Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy最新文献_第9页

Political realism and the relationship between ideal and non-ideal theory 政治现实主义与理想与非理想理论的关系

IF 0.8

Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy Pub Date : 2022-09-12 DOI: 10.1080/13698230.2022.2120657

G. Favara

{"title":"Political realism and the relationship between ideal and non-ideal theory","authors":"G. Favara","doi":"10.1080/13698230.2022.2120657","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13698230.2022.2120657","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT When interest in political realism started to resurge a few years ago, it was not uncommon to interpret realist political theory as a form of non-ideal theorising. This reading has been subjected to extensive criticism. First, realists have argued that political realism cannot be interpreted as merely a form of applied political theory. Second, realists have explained that political realism can defend a role for unfeasible normative prescriptions in political theory. I explain that these developments, besides allowing us to reject interpretations of political realism as a form of non-ideal theory, have given us reason to think of political realism as a form of ideal theory. Yet, when ideal theory enters the picture, a series of methodological questions arise regarding the proper use of ideals. In this paper, I clarify how the relationship between ideal and non-ideal theory ought to be conceptualised in realist political theory. I examine the two major interpretations of the role of ideals that have been provided so far – the target and benchmark interpretations – and I show that neither is compatible with some of the fundamental theoretical commitments of realist political theory. This both allows me to point out the requirements that an interpretation of the relationship between ideal and non-ideal theory must meet to be defined as properly realist and allows me to emphasise the strengths of the realist approach. Accordingly, I propose a new interpretation of the role of ideals, one consistent with realist theoretical commitments: I suggest that realist political ideals ought to be interpreted as models.","PeriodicalId":46451,"journal":{"name":"Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy","volume":"26 1","pages":"376 - 397"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2022-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48225719","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

Data based radicalism? data usage and the problem of critical distance in contextual and empirical political theory 基于数据的激进主义?语境与实证政治理论中的数据使用与临界距离问题

IF 0.8

Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy Pub Date : 2022-09-08 DOI: 10.1080/13698230.2022.2121519

Nahshon Perez

引用次数: 0

Can business corporations be legally responsible for structural injustice? The social connection model in (legal) practice 商业公司能对结构性不公正承担法律责任吗？（法律）实践中的社会联系模式

IF 0.8

Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy Pub Date : 2022-09-07 DOI: 10.1080/13698230.2022.2120732

Barbara Bziuk

引用次数: 1

Is political realism barren?: normativity and story-telling 政治现实主义是贫瘠的吗?:规范性和讲故事

IF 0.8

Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy Pub Date : 2022-09-06 DOI: 10.1080/13698230.2022.2120658

Nat Rutherford

{"title":"Is political realism barren?: normativity and story-telling","authors":"Nat Rutherford","doi":"10.1080/13698230.2022.2120658","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13698230.2022.2120658","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Political realism has been criticised for its methodological claims about normativity and for its criticisms of moralism. Realists themselves should be more concerned that for all its methodological wrangling, realists have struggled to produce much positive theorising, rendering realism barren. I argue that realism, in both its liberal and radical forms, is currently barren in the sense of being unproductive, and show how the two dominant forms of realism are barren in different ways. Bernard Williams’s liberal realism exclusively derives its normative resources from existing political practices, values, and institutions, which leads it to replicate the status quo and precludes external criticism. Radical realism, represented here by Raymond Geuss, is barren because the fear of succumbing to moralism or ‘normativism’ leads radical realists to wrongly abjure normativity altogether. Having shown that both forms of realism are barren I argue that radical realists should adopt a method of political theory as story-telling as a way to avoid both moralism and barrenness. While realists are right to be wary of normative prescription, I argue that realists need to tell a story about which political transformations are desirable and why or else risk succumbing barrenness. I give a brief illustration of story-telling in practice then address some objections to story-telling as a productive method.","PeriodicalId":46451,"journal":{"name":"Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy","volume":"26 1","pages":"398 - 417"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2022-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47657791","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Gentrification as domination 作为统治的绅士化

IF 0.8

Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy Pub Date : 2022-09-05 DOI: 10.1080/13698230.2022.2119523

David Jenkins

引用次数: 2

Data-owning democracy or digital socialism? 拥有数据的民主还是数字社会主义?

IF 0.8

Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy Pub Date : 2022-09-05 DOI: 10.1080/13698230.2022.2120737

J. Muldoon

引用次数: 3

Introduction: corporate power and political domination 引言：公司权力和政治统治

IF 0.8

Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy Pub Date : 2022-08-31 DOI: 10.1080/13698230.2022.2113228

C. Neuhäuser, Andreas Oldenbourg

引用次数: 0

Firms as coalitions of democratic cultures: towards an organizational theory of workplace democracy 企业作为民主文化的联盟：走向职场民主的组织理论

IF 0.8

Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy Pub Date : 2022-08-30 DOI: 10.1080/13698230.2022.2113225

Roberto Frega

引用次数: 3

Business interest in human rights regulation: shaping actors’ duties and rights 人权监管中的商业利益：塑造行为者的义务和权利

IF 0.8

Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy Pub Date : 2022-08-23 DOI: 10.1080/13698230.2022.2113226

D. Fuchs, Benedikt Lennartz

引用次数: 1

Corporate knowledge and corporate power. Reining in the power of corporations as epistemic agents 企业知识和企业力量。企业作为认识主体的权力约束

IF 0.8

Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy Pub Date : 2022-08-21 DOI: 10.1080/13698230.2022.2113227

Lisa Herzog

引用次数: 0