Politische Vierteljahresschrift最新文献_第9页

Wolkenstein, Fabio (2022): Die dunkle Seite der Christdemokratie. Geschichte einer autoritären Versuchung 塞尔瓦，法比奥（2022）：基督教民主的黑暗面。独裁诱惑的历史

IF 1.3 4区社会学

Politische Vierteljahresschrift Pub Date : 2023-01-03 DOI: 10.1007/s11615-022-00442-2

Hermann-Josef Große Kracht

引用次数: 0

Frye, Timothy (2021): Weak Strongman. The Limits of Power in Putin’s Russia 蒂莫西·弗莱(2021):《软弱的强人》。普京统治下的俄罗斯的权力界限

IF 1.3 4区社会学

Politische Vierteljahresschrift Pub Date : 2023-01-03 DOI: 10.1007/s11615-022-00445-z

D. Rybakova

引用次数: 0

Wiesendahl, Elmar (2022): Parteienforschung. Ein Überblick 埃尔马(2022)党派研究一个概览

IF 1.3 4区社会学

Politische Vierteljahresschrift Pub Date : 2023-01-03 DOI: 10.1007/s11615-022-00451-1

Ulrich von Alemann

引用次数: 0

Special Issue Introduction: The GLES Open Science Challenge 2021: A Pilot Project on the Applicability of Registered Reports in Quantitative Political Science. 特刊介绍:2021年全球地理信息系统开放科学挑战:定量政治学中注册报告适用性的试点项目。

IF 1.3 4区社会学

Politische Vierteljahresschrift Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI: 10.1007/s11615-022-00436-0

Hannah Bucher, Anne-Kathrin Stroppe, Axel M Burger, Thorsten Faas, Harald Schoen, Marc Debus, Sigrid Roßteutscher

{"title":"Special Issue Introduction: The GLES Open Science Challenge 2021: A Pilot Project on the Applicability of Registered Reports in Quantitative Political Science.","authors":"Hannah Bucher, Anne-Kathrin Stroppe, Axel M Burger, Thorsten Faas, Harald Schoen, Marc Debus, Sigrid Roßteutscher","doi":"10.1007/s11615-022-00436-0","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11615-022-00436-0","url":null,"abstract":"The GLES Open Science Challenge 2021 was a pioneering initiative in quantitative political science. Aimed at increasing the adoption of replicable and transparent research practices, it led to this special issue. The project combined the rigor of registered reports-a new publication format in which studies are evaluated prior to data collection/access and analysis-with quantitative political science research in the context of the 2021 German federal election. This special issue, which features the registered reports that resulted from the project, shows that transparent research following open science principles benefits our discipline and substantially contributes to quantitative political science. In this introduction to the special issue, we first elaborate on why more transparent research practices are necessary to guarantee the cumulative progress of scientific knowledge. We then show how registered reports can contribute to increasing the transparency of scientific practices. Next, we discuss the application of open science practices in quantitative political science to date. And finally, we present the process and schedule of the GLES Open Science Challenge and give an overview of the contributions included in this special issue.","PeriodicalId":45529,"journal":{"name":"Politische Vierteljahresschrift","volume":"64 1","pages":"1-17"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9684978/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10815240","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Jumping on the Bandwagon: The Role of Voters' Social Class in Poll Effects in the Context of the 2021 German Federal Election. 随波逐流:2021年德国联邦大选背景下选民社会阶层在民意调查中的作用

IF 1.3 4区社会学

Politische Vierteljahresschrift Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI: 10.1007/s11615-022-00417-3

Fabienne Unkelbach, Melvin John, Vera Vogel

{"title":"Jumping on the Bandwagon: The Role of Voters' Social Class in Poll Effects in the Context of the 2021 German Federal Election.","authors":"Fabienne Unkelbach, Melvin John, Vera Vogel","doi":"10.1007/s11615-022-00417-3","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11615-022-00417-3","url":null,"abstract":"Published findings of opinion polls are an important part of the political coverage before elections. Thus, researchers have long investigated whether the perceived popularity of political parties can lead to even more voters following this majority. However, empirical findings on this so-called political bandwagon effect are mixed. In the present paper, we integrate theories from political science and social psychology to explain these inconsistencies through social class as a potential moderating variable. Based on previous findings regarding consumer decisions, we hypothesized that bandwagon effects are greater among voters with lower social class. To investigate this hypothesis, we combined data from the German Longitudinal Election Study (GLES) Rolling Cross-Section 2021, which was collected over the 55 days before the 2021 German federal election, with the results of published preelection polls. Using separate multilevel models for each of the parties, we found no evidence for bandwagon effects. Only for the Social Democratic Party were poll results related to voting intentions assessed on the following day, suggesting that polls might have contributed to the party's electoral success. However, there was no evidence for a moderation of bandwagon effects by voters' social class. Accordingly, we could not resolve the mixed findings in this field of research. Our results point to important open questions in research on bandwagon effects in multiparty systems as well as on effects of social class in Germany.Supplementary information: The online version of this article (10.1007/s11615-022-00417-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.","PeriodicalId":45529,"journal":{"name":"Politische Vierteljahresschrift","volume":"64 1","pages":"51-78"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9364306/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9375923","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 2

Subjective Freedom of Speech: Why Do Citizens Think They Cannot Speak Freely? 主观言论自由:为什么公民认为自己不能自由发言?

IF 1.3 4区社会学

Politische Vierteljahresschrift Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI: 10.1007/s11615-022-00414-6

Jan Menzner, Richard Traunmüller

{"title":"Subjective Freedom of Speech: Why Do Citizens Think They Cannot Speak Freely?","authors":"Jan Menzner, Richard Traunmüller","doi":"10.1007/s11615-022-00414-6","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11615-022-00414-6","url":null,"abstract":"We provide the first systematic research into the origins of subjective freedom of speech in Germany. Relying on the GLES 2021 Cross-Section Pre-Election Survey, which includes a newly designed survey item on subjective freedom of speech, we evaluate a whole range of plausible candidate hypotheses. First, we contribute to cumulative research by testing the explanatory factors in Gibson (1993)-citizens' social class, their political involvement and political preferences, and their personality dispositions-for the German case. Second, we move beyond the state of the art and test three new hypotheses that reflect more recent political developments and arguments in the free speech debate: the role of social media, increasing political and social polarization, and the rise of populism. Importantly, all hypothesis tests reported in this paper have been preregistered prior to data collection. Our results reveal that three explanatory factors are significantly, consistently, and substantively related to subjective free speech in Germany: political preferences, populist attitudes, and identification with the Alternative for Germany party.Supplementary information: The online version of this article (10.1007/s11615-022-00414-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.","PeriodicalId":45529,"journal":{"name":"Politische Vierteljahresschrift","volume":"64 1","pages":"155-181"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9368691/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10869221","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 3

Foret, François, und Oriane Calligaro (Hrsg.) (2020): European Values. Challenges and Opportunities for EU Governance Foret，François，und Oriane Calligaro（Hrsg.）（2020）：欧洲价值观。欧盟治理面临的挑战与机遇

IF 1.3 4区社会学

Politische Vierteljahresschrift Pub Date : 2022-12-22 DOI: 10.1007/s11615-022-00446-y

Stefan Wallaschek

引用次数: 4

Bergem, Wolfgang, und Helmar Schöne (Hrsg.) (2022): Wie relevant ist die Politikwissenschaft? Wissenstransfer und gesellschaftliche Wirkung von Forschung und Lehre 沃尔夫冈，沃尔夫冈，以及赫尔玛·赫尔姆(编辑部):政治科学有多大意义?知识和理论的传播和社会影响

IF 1.3 4区社会学

Politische Vierteljahresschrift Pub Date : 2022-12-22 DOI: 10.1007/s11615-022-00444-0

E. Jesse

引用次数: 0

Identität, Populismus und direkte Demokratie. Zum Einfluss der nationalen Identität auf das Verhältnis von rechtspopulistischen Einstellungen und der Präferenz für direktdemokratische Entscheidungsverfahren 身份、民粹主义和直接民主关于民族身份对右翼民粹主义观念和关于决策程序偏好的影响

IF 1.3 4区社会学

Politische Vierteljahresschrift Pub Date : 2022-12-06 DOI: 10.1007/s11615-022-00439-x

P. Reinhardt

引用次数: 0

Politisches Handeln. Zum Verhältnis von Zielorientierung und Collective Agency 政治行动.这是一个追踪装置

IF 1.3 4区社会学

Politische Vierteljahresschrift Pub Date : 2022-11-30 DOI: 10.1007/s11615-022-00440-4

K. Möller, P. Schink

引用次数: 0