Israel Yearbook on Human Rights, Volume 32 (2002)最新文献

The Status of A1 Qaeda/Taliban Detainees under the Geneva Conventions 《日内瓦公约》下基地组织/塔利班在押人员的地位

Israel Yearbook on Human Rights, Volume 32 (2002) Pub Date : 2003-01-01 DOI: 10.1163/9789004423169_008

引用次数: 4

Jus ad Bellum and International Terrorism 战争法和国际恐怖主义

Israel Yearbook on Human Rights, Volume 32 (2002) Pub Date : 2003-01-01 DOI: 10.1163/9789004219120_023

Rein Müllerson

引用次数: 3

Incarceration of Unlawful Combatants Law, 5762-2002 《非法战斗人员监禁法》，5762-2002年

Israel Yearbook on Human Rights, Volume 32 (2002) Pub Date : 2003-01-01 DOI: 10.1163/9789004423169_012

引用次数: 0

The Legal Case for Invading Iraq and Toppling Hussein 入侵伊拉克并推翻侯赛因政权的法律依据

Israel Yearbook on Human Rights, Volume 32 (2002) Pub Date : 2003-01-01 DOI: 10.1163/9789004423169_005

引用次数: 0

Unlawful Combatancy 非法Combatancy

Israel Yearbook on Human Rights, Volume 32 (2002) Pub Date : 2003-01-01 DOI: 10.1163/9789004423169_007

Unlawful Combatancy

引用次数: 26

The Laws of War in the War on Terror 反恐战争中的战争法

Israel Yearbook on Human Rights, Volume 32 (2002) Pub Date : 2003-01-01 DOI: 10.1163/9789004219120_022

A. Roberts

引用次数: 15

International Law and the War on Terrorism: The Road Ahead 国际法与反恐战争:未来之路

Israel Yearbook on Human Rights, Volume 32 (2002) Pub Date : 2002-10-01 DOI: 10.2139/SSRN.336260

J. Murphy

引用次数: 1

Counter-Terrorism and the Use of Force in International Law 反恐与国际法中的武力使用

Israel Yearbook on Human Rights, Volume 32 (2002) Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.1163/9789004423169_003

M. Schmitt

{"title":"Counter-Terrorism and the Use of Force in International Law","authors":"M. Schmitt","doi":"10.1163/9789004423169_003","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004423169_003","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract : In this paper, Michael Schmitt explores the legality of the attacks against Al Qaeda and the Taliban under the \"jus ad bellum,\" that component of international law that governs when a State may resort to force as an instrument of national policy. Although States have conducted military counterterrorist operations in the past, the scale and scope of Operation Enduring Freedom may signal a sea change in strategies to defend against terrorism. This paper explores the normative limit on counterterrorist operations. Specifically, under what circumstances can a victim State react forcibly to an act of terrorism? Against whom? When? With what degree of severity? And for how long? The author contends that the attacks against Al Qaeda were legitimate exercises of the rights of individual and collective defense. They were necessary and proportional, and once the Taliban refused to comply with U.S. and United Nations demands to turn over the terrorists located in Afghanistan, it was legally appropriate for coalition forces to enter the country for the purpose of ending the ongoing Al Qaeda terrorist campaign. However, the attacks on the Taliban were less well grounded in traditional understandings of international law. Although the Taliban were clearly in violation of their legal obligation not to allow their territory to be used as a terrorist sanctuary, the author suggests that the degree and nature of the relationship between the Taliban and Al Qaeda may not have been such that the September 11 attacks could be attributed to the Taliban, thereby disallowing strikes against them in self-defense under traditional understandings of international law. Were the attacks, therefore, illegal? Not necessarily. Over the past half-century the international community's understanding of the international law governing the use of force by States has been continuously evolving. The author presents criteria likely to drive future assessments of the legality of counterterrorist operatio7","PeriodicalId":440409,"journal":{"name":"Israel Yearbook on Human Rights, Volume 32 (2002)","volume":"94 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"124615618","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 28

Judge Advocates in Combat: Army Lawyers in Military Operations from Vietnam to Haiti 战斗中的法官辩护:从越南到海地军事行动中的军队律师

Israel Yearbook on Human Rights, Volume 32 (2002) Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.1163/9789004423169_010

Christopher W. Behan

引用次数: 8