Gynecological Surgery最新文献_第8页

Pregnancy following laparoscopic hysteropexy-a case series. 腹腔镜子宫切除术后妊娠-一个病例系列。

Gynecological Surgery Pub Date : 2017-01-01 Epub Date: 2017-08-17 DOI: 10.1186/s10397-017-1017-1

Helen Jefferis, Natalia Price, Simon Jackson

{"title":"Pregnancy following laparoscopic hysteropexy-a case series.","authors":"Helen Jefferis, Natalia Price, Simon Jackson","doi":"10.1186/s10397-017-1017-1","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s10397-017-1017-1","url":null,"abstract":"Background: Uterine-preserving prolapse surgery offers the chance to retain fertility; however, limited data is available for the safety of pregnancy following surgery and the effect of pregnancy on surgical outcome. Our operative technique involves mesh encircling the cervix and uterine arteries, which raises concerns that compromise of uterine blood flow during pregnancy may lead to foetal growth restriction. We also think this necessitates delivery by caesarean section. We report on six pregnancy outcomes following laparoscopic hysteropexy. Primary outcomes were live birth and birth weight. Secondary outcomes were integrity of mesh and immediate effect on prolapse.Results: All patients had successful pregnancy outcomes with birth weights on or above the 10th centile. There was no effect on mesh integrity seen in any of the cases. There was no deterioration in apical prolapse when assessed post delivery, but two patients had new onset anterior vaginal wall prolapse.Conclusions: We think our technique of hysteropexy is safe for those wishing to conceive. Larger numbers are needed to allow robust evidence-based guidance for patients and clinicians.","PeriodicalId":46311,"journal":{"name":"Gynecological Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s10397-017-1017-1","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"35390481","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 14

Vaginal McCall culdoplasty versus laparoscopic uterosacral plication to prophylactically address vaginal vault prolapse. 阴道麦考尔盲道成形术与腹腔镜子宫骶部应用预防性解决阴道穹窿脱垂的比较。

Gynecological Surgery Pub Date : 2017-01-01 Epub Date: 2017-04-12 DOI: 10.1186/s10397-017-1006-4

Kathy Niblock, Emily Bailie, Geoff McCracken, Keith Johnston

{"title":"Vaginal McCall culdoplasty versus laparoscopic uterosacral plication to prophylactically address vaginal vault prolapse.","authors":"Kathy Niblock, Emily Bailie, Geoff McCracken, Keith Johnston","doi":"10.1186/s10397-017-1006-4","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s10397-017-1006-4","url":null,"abstract":"Background: Studies have shown that vaginal vault prolapse can affect up to 43% of women following hysterectomy for pelvic organ prolapse. Many techniques have been described to prevent and treat vaginal vault prolapse. The primary objective of our study was to compare McCall's culdoplasty (when performed along side vaginal hysterectomy) with laparoscopic uterosacral plication (when performed along side total laparoscopic hysterectomy) for prevention of vaginal vault prolapse. Secondary outcomes included inpatient stay and perioperative complications. A retrospective comparison study comparing 73 patients who underwent 'laparoscopic hysterectomy and uterosacral plication' against 70 patients who underwent 'vaginal hysterectomy and McCall culdoplasty'. All operations were carried out by two trained surgeons.Results: There was no significant difference between BMI or parity. There were statistically significantly more patients presenting with post hysterectomy vault prolapse (PHVP) in the group of patients who had undergone uterosacral plication (12 out of 73) compared with McCalls culdoplasty (0 out of 70) P = 0.000394. Inpatient stay in the uterosacral plication group was significantly shorter mean 1.8 compared to 3.6 for McCall group (P-Value is <0.00001). There was no significance in the perioperative complications between both groups (P = 0.41).Conclusions: McCalls is a superior operation to prevent PHVP compared to uterosacral plication with no difference in terms of perioperative complications.","PeriodicalId":46311,"journal":{"name":"Gynecological Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s10397-017-1006-4","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"34955176","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 11

AAGL practice report: practice guidelines on intrauterine adhesions developed in collaboration with the European Society of Gynaecological Endoscopy (ESGE). AAGL实践报告:与欧洲妇科内镜学会(ESGE)合作开发的宫内粘连实践指南。

Gynecological Surgery Pub Date : 2017-01-01 Epub Date: 2017-05-01 DOI: 10.1186/s10397-017-1007-3

引用次数: 118

Laparoscopic uterovaginal prolapse surgery in the elderly: feasibility and outcomes. 腹腔镜下老年子宫阴道脱垂手术的可行性和效果。

Gynecological Surgery Pub Date : 2017-01-01 Epub Date: 2017-04-11 DOI: 10.1186/s10397-017-1000-x

Samuel W King, Helen Jefferis, Simon Jackson, Alexander G Marfin, Natalia Price

{"title":"Laparoscopic uterovaginal prolapse surgery in the elderly: feasibility and outcomes.","authors":"Samuel W King, Helen Jefferis, Simon Jackson, Alexander G Marfin, Natalia Price","doi":"10.1186/s10397-017-1000-x","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s10397-017-1000-x","url":null,"abstract":"Background: Uterovaginal prolapse in very elderly women is a growing problem due to increased life expectancy. Surgeons and anaesthetists may be wary of performing quality of life surgery on this higher risk group. Where surgery is undertaken, it is commonly performed vaginally; there is a perception that this is better tolerated than abdominal surgery. Little data is published about laparoscopic prolapse surgery tolerability in this population, and laparoscopic surgery is perceived within the urogynaecological community as complex and lengthy and hence inherently unsuitable for the very elderly. In Oxford, UK, laparoscopic abdominal surgical techniques are routinely employed for urogynaecological reconstructive surgery. The authors offer abdominal laparoscopic prolapse surgery to patients suitable for general anaesthesia with apical vaginal prolapse, irrespective of age. We here report outcomes in this elderly patient cohort and hypothesise these to be acceptable. This is a retrospective case note review of all patients aged 79 years old and above undergoing laparoscopic prolapse surgery (hysteropexy or sacrocolpopexy) in two centres in Oxford, UK, over a 5-year period (n = 55). Data were collected on length of surgery, length of stay, intraoperative complications, early and late post-operative complications and surgical outcome.Results: Mean age was 82.6 years (range 79-96). There were no deaths. Minor post-operative complications such as UTI and constipation were frequent, but there were no serious (Clavien-Dindo grade III or above) complications; 80% achieved objective good anatomical outcome.Conclusions: Laparoscopic prolapse surgery appears well tolerated in the elderly with low operative morbidity and mortality.","PeriodicalId":46311,"journal":{"name":"Gynecological Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s10397-017-1000-x","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"34973726","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 9

Perioperative surgical outcome of conventional and robot-assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomy. 传统和机器人辅助全腹腔镜子宫切除术的围手术期手术效果。

Gynecological Surgery Pub Date : 2017-01-01 Epub Date: 2017-04-25 DOI: 10.1186/s10397-017-1008-2

W J van Weelden, B B M Gordon, E A Roovers, A A Kraayenbrink, C I M Aalders, F Hartog, F P H L J Dijkhuizen

{"title":"Perioperative surgical outcome of conventional and robot-assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomy.","authors":"W J van Weelden, B B M Gordon, E A Roovers, A A Kraayenbrink, C I M Aalders, F Hartog, F P H L J Dijkhuizen","doi":"10.1186/s10397-017-1008-2","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s10397-017-1008-2","url":null,"abstract":"Background: To evaluate surgical outcome in a consecutive series of patients with conventional and robot assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomy.Methods: A retrospective cohort study was performed among patients with benign and malignant indications for a laparoscopic hysterectomy. Main surgical outcomes were operation room time and skin to skin operating time, complications, conversions, rehospitalisation and reoperation, estimated blood loss and length of hospital stay.Results: A total of 294 patients were evaluated: 123 in the conventional total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH) group and 171 in the robot TLH group. After correction for differences in basic demographics with a multivariate linear regression analysis, the skin to skin operating time was a significant 18 minutes shorter in robot assisted TLH compared to conventional TLH (robot assisted TLH 92m, conventional TLH 110m, p0.001). The presence or absence of previous abdominal surgery had a significant influence on the skin to skin operating time as did the body mass index and the weight of the uterus. Complications were not significantly different. The robot TLH group had significantly less blood loss and lower rehospitalisation and reoperation rates.Conclusions: This study compares conventional TLH with robot assisted TLH and shows shorter operating times, less blood loss and lower rehospitalisation and reoperation rates in the robot TLH group.","PeriodicalId":46311,"journal":{"name":"Gynecological Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5440536/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"35078286","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Spontaneous twin pregnancy with live births after cryopreservation and re-implantation of ovarian tissue. 卵巢组织冷冻保存和再植入后的双胎自然妊娠。

Gynecological Surgery Pub Date : 2017-01-01 Epub Date: 2017-06-14 DOI: 10.1186/s10397-017-1012-6

Milan Milenkovic, Mats Brännström, Cesar Diaz-Garcia, Kersti Lundin, Ulrika Selleskog, Brita Söderlund, Ali Khatibi, Berit Gull, Hans Bokström, Claudia Mateoiu, Levent M Akyürek, Ann Thurin-Kjellberg

引用次数: 7

Spigelian hernia in gynaecology. 妇科Spigelian疝。

Gynecological Surgery Pub Date : 2017-01-01 Epub Date: 2017-05-15 DOI: 10.1186/s10397-017-1010-8

Anastasia Ussia, Fabio Imperato, Larissa Schindler, Arnaud Wattiez, Philippe R Koninckx

引用次数: 5

Treating symptomatic uterine fibroids with myomectomy: current practice and views of UK consultants. 治疗症状性子宫肌瘤与子宫肌瘤切除术:目前的做法和意见的英国顾问。

Gynecological Surgery Pub Date : 2017-01-01 Epub Date: 2017-12-19 DOI: 10.1186/s10397-017-1033-1

R Mallick, F Odejinmi

引用次数: 0

Laparoscopic management of spontaneous vaginal vault dehiscence and bowel evisceration 17 years following total abdominal hysterectomy. 腹腔全子宫切除术后自发性阴道穹窿破裂及肠内内脏切除17年的腹腔镜治疗。

Gynecological Surgery Pub Date : 2017-01-01 Epub Date: 2017-04-11 DOI: 10.1186/s10397-017-1004-6

Georgina Baines, Simon R Jackson, Natalia Price

引用次数: 3

The effect of music in gynaecological office procedures on pain, anxiety and satisfaction: a randomized controlled trial. 妇科手术中音乐对疼痛、焦虑和满意度的影响:一项随机对照试验。

Gynecological Surgery Pub Date : 2017-01-01 Epub Date: 2017-08-09 DOI: 10.1186/s10397-017-1016-2

N Mak, I M A Reinders, S A Slockers, E H M N Westen, J W M Maas, M Y Bongers

{"title":"The effect of music in gynaecological office procedures on pain, anxiety and satisfaction: a randomized controlled trial.","authors":"N Mak, I M A Reinders, S A Slockers, E H M N Westen, J W M Maas, M Y Bongers","doi":"10.1186/s10397-017-1016-2","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s10397-017-1016-2","url":null,"abstract":"Background: Pain can interfere with office procedures in gynaecology. The aim of this study is to measure the positive effect of music in gynaecological office procedures.Methods: A randomized controlled trial was performed between October 2014 and January 2016. Women scheduled for an office hysteroscopy or colposcopy were eligible for randomization in the music group or control group. Stratification for hysteroscopy and colposcopy took place. The primary outcome is patients' level of pain during the procedure measured by the visual analogue scale (VAS). Secondary outcomes include patients' level of pain after the procedure, anxiety and satisfaction of patient and doctor.Results: No positive effect of music on patients' perception of pain during the procedure was measured, neither for the hysteroscopy group (57 mm vs. 52 mm) nor for the colposcopy group (32 mm vs. 32 mm). Secondary outcomes were also similar for both groups.Conclusions: This study showed no positive effect of music on patients' level of pain, anxiety or satisfaction of patient or doctor for office hysteroscopy and colposcopy. We believe a multimodal approach has to be used to decrease patient distress in terms of pain and anxiety, with or without music.Trial registration: Dutch Trial Register, NTR4924.","PeriodicalId":46311,"journal":{"name":"Gynecological Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s10397-017-1016-2","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"35390479","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 46