Res Publica-A Journal of Moral Legal and Political Philosophy最新文献_第9页

Proportionality without Inequality: Defending Lifetime Political Equality through Storable Votes 没有不平等的比例:通过可储存的选票捍卫终身政治平等

IF 0.7 2区哲学

Res Publica-A Journal of Moral Legal and Political Philosophy Pub Date : 2022-03-15 DOI: 10.1007/s11158-022-09547-2

Manuel Sá Valente

引用次数: 0

Justice and Migration. Europe’s Most Cruel Dilemma 正义与移民。欧洲最残酷的困境

IF 0.7 2区哲学

Res Publica-A Journal of Moral Legal and Political Philosophy Pub Date : 2022-03-08 DOI: 10.1007/s11158-022-09548-1

Philippe Van Parijs

引用次数: 3

EU Citizens’ Access to Welfare Rights: How (not) to Think About Unreasonable Burdens? 欧盟公民获得福利权利:如何(不)考虑不合理的负担?

IF 0.7 2区哲学

Res Publica-A Journal of Moral Legal and Political Philosophy Pub Date : 2022-03-08 DOI: 10.1007/s11158-021-09536-x

Dimitrios E. Efthymiou

引用次数: 1

The Fairness in Algorithmic Fairness 算法公平中的公平

IF 0.7 2区哲学

Res Publica-A Journal of Moral Legal and Political Philosophy Pub Date : 2022-02-21 DOI: 10.1007/s11158-022-09546-3

Sune Holm

引用次数: 7

AI and the Social Sciences: Why All Variables are Not Created Equal 人工智能和社会科学:为什么所有变量都不是平等的

IF 0.7 2区哲学

Res Publica-A Journal of Moral Legal and Political Philosophy Pub Date : 2022-02-17 DOI: 10.1007/s11158-022-09544-5

Catherine Greene

引用次数: 0

Ideal Theory for a Complex World 复杂世界的理想理论

IF 0.7 2区哲学

Res Publica-A Journal of Moral Legal and Political Philosophy Pub Date : 2022-02-17 DOI: 10.1007/s11158-022-09545-4

Jeffrey Carroll

引用次数: 0

Should Republicans be Interested in Exploitation? 共和党人应该对剥削感兴趣吗?

IF 0.7 2区哲学

Res Publica-A Journal of Moral Legal and Political Philosophy Pub Date : 2022-01-18 DOI: 10.1007/s11158-021-09542-z

A. Bryan, Ioannis N. Kouris

引用次数: 0

Contracting for Catastrophe:Legitimizing Emergency Constitutions by Drawing on Social Contract Theory. 灾难契约：借鉴社会契约论使紧急状态宪法合法化》（Contracting for Catastrophe:Legitimizing Emergency Constitutions by Drawing on Social Contract Theory）。

IF 0.9 2区哲学

Res Publica-A Journal of Moral Legal and Political Philosophy Pub Date : 2022-01-01 Epub Date: 2021-06-16 DOI: 10.1007/s11158-021-09518-z

Stefan Voigt

引用次数: 0

What Is Wrong with the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance's Definition of Antisemitism? 国际大屠杀纪念联盟对反犹主义的定义错在哪里?

IF 0.7 2区哲学

Res Publica-A Journal of Moral Legal and Political Philosophy Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI: 10.1007/s11158-022-09553-4

Jan Deckers, Jonathan Coulter

{"title":"What Is Wrong with the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance's Definition of Antisemitism?","authors":"Jan Deckers, Jonathan Coulter","doi":"10.1007/s11158-022-09553-4","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11158-022-09553-4","url":null,"abstract":"The International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA) developed a 'Working Definition of Antisemitism' in 2016. Whilst the definition has received a significant amount of media attention, we are not aware of any comprehensive philosophical analysis. This article analyses this definition. We conclude that the definition and its list of examples ought to be rejected. The urgency to do so stems from the fact that pro-Israel activists can and have mobilised the IHRA document for political goals unrelated to tackling antisemitism, notably to stigmatise and silence critics of the Israeli government. This causes widespread self-censorship, has an adverse impact on freedom of speech, and impedes action against the unjust treatment of Palestinians. We also identify intrinsic problems in the way the definition refers to criticism of Israel similar 'to that leveled against any other country', ambiguous wording about 'the power of Jews as a collective', lack of clarity as to the Jewish people's 'right to self-determination', and its denial of obvious racism. We consider alternative definitions and prefer one like the Oxford English Dictionary (OED) definition, 'hostility to or prejudice against Jews', with the addition of the words 'as Jews'. We recognise that the Jerusalem Declaration on Antisemitism (JDA) can play a useful purpose in illustrating the shortcomings of the IHRA definition. However, we do not advocate promoting it as the prime international definition. Indeed, we question the efficacy of using complex new definitions to combat racism against Jews or other groups, and instead advocate combatting it through collective action across societies.","PeriodicalId":45474,"journal":{"name":"Res Publica-A Journal of Moral Legal and Political Philosophy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9092927/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10707232","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

The Need for an EU Expulsion Mechanism: Democratic Backsliding and the Failure of Article 7. 欧盟驱逐机制的必要性:民主倒退和第7条的失败。

IF 0.7 2区哲学

Res Publica-A Journal of Moral Legal and Political Philosophy Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI: 10.1007/s11158-021-09537-w

Tom Theuns

{"title":"The Need for an EU Expulsion Mechanism: Democratic Backsliding and the Failure of Article 7.","authors":"Tom Theuns","doi":"10.1007/s11158-021-09537-w","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11158-021-09537-w","url":null,"abstract":"What should the EU do about the fact that some Member States are backsliding on their commitments to democracy, supposedly a fundamental value of the EU? The Treaty provisions under Article 7 TEU are widely criticized for being ineffective in preventing such developments. Are they legitimate? I argue that the ultimate sanction of Article 7 TEU falls into a performative contradiction, which undermines its ability to coherently defend fundamental values. Instead, expulsion from the EU is the appropriate, coherent and legitimate final political sanction for democratic and rule of law backsliding by a Member State. The argument has the following steps: In Part 1, I argue that the current Article 7 framework for responding to democratic and rule of law backsliding in the EU is normatively problematic, in that the mechanism currently in the Treaty undermines the values it purports to defend; in other words, it falls into a performative contradiction. It is undemocratic to deprive Member States of their right to vote in the Council while holding them subject to Council decisions. However, Part 2 studies relevant philosophical arguments from an adjacent literature on criminal disenfranchisement, concluding that allowing backsliding Member States to keep their voting rights in the Council also taints the democratic character of Council decision-making. In Part 3, I consider the resulting paradox in light of the literature on militant democracy. Could militant democracy justify Article 7? I argue not; even if we accept the hypothetical justifiability of militant measures, they are not legitimate here since a democratically acceptable alternative exists that would safeguard the democratic character and legitimacy of Council decision-making: expulsion from the Union. I also address a central objection to an expulsion mechanism-that it would require treaty change and is therefore practically impossible.","PeriodicalId":45474,"journal":{"name":"Res Publica-A Journal of Moral Legal and Political Philosophy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8754548/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10338851","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 7