{"title":"The effects of work division and technology on auditor engagement and performance","authors":"Christopher A. Pearson","doi":"10.1111/ijau.12367","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ijau.12367","url":null,"abstract":"<p>In this study, I report the results of an experiment that considers how inexperienced auditors respond to work division and whether they respond to work differently when they divide it with technology instead of a colleague. Although work division may benefit audit efficiency and effectiveness, prior research suggests potentially worse performance when auditors divide work with their colleagues. However, the underlying mechanisms driving these adverse effects are unclear. Likewise, it is unclear whether findings extend to settings where auditors divide work with technology instead of their colleagues. Using a 3 × 1 between-subjects experiment that uses accounting students as proxies for inexperienced auditors, I find significantly worse performance when auditors divide work with a colleague compared with when they divide work with a technological tool or complete work independently. Additional analysis indicates that work division indirectly impacts performance through engagement, as experimental participants were less likely to engage with their work when it involved a colleague compared with when it involved technology or themselves. This study contributes by documenting how work division affects auditor performance, particularly how inexperienced auditors respond to work division involving technology compared with when involving a human colleague.</p>","PeriodicalId":47092,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Auditing","volume":"29 1","pages":"229-241"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2024-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143111756","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Dongliang Yuan, Xiaojuan Yang, Rong Qin, Jianglong Yu
{"title":"Financial report readability and audit fees: Evidence from China","authors":"Dongliang Yuan, Xiaojuan Yang, Rong Qin, Jianglong Yu","doi":"10.1111/ijau.12366","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ijau.12366","url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study investigates the impact of the readability of financial reports on audit fees. Moreover, it explores how various contextual factors affect the relationship between readability and audit fees from the perspectives of information provision, transmission and reception. Considering listed firms in the Chinese market, this study demonstrates the significant negative effect of financial report readability on audit fees. However, this association is weakened by annual report similarity, the board secretary's social capital and auditors' industry expertise. Furthermore, this study demonstrates that audit fees increase because of both prolonged audit delays and information asymmetry resulting from low readability. By presenting empirical evidence to substantiate the rationale and necessity for enhanced textual readability requirements, this research can provide valuable insights for corporations to improve the effectiveness of their information communication to external stakeholders, which is very important for enhancing financial report quality and aligns with the primary focus of standard setters.</p>","PeriodicalId":47092,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Auditing","volume":"29 1","pages":"207-228"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2024-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143114177","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Tina Vuko, Sergeja Slapničar, Marko Čular, Matej Drašček
{"title":"Key drivers of cybersecurity audit effectiveness: A neo-institutional perspective","authors":"Tina Vuko, Sergeja Slapničar, Marko Čular, Matej Drašček","doi":"10.1111/ijau.12365","DOIUrl":"10.1111/ijau.12365","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The aim of this paper is to analyse which factors explain the effectiveness of internal audit in providing assurance about cybersecurity risk management. On the basis of neo-institutional theory, we hypothesize that coercive (cybersecurity regulation), normative (professionalization of internal auditors and Boards) and mimetic forces (outsourcing of cyber security assurance services) positively contribute to cybersecurity audit (CSA) effectiveness. As these forces do not come about in an interest free model, we study the role of and the interaction with other actors who shape the CSA practices—Boards and security experts. We hypothesize that Board's support to CSA and the level of internal auditors' cooperation with the first and the second line of defence positively affect CSA effectiveness. To test our hypothesis, we conducted a survey involving IT auditors and Chief Audit Executives from various industries, organizations of different sizes and countries. We examined the hypothesized relationships in a series of regression analyses. We find that normative forces (professionalization of the internal auditors and Boards' competences), Board's support to CSA and cooperation between the internal audit function (IAF) and the first two line of defence significantly explain the CSA effectiveness. We find no support for the effect of regulation as a coercive force and outsourcing as a mimetic force. We discuss potential reasons for our findings and their implications. The paper is an original analysis that advances our understanding of key drivers of CSA effectiveness and their relationships.</p>","PeriodicalId":47092,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Auditing","volume":"29 1","pages":"188-206"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2024-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ijau.12365","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141775725","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Fresh-look effect of audit firm and audit partner rotations? Evidence from European key audit matters","authors":"Florian Philipp Federsel","doi":"10.1111/ijau.12364","DOIUrl":"10.1111/ijau.12364","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Many countries worldwide mandate the rotation of audit partners or audit firms to reinforce independence and professional skepticism. The European Union is a rare instance requiring audit firm and audit partner rotation simultaneously. By analysing 6,103 firm-year observations of non-financial firms from 29 European countries between 2018 and 2022, this study finds that audit firm rotations are associated with considerable changes in key audit matters, suggesting the existence of a fresh-look effect. In contrast, audit partner rotations appear to induce only limited variations in the key audit areas. Additional analyses reveal that the results are consistent across mandatory and voluntary rotations. Collectively, the findings suggest that audit firm rotations enable auditors to overcome institutional pressures toward standardisation within audit firms, while practical considerations such as the requirement of gradual rotation mechanisms within audit firms might limit individual audit partners' influence. This study adds to the inconclusive literature on the effects of (mandatory) audit partner and audit firm rotations. Further, the results contribute new insights into the consequences of the EU audit reform that has introduced mandatory audit firm rotation and provide evidence in favour of audit firm rotation requirements for other regulators.</p>","PeriodicalId":47092,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Auditing","volume":"29 1","pages":"160-187"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2024-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ijau.12364","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141744304","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"The Big 4 effect for new audit services: The case of the Danish COVID-19 fixed-cost business-support scheme","authors":"Morten Holm, Thomas Riise Johansen","doi":"10.1111/ijau.12363","DOIUrl":"10.1111/ijau.12363","url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study investigates the Big 4 effect for a new-to-the-world audit service. Based on unique data from the Danish COVID-19 fixed cost support scheme we analyse differences in audit fees and two measures of audit quality across Big 4 and non-Big 4 engagements. Our findings suggest that firms engaging with Big 4 auditors experience more successful outcomes in the application process and are willing to pay a Big 4 premium for comparable assurance services. Clients of Big 4 auditors are, on average, more likely to receive full compensation, and experience fewer rejections during the application process than clients of non-Big 4 auditors. This research has implications for policymakers and companies.</p>","PeriodicalId":47092,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Auditing","volume":"29 1","pages":"136-159"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2024-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ijau.12363","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141609049","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Are there audit fee premiums for client portfolio management?","authors":"Stuart D. Taylor","doi":"10.1111/ijau.12361","DOIUrl":"10.1111/ijau.12361","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Auditing is a credence good so its quality cannot be determined directly. The gain or loss of large clients is one publicly available signal that can used by other clients to ascertain the quality provided by audit firms. This paper examines whether this quality signal results in firms earning fee premiums and discounts. Empirical examination of a sample of 16,233 firm-years of listed Australian companies for the period 2011–2021 shows that there is an association between offices and industry groups that gain and lose large clients, in both the current and previous periods, and economically significant fee premiums for both Big-4 and non-Big-4 firms. These results suggest that clients can use auditor portfolio changes as quality signals and that they appear to reward firms that gain large clients and prune their portfolios of poor clients, particularly if these changes are in the same industry as the client.</p>","PeriodicalId":47092,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Auditing","volume":"29 1","pages":"111-135"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2024-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ijau.12361","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141546973","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Regulatory intensity and audit fees","authors":"Hongkang Xu","doi":"10.1111/ijau.12362","DOIUrl":"10.1111/ijau.12362","url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study employs the measurement of the cost of compliance with all federal paperwork regulations to examine the association between regulatory intensity and audit fees at the company level. Using a sample of US companies from 2003 to 2019, I find that regulatory intensity is positively associated with audit fees, suggesting that firms facing a heavier burden of regulatory compliance tend to incur higher audit fees. The findings are supported by various robustness tests. I also document a positive association between regulatory intensity and audit report lag. Moreover, I find that the positive relation between regulatory intensity and audit fees is more pronounced among firms in high-litigation industries, which are typically subject to elevated litigation risks. This study contributes to the existing literature by providing new evidence on the relationship between regulatory intensity and audit fees, utilizing a novel and rigorous measure that captures the intensity of a broad range of regulations.</p>","PeriodicalId":47092,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Auditing","volume":"29 1","pages":"92-110"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2024-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141501658","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"External auditing arrangements of smaller authorities in England","authors":"Katarzyna Lakoma, Peter Murphy, Angela Toothill","doi":"10.1111/ijau.12360","DOIUrl":"10.1111/ijau.12360","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Less complex entities (LCEs) make a critical contribution to the public, private and voluntary sectors in England and internationally and account for the great majority of all local public audits. Recently, the role and objectives of financial reporting and external auditing in England have been subject to unprecedented criticism through a number of independent national reports. This paper discusses the auditing arrangements for LCEs in the public sector in England by examining the evidence generated by the local public audit review by Sir Tony Redmond. It discusses implications for the local public audit regime and considers whether the existing and proposed accountability and transparency arrangements are compatible with the new International Standard on Auditing (ISA) for LCEs. It contributes to the limited research on the new ISA for LCEs by investigating the differences and similarities between the new ISA for LCEs and the emerging auditing standards for English LCEs.</p>","PeriodicalId":47092,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Auditing","volume":"28 4","pages":"792-805"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2024-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ijau.12360","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141501657","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Setting auditing standards: Analysis of a writing process","authors":"Isabelle Fabioux","doi":"10.1111/ijau.12355","DOIUrl":"10.1111/ijau.12355","url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study investigates the work of actually writing auditing standards in France, a country that has not adopted the International Standards on Auditing (ISAs). Based on interviews, participant observation, and documentary study, I highlight the adaptation work carried out to develop French standards, with a transposition mechanism that goes far beyond simply translating ISAs. I emphasise the significant impact of legalism and the principle of hierarchy of norms. I also illustrate the writing conventions used to set standards that are clear and understandable for a wide range of stakeholders. My results show that every word counts in standard-setting work, which makes it an iterative process involving experts in standard-setting technique. This study opens the black box of standard-setters' work and offers a new perspective for analysis of standard setting by considering it as a writing process.</p>","PeriodicalId":47092,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Auditing","volume":"28 4","pages":"772-791"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2024-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ijau.12355","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141374489","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Audit team diversity, work quality and affective state outcomes","authors":"Alice Annelin, Tobias Svanström","doi":"10.1111/ijau.12354","DOIUrl":"10.1111/ijau.12354","url":null,"abstract":"<p>This paper investigates the audit team outcomes of team diversity. Diversity theory suggests that diversity can benefit a team's work quality if the variety of team characteristics improves decision-making and performance. However, team diversity can have harmful affective outcomes if team members separate into different categories, and thus they feel stressed, intend to leave the profession or experience conflict between team members. We investigated this paradox in team diversity in an audit context at a Big 4 audit firm in Sweden, which provided proprietary team data. In addition, 335 individuals from 185 different audit teams responded to a questionnaire. Each participant responded to a survey about their experience with one specific engagement. Results indicated that team diversity benefits the audit team's affective outcomes of role stress, satisfaction and turnover intentions. However, diverse teams also reduce some audit teams' work quality outcomes, such as dysfunctional behaviour, performance, effort and perceptions of audit quality.</p>","PeriodicalId":47092,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Auditing","volume":"28 4","pages":"743-771"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2024-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ijau.12354","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141192922","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}