BYZANTINISCHE ZEITSCHRIFT最新文献_第10页

Bianca Kühnel / Gustav Kühnel. Die Geburtskirche in Bethlehem. Die kreuzfahrerzeitliche Auskleidung einer frühchristlichen Basilika 比安卡伯利恒的圣诞教堂十字形装饰的早期基督教圣彼得教堂

IF 0.3 3区历史学

BYZANTINISCHE ZEITSCHRIFT Pub Date : 2021-09-01 DOI: 10.1515/bz-2021-0072

B. Brenk

引用次数: 0

John II Komnenos’ campaign in Cilician Armenia 约翰二世在西里西亚亚美尼亚的战役

IF 0.3 3区历史学

BYZANTINISCHE ZEITSCHRIFT Pub Date : 2021-09-01 DOI: 10.1515/bz-2021-0065

Konstantinos Takirtakoglou

{"title":"John II Komnenos’ campaign in Cilician Armenia","authors":"Konstantinos Takirtakoglou","doi":"10.1515/bz-2021-0065","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/bz-2021-0065","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The present paper challenges the assertion that John II Komnenos’ first campaign against Cilician Armenia (1137) was directly connected with the conflict between the Byzantines and the Principality of Antioch. The supposed anti-Byzantine alliance between the Armenians and the Crusaders is examined within this context; excerpts from the relevant sources not only cast doubt on its existence, but also allow the assertion that during the period under examination the relations between the Armenians and the Crusaders were hostile. Thus, the issue that arises is the following: If Levon was an enemy of the Crusaders, why did he not stand at the Byzantines’ side, instead waging war against them? The assertion of the present paper regarding this policy decision is that it was due to Levon’s alliance with John’s primary enemy in the East, the Danishmends. In fact, the sources indicate that the subjugation of Armenia was of greater priority for the Byzantine emperor in his campaign than the conquest of Antioch. This is demonstrated by the fact that John refused to conclude a treaty with the Rubenid lord similar to that which he had concluded with the prince of Antioch, and is supported by the operational maneuvers of the Byzantine forces during the campaign. To connect John’s activities in Cilicia with his subsequent campaign in Pontus and the Turkish reactions to these Byzantine strategic moves, the present paper asserts that John’s conquest of Cilicia was part of a wider policy of strategic encirclement of the Danishmends.","PeriodicalId":44281,"journal":{"name":"BYZANTINISCHE ZEITSCHRIFT","volume":"114 1","pages":"1329 - 1349"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48948343","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Titelei 标题

IF 0.3 3区历史学

BYZANTINISCHE ZEITSCHRIFT Pub Date : 2021-09-01 DOI: 10.1515/bz-2021-frontmatter11403

引用次数: 0

Die zweite Definition der Philosophie der alexandrinischen neuplatonischen Schule in den Werken des Niketas Stethatos 尼克塔斯·Stethatos所著的文章里，反映了亚历山大政治理念的第二定义

IF 0.3 3区历史学

BYZANTINISCHE ZEITSCHRIFT Pub Date : 2021-09-01 DOI: 10.1515/bz-2021-0054

G. Diamantopoulos

引用次数: 0

Stemmatologisches Stemmatologisches

IF 0.3 3区历史学