SCANDINAVIAN STUDIES最新文献_第3页

4区社会学

SCANDINAVIAN STUDIES Pub Date : 2023-07-01 DOI: 10.5406/21638195.95.2.07

Björn Nordfjörd

{"title":"A History of Danish Cinema","authors":"Björn Nordfjörd","doi":"10.5406/21638195.95.2.07","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5406/21638195.95.2.07","url":null,"abstract":"Without a doubt, Danish cinema has been one of the hot spots of twenty-first-century world cinema. Turning the success of Dogme 95 into a springboard, so many Danish filmmakers have experienced remarkable international success—and an unparalleled one, considering the small size of the country. The success of Danish cinema is evident at the domestic box office, the international film festival circuit, and even Hollywood. And by Hollywood, I don't mean only the Academy Awards, where Danish films have received seven nominations for best foreign film this century and won twice, but also in the making of English-language films competing in the Hollywood market. This newfound interest has been given some historical weight with the continued interest in celebrated auteur Carl Theodor Dreyer.Not surprisingly, this success has been accompanied by plenty of academic interest and some solid scholarly publications. In English, we have seen numerous books on the Dogme phenomenon and even monographs on specific Dogme films. Many auteur studies have seen the light of day with scholarship on Lars von Trier constituting a field all its own. Other scholars have taken a broader view but still confined their reach to New Danish Cinema. Television has not been left out of the equation, and much work has been done on the comparable global success of Danish television. But what we have not had until now is a work that presents itself as A History of Danish Cinema overall.As the editors C. Claire Thomson, Isak Thorsen, and Pei-Sze Chow freely admit in their introduction, such an enterprise is fraught with challenges and difficult decisions. Do you aim for a broad overview or close analyses of specific issues? Do you summarize previous research or privilege new findings? Do you focus on the films themselves or their institutional context? Instead of favoring a single approach, the editors have tried to find a balance between multiple, and not necessarily always reciprocal, goals. Indeed, despite the book's title emphasizing a single history (albeit with an indefinite rather than a definite article), the editors refer to its many chapters as so many histories in the plural. And as with any other important decision, something is won but also lost by this particular approach: “The richness of perspective that is gained from an anthology of critical voices also sacrifices the cohesiveness of a monograph” (p. 6). While there is truth in their forthrightness here—readers should not expect a straightforward overview of Danish cinema from the volume—the editors have nonetheless aimed for a certain cohesiveness. For starters, the entries are arranged in a chronological order, or as much as possible, as their time span can vary quite a bit, and are furthermore split into four different parts defined by historical time period. The editors and authors have also provided a plethora of cross-references to assist readers in linking different chapters together.Most importantly, they hav","PeriodicalId":44446,"journal":{"name":"SCANDINAVIAN STUDIES","volume":"63 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135154869","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}