Utrecht Law Review最新文献_第4页

Planning the Energy Transition: A Comparative Examination of Large-Scale Solar Energy Siting on Agricultural Land in Australia 能源转型规划:澳大利亚农业用地大规模太阳能选址的比较研究

IF 0.6

Utrecht Law Review Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI: 10.36633/ulr.814

Madeline Taylor

引用次数: 1

Mitigating the Risk of Failure: Legal Accountability for International Carbon Markets 减轻失败的风险:国际碳市场的法律责任

IF 0.6

Utrecht Law Review Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI: 10.36633/ulr.810

Baine P. Kerr

引用次数: 0

(Re)framing Responsibility? Assessing the Division of Burdens Under the EU Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (重新)框架责任?欧盟碳边界调整机制下的负担划分评估

IF 0.6

Utrecht Law Review Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI: 10.36633/ulr.808

Natalie L. Dobson

引用次数: 1

Climate-Induced Wildfires and Strengthening Resilience in Electricity Infrastructure 气候引发的野火和加强电力基础设施的抵御能力

IF 0.6

Utrecht Law Review Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI: 10.36633/ulr.812

R. Lyster, D. Farber, Rory R. McFadden

引用次数: 0

Editorial: Special Issue Managing Responsibilities for Climate Change Risks 社论:特刊管理气候变化风险的责任

IF 0.6

Utrecht Law Review Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI: 10.36633/ulr.886

Katherine Owens, Natalie L. Dobson

引用次数: 0

Non-Retroactivity as a General Principle of Law 作为一般法律原则的不可追溯性

IF 0.6

Utrecht Law Review Pub Date : 2021-05-26 DOI: 10.36633/ULR.604

Yarik Kryvoi, Shaun Matos

引用次数: 7

‘Mind the (Knowledge) Gap’: Towards a Criminal Duty to Report Child Sexual Abuse? “注意(知识)差距”:举报儿童性虐待的刑事责任?

IF 0.6

Utrecht Law Review Pub Date : 2021-05-26 DOI: 10.36633/ULR.589

R. Kool, S. Kerssies, Tessa van der Rijst

{"title":"‘Mind the (Knowledge) Gap’: Towards a Criminal Duty to Report Child Sexual Abuse?","authors":"R. Kool, S. Kerssies, Tessa van der Rijst","doi":"10.36633/ULR.589","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.36633/ULR.589","url":null,"abstract":"Over the past few decades, child sexual abuse (‘CSA’) has become recognized as a serious and major problem in modern societies. Consequently, a common denominator in modern government policy is that CSA must be criminalized and pro-actively enforced. However, if national authorities are to be able to enforce, knowledge about the abuse is essential. Yet the disclosing of information to the authorities is hampered by the hidden nature of the offence. According to the Council of Europe Convention on the Protection of Children against Sexual Exploitation and Sexual Abuse (Lanzarote) and EU Directive 2011/93 on combating the sexual abuse and sexual exploitation of children, Member States should ‘encourage any person’ who knows about or suspects CSA to report this to the relevant authorities. To encourage such disclosure, several European governments have introduced mandatory reporting systems imposing a (non-criminal) duty on designated professionals to report information about or suspicions of CSA to the competent authorities. This article examines whether introducing a criminal duty to report CSA could be recommendable for the European Union or the Council of Europe in order to improve Member States’ knowledge of CSA and thus protect children more effectively against this type of violence. Using the outcomes of our recent study into the possibilities and impossibilities of extending the present Dutch criminal duty (aangifteplicht) to report rape, we argue that a criminal duty to report CSA is not recommendable as a means to encourage CSA disclosure by third parties.","PeriodicalId":44535,"journal":{"name":"Utrecht Law Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6,"publicationDate":"2021-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43568867","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

Role of the Industry in the Enforcement of the Tobacco Policy 烟草业在执行烟草政策中的作用

IF 0.6

Utrecht Law Review Pub Date : 2021-05-26 DOI: 10.36633/ULR.611

S. Tosza

{"title":"Role of the Industry in the Enforcement of the Tobacco Policy","authors":"S. Tosza","doi":"10.36633/ULR.611","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.36633/ULR.611","url":null,"abstract":"Tobacco products are heavily regulated because, in particular, of their acknowledged harmfulness to health, with highly elevated prices as one of the most important means of discouraging consumption. One of the most serious threats to the effectiveness of the tobacco policy comes from the trafficking of illicit tobacco, which is much cheaper, often of lower quality, and which reduces state and EU revenues. The achievement of tobacco policy objectives, in particular the combatting of illicit tobacco trade, depends on the participation of private actors, amongst which big industry plays a crucial role. Yet, the legal landscape of enforcement duties of the tobacco industry is a patchwork of instruments, unevenly affecting different players. In particular it includes controversial agreements between the major tobacco producers and the EU and Member States, to which three out of four major producers are subject. The agreement with the fourth – PMI – was not extended by the Commission in 2016. The decision as to the extension of the remaining agreements is looming. The objective of this article is to analyse the framework of duties of the tobacco industry in the enforcement of the tobacco policy, especially against illicit tobacco, and to reflect on whether the enforcement model, including the agreements with the tobacco producers, should be kept or abandoned.","PeriodicalId":44535,"journal":{"name":"Utrecht Law Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6,"publicationDate":"2021-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49084044","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 5

A Right to Have One’s Case Heard within a Reasonable Time before the Czech and the Polish Supreme Administrative Courts – Standards, the Reality and Proposals for the Future 捷克和波兰最高行政法院在合理时间内审理案件的权利——标准、现实和未来建议

IF 0.6

Utrecht Law Review Pub Date : 2021-05-26 DOI: 10.36633/ULR.586

Wojciech Piątek, L. Potěšil

引用次数: 2

Roadmap on Comparative Law in the Case-Law and Practice of the Supreme Courts of the EU 欧盟最高法院判例法和实践中的比较法路线图

IF 0.6

Utrecht Law Review Pub Date : 2021-05-26 DOI: 10.36633/ULR.692

Maarten Feteris

引用次数: 0