Studies in American Political Development最新文献_第4页

Reinvigorating American Political Development Scholarship through Du Bois's Black Reconstruction 通过杜波依斯的黑人重建重振美国政治发展奖学金

IF 0.8 3区社会学

Studies in American Political Development Pub Date : 2022-05-30 DOI: 10.1017/S0898588X22000062

K. Ramanathan

引用次数: 0

WITHDRAWN: Serum Levels of Micronutrients, Magnesium, and Mark-ers of Immunity (CD4+) in Antiretroviral-naïve HIV-infected Individuals: Relationships and Predictors 抗逆转录病毒疗法无效的 HIV 感染者血清中微量营养素、镁和免疫标志物（CD4+）的水平：关系和预测因素。

IF 0.5 3区社会学

Studies in American Political Development Pub Date : 2022-05-23 DOI: 10.2174/1871526522666220523145253

Tewogbade A Adedeji, Adeyinka A Akande, Nife O Adedeji, Olufemi S Smith, Olusola A Jeje, Abiodun K Ajeigbe, Olabamiji A Ajose

{"title":"WITHDRAWN: Serum Levels of Micronutrients, Magnesium, and Mark-ers of Immunity (CD4+) in Antiretroviral-naïve HIV-infected Individuals: Relationships and Predictors","authors":"Tewogbade A Adedeji, Adeyinka A Akande, Nife O Adedeji, Olufemi S Smith, Olusola A Jeje, Abiodun K Ajeigbe, Olabamiji A Ajose","doi":"10.2174/1871526522666220523145253","DOIUrl":"10.2174/1871526522666220523145253","url":null,"abstract":"Since the authors are not responding to the editor’s requests to fulfil the editorial requirement, therefore, the article has been withdrawn from the journal \"Infectious Disorders - Drug Targets\"Bentham Science apologizes to the readers of the journal for any inconvenience this may have caused.The Bentham Editorial Policy on Article Withdrawal can be found at https://benthamscience.com/editorial-policies-main.phpBentham science disclaimer: It is a condition of publication that manuscripts submitted to this journal have not been published and will not be simultane-ously submitted or published elsewhere. Furthermore, any data, illustration, structure or table that has been published elsewhere must be reported, and copyright permission for reproduction must be obtained. Plagiarism is strictly forbidden, and by submit-ting the article for publication the authors agree that the publishers have the legal right to take appropriate action against the authors, if plagiarism or fabricated information is discovered. By submitting a manuscript the authors agree that the copyright of their article is transferred to the publishers if and when the article is accepted for publication.","PeriodicalId":45195,"journal":{"name":"Studies in American Political Development","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5,"publicationDate":"2022-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"79344311","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

SAP volume 36 issue 1 Front matter SAP第36卷第1期

IF 0.8 3区社会学

Studies in American Political Development Pub Date : 2022-04-01 DOI: 10.1017/s0898588x22000025

引用次数: 0

The Politics of the American Knowledge Economy 美国知识经济的政治学

IF 0.8 3区社会学

Studies in American Political Development Pub Date : 2022-03-22 DOI: 10.1017/S0898588X21000134

N. Short

引用次数: 0

From Many Divides, One? The Polarization and Nationalization of American State Party Platforms, 1918–2017 从许多分歧，一个?美国政党政纲的两极分化与民族化，1918-2017

IF 0.8 3区社会学

Studies in American Political Development Pub Date : 2022-03-07 DOI: 10.1017/S0898588X22000013

D. Hopkins, E. Schickler, David Azizi

{"title":"From Many Divides, One? The Polarization and Nationalization of American State Party Platforms, 1918–2017","authors":"D. Hopkins, E. Schickler, David Azizi","doi":"10.1017/S0898588X22000013","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0898588X22000013","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Many contend that U.S. state parties are increasingly polarized and nationalized, meaning that they have adopted divergent positions matching their national counterparts’ positions. Such trends reflect a transformation of America's historically decentralized party system. Yet, the precise timing of these related trends—as well as the mechanisms underpinning them—remain unclear. We assess these dynamics using a novel data set of 1,783 state party platforms between 1918 and 2017. Applying tools from automated and manual content analysis, we document a dramatic divergence in the topics emphasized by Democrats and Republicans starting in the mid-1990s, just as congressional speech became polarized. During this period, cross-state differences in each party's agenda decreased and regional/sectoral issues became less prominent, suggesting tight connections between polarization, nationalization, and state agendas. We also find that innovative phrases increasingly debut in state (not national) platforms. Overall, the evidence undercuts claims of top-down polarization emanating from national party leaders in Washington, DC. Polarization at the state and federal levels coincided with the development of an integrated network of activists spanning multiple levels of the polity.","PeriodicalId":45195,"journal":{"name":"Studies in American Political Development","volume":"36 1","pages":"1 - 20"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2022-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44397275","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

“This Crisis of Our History”: The Colored Conventions Movement and the Temporal Construction of Southern Politics “我们历史的危机”:有色代表大会运动与南方政治的时间建构

IF 0.8 3区社会学

Studies in American Political Development Pub Date : 2022-02-18 DOI: 10.1017/S0898588X21000122

Paul E. Herron

{"title":"“This Crisis of Our History”: The Colored Conventions Movement and the Temporal Construction of Southern Politics","authors":"Paul E. Herron","doi":"10.1017/S0898588X21000122","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0898588X21000122","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract After defeat in the Civil War, the white South used time as a tool of political oppression. Myths of the “Old South” and the “Lost Cause” distorted history and public memory; vagrancy laws and labor regulations controlled the time of the newly free; grandfather clauses distributed rights based on past conditions; and attacks on education, labor, and democratic rights undermined progress in the “New South.” In this article, I show that Black southerners also recognized the political value of time. My source for their sentiments is the Colored Conventions Movement. From 1865 to 1900, dozens of conventions gathered in the South, at a significantly higher rate than in other regions. Delegates deployed temporal rhetoric of the past, present, and future in pursuit of equality and justice by (1) publicly recounting African American history and national contributions to counter white narratives, (2) arguing that emancipation was a new founding moment and the present a time of ongoing crisis, and (3) demanding labor and education rights to secure the future. Scholars of American political development often consider time in studies of institutional change; we should also explore the use of time as a political tool and how temporality illuminates American racial dynamics.","PeriodicalId":45195,"journal":{"name":"Studies in American Political Development","volume":"36 1","pages":"21 - 40"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2022-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41669551","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

SAP volume 35 issue 2 Cover and Front matter SAP第35卷第2期封面和封面

IF 0.8 3区社会学

Studies in American Political Development Pub Date : 2021-10-01 DOI: 10.1017/s0898588x21000109

引用次数: 0

When Think Tanks Refuse Thinking: Why American Pro-Market Conservatives Oppose Market Integration 当智囊团拒绝思考：为什么美国亲市场保守派反对市场一体化

IF 0.8 3区社会学

Studies in American Political Development Pub Date : 2021-10-01 DOI: 10.1017/S0898588X21000092

Benedikt Springer

{"title":"When Think Tanks Refuse Thinking: Why American Pro-Market Conservatives Oppose Market Integration","authors":"Benedikt Springer","doi":"10.1017/S0898588X21000092","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0898588X21000092","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract American pro-market conservatives often oppose use of federal authority to rein in anti-competitive behavior by market actors. Competitive barriers, whether created by local jurisdictions or the absence of national competitive rules, go unaddressed. In international comparison, especially considering the European Union's use of central authority for market openness, this is quite puzzling. Based on interviews and archival research, I trace inattention to market barriers to contradictions within Hayek's neoliberalism and an enthusiastic reception within the American academy of one possible interpretation of those writings. This conception of markets—competitive federalism—diffused into the conservative law and economics movements, think tanks, and eventually mainstream conservative politics. It permitted conservatism to align a strong pro-market rhetoric with demands for states’ rights and federal retrenchment, albeit side-stepping many significant issues in economic theory and policy. Thus, conservatives pursue spending and tax cuts, deregulation and decentralization, often to the detriment of market openness.","PeriodicalId":45195,"journal":{"name":"Studies in American Political Development","volume":"35 1","pages":"239 - 252"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2021-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48342057","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

SAP volume 35 issue 2 Cover and Back matter SAP第35卷第2期封面和封底

IF 0.8 3区社会学

Studies in American Political Development Pub Date : 2021-10-01 DOI: 10.1017/s0898588x21000110

引用次数: 0

The 1982 Voting Rights Act Extension as a “Critical Juncture”: Ronald Reagan, Bob Dole, and Republican Party-Building 1982年投票权法案延期是一个“关键节点”:罗纳德·里根、鲍勃·多尔和共和党的建设

IF 0.8 3区社会学

Studies in American Political Development Pub Date : 2021-08-23 DOI: 10.1017/S0898588X21000079

Richard Johnson

{"title":"The 1982 Voting Rights Act Extension as a “Critical Juncture”: Ronald Reagan, Bob Dole, and Republican Party-Building","authors":"Richard Johnson","doi":"10.1017/S0898588X21000079","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0898588X21000079","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Republican support for the 1982 Voting Rights Act (VRA) extension is a puzzle for scholars of racial policy coalitions. The extension contained provisions that were manifestly antithetical to core principles of the “color-blind” policy alliance said to dominate the GOP. Recent scholarship has explained this puzzling decision by arguing that conservatives were confident that the VRA's most objectionable provisions could be undone by the federal bureaucracy and judiciary, while absolving Republicans of the blame of being against voting rights. This article suggests that the picture is more complicated. Applying the concept of “critical junctures” to the 1982 VRA extension, the article highlights the importance of actors’ contingent decisions and reveals a wider range of choices available to political entrepreneurs than has been conventionally understood. Highlighting differing views within the Reagan administration, this article also identifies a wider range of reasons why Republicans supported the act's extension, including career ambition, party-building, policy agenda advancement, and genuine commitment, rather than simply a defensive stance as implied by recent histories.","PeriodicalId":45195,"journal":{"name":"Studies in American Political Development","volume":"35 1","pages":"223 - 238"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2021-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48883280","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0