Parliamentary History最新文献

The Discovery of D'Ewes's Long Parliament Diary 发现达维斯的长期议会日记

IF 0.2 3区历史学

Parliamentary History Pub Date : 2024-06-01 DOI: 10.1111/1750-0206.12747

M. Mendle

{"title":"The Discovery of D'Ewes's Long Parliament Diary","authors":"M. Mendle","doi":"10.1111/1750-0206.12747","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1750-0206.12747","url":null,"abstract":"2023 marked the centenary of Wallace Notestein's edition of part of Sir Simonds D'Ewes's journal of the Long Parliament. This essay treats the diary's pre‐Notestein emergence as a prime source for the history of the Long Parliament. Thomas Carlyle was first to publicise the diary. He could not read it but paid for a ‘transcript’ of major passages. Though only indirectly useful to Carlyle's project of editing Oliver Cromwell's letters and speeches, the so‐called transcript prompted Carlyle to experiment at the boundary of history and fiction. Carlyle passed the transcript to the antiquary John Bruce and to John Forster. Both praised the diary, touted their paleographical skills, and also relied on the ‘transcript’. Whatever their paleographical limitations, their enthusiasm canonised the text. When Samuel Rawson Gardiner turned to the Long Parliament, D'Ewes's diary joined the Thomason tracts and the State Papers as foundational sources. Though he owed his source‐agenda to Carlyle, Bruce, Forster and J. L. Sanford, Gardiner was determined to supersede them, in large part by correcting their use of D'Ewes's diary. In Forster's case, Gardiner verged on the patricidal. This was a moment in the bifurcation of ‘history’ from ‘letters’, and in the creation of the historical ‘profession’.","PeriodicalId":44112,"journal":{"name":"Parliamentary History","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141402372","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Cover Image, Volume 43, Issue 2 封面图片，第 43 卷第 2 期

IF 0.2 3区历史学

Parliamentary History Pub Date : 2024-06-01 DOI: 10.1111/1750-0206.12692

引用次数: 0

A Liberal Chronicle in Peace and War. Journals and Papers of J.A. Pease, 1st Lord Gainford, 1911–1915. Edited by CameronHazlehurst and ChristineWoodland. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2023. xxiii, 572 pp. hardback. £190.00. ISBN 9780192887054. 和平与战争中的自由纪事。第一任盖恩福德勋爵 J.A. 皮斯的日记和论文，1911-1915 年。卡梅伦-哈兹勒赫斯特（CameronHazlehurst）和克里斯汀-伍德兰德（ChristineWoodland）编辑。牛津大学出版社：牛津大学出版社。2023.xxiii, 572 pp.ISBN9780192887054。

IF 0.2 3区历史学

Parliamentary History Pub Date : 2024-06-01 DOI: 10.1111/1750-0206.12745

R. Toye

引用次数: 0

The Diaries of Anthony Hewitson, Provincial Journalist. Volume 1: 1865–1887. Edited by AndrewHobbs. Cambridge: Open Book Publishers. 2022. xlix, 673 pp. paperback. £25.95. ISBN 9781800642362. 省级记者安东尼-休伊森的日记。第 1 卷：1865-1887 年。安德鲁-霍布斯编辑。剑桥：开卷出版社。2022.xlix, 673 pp.ISBN9781800642362。

IF 0.2 3区历史学

Parliamentary History Pub Date : 2024-06-01 DOI: 10.1111/1750-0206.12741

Kathryn Rix

引用次数: 0

The Sporting Paper and the Culture of Popular Conservatism in Edwardian Britain* 体育报纸与爱德华时代英国的大众保守主义文化*

IF 0.2 3区历史学

Parliamentary History Pub Date : 2024-06-01 DOI: 10.1111/1750-0206.12750

H.G. Cocks

{"title":"The Sporting Paper and the Culture of Popular Conservatism in Edwardian Britain*","authors":"H.G. Cocks","doi":"10.1111/1750-0206.12750","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1750-0206.12750","url":null,"abstract":"Late‐Victorian and Edwardian Popular Conservatism is now mainly seen as a cultural‐ideological form, and this article aims to reconstruct one aspect of this ethos by focusing on the use of sport, especially horse racing, as a means of political differentiation and a method of attracting a new mass electorate to the Tory cause. The sporting paper focusing on horse racing was one way of doing this. Weeklies like the Sporting Times and the Winning Post tried to sell high Tory ideals to a mass electorate and thereby to knit together an older aristocratic party with newer urban, white‐collar, and working‐class voters. The political outgrowth of this element of popular conservatism was the Sporting League (established 1894) and also the later National Sporting League (1905). Both of these organisations took aim at Radical Liberals, and especially their attempt to restrict betting, and did so by exerting pressure at national and local elections from 1895 to 1914. Some of those involved with the Sporting Leagues and the racing paper became Conservative candidates. Although it is difficult to estimate the actual electoral impact of both Sporting Leagues, they nevertheless created a political style that might have a broad appeal, especially to a white‐collar class and working people.","PeriodicalId":44112,"journal":{"name":"Parliamentary History","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141411215","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

‘Shut Up! Sit Down!’: The Politics of Disruption and the 1886 Home Rule Crisis in England* 闭嘴！坐下！'：英国的破坏政治与 1886 年地方自治危机*

IF 0.2 3区历史学

Parliamentary History Pub Date : 2024-06-01 DOI: 10.1111/1750-0206.12748

Naomi Lloyd‐Jones

{"title":"‘Shut Up! Sit Down!’: The Politics of Disruption and the 1886 Home Rule Crisis in England*","authors":"Naomi Lloyd‐Jones","doi":"10.1111/1750-0206.12748","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1750-0206.12748","url":null,"abstract":"This article examines the oral and physical disruption of ‘public’ meetings in England in the spring of 1886, when such activity formed part of broader contests over the legitimacy of extra‐parliamentary responses to the Liberal government's Irish Home Rule Bill. Disruption is an important example of the diverse ways in which home rule energised politics outside Westminster and of the heatedness of grassroots responses to it. For those who engaged in it, disruption offered forms of political interaction and participation that, additionally, made claims to representation and opinion. However, disruption was a practice of contestation that was itself the subject of contention and it was decried as transgressing the bounds of appropriate political conduct. Disruption could be seen, in both intent and effect, as a permissive or subversive, inclusive or exclusionary, behaviour. It could therefore legitimise or undermine claims that popular feeling was on the side of or opposed to the policy. The ‘politics of disruption’ both reflected and generated intense debate about the state of politics in an age of ‘mass democracy’ – of which home rule was the first major crisis – and about the sanctity of political rights and liberties. This article argues that our understanding of political disruption is enhanced by examining its practice and reception at historical moments, outside the episodic election cycle, when contemporaries believed that it was critically important that ‘public opinion’ on a political issue be ascertained and voiced, and when the validity of such opinion was disputed.","PeriodicalId":44112,"journal":{"name":"Parliamentary History","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141390751","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

The National Covenant and the Solemn League and Covenant 1660–1696. By JamesWalters. Woodbridge: The Boydell Press. 2022. 232 pp. hardback. £75.00. ISBN 97810783276042. 民族盟约》和《庄严同盟与盟约》1660-1696 年。詹姆斯-沃尔特斯著。伍德布里奇：博伊德尔出版社。2022.232 pp.ISBN97810783276042。

IF 0.2 3区历史学

Parliamentary History Pub Date : 2024-06-01 DOI: 10.1111/1750-0206.12742

P. Seaward

引用次数: 0

Edmund Sexten Pery: The Politics of Virtue and Intrigue in Eighteenth‐century Ireland. Edited by David A.Fleming. Dublin: Four Courts Press. 2023. 310 pp. hardback £60.00. ISBN 9781801510875. 埃德蒙-塞克斯滕-佩里十八世纪爱尔兰的美德与阴谋政治》。戴维-A-弗莱明编辑。都柏林：Four Courts Press.2023.310 pp.ISBN9781801510875。

IF 0.2 3区历史学

Parliamentary History Pub Date : 2024-06-01 DOI: 10.1111/1750-0206.12738

D.W. Hayton

引用次数: 0

English MPs: Legislators and Servants of their Constituents, 1750–1800. By MichaelMcCahill. London: Bloomsbury. 2023. xi, 271 pp. hardback. £85.00. ISBN. 9781350332270. 英国国会议员：立法者及其选民的仆人，1750-1800 年。迈克尔-麦卡希尔著。伦敦：布鲁姆斯伯里。2023.xi, 271 pp.ISBN.9781350332270.

IF 0.2 3区历史学

Parliamentary History Pub Date : 2024-06-01 DOI: 10.1111/1750-0206.12739

Maria Tauber

引用次数: 0

Witness Seminar: Writing to Politicians 证人研讨会：给政治家写信

IF 0.2 3区历史学

Parliamentary History Pub Date : 2024-06-01 DOI: 10.1111/1750-0206.12749

Kit Kowol, R. Toye

{"title":"Witness Seminar: Writing to Politicians","authors":"Kit Kowol, R. Toye","doi":"10.1111/1750-0206.12749","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1750-0206.12749","url":null,"abstract":"This article represents the transcript of a 2022 witness seminar on the theme of members of the British public writing to politicians. Collectively, the witnesses have experience of this issue dating from the early 1970s through to the present day. Angie Williams shares her experience of handling correspondence for Ed Miliband and Jeremy Corbyn as leaders of the Labour Party. Lord Kinnock (Neil Kinnock) describes what it was like to receive correspondence both as an MP and as Labour Party leader. David Beckingham relates his experience working in the Number 10 Political Office under Theresa May and Boris Johnson. Lord Parkinson (Stephen Parkinson) also gives a perspective on May, for whom he worked both at the Home Office and in Downing Street. Camilla Jequier explains her role dealing with correspondence for two Conservative MPs. The issues explored include attempts to use correspondence to measure public opinion, the shift from letters to email, gifts enclosed with letters, correspondents with mental health issues, death threats, and the emotional dimensions of correspondence. The witnesses had similar or overlapping experiences. There was agreement that correspondence is often misdirected or phrased in ways that are unlikely to be productive. This may point to a failure of citizenship education.","PeriodicalId":44112,"journal":{"name":"Parliamentary History","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141407876","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0