Catholic University Law Review最新文献_第3页

Towards a Theory of Assimilating Law Students into the Culture of the Legal Profession 法学专业学生融入法律职业文化的理论探讨

IF 0.2 4区社会学

Catholic University Law Review Pub Date : 2003-02-12 DOI: 10.2139/SSRN.347343

M. Monahan

引用次数: 5

Promoting life?: Embryonic stem cell research legislation. 促进生活吗?胚胎干细胞研究立法。

IF 0.2 4区社会学

Catholic University Law Review Pub Date : 2003-01-01

J Frederick Miller

引用次数: 0

In good conscience: the legal trend to include prescription contraceptives in employer insurance plans and Catholic charities' "conscience clause" objection. 良心:将处方避孕药纳入雇主保险计划的法律趋势和天主教慈善机构的“良心条款”反对。

IF 0.2 4区社会学

Catholic University Law Review Pub Date : 2003-01-01

Kate Spota

引用次数: 0

Federal genetic nondiscrimination legislation: the new "right" and the race to protect DNA at the local, state, and federal level. 联邦基因非歧视立法:在地方、州和联邦层面保护DNA的新“权利”和竞赛。

IF 0.2 4区社会学

Catholic University Law Review Pub Date : 2002-01-01

Katherine A Hathaway

引用次数: 0

Examining disputes over ownership rights to frozen embryos: will prior consent documents survive if challenged by state law and/or constitutional principles? 检查关于冷冻胚胎所有权的争议:如果受到州法律和/或宪法原则的挑战，事先同意文件是否有效?

IF 0.2 4区社会学

Catholic University Law Review Pub Date : 1999-01-01

D M Sheinbach

引用次数: 0

Constitutional Cultures: The Mentality and Consequences of Judicial Review by Robert F. Nagel 宪法文化:司法审查的心态与后果

IF 0.2 4区社会学

Catholic University Law Review Pub Date : 1989-01-01 DOI: 10.5860/choice.27-1780

R. May

{"title":"Constitutional Cultures: The Mentality and Consequences of Judicial Review by Robert F. Nagel","authors":"R. May","doi":"10.5860/choice.27-1780","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.27-1780","url":null,"abstract":"It's not easy to teach constitutional law. In the first part of the course, where the justifications for and the problems with judicial review are established, the arguments make some sense and the subject has some shape. The painful part begins with the examination of the actual case law of the United States Supreme'Court. In area after area this requires explication of elaborate \"tests\" the Court has developed for deciding whether or not some challenged action is consistent with some part of the Constitution. These tests have the appearance of precision and logic. Once mastered, they need only be applied to the particular activity at issue. If a state has treated children of married and unmarried women differently in distributing some public benefit, we apply the test for discrimination based on parental marital status or \"illegitimacy.\" We ask whether the state's distinction is substantially related to the achievement of a proper governmental interest.' If so, the state's action is valid. If not, it violates the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. If a state has put restrictions on telephone sales solicitors, we apply the test for limitations of commercial speech. We ask first whether the expression regulated concerns unlawful activity or is misleading. If not, we must inquire whether the state's interest in restricting the expression is substantial, whether the limitations advance that interest, and whether they are no greater than necessary to serve that interest. 2","PeriodicalId":44667,"journal":{"name":"Catholic University Law Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2,"publicationDate":"1989-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"71034223","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Democratic Representation: Reapportionment in Law and Politics. By Robert G. Dixon, Jr. New York: Oxford University Press, 1968. Pp. xviii, 654. Cloth: $12.50. 民主代表制:法律与政治的重新分配。小罗伯特·g·迪克森著，纽约:牛津大学出版社，1968年。第18页，654页布:12.50美元。

IF 0.2 4区社会学

Catholic University Law Review Pub Date : 1969-01-01 DOI: 10.1086/ahr/74.5.1750

A. L. Scanlan

引用次数: 1

The Devils of Due Process in Criminal Detection, Detention, and Trial 正当程序在刑事侦查、拘留和审判中的魔鬼

IF 0.2 4区社会学

Catholic University Law Review Pub Date : 1966-01-01 DOI: 10.2307/1598505

R. J. Traynor

{"title":"The Devils of Due Process in Criminal Detection, Detention, and Trial","authors":"R. J. Traynor","doi":"10.2307/1598505","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2307/1598505","url":null,"abstract":"WVe recall on this occasion not only Justice Cardozo's surpassingly noble spirit and imaginative genius, but his concern that judicial decisions evince a reasoned consideration of their far-reaching consequences. We can pay no better tribute to his sense of professional responsibility than to consider together the far-reaching consequences of judicial decisions in our own day on the now crucial problems of criminal procedure. Lawyers as well as laymen often voice extreme views on the problem of crime in the catch phrases of the day, and today's vogue is to pitch them at courts. A giant problem is in no measure solved, however, by indiscriminate charges that the courts have a predilection either for coddling criminals or for depriving those suspected of crime of whatever due process is due them. We might better concern ourselves with reinforcing the words of Mr. Justice Clark: \"There is no war between the Constitution and common sense.\"'1 Certainly there need be no war. It could break out at any time, however, unless we succeed in bringing constitutional doctrines down to earth on the homely local scenes. That may prove even more of a challenge than the launching of such doctrines, for landings often call for more skill than takeoffs. It is no secret that we have had some spectacular takeoffs in recent years. Our concern with pretrial criminal procedure has correspondingly grown in the time span encompassing the McNabb-Mallory2 doctrine on limiting prearraignment interrogation to foster prompt arraignment, the Mapp3 decision extending to states the rule excluding evidence obtained from unconstitutional searches and seizures, and the","PeriodicalId":44667,"journal":{"name":"Catholic University Law Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2,"publicationDate":"1966-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2307/1598505","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"68513528","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 4

Cruel and Unusual Punishments 残忍和不寻常的惩罚

IF 0.2 4区社会学

Catholic University Law Review Pub Date : 1953-01-01 DOI: 10.4324/9781315699868-178

Nancy-Nellis Warner

引用次数: 6