European Security最新文献_第10页

Party politics and military deployments: explaining political consensus on Belgian military intervention 政党政治与军事部署:解释比利时军事干预的政治共识

IF 1.6 2区社会学

European Security Pub Date : 2021-09-02 DOI: 10.1080/09662839.2021.1970537

Tim Haesebrouck, Yf Reykers, Daan Fonck

引用次数: 4

Consolidating EU energy security by relying on energy de-politicisation 依靠能源去政治化巩固欧盟能源安全

IF 1.6 2区社会学

European Security Pub Date : 2021-09-01 DOI: 10.1080/09662839.2021.1970538

Javad Keypour, Ulkar Ahmadzada

引用次数: 4

Europe as a geoeconomic pivot: geography and the limits of US economic containment of China 欧洲作为地缘经济支点：地理与美国经济遏制中国的局限

IF 1.6 2区社会学

European Security Pub Date : 2021-08-24 DOI: 10.1080/09662839.2021.1969363

Dong Jung Kim

{"title":"Europe as a geoeconomic pivot: geography and the limits of US economic containment of China","authors":"Dong Jung Kim","doi":"10.1080/09662839.2021.1969363","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09662839.2021.1969363","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Intensifying strategic competition with China has introduced the need for the United States to consider extensive and stringent economic restrictions against the rising power. This article suggests that US economic containment of China is unlikely to materialise due to the presence of the EU states that are not militarily threatened by the geographically separated China and in a position to prioritise economic benefits in exchanges with that state. It first identifies the role of the EU in China’s foreign economic exchanges and addresses the ability of the EU states to replace the economic function of the United States in China. Then, it discusses how geographical conditions surrounding China make the rising state largely an East Asian threat. It suggests that, devoid of any direct military threat from China, the EU states can undermine the effectiveness of substantial US economic containment measures against China by functioning as alternative economic partners or facilitating China’s construction of alternative economic routes. Finally, this paper discusses the limitations in US ability to constrain the EU states’ economic exchanges with China. While concerns grow over Washington’s economic assertiveness against Beijing, the feasibility of a US-led upheaval in economic relations involving China should be carefully gauged.","PeriodicalId":46331,"journal":{"name":"European Security","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2021-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49235364","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 2

“And now we’re facing that reality too”: Brexit, ontological security, and intergenerational anxiety in the Irish border region “现在我们也面临着这个现实”：英国脱欧、本体论安全和爱尔兰边境地区的代际焦虑

IF 1.6 2区社会学

European Security Pub Date : 2021-07-18 DOI: 10.1080/09662839.2021.1949297

Ben Rosher

{"title":"“And now we’re facing that reality too”: Brexit, ontological security, and intergenerational anxiety in the Irish border region","authors":"Ben Rosher","doi":"10.1080/09662839.2021.1949297","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09662839.2021.1949297","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Though conspicuous by its absence in debates among the British political and media establishments during the EU referendum campaign, the Irish border has been the central feature of Brexit as the implications and complications of trying to “take back control of borders” have become apparent. Drawing on focus group data gathered between 2017 and 2019 I employ ontological security theory to investigate the impact that Brexit is having on residents and communities living in the central Irish border region. In particular, I draw on the work of David Carr to explore the social role of memory and narrative in ontological (in)security and how this has manifested in the border region throughout the Brexit process. I find that the uncertainties generated by Brexit have caused border residents to draw on anxiety-filled memories and narratives from the securitised border of the pre-Good Friday Agreement era which they then project onto and vicariously through the next generation who, in turn, embody these anxieties, creating intergenerational ontological insecurity. Brexit has reintroduced, if not the physical border, the psychological borders of the past.","PeriodicalId":46331,"journal":{"name":"European Security","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2021-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/09662839.2021.1949297","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49493821","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 6

German-UK defence cooperation amid Brexit: prospects for new bilateralism? 英国脱欧期间的德英防务合作：新双边主义的前景？

IF 1.6 2区社会学

European Security Pub Date : 2021-07-14 DOI: 10.1080/09662839.2021.1948402

Jana Urbanovská, Martin Chovančík, M. Meislová

引用次数: 3

A “hybrid offensive” in the Balkans? Russia and the EU-led Kosovo-Serb negotiations 在巴尔干半岛发动“混合攻势”?俄罗斯和欧盟领导的科索沃-塞尔维亚谈判

IF 1.6 2区社会学

European Security Pub Date : 2021-07-14 DOI: 10.1080/09662839.2021.1948837

Lance Davies

{"title":"A “hybrid offensive” in the Balkans? Russia and the EU-led Kosovo-Serb negotiations","authors":"Lance Davies","doi":"10.1080/09662839.2021.1948837","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09662839.2021.1948837","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Recent analysis has interpreted Russia’s approach to the EU-led dialogue between Kosovo and Serbia through the lens of its actions in Ukraine. This has been characterised as “hybrid warfare” designed to disrupt the negotiations to prevent the integration of the Balkans into Western institutions. This article examines whether Russian actions in Ukraine have signalled a recalibration of Russia’s response to the Kosovo issue based on a repudiation of the EU-led dialogue. This article argues that while Russia’s behaviour has been shaped by its growing competition with the Western powers, its approach has been ambiguous and driven by a range of humanitarian, legal and security-based arguments rooted in the context of the Kosovo problem. These arguments have emerged as important trends in Russia’s behaviour and can be traced to its response to the Kosovo conflict in 1999. This article shows that there has not been a complete recalibration in Russia’s policy towards the dialogue. Russia’s approach has shown both continuity with these trends and a growing politicisation accelerated by the sharp decline in Russia’s relations with the West since 2014. In a broader sense, this article questions the intent and form of Russia’s actions in Ukraine as an explanatory framework for Russia’s behaviour elsewhere.","PeriodicalId":46331,"journal":{"name":"European Security","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2021-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/09662839.2021.1948837","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49138462","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

Contradictory migration management? Differentiated security approaches to visa overstay and irregular border crossings in the European Union 矛盾的迁移管理？对欧盟签证逾期居留和非正常越境采取区别对待的安全措施

IF 1.6 2区社会学

European Security Pub Date : 2021-07-06 DOI: 10.1080/09662839.2021.1945038

Frida Hansen, J. Pettersson

{"title":"Contradictory migration management? Differentiated security approaches to visa overstay and irregular border crossings in the European Union","authors":"Frida Hansen, J. Pettersson","doi":"10.1080/09662839.2021.1945038","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09662839.2021.1945038","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT While the construction of migration as a security threat in Europe has been thoroughly examined, how different groups of migrants become targets of security concerns has not received similar attention. In its fight against irregular immigration, the European Union uses visa liberalisation agreements with neighbouring states as an incentive for cooperation on migration control. At a first glance, this strategy appears somewhat contradictory, as visa liberalisation potentially increases the share of visa overstayers among irregular migrants. Through analysis of the annual “Risk Analysis” reports between 2015 and 2020 published by EU’s border and migration management agency, FRONTEX, this article shows that visa overstay is routinely left out of the agency’s security concerns of irregular migration, thus rendering risk assessments asymmetrically occupied with irregular migration by means of “illegal entry”. Although visa overstayers are not conceptualised as threats to security in discourse on par with other categories of irregular migrants, we find that they are increasingly subjected to a rationale of surveillance and risk.","PeriodicalId":46331,"journal":{"name":"European Security","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2021-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/09662839.2021.1945038","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41259772","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 2

In the EDTIB we trust(?) 在EDTIB中，我们信任（？）

IF 1.6 2区社会学

European Security Pub Date : 2021-07-06 DOI: 10.1080/09662839.2021.1945037

C. Kollias, Panayiotis G. Tzeremes

引用次数: 7

The dog that did not bark: the EU and the clash between sovereignty and justice in the International Criminal Court 不叫的狗:欧盟和国际刑事法院主权与正义之间的冲突

IF 1.6 2区社会学

European Security Pub Date : 2021-07-03 DOI: 10.1080/09662839.2021.1947801

Oriol Costa, G. Collantes-Celador, Diego Badell

{"title":"The dog that did not bark: the EU and the clash between sovereignty and justice in the International Criminal Court","authors":"Oriol Costa, G. Collantes-Celador, Diego Badell","doi":"10.1080/09662839.2021.1947801","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09662839.2021.1947801","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT\u0000 The cosmopolitan character of the International Criminal Court (ICC) is not immune to the growing surge in the contestation of international institutions. The African Union’s reaction to the ICC decision to indict the then sitting heads of state of Sudan and Kenya, and the actions undertaken by the Trump Administration against the Court over possible investigations into Afghanistan and Palestine, are cases in point. This article explores what that surge has meant for intra-EU debates on its position towards the ICC. We present a two-fold argument based on an empirical analysis of key moments in the institutional development of the Court that coincide with the pre- and post-rise phases in the politicisation of international institutions. First, the level of agreement on the ICC within the EU has been grossly exaggerated. Second, despite bouts of disagreement, patterns of political conflict over the ICC within the EU remain constant. That is, there is recurrent polarisation, with a range of opinions on the intractable debate about Westphalian sovereignty vs. cosmopolitan justice, but no change in the other two dimensions of politicisation (salience and actor range).","PeriodicalId":46331,"journal":{"name":"European Security","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2021-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42946471","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

Politicisation of the European Foreign, security, and defence cooperation: the case of the EU’s Russian sanctions 欧洲外交、安全和防务合作的政治化:以欧盟对俄制裁为例

IF 1.6 2区社会学

European Security Pub Date : 2021-07-03 DOI: 10.1080/09662839.2021.1964474

Antonio Karlović, Dario Čepo, Katja Biedenkopf

{"title":"Politicisation of the European Foreign, security, and defence cooperation: the case of the EU’s Russian sanctions","authors":"Antonio Karlović, Dario Čepo, Katja Biedenkopf","doi":"10.1080/09662839.2021.1964474","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09662839.2021.1964474","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This paper examines the response of the members of the European Council towards the EU’s sanctions policy against Russia following the 2014 Russian occupation and annexation of Crimea and the continued Ukraine crisis. The case is analysed to answer the question on the traits of the politicisation of the EU’s Russia sanctions policy. Concretely, the main research question is: what does the interplay of actor range, salience, and polarisation tell us about politicisation of CFSP in the case of sanctions policy? The secondary research question deals with how actors interact when contesting a sanctions policy to boost their success. Considering that the European Council, as the main actor in CFSP, is something of a “black box”, the paper heuristically focuses on statements (N = 223) on the sanctions policy given by its members from March 2014 till the end of 2019. The analysis shows how the politicisation of the sanctions policy seemingly entrenched itself into EUFP politics after it skyrocketed and fell in the wake of Russia’s annexation of Crimea. Finally, a latent class analysis indicates the existence of two latent coalitions with opposing views on the sanctions policy.","PeriodicalId":46331,"journal":{"name":"European Security","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2021-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43798200","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 3