发布求助
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献

Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
Process Evaluation of a Cooking Circle Program in the Arctic: Developing the Mukluk Logic Model and Identifying Key Enablers and Barriers for Program Implementation 北极烹饪圈计划过程评估：开发 Mukluk 逻辑模型并确定计划实施的关键推动因素和障碍
IF 0.8
Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation Pub Date : 2023-12-01 DOI: 10.3138/cjpe-2023-0031
Lena Dedyukina, Celina Wolki, Denise Wolki, S. Wesche, T. Kenny, Kelly Skinner
{"title":"Process Evaluation of a Cooking Circle Program in the Arctic: Developing the Mukluk Logic Model and Identifying Key Enablers and Barriers for Program Implementation","authors":"Lena Dedyukina, Celina Wolki, Denise Wolki, S. Wesche, T. Kenny, Kelly Skinner","doi":"10.3138/cjpe-2023-0031","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3138/cjpe-2023-0031","url":null,"abstract":"This study investigates the implementation of the Nutrition North Canada (NNC)-funded cooking circle program in the Inuvialuit (Inuit) hamlet of Paulatuk, Northwest Territories. The objectives of this study are to co-develop a culturally relevant logic model and to conduct a process evaluation of program implementation to identify and assess key enablers and barriers. The co-developed Mukluk Logic Model played an instrumental role in the conceptualization of the process evaluation. The process evaluation results indicated that the long-standing sustainability of the program is related to the consistency of program funding, engaging facilitation practices, and creative utilization of the multi-purpose space for program activities. However, significant barriers limit program sustainability. These include funding amounts and distribution, space and equipment limitations, and human resources challenges. This study illustrates the utility of qualitative process evaluation research in a Canadian Arctic community context and generates important place-based knowledge and insights to better support northern community-based food preparation programs.","PeriodicalId":43924,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation","volume":"475 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138992695","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Community-Based Evaluation When Localizing Sustainable Development Goals 可持续发展目标本地化时的社区评价
IF 0.8
Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation Pub Date : 2023-12-01 DOI: 10.3138/cjpe.75810
Rich Janzen, Sarah Switzer, Jean de Dieu Basabose, Madeline Docherty, Paul Heidebrecht
{"title":"Community-Based Evaluation When Localizing Sustainable Development Goals","authors":"Rich Janzen, Sarah Switzer, Jean de Dieu Basabose, Madeline Docherty, Paul Heidebrecht","doi":"10.3138/cjpe.75810","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3138/cjpe.75810","url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this practice note is to demonstrate how a community-based approach to evaluation can be used to support the evaluations of the United Nation’s Sustainable Development Goals in local community settings. The authors argue that using a community-based evaluation approach that is stakeholder-driven, participatory, and action-oriented is one mechanism to address this challenge. They illustrate the utility of such an evaluation approach by identifying their key learnings through a national capacity-building project.","PeriodicalId":43924,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation","volume":"203 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139013599","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Indigenous Feminist Evaluation Methods: A Case Study in “My Two Aunties” 本土女性主义评估方法：我的两个姑妈 "案例研究
IF 0.8
Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation Pub Date : 2023-12-01 DOI: 10.3138/cjpe-2023-0042
Shelbi Nahwilet Meissner, Jeremy Braithwaite, Karan Thorne, Art Martinez, Elizabeth Lycett
{"title":"Indigenous Feminist Evaluation Methods: A Case Study in “My Two Aunties”","authors":"Shelbi Nahwilet Meissner, Jeremy Braithwaite, Karan Thorne, Art Martinez, Elizabeth Lycett","doi":"10.3138/cjpe-2023-0042","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3138/cjpe-2023-0042","url":null,"abstract":"This paper offers some key characteristics of Indigenous feminist approaches to evaluation and spotlights a unique and promising example of Indigenous feminist evaluation methods in the My Two Aunties (M2A) program. Though Indigenous feminist evaluation methods are diverse, complex, and community-specific, some general characteristics we point to in this analysis are commitments to anti-colonial conceptions of family, gender, and belonging, an assertion of the epistemic and evaluative importance of felt knowledge, the explicit confrontation of settler colonialism’s impact on Indigenous life, and the commitment to the transformative potential of community-led caretaking. We then turn to what we see as an exemplar of Indigenous feminist evaluation methods—the evaluation component of the My Two Aunties (M2A) program. Our paper will provide theoretical scaffolding for Indigenous feminist evaluation and add to the growing body of Indigenous scholarship that challenges what “counts” as evidence in settler scholarship arenas.","PeriodicalId":43924,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation","volume":"369 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139022180","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Arts-Based Evaluation 基于艺术的评价
IF 0.8
Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation Pub Date : 2023-12-01 DOI: 10.3138/cjpe-2023-0024
Karyn Hurlbut, Astrid Brousselle
{"title":"Arts-Based Evaluation","authors":"Karyn Hurlbut, Astrid Brousselle","doi":"10.3138/cjpe-2023-0024","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3138/cjpe-2023-0024","url":null,"abstract":"Arts-based evaluation is an effective way to engage people and uncover meaningful, valid results. In the project that was used to inform this article, an arts-based approach was used to gain an understanding of the effects the Communities ChooseWell Program has had according to the Champions’ experiences. Communities ChooseWell is an Alberta Recreation and Parks Association Program that promotes healthy eating and active living in communities across Alberta. The evaluation was completed using an arts-based approach which allowed us to explore varied long-term effects in different contexts. The arts used within this project include painting, writing narratives, and quilting. This article will present some reflections and recommendations that could inform evaluators that are interested in using arts-based approaches. This article starts with information from relevant literature about arts-based approaches to evaluation followed by what was learned throughout the ChooseWell arts-based evaluation and recommendations for evaluators when planning an arts-based evaluation.","PeriodicalId":43924,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation","volume":"181 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138988310","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Employing Mixed-Methods Citation Analysis to Investigate Transnational Influence in Evaluation Theory 运用混合方法引文分析调查评价理论中的跨国影响
IF 0.8
Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation Pub Date : 2023-12-01 DOI: 10.3138/cjpe-2023-0009
M. Goodnight, Cherie M. Avent, Ramya Kumaran
{"title":"Employing Mixed-Methods Citation Analysis to Investigate Transnational Influence in Evaluation Theory","authors":"M. Goodnight, Cherie M. Avent, Ramya Kumaran","doi":"10.3138/cjpe-2023-0009","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3138/cjpe-2023-0009","url":null,"abstract":"Mixed-methods citation analysis can be used to conduct research on evaluation (RoE) studies with a cross-country focus. In particular, this RoE study employs mixed-methods citation analysis to investigate the influence of an evaluation theorist’s concepts transnationally. We use Jennifer Greene’s program evaluation theories as a case example for observing the imprint of a theorists’ concepts on evaluators theorizing and practicing outside of the United States. Conducting this case analysis highlights the methodological affordances and shortcomings of citation analysis. The article addresses equity and diversity considerations in using citation analysis, particularly for investigating multidirectional transnational influences in evaluation theory.","PeriodicalId":43924,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation","volume":"51 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139016849","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
The “What” and “Why” of (Un)Ethical Evaluation Practice: A Meta-Narrative Review and Ethical Awareness Framework 不道德的评估实践 "是什么 "和 "为什么"？元叙事回顾与伦理意识框架
IF 0.8
Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation Pub Date : 2023-12-01 DOI: 10.3138/cjpe-2023-0023
Betty Onyura, Emilia Main, Claudia Barned, Alexandra Wong, Tin D. Vo, Nivetha Chandran, Nazi Torabi, Deena M. Hamza
{"title":"The “What” and “Why” of (Un)Ethical Evaluation Practice: A Meta-Narrative Review and Ethical Awareness Framework","authors":"Betty Onyura, Emilia Main, Claudia Barned, Alexandra Wong, Tin D. Vo, Nivetha Chandran, Nazi Torabi, Deena M. Hamza","doi":"10.3138/cjpe-2023-0023","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3138/cjpe-2023-0023","url":null,"abstract":"There is growing recognition of the complex moral and ethical tensions associated with evaluation practice. However, there are scant evidence-informed frameworks for cultivating ethical awareness or informing ethical deliberation across the evaluation landscape. Thus, we aimed to synthesize research evidence on evaluation ethics, and draw on these findings to develop an evidence-informed evaluation ethics framework. Our methodological approach involved, first, conducting a meta-narrative review of empirical studies on evaluation ethics. Specifically, we conducted a systematic peer-reviewed and grey literature search, then identified, extracted, and thematically organize data from 20 studies that meet inclusion criteria. Second, in consultation with an ethicist, we curated findings on ethical concerns within an integrated evaluation ethics framework. Our results illustrate six thematic patterns of research inquiry on evaluation ethics and highlight trends, and gaps. The ethics framework (ACAP) we develop includes four multi-faceted categories. It outlines six Accountabilities (where ethical consideration is owed), illustrates how ethical Concerns can manifest in practice, and outlines diverse stakeholder groups’ Agency over the management of ethical concerns. Critically, it outlines five meta-categories of ethical principles (P) including systematic and transparent inquiry, accordant self-determination, fairness, beneficence and non-maleficence, and reflexive stewardship. Implications for priming ethical awareness, navigating ethical conflicts, and advancing evaluation ethics education and research are discussed.","PeriodicalId":43924,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation","volume":"141 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139025739","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Contribution Analysis of a Complex System During Disruptions 复杂系统在中断期间的贡献分析
IF 0.8
Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation Pub Date : 2023-12-01 DOI: 10.3138/cjpe.75803
Sharon L. Newbill
{"title":"Contribution Analysis of a Complex System During Disruptions","authors":"Sharon L. Newbill","doi":"10.3138/cjpe.75803","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3138/cjpe.75803","url":null,"abstract":"The U.S. National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) supports 11 regional centers to conduct research and outreach in agriculture, fishing, and forestry. The Southwest Center for Agricultural Health, Injury Prevention, and Education serves Arkansas, Louisiana, New Mexico, Oklahoma, and Texas. The 2016–2022 evaluation used contribution analysis since it is effective in evaluating complex systems with diverse stakeholders and multiple projects, with partners working toward the same outcome over time. The evaluation responded to the disruptions in program implementation caused by the COVID-19 pandemic and to NIOSH modifications to key elements of contribution analysis procedures.","PeriodicalId":43924,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation","volume":"168 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139025731","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
How to Conduct a Metaevaluation?: A Metaevaluation Practice 如何进行元评估？：元评估实践
IF 0.8
Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI: 10.3138/cjpe.71619
Esra Kerimoğlu, Muazzez Nihal Öykü Ülker, Ş. Berk
{"title":"How to Conduct a Metaevaluation?: A Metaevaluation Practice","authors":"Esra Kerimoğlu, Muazzez Nihal Öykü Ülker, Ş. Berk","doi":"10.3138/cjpe.71619","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3138/cjpe.71619","url":null,"abstract":"A metaevaluation is a quality cross-check to examine the conduct of an evaluation and validate the results. Of the few metaevaluation studies, almost none have reported on the metaevaluation procedure through a practical example evaluation. This study reports on the strengths and weaknesses of a program evaluation study in terms of the four main standards: utility, feasibility, propriety, and accuracy. It includes a metaevaluation process that involves both quantitative and qualitative analysis of data from eight meta-evaluators. It was found that while the evaluation study had very good utility and accuracy standards, the feasibility and propriety standards were only fair.","PeriodicalId":43924,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46432301","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Ethics for Evaluation. Beyond “Doing No Harm” to “Tackling Bad” and “Doing Good”, par Rob van den Berg, Penny Hawkins et Nicoletta Stame (dir.) 评价伦理。从“不做坏事”到“处理坏事”和“做好事”，罗伯·范登伯格、潘妮·霍金斯和尼科莱塔·斯塔姆(导演)
IF 0.8
Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI: 10.3138/cjpe.76031
Steve Jacob
{"title":"Ethics for Evaluation. Beyond “Doing No Harm” to “Tackling Bad” and “Doing Good”, par Rob van den Berg, Penny Hawkins et Nicoletta Stame (dir.)","authors":"Steve Jacob","doi":"10.3138/cjpe.76031","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3138/cjpe.76031","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":43924,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48441877","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Thematic Analysis: A Practical Guide, by Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke 《主题分析：实用指南》，弗吉尼亚·布劳恩和维多利亚·克拉克著
IF 0.8
Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI: 10.3138/cjpe.76737
C. Roseveare
{"title":"Thematic Analysis: A Practical Guide, by Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke","authors":"C. Roseveare","doi":"10.3138/cjpe.76737","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3138/cjpe.76737","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":43924,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44066825","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
下一页 尾页
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整，为了账户安全，请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们：info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务，方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号：481959085
Book学术官方微信