European Security最新文献_第10页

Silencing the contestant. Legitimizing Crimea’s annexation by mimicking the West 让选手安静下来。模仿西方，使吞并克里米亚合法化

IF 1.6 2区社会学

European Security Pub Date : 2020-01-02 DOI: 10.1080/09662839.2019.1688303

Vasile K. Rotaru

引用次数: 4

Unity in the face of threat? Exploring the empirical relationship between strategic threat perceptions and public support for a common European army in Germany 面对威胁团结一致?探索战略威胁感知与公众对德国共同欧洲军队的支持之间的实证关系

IF 1.6 2区社会学

European Security Pub Date : 2020-01-02 DOI: 10.1080/09662839.2019.1704267

Tim Graf

{"title":"Unity in the face of threat? Exploring the empirical relationship between strategic threat perceptions and public support for a common European army in Germany","authors":"Tim Graf","doi":"10.1080/09662839.2019.1704267","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09662839.2019.1704267","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Perceptions of threat from Russia’s military activities in Ukraine and President Trump’s critical attitude towards NATO have put the idea of a common European army on the agenda of European politics. Do these strategic threat perceptions also influence public support for the creation of a common European army? Previous research has largely overlooked strategic threat perceptions as individual-level determinants of public support for a common European army. This article explores the empirical relationship between strategic threat perceptions and support for a common European army at the individual level of analysis with representative German survey data from 2018. The multivariate analysis shows that perceiving Russia’s military activities in Ukraine as a threat to Germany’s security, and U.S. foreign and security policy as a threat to the cohesion of NATO significantly increases support for the creation of a common European army, even when the influence of numerous other determinants is controlled for. The findings highlight the importance of considering strategic threat perceptions in future analyses of public opinion on European defence cooperation and integration.","PeriodicalId":46331,"journal":{"name":"European Security","volume":"29 1","pages":"55 - 73"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2020-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/09662839.2019.1704267","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44820479","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 9

The evolution of the European Union’s failed approach to Afghanistan 欧盟在阿富汗问题上失败做法的演变

IF 1.6 2区社会学

European Security Pub Date : 2020-01-02 DOI: 10.1080/09662839.2019.1679773

O. Hassan

{"title":"The evolution of the European Union’s failed approach to Afghanistan","authors":"O. Hassan","doi":"10.1080/09662839.2019.1679773","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09662839.2019.1679773","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article provides a genealogical account of European actorness in Afghanistan. It argues that European agreement towards facilitating modernisation and development in Afghanistan was initiated with aid and trade, evolving into humanitarianism in the 1990s, and reconstruction and democratisation in the 2000s. The European Union has had a positive impact on Afghanistan, focusing on humanitarianism, but its multilateral and programme level approach to reconstruction and democratisation has failed to meet the EU’s stated objectives. By promoting the flawed “Bonn Model”, the EU is proportionally culpable for failed international attempts to reconstruct Afghanistan; even though the United States has been the primary international actor. Drawing a series of broader lessons, such as tensions between Atlantic solidarity and European integration, and the limitations of the European crisis management, the article demonstrates how European policy has been shaped by crises inside Afghanistan and the larger geopolitical crises these have generated. These have contemporary importance as history suggests that as the US withdraws its commitment to Afghanistan, the EU will have a very significant role in attempting to fill a humanitarian vacuum.","PeriodicalId":46331,"journal":{"name":"European Security","volume":"29 1","pages":"74 - 95"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2020-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/09662839.2019.1679773","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45985661","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 5

The European Union’s approach to conflict resolution: transformation or regulation in the Western Balkans 欧洲联盟解决冲突的方法：西巴尔干地区的转型或监管

IF 1.6 2区社会学

European Security Pub Date : 2020-01-02 DOI: 10.1080/09662839.2019.1641696

Lorenzo Cladi

引用次数: 1

Europe and America: The End of the Transatlantic Relationship? 欧美:跨大西洋关系的终结?

IF 1.6 2区社会学

European Security Pub Date : 2020-01-02 DOI: 10.1080/09662839.2019.1649253

Jeremy W. Lamoreaux

引用次数: 1

Military operations and the EU’s identity as an international security actor 军事行动与欧盟作为国际安全行动者的身份

IF 1.6 2区社会学

European Security Pub Date : 2019-09-19 DOI: 10.1080/09662839.2019.1667769

T. Palm, B. Crum

引用次数: 18

Internal and external perceptions of small state security: the case of Estonia 小国安全的内部和外部看法:以爱沙尼亚为例

IF 1.6 2区社会学

European Security Pub Date : 2019-09-18 DOI: 10.1080/09662839.2019.1665517

Jana Wrange, Rikard Bengtsson

{"title":"Internal and external perceptions of small state security: the case of Estonia","authors":"Jana Wrange, Rikard Bengtsson","doi":"10.1080/09662839.2019.1665517","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09662839.2019.1665517","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article concerns small state security from a cognitive perspective and investigates Estonia as a security actor as perceived by all littoral Baltic Sea states. Drawing on unique elite survey and interview data, the article unpacks similarities and differences among internal (Estonian) and external perceptions of security, threats, and capabilities. The investigation is theoretically informed by research on perceptions, specifically image theory and role theory. Our analysis indicates that there are generally speaking quite similar perceptions among internal and external respondents regarding Estonia’s security situation, threat context, and the importance of EU and NATO membership. When it comes to capabilities in the security field, Estonian respondents have a somewhat more positive view than external respondents. Notably, Russian perceptions stand in stark contrast to those of others regarding most dimensions. Relating our results to previous research on national role conceptions, the perceptions we have explicated correspond to three distinct role conceptions – protectee/faithful ally, sub-system collaborator and regional leader.","PeriodicalId":46331,"journal":{"name":"European Security","volume":"28 1","pages":"449 - 472"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2019-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/09662839.2019.1665517","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42210115","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 9

British defence in the 21st century 21世纪的英国国防

IF 1.6 2区社会学

European Security Pub Date : 2019-08-28 DOI: 10.1080/09662839.2019.1657095

W. Rees

引用次数: 0

The double proximity paradox in peacebuilding: implementation and perception of the EU rule of law mission in Kosovo 建设和平中的双重接近悖论:欧盟在科索沃法治使命的实施与认知

IF 1.6 2区社会学

European Security Pub Date : 2019-08-05 DOI: 10.1080/09662839.2019.1649658

Kari M. Osland, Mateja Peter

{"title":"The double proximity paradox in peacebuilding: implementation and perception of the EU rule of law mission in Kosovo","authors":"Kari M. Osland, Mateja Peter","doi":"10.1080/09662839.2019.1649658","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09662839.2019.1649658","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This contribution increases the understanding of the EU's role in post-conflict settings by exploring perceptions of EULEX by local rule of law experts. Drawing on critical peacebuilding and the decline of normative power Europe literatures, we develop an analytical framework, underlining the importance of the intention–implementation gap and the implementation–perception gap in understanding how EU missions are perceived. By comparing local expert narratives to those of EULEX judges, prosecutors, and legal officers, we contend that the core problem for the negative perception of the mission results from what we call the double proximity paradox in peacebuilding. The first paradox is one of implementation and transpires when an actor commits substantial resources to address structural problems in a post-conflict territory due to its centrality for its own interests, but fails to uphold its commitment as its immediate interests can only be achieved through agents who contribute to these problems. The second paradox relates to perception and transpires as high commitments raise expectations of structural impact. The visibility of the actor's investment makes any implementation failures more tangible. The actor is therefore, paradoxically, the most open to criticism in a territory where it is doing the most.","PeriodicalId":46331,"journal":{"name":"European Security","volume":"28 1","pages":"493 - 512"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2019-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/09662839.2019.1649658","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42420983","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 5

Proving a negative: why deterrence does not work in the Baltics 证明一个否定:为什么威慑在波罗的海不起作用

IF 1.6 2区社会学

European Security Pub Date : 2019-07-11 DOI: 10.1080/09662839.2019.1637855

Matus Halas

{"title":"Proving a negative: why deterrence does not work in the Baltics","authors":"Matus Halas","doi":"10.1080/09662839.2019.1637855","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09662839.2019.1637855","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The increased Russian foreign policy assertiveness and the related security concerns associated with the Eastern Flank of NATO caused a revival of interest in European deterrence after more than two decades of neglect. Yet the absence of a military invasion into the Baltics does not necessarily imply a successful deterrent threat. Quite the contrary: a detailed analysis using Boolean logic suggests that deterrence does not really work in the Baltics, neither at the conventional, nor at the sub-conventional level. A lack of capabilities undermines the credibility of NATO’s conventional deterrence posture despite its clear effort to communicate the threat to the other side. The only reason why the lack of capabilities on the Eastern Flank has no negative consequences for the Alliance is because Russia has (currently) no need to advance its state interests by resorting to military force. At the same time, deterrence fails repeatedly at the sub-conventional level and it will probably continue to fail in the future. Incidents like the relocation of the Bronze Soldier Memorial in 2007, the kidnapping of a security officer in 2014 or the violations of airspace in 2018 can escalate to a full-blown crisis. Limiting the number of such incidents should be the main goal of the cumulative deterrence of hybrid threats.","PeriodicalId":46331,"journal":{"name":"European Security","volume":"28 1","pages":"431 - 448"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2019-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/09662839.2019.1637855","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42867735","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 8