Surveillance & Society最新文献_第3页

Participatory Security and Punitive Agency: Acclimation to Homeland Surveillance in the United States 参与式安全和惩罚性机构:对美国国土监视的适应

IF 2

Surveillance & Society Pub Date : 2021-09-21 DOI: 10.24908/ss.v19i3.15024

M. Ward

引用次数: 0

Democracy's Savior or Citizen Spy? 民主的救世主还是公民间谍?

IF 2

Surveillance & Society Pub Date : 2021-09-21 DOI: 10.24908/ss.v19i3.15015

Robert Tynes

引用次数: 0

Surveillance Punitivism: Colonialism, Racism, and State Terrorism in Spain 监视惩罚主义：西班牙的殖民主义、种族主义和国家恐怖主义

IF 2

Surveillance & Society Pub Date : 2021-09-21 DOI: 10.24908/ss.v19i3.15009

Aitor Jiménez, Ekaitz Cancela

引用次数: 1

Review of Johnson’s Spy Watching: Intelligence Accountability in the United States 约翰逊间谍监视述评：美国的情报问责制

IF 2

Surveillance & Society Pub Date : 2021-09-21 DOI: 10.24908/ss.v19i3.15037

Reg Whitaker

引用次数: 0

Imagining Impact in Global Supply Chains: Data-Driven Sustainability and the Production of Surveillable Space 想象全球供应链的影响：数据驱动的可持续性和可监控空间的生产

IF 2

Surveillance & Society Pub Date : 2021-09-21 DOI: 10.24908/ss.v19i3.14256

Matthew Archer

引用次数: 3

Immaterial Support: Whiteness, Stings, and the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act 非物质支持:白人、毒刺、反恐怖主义和有效死刑法案

IF 2

Surveillance & Society Pub Date : 2021-09-21 DOI: 10.24908/ss.v19i3.15030

Zackary N. Parker

引用次数: 0

Review of Sethna and Hewitt’s Just Watch Us: RCMP Surveillance of the Women’s Liberation Movement in Cold War Canada Sethna和Hewitt的Just Watch Us:加拿大皇家骑警对冷战时期加拿大妇女解放运动的监视

IF 2

Surveillance & Society Pub Date : 2021-09-21 DOI: 10.24908/ss.v19i3.15002

E. Arsenault

引用次数: 0

State Surveillance of Violent Extremism and Threats of White Supremacist Violence in Sweden 瑞典国家对暴力极端主义的监控和白人至上主义的暴力威胁

IF 2

Surveillance & Society Pub Date : 2021-09-21 DOI: 10.24908/ss.v19i3.15025

Amir Rostami, Tina Askanius

引用次数: 2

Introduction Domestic Terrorism, White Supremacy, and State Surveillance 国内恐怖主义、白人至上主义和国家监视

IF 2

Surveillance & Society Pub Date : 2021-09-21 DOI: 10.24908/ss.v19i3.15029

B. Newell

引用次数: 1

Procedural Justice Concerns and Technologically Mediated Interactions with Legal Authorities 程序正义关注与技术媒介与法律权威的互动

IF 2

Surveillance & Society Pub Date : 2021-09-21 DOI: 10.24908/ss.v19i3.14112

A. Saulnier, D. Sivasubramaniam

{"title":"Procedural Justice Concerns and Technologically Mediated Interactions with Legal Authorities","authors":"A. Saulnier, D. Sivasubramaniam","doi":"10.24908/ss.v19i3.14112","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.24908/ss.v19i3.14112","url":null,"abstract":"The use of surveillance technologies by legal authorities has intensified in recent years. As new data collection technologies expand into law enforcement spaces previously dominated by interpersonal interactions, questions emerge about whether the public will evaluate interpersonal and technologically mediated interactions with legal authorities in the same ways. In an analysis guided by procedural justice theory, we examine whether and how legal authorities’ use of decision-making technology affects public evaluations of an authority-subordinate interaction and its outcome in the context of airport border crossings. Using an experimental vignette design (N = 278), we varied whether an encounter between a traveller and border security “agent” that produced a secondary search was described as interpersonal (conducted by a human agent) or technologically mediated (conducted by a machine agent). We also varied the traveller’s group membership relative to the nation-state, describing the traveller as either born in the country in question and a member of the nation’s most common racial group (in-group) or not born in the country and a racial minority (out-group). Both encounter type and group membership independently affected perceptions of the interaction (procedural justice judgements) and its outcome (distributive justice judgments). Technologically mediated encounters improved perceptions of procedural and distributive justice. Further, procedural justice judgments mediated the relationship between encounter type and distributive justice, demonstrating how perceptions of interactions influence perceptions of the outcomes of those interactions. Out-group members were evaluated as having worse experiences across all measures. The findings underscore the importance of extending tests of procedural justice theory beyond interpersonal interactions to technologically mediated interactions.","PeriodicalId":47078,"journal":{"name":"Surveillance & Society","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2021-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44372093","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1