发布求助
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献

Ethics Policy & Environment最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
The Invasive Species Diet: The Ethics of Eating Lionfish as a Wildlife Management Strategy 入侵物种饮食:食用狮子鱼作为野生动物管理策略的伦理
IF 1
Ethics Policy & Environment Pub Date : 2020-09-01 DOI: 10.1080/21550085.2020.1848189
S. Noll, B. Davis
{"title":"The Invasive Species Diet: The Ethics of Eating Lionfish as a Wildlife Management Strategy","authors":"S. Noll, B. Davis","doi":"10.1080/21550085.2020.1848189","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21550085.2020.1848189","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This paper explores the ethical dimensions of lionfish removal and provides an argument supporting hunting lionfish for consumption. Lionfish are an invasive species found around the world. Their presence has fueled management strategies that predominantly rely on promoting human predation and consumption. We apply rights-based ethics, utilitarian ethics, and ecocentric environmental ethics to the question of whether hunting and eating lionfish is ethical. After applying these perspectives, we argue that, from a utilitarian perspective, lionfish should be culled. Rights-based ethics, on the other hand, are not applicable in this case, while ecocentric environmental ethics would support lionfish removal.","PeriodicalId":45955,"journal":{"name":"Ethics Policy & Environment","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2020-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"73381904","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
The Case for ‘Contributory Ethics’: Or How to Think about Individual Morality in a Time of Global Problems “贡献伦理”的案例:或如何思考全球问题时代的个人道德
IF 1
Ethics Policy & Environment Pub Date : 2020-09-01 DOI: 10.1080/21550085.2020.1848188
Travis N. Rieder, J. Bernstein
{"title":"The Case for ‘Contributory Ethics’: Or How to Think about Individual Morality in a Time of Global Problems","authors":"Travis N. Rieder, J. Bernstein","doi":"10.1080/21550085.2020.1848188","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21550085.2020.1848188","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Many of us believe that we can and do have individual obligations to refrain from contributing to massive collective harms – say, from producing luxury greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions; however, our individual actions are so small as to be practically meaningless. Can we then, justify the intuition that we ought to refrain? In this paper, we argue that this debate may have been mis-framed. Rather than investigating whether or not we have obligations to refrain from contributing to collective action, perhaps we should ask whether we have reason to do so. However, this framing brings challenges of its own, and so we close by asking what problems are generated if we focus on these questions of ‘contributory ethics’.","PeriodicalId":45955,"journal":{"name":"Ethics Policy & Environment","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2020-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"78318649","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Green Moral Hazards 绿色道德风险
IF 1
Ethics Policy & Environment Pub Date : 2020-07-08 DOI: 10.1080/21550085.2021.1940449
Gernot Wagner, Daniel Zizzamia
{"title":"Green Moral Hazards","authors":"Gernot Wagner, Daniel Zizzamia","doi":"10.1080/21550085.2021.1940449","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21550085.2021.1940449","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Moral hazards are ubiquitous. Green ones typically involve technological fixes: Environmentalists often see ‘technofixes’ as morally fraught because they absolve actors from taking more difficult steps toward systemic solutions. Carbon removal and especially solar geoengineering are only the latest example of such technologies. We here explore green moral hazards throughout American history. We argue that dismissing (solar) geoengineering on moral hazard grounds is often unproductive. Instead, especially those vehemently opposed to the technology should use it as an opportunity to expand the attention paid to the underlying environmental problem in the first place, actively invoking its opposite: ‘inverse moral hazards’.","PeriodicalId":45955,"journal":{"name":"Ethics Policy & Environment","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2020-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"74578646","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13
The Case for a 21st Century Wilderness Ethic 21世纪荒野伦理的案例
IF 1
Ethics Policy & Environment Pub Date : 2020-05-03 DOI: 10.1080/21550085.2020.1848183
Brian Petersen, J. Hultgren
{"title":"The Case for a 21st Century Wilderness Ethic","authors":"Brian Petersen, J. Hultgren","doi":"10.1080/21550085.2020.1848183","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21550085.2020.1848183","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Past debates surrounding wilderness have not led to constructive dialogue but instead have created a rift between dueling sides. Far from academic, this debate has important ethical, policy, and practical implications. We outline out the major fault lines of the debate between wilderness realists and constructivists and also identify common ground between them. From this starting point, we offer three potential bridges between them and conclude by proposing a preliminary vision of a 21st Century wilderness ethic focused on social-ecological connection, re-commoning, and social justice. Returning to the ‘great wilderness debate’ can lead to a synthesis of the realist and constructivist positions and a renewed wilderness ethic in an era of neoliberalism, hyper-nationalism, and intensified environmental crises.","PeriodicalId":45955,"journal":{"name":"Ethics Policy & Environment","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2020-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"75110028","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
The Tragic Death of a Utah Goblin: Conservation and the Problem of Abiotic Nature 犹他州地精的悲惨死亡:保护和非生物性质的问题
IF 1
Ethics Policy & Environment Pub Date : 2020-05-03 DOI: 10.1080/21550085.2020.1848174
Alexander Lee
{"title":"The Tragic Death of a Utah Goblin: Conservation and the Problem of Abiotic Nature","authors":"Alexander Lee","doi":"10.1080/21550085.2020.1848174","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21550085.2020.1848174","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Biocentric (life-centered) and ecocentric (ecosystem-centered) ethics offer a rich discourse on protecting biotic communities – defending conservation with inherent value tied to life. A problem arises from these views if mountains, glaciers, canyons, and other abiotic natural objects (often foci of conservation efforts) matter in and of themselves. Abiotic nature helps demonstrate and delineate the boundaries of environmental ethics grounded in life-based axiology. A series of thought experiments suggest that orienting conservation as a question of obligation offers an additional avenue to explore and defend the protection of abiotic nature; agreements and property rights plausibly ground moral obligations to conserve abiotic nature.","PeriodicalId":45955,"journal":{"name":"Ethics Policy & Environment","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2020-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"79611509","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Pervasive Captivity and Urban Wildlife 普遍的圈养和城市野生动物
IF 1
Ethics Policy & Environment Pub Date : 2020-05-03 DOI: 10.1080/21550085.2020.1848173
Nicolas Delon
{"title":"Pervasive Captivity and Urban Wildlife","authors":"Nicolas Delon","doi":"10.1080/21550085.2020.1848173","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21550085.2020.1848173","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Urban animals can benefit from living in cities, but this also makes them vulnerable as they increasingly depend on the advantages of urban life. This article has two aims. First, I provide a detailed analysis of the concept of captivity and explain why it matters to nonhuman animals – because and insofar as many of them have a (non-substitutable) interest in freedom. Second, I defend a surprising implication of the account – pushing the boundaries of the concept while the boundaries of cities and human activities expand. I argue for the existence of the neglected problem of pervasive captivity, of which urban wildlife is an illustration. Many urban animals are confined, controlled and dependent, therefore often captive of expanding urban areas. While I argue that captivity per se is value-neutral, I draw the ethical and policy implications of harmful pervasive captivity.","PeriodicalId":45955,"journal":{"name":"Ethics Policy & Environment","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2020-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"83323428","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6
The Most Good We Can Do or the Best Person We Can Be? 我们能做的最好的人还是我们能成为最好的人?
IF 1
Ethics Policy & Environment Pub Date : 2020-05-03 DOI: 10.1080/21550085.2020.1848175
Michel Bourban, Lisa Broussois
{"title":"The Most Good We Can Do or the Best Person We Can Be?","authors":"Michel Bourban, Lisa Broussois","doi":"10.1080/21550085.2020.1848175","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21550085.2020.1848175","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT We challenge effective altruism (EA) on the basis that it should be more inclusive regarding the demands of altruism. EA should consider carefully agents’ intentions and the role those intentions can play in agents’ moral lives. Although we argue that good intentions play an instrumental role and can lead to better results, by adopting a Hutchesonian perspective, we show that intentions should, first and foremost, be considered for their intrinsic value. We examine offsetting and geoengineering, two so-called solutions to climate change supported by EA, to highlight the limitations of a narrow understanding of altruism.","PeriodicalId":45955,"journal":{"name":"Ethics Policy & Environment","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2020-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"89263761","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
When Ecology Needs Economics and Economics Needs Ecology: Interdisciplinary Exchange during the Anthropocene 当生态需要经济学与经济学需要生态学:人类世的跨学科交流
IF 1
Ethics Policy & Environment Pub Date : 2020-05-03 DOI: 10.1080/21550085.2020.1848182
S. A. Inkpen, C. Tyler DesRoches
{"title":"When Ecology Needs Economics and Economics Needs Ecology: Interdisciplinary Exchange during the Anthropocene","authors":"S. A. Inkpen, C. Tyler DesRoches","doi":"10.1080/21550085.2020.1848182","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21550085.2020.1848182","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Evidence that humans play a dominant role in most ecosystems forces scientists to confront systems that contain factors transgressing traditional disciplinary boundaries. However, it is an open question whether this state of affairs should encourage interdisciplinary exchange or integration. With two case studies, we show that exchange between ecologists and economists is preferable, for epistemological and policy-oriented reasons, to their acting independently. We call this “exchange gain.” Our case studies show that theoretical exchanges can be less disruptive to current theory than commonly thought. Valuable interdisciplinary exchange does not necessarily require disciplinary breakdown.","PeriodicalId":45955,"journal":{"name":"Ethics Policy & Environment","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2020-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"87246112","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
State Commissioning of Solar Radiation Management Geoengineering 太阳辐射管理地球工程国家调试
IF 1
Ethics Policy & Environment Pub Date : 2020-05-03 DOI: 10.1080/21550085.2020.1848176
A. Lockley
{"title":"State Commissioning of Solar Radiation Management Geoengineering","authors":"A. Lockley","doi":"10.1080/21550085.2020.1848176","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21550085.2020.1848176","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Solar Radiation Management (SRM) is a proposed response to Anthropogenic Global Warming (AGW). Other papers consider private SRM provision, e.g. via Voluntary Carbon Offsets (VCO). Limited VCO markets would under-supply SRM, so state provision or mandating is possible. Public funding does not presume state execution; private subcontracting is feasible. Notwithstanding concerns about privatization, we assume state commissioning of SRM – proposing and analyzing plausible governance, by adapting extant proposals. We consider two regulatory functions: legal/corporate; and scientific/technical. We briefly discuss mandatory, emissions-linked SRM funding. State contracting is deemed plausible, e.g. for historic emissions. For future emissions, mandatory polluter-pays SRM may be preferable.","PeriodicalId":45955,"journal":{"name":"Ethics Policy & Environment","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2020-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"72582315","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A Care-Based Approach to Transformative Change: Ethically-Informed Practices, Relational Response-Ability & Emotional Awareness 以关怀为基础的变革方法:道德知情实践，关系反应能力和情感意识
IF 1
Ethics Policy & Environment Pub Date : 2020-01-07 DOI: 10.1080/21550085.2020.1848186
Angela Moriggi, K. Soini, A. Franklin, D. Roep
{"title":"A Care-Based Approach to Transformative Change: Ethically-Informed Practices, Relational Response-Ability & Emotional Awareness","authors":"Angela Moriggi, K. Soini, A. Franklin, D. Roep","doi":"10.1080/21550085.2020.1848186","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21550085.2020.1848186","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Notions of care for humans and more-than-humans appear at the margins of the sustainability transformations debate. This paper explores the merits of an ethics of care approach to sustainability transformations. It argues that more radical, transformative change can be fostered via three mutually reinforcing dimensions: (a) ethically informed practices; (b) relational response-ability; and (c) emotional awareness. This novel theoretical and methodological lens emphasizes the transformative potential of caring practices and as such extends the reach of the sustainability transformations debate.","PeriodicalId":45955,"journal":{"name":"Ethics Policy & Environment","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2020-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"76060205","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 25
首页 上一页
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整，为了账户安全，请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们：info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务，方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号：481959085
Book学术官方微信