Andrea Orfanoz-Cheuquelaf, Alexei Rozanov, M. Weber, C. Arosio, A. Ladstätter-weißenmayer, J. Burrows
{"title":"Total ozone column retrieval from OMPS-NM measurements","authors":"Andrea Orfanoz-Cheuquelaf, Alexei Rozanov, M. Weber, C. Arosio, A. Ladstätter-weißenmayer, J. Burrows","doi":"10.5194/AMT-2021-61","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5194/AMT-2021-61","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. A scientific total ozone column product from the Ozone Mapping and Profiler Suite Nadir Mapper (OMPS-NM) observations and its retrieval algorithm are presented. The retrieval employs the Weighting Function Fitting Approach (WFFA), a modification of the Weighting Function Differential Optical Absorption Spectroscopy (WFDOAS) technique. The total ozone columns retrieved with WFFA are in very good agreement with other datasets. A mean difference of 0.6 % with respect to ground-based Brewer and Dobson measurements is observed. Seasonal and latitudinal variations are well represented and in agreement with other satellite datasets. The comparison of our product with the scientific product of OMPS-NM indicate a mean bias of around 0.1 %. The comparison with the Tropospheric Monitoring Instrument products (S5P/TROPOMI) OFFL and WFDOAS, shows a persistent negative bias of about −0.5 % for OFFL and –2 % for WFDOAS. Larger differences are only observed in the polar regions. This data product is intended to be used for trend analysis and the retrieval of tropospheric ozone combined with the OMPS limb profiler data.","PeriodicalId":441110,"journal":{"name":"Atmospheric Measurement Techniques Discussions","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"114889574","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
M. Oue, P. Kollias, S. Matrosov, A. Battaglia, A. Ryzhkov
{"title":"Combination Analysis of Multi-Wavelength, Multi-Parameter Radar Measurements for Snowfall","authors":"M. Oue, P. Kollias, S. Matrosov, A. Battaglia, A. Ryzhkov","doi":"10.5194/AMT-2021-78","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5194/AMT-2021-78","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. Radar dual wavelength ratio (DWR) measurements from the Stony Brook Radar Observatory Ka-band Scanning Polarimetric Radar (KASPR, 35 GHz), a profiling W-band (94 GHz) and a next generation K-band (24-GHz) Micro Rain Radar (MRRPro) were exploited for ice particle identification using triple frequency approaches. The results indicated that two of the radar frequencies (K- and Ka-band) are not sufficiently separated, thus, the triple radar frequency approaches had limited success. On the other hand, a joint analysis of DWR, mean vertical Doppler velocity (MDV), and polarimetric radar variables indicated potential in identifying ice particle types and distinguishing among different ice growth processes and even in revealing additional microphysical details.We investigated all DWR pairs in conjunction with MDV from the KASPR profiling measurements and differential reflectivity (ZDR) and specific differential phase (KDP) from the KASPR quasi-vertical profiles. The DWR-versus-MDV diagrams coupled with the polarimetric observables exhibited distinct separations of particle populations attributed to different rime degrees and particle growth processes. In fallstreaks, the 35–94 GHz DWR pair increased with the magnitude of MDV corresponding to the scattering calculations for aggregates with lower degrees of riming. The DWR values further increased at lower altitudes while ZDR slightly decreased, indicating further aggregation. Particle populations with higher rime degrees had a similar increase of DWR, but the 1–1.5 m s−1 larger magnitude of MDV and rapid decreases in KDP and ZDR. The analysis also depicted the early stage of riming where ZDR increased with the MDV magnitude collocated with small increases of DWR. This approach will improve quantitative estimations of snow amount and microphysical quantities such as rime mass fraction.\u0000","PeriodicalId":441110,"journal":{"name":"Atmospheric Measurement Techniques Discussions","volume":"4 4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-03-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"129071472","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Characterizing and correcting the warm bias observed in AMDAR\u0000temperature observations","authors":"S. Haan, P. M. Jong, J. V. D. Meulen","doi":"10.5194/AMT-2020-519","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5194/AMT-2020-519","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. Some aircraft temperature observations, retrieved through the Aircraft Meteorological Data Relay (AMDAR), suffer from a significant warm bias when comparing observations with numerical weather prediction (NWP) model. In this manuscript we show that this warm bias of AMDAR temperature can be characterized and consequently reduced substantially. The characterization of this warm bias is based on the methodology of measuring temperature with a moving sensor and can be split into two separate processes. The first process depends on the flight phase of the aircraft and relates to difference of timing, as it appears that the time of measurement of altitude and temperature differ. When an aircraft is ascending or descending this will result in small bias in temperature due to the (on average) presence of an atmospheric temperature lapse rate. The second process is related to internal corrections applied to pressure altitude without feedback to temperature observation measurement. Based on NWP model temperature data combined with additional information on Mach number and true airspeed, we were able to estimate corrections using an 18 months period from January 2017 to July 2018. Next, the corrections were applied on AMDAR observations over the period from September 2018 to mid-December 2019. Comparing these corrected temperatures with (independent) radiosonde temperature observations demonstrates a reduction of the temperature bias from 0.5 K to around zero and reduction of standard deviation of almost 10 %.\u0000","PeriodicalId":441110,"journal":{"name":"Atmospheric Measurement Techniques Discussions","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"121723110","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}