. Timmermans

引用次数: 56

Placing Welfare States: The Netherlands as a Crucial Test Case 安置福利国家:荷兰作为一个关键的测试案例

IF 3.3 3区管理学

Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis Pub Date : 2000-04-01 DOI: 10.1080/13876980008412635

R. Goodin, Anneloes Smitsman

引用次数: 25

Winners, Losers, and Efficiency: Achieving Multiple Goals in Japan's Financial System Reforms 赢家、输家和效率:实现日本金融体制改革的多重目标

IF 3.3 3区管理学

Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis Pub Date : 2000-04-01 DOI: 10.1080/13876980008412634

C. Weare, E. Smolensky

{"title":"Winners, Losers, and Efficiency: Achieving Multiple Goals in Japan's Financial System Reforms","authors":"C. Weare, E. Smolensky","doi":"10.1080/13876980008412634","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13876980008412634","url":null,"abstract":"When giving policy advice, economists often proceed as if efficiency is the only valid social goal. Although efficiency is important, we argue that single-minded pursuit of it is counterproductive. It unnecessarily erects political hurdles to the enactment of efficiency-enhancing reforms because policy proposals that ignore valid, nonefficiency concerns are more likely to meet political and bureaucratic resistance. Moreover, such resistance may be avoided. A number of design principals can be employed to craft proposals that address political goals without abandoning efficiency. We describe three classes of principles: creative design of market mechanisms, maintenance of marginal incentives, and compensation for losers.We then illustrate their practical application in the context of Japanese financial-sector deregulation. This policy area usefully illustrates the importance of considering multiple goals in policy design. While efficiency is a frequently expressed goal, Japan's continued policy paralysis indicates that the bureaucratic and political goals of major stakeholders make the straightforward deregulation of financial markets difficult to achieve. We do not purport to resolve the entrenched barriers to economic reform in Japan, but to the extent that we identify and address valid nonefficiency goals, the conclusions of the analysis are relevant.","PeriodicalId":47229,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis","volume":"17 1","pages":"9-37"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2000-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/13876980008412634","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"60014948","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 2

Federalism, Political Structure, and Public Policy in the United States and Canada 美国和加拿大的联邦制、政治结构和公共政策

IF 3.3 3区管理学

Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis Pub Date : 2000-04-01 DOI: 10.1080/13876980008412636

B. Radin, J. Boase

{"title":"Federalism, Political Structure, and Public Policy in the United States and Canada","authors":"B. Radin, J. Boase","doi":"10.1080/13876980008412636","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13876980008412636","url":null,"abstract":"Two of the three large countries on the North American continent—the United States and Canada—share a number of similarities that often make it difficult for the untrained observer to differentiate between the two nations. On the surface, the two are structured similarly as federal systems that, by definition, exhibit shared power between the national government and provincial or state political entities.Although there are other important social and economic characteristics of the two countries that help explain differences in policy processes and outcomes, it is the contention of this article that one gets the clearest sense of what Elazar has called “thinking federal” by utilizing an analytical approach that joins questions related to federalism with some conceptual frameworks of the public policy field. Two frameworks undergird the argument in this article—the Lowi typology of different types of policies and Deil Wright's typology of different models that describe the American inter-governmental system.In both countries, policies must be sensitive to the greater interdependencies between units of government as well as to linkages between policy areas. The mechanisms or instrumentalities for dealing with policy issues are intrinsically complex. It is also clear that the intergovernmental networks that exist in both the U.S. and Canada are composed of an array of actors. The differing political structures of the systems do impact the types of intergovernmental policies that have emerged in the two countries. The executive dominance so imbedded in Canadian governments has contributed to their ability to adopt and implement certain controversial redistributive policies, such as a national health insurance program. By contrast, the fragmentation of the U.S. system makes redistributive policies more difficult.","PeriodicalId":47229,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis","volume":"2 1","pages":"65-89"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2000-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/13876980008412636","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"60015003","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 22

Well-Being in the Welfare State: Level Not Higher, Distribution Not More Equitable 福利国家的幸福:水平不高，分配不公平

IF 3.3 3区管理学

Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis Pub Date : 2000-01-01 DOI: 10.1023/A:1010058615425

R. Veenhoven

引用次数: 52

Editor's Introduction 编辑器的介绍

IF 3.3 3区管理学

Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis Pub Date : 2000-01-01 DOI: 10.1023/A:1011436816502

M. Luger

引用次数: 0