European Security最新文献_第10页

Between human rights and security concerns: politicisation of EU-Turkey and EU-Libya agreements on migration in national parliaments 在人权和安全问题之间：欧盟-土耳其和欧盟-利比亚国家议会移民协议的政治化

IF 1.6 2区社会学

European Security Pub Date : 2021-07-03 DOI: 10.1080/09662839.2021.1947804

Elodie Thevenin

{"title":"Between human rights and security concerns: politicisation of EU-Turkey and EU-Libya agreements on migration in national parliaments","authors":"Elodie Thevenin","doi":"10.1080/09662839.2021.1947804","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09662839.2021.1947804","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT For the past few decades, the increased perception of migration as an issue in Europe resulted in the development of the externalisation of the EU’s migration governance to third countries. EU-Turkey and EU-Libya cooperation frameworks on migration have in this perspective been established in the wake of the 2015 migration crisis and triggered major controversies. The agreements received fierce contestation from non-governmental and international actors, highlighting the poor protection of human rights through this management. This paper analyses the dynamics of politicisation of EU-Turkey and EU-Libya agreements on migration in domestic political discourse. A qualitative comparison between German, French and Polish parliamentary debates constitutes the main empirical basis of this research. The analysis focuses on the different patterns of politicisation with emphasis on contesting arguments. This paper examines members of parliaments’ stances on EU-Turkey and EU-Libya cooperation focusing on humanitarian and securitisation frames. Results demonstrate an uneven process of politicisation in national parliaments dependent on the robustness of parliamentary majority and political parties’ issue positions. Overall, the analysis of discourse on the two agreements clearly illustrates the prioritisation of security over human rights when it comes to migration management.","PeriodicalId":46331,"journal":{"name":"European Security","volume":"30 1","pages":"464 - 484"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2021-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41728545","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 3

How much unity do you need? Systemic contestation in EU foreign and security cooperation 你需要多少团结？欧盟对外安全合作中的系统性争论

IF 1.6 2区社会学

European Security Pub Date : 2021-07-03 DOI: 10.1080/09662839.2021.1947800

H. Maurer, Nicholas Wright

{"title":"How much unity do you need? Systemic contestation in EU foreign and security cooperation","authors":"H. Maurer, Nicholas Wright","doi":"10.1080/09662839.2021.1947800","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09662839.2021.1947800","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The Common Foreign & Security Policy (CFSP) is a transnational policy framework to deliver collective foreign policy and also to manage differences among member states. As such, it has always been dependent on their support. Since 2019, however, disagreement within this system is said to have reached a new level. Taking this political trend as our starting point, this article proposes a new, conceptual approach to understanding how contestation challenges the EU’s foreign policy cooperation system. While the majority of research focuses on disagreements in decision-making, we argue for a broader conceptualisation – systemic contestation. Drawing on norm contestation scholarship, we argue that systemic contestation manifests itself in two ways: as passive contestation, when member states disengage from and fail to take ownership of CFSP initiatives and their implementation; and as tacit contestation, when they fail to act when faced with the need to safeguard the system. This approach accounts for the transgovernmental character of the CFSP; and the central role of member states within it. Finally, we contend that our conceptualisation of systemic contestation offers promising new avenues for empirical research to understand the “black box” of EU foreign policy cooperation.","PeriodicalId":46331,"journal":{"name":"European Security","volume":"30 1","pages":"385 - 401"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2021-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43412873","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 5

Introduction: shades of contestation and politicisation of CFSP 导言:CFSP的争论和政治化的阴影

IF 1.6 2区社会学

European Security Pub Date : 2021-07-03 DOI: 10.1080/09662839.2021.1964473

Katja Biedenkopf, Oriol Costa, Magdalena Góra

{"title":"Introduction: shades of contestation and politicisation of CFSP","authors":"Katja Biedenkopf, Oriol Costa, Magdalena Góra","doi":"10.1080/09662839.2021.1964473","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09662839.2021.1964473","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Contestation and politicisation are two concepts of increasing relevance to European foreign and security policy (CFSP) scholars and practitioners alike. However, reasonable doubts can be raised as regards this growing literature: first, political conflict has always been part of CFSP, and national and European politics have traditionally been at the centre of research in this field. Second, exploring how the two concepts relate to European foreign, security and defence policies is complicated by the fact that foreign affairs more broadly do not meet all the criteria set by the literature on politicisation, which usually requires that some form of mass mobilisation takes place, or at least a high degree of salience. This article addresses these concerns by looking at the changing politics of CFSP. As the introduction to the special issue, we explore the hypothesis that contestation of European foreign, security and defence policy is now more in line with the broader way in which political conflict is being re-structured in Europe. If this is so, political conflict over CFSP will more easily be associated with issues that have an appeal beyond the narrow community of its practitioners and observers.","PeriodicalId":46331,"journal":{"name":"European Security","volume":"30 1","pages":"325 - 343"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2021-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44603288","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 14

An Arctic security dilemma: assessing and mitigating the risk of unintended armed conflict in the High North 北极安全困境：评估和减轻高北地区意外武装冲突的风险

IF 1.6 2区社会学

European Security Pub Date : 2021-06-28 DOI: 10.1080/09662839.2021.1942850

J. Wither

{"title":"An Arctic security dilemma: assessing and mitigating the risk of unintended armed conflict in the High North","authors":"J. Wither","doi":"10.1080/09662839.2021.1942850","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09662839.2021.1942850","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT After the Cold War, international relations in the Arctic were characterised by cooperation and diplomacy. However, since Russia's annexation of Crimea in 2014, largely peaceful relations in the High North have been endangered by growing military competition between Russia and Western Arctic powers. The lack of military to military dialogue between Russia and the West has exacerbated the situation. Consequently, an Arctic security dilemma has arisen, which threatens stability and increases the danger of unintended armed conflict resulting from accidents or misunderstandings. Security dilemmas are as old as international politics. They occur when states feel threatened by the expanding military capabilities of their neighbours even if there is no deliberate hostile intent. This article will examine the developing Arctic security dilemma and the chances of its mitigation. Two recent developments provide potential grounds for optimism. The new United States’ administration has pledged to return America to global engagement and multilateralism. In 2021, the Russian Federation is scheduled to become chair of the Arctic Council and the Arctic Coastguard Forum, the main intergovernmental institutions in the region. These events provide an opportunity to rebuild greater trust and confidence in relations between Russia and its Arctic neighbours and alleviate dangerous tensions.","PeriodicalId":46331,"journal":{"name":"European Security","volume":"30 1","pages":"649 - 666"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2021-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/09662839.2021.1942850","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47837174","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 3

German views on US nuclear weapons in Europe: public and elite perspectives 德国对美国在欧洲核武器的看法：公众和精英视角

IF 1.6 2区社会学

European Security Pub Date : 2021-06-23 DOI: 10.1080/09662839.2021.1941896

M. Onderco, Michal Smetana

引用次数: 9

How EU accession has affected military service in post-conflict Cyprus 加入欧盟如何影响冲突后塞浦路斯的军事服务

IF 1.6 2区社会学

European Security Pub Date : 2021-05-10 DOI: 10.1080/09662839.2021.1912017

S. Efthymiou

引用次数: 2

The European Commission’s new role in EU security and defence cooperation: the case of the European Defence Fund 欧盟委员会在欧盟安全与防务合作中的新作用：以欧洲防务基金为例

IF 1.6 2区社会学

European Security Pub Date : 2021-04-05 DOI: 10.1080/09662839.2021.1906229

Calle Håkansson

{"title":"The European Commission’s new role in EU security and defence cooperation: the case of the European Defence Fund","authors":"Calle Håkansson","doi":"10.1080/09662839.2021.1906229","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09662839.2021.1906229","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT European Defence is in a new and formative phase in which the European Union’s long list of defence acronyms has steadily grown. One of the most noticeable new policy initiatives is the European Commission’s European Defence Fund (EDF). This article consequently investigates and outlines the establishment of the European Defence Fund and the European Commission’s new role within the field of security and defence through the lens of revised neofunctionalism. This article thus asks how and through what steps did the EDF come about; and secondly how can neofunctionalism explain the dynamics involved in the establishment of the European Defence Fund. The analysis uses a process-tracing method and draws on interviews with relevant policymakers and officials in Brussels as well as official EU documents. The conclusions argue that the ever-increasing involvement of the European Commission in a policy field close to national sovereignty is starting to blur the traditional dichotomy between intergovernmental and supranational decision-making. In this way, this study contributes to the growing literature on the weakening of intergovernmentalism within the EU security and defence policy field.","PeriodicalId":46331,"journal":{"name":"European Security","volume":"30 1","pages":"589 - 608"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2021-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/09662839.2021.1906229","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42069319","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 30

Regional security cooperation revisited: the Western Balkans as the future security provider 重新讨论区域安全合作:西巴尔干成为未来的安全提供者

IF 1.6 2区社会学

European Security Pub Date : 2021-04-03 DOI: 10.1080/09662839.2021.1872545

J. Klemenc, Martin Hrabálek, Vladimir Đorđević

{"title":"Regional security cooperation revisited: the Western Balkans as the future security provider","authors":"J. Klemenc, Martin Hrabálek, Vladimir Đorđević","doi":"10.1080/09662839.2021.1872545","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09662839.2021.1872545","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT In this article, we offer a fresh look at the Western Balkans by addressing EU external governance with respect to a regional security cooperation perspective as a major EU external governance venue. We analyse how the said cooperation represents a positive example of EU rule transfer by paying attention to the results and to the level of regional ownership in the EU-Western Balkans security engagement. We pay tribute to the existing research on the EU external governance model with respect to regional cooperation and security and build our arguments by extending the said model. The said analysis represents the basis for our claims that the region has transformed from a consumer (of European security) into a security provider. Hence, the Western Balkans has witnessed an EU-induced security framework allowing it to build its capabilities and experience towards finding a more efficient role in the European security system and its governance. We aim to establish a basis for rethinking the concept of the EU-Western Balkans engagement from the Justice and Home Affairs perspective as the core element of what is described in EU strategic documents as EU external governance, outlining a more symmetric relationship between Brussels and the region.","PeriodicalId":46331,"journal":{"name":"European Security","volume":"30 1","pages":"285 - 304"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2021-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/09662839.2021.1872545","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46443563","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 2

Redrawing borders, reshaping orders: Russia’s quest for dominance in the Black Sea region 重新划定边界，重塑秩序：俄罗斯寻求在黑海地区的主导地位

IF 1.6 2区社会学

European Security Pub Date : 2021-04-03 DOI: 10.1080/09662839.2021.1872546

Kristian Åtland

{"title":"Redrawing borders, reshaping orders: Russia’s quest for dominance in the Black Sea region","authors":"Kristian Åtland","doi":"10.1080/09662839.2021.1872546","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09662839.2021.1872546","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Since Russia’s annexation of Crimea in March 2014, severe limitations have been placed on Ukraine’s coastal state rights and navigational freedoms in the Black and Azov Seas and the Kerch Strait. The “Kerch Strait clash” in November 2018, which resulted in the Russian capture of three Ukrainian naval vessels in international waters south of the strait, can be seen as the temporary culmination of tensions that have been building up over a longer period. In violation of international law and bilateral agreements, Russia has in recent years pursued an increasingly assertive and revisionist policy in the region and sought to turn the maritime spaces on the country’s southwestern flank into a “Russian lake”. This policy is affecting not only the security and economy of neighbouring states such as Ukraine and Georgia, but also the strategic balance in the southeastern corner of Europe. Drawing on empirical evidence derived from Russian, Ukrainian and Western sources, as well as insights from neoclassical realist theory, this article discusses legal, economic and security aspects of Russia’s ongoing quest for a dominant position in the Black Sea region.","PeriodicalId":46331,"journal":{"name":"European Security","volume":"30 1","pages":"305 - 324"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2021-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/09662839.2021.1872546","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47915666","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 9

When security elites deal with politicians: rethinking practices from the perspective of security-politics relationships 当安全精英与政治家打交道：从安全政治关系的角度重新思考实践

IF 1.6 2区社会学

European Security Pub Date : 2021-04-03 DOI: 10.1080/09662839.2020.1865930

H. Jaffel

{"title":"When security elites deal with politicians: rethinking practices from the perspective of security-politics relationships","authors":"H. Jaffel","doi":"10.1080/09662839.2020.1865930","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09662839.2020.1865930","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article examines how security-politics relationships play out in the routines of security elites when confronted with political decisions pertaining to European security cooperation. To do so, the article reflects upon British debates about police and judicial cooperation in a post-Brexit Europe along with debates on the 2014 opt-out from Justice and Home Affairs. How security elites respond to political decisions is investigated from a sociological lens that mobilises lessons from Norbert Elias. The article thus shows how security elites play out distinct roles and conduct distinct types of work when embedded chains of interdependence with professionals of politics that define what legitimate security cooperation is; a neglected aspect in bureaucratic politics and practice turn literature, and Critical Security Studies. It also exposes how security elites fight for EU-led cooperation because of attributes seemingly drawn from lived experiences in EU cooperation and triggered by the constraints of the relationships in which they are situated. The article thus complements existing debates on practices and security professionals by building knowledge on security elites and their routines from the angle of security-politics relationships.","PeriodicalId":46331,"journal":{"name":"European Security","volume":"30 1","pages":"259 - 284"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2021-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/09662839.2020.1865930","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43661422","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1