Free Speech Yearbook最新文献_第4页

Lock Down Behind the Schoolhouse Gate: Student Speech from Tinker to Morse 锁在校舍大门后面:从Tinker到Morse的学生演讲

Free Speech Yearbook Pub Date : 2009-01-01 DOI: 10.1080/08997225.2009.10556345

Susan Balter-Reitz

引用次数: 2

Freedom of Speech: Do We Have to Dance with Tyranny? Response to John Durham Peters' Courting the Abyss 言论自由:我们必须与暴政共舞吗?对约翰·达勒姆·彼得斯《追求深渊》的回应

Free Speech Yearbook Pub Date : 2009-01-01 DOI: 10.1080/08997225.2009.10556357

S. Larson, John Howell

引用次数: 1

From Freedom of Speech to Free Speech: Response to John Durham Peters' Courting the Abyss 从言论自由到言论自由:对约翰·达勒姆·彼得斯《追求深渊》的回应

Free Speech Yearbook Pub Date : 2009-01-01 DOI: 10.1080/08997225.2009.10556358

David Boromisza-Habashi

引用次数: 1

Embracing the Abyss: Response to John Durham Peters' Courting the Abyss 拥抱深渊:对约翰·达勒姆·彼得斯《追求深渊》的回应

Free Speech Yearbook Pub Date : 2009-01-01 DOI: 10.1080/08997225.2009.10556359

S. O’Rourke, Ron Manuto

引用次数: 2

Justice Scalia and the R.A.V. Mystery: A Discussion of Hate Speech, Critical Race Theory, and the First Amendment 大法官斯卡利亚和R.A.V.之谜:仇恨言论、批判种族理论和第一修正案的讨论

Free Speech Yearbook Pub Date : 2006-01-01 DOI: 10.1080/08997225.2006.10556334

Eric M. Gander

引用次数: 5

The Supreme Court and Freedom of Speech, 2005–2006 最高法院与言论自由，2005-2006年

Free Speech Yearbook Pub Date : 2006-01-01 DOI: 10.1080/08997225.2006.10556338

P. Siegel

{"title":"The Supreme Court and Freedom of Speech, 2005–2006","authors":"P. Siegel","doi":"10.1080/08997225.2006.10556338","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08997225.2006.10556338","url":null,"abstract":"We don’t usually spend much time in this annual essay on non-decisions, such as denials of certiorari, or applications for a stay of a lower court decision to individual justices. But Justice Ginsburg’s refusal to vacate an order by the Ninth Circuit in Doe v. Gonzales 1 is at least worthy of mention. At issue was that part of the Patriot Act providing that when the FBI issues a “national security letter” to an individual or group (here, to “a member of the American Library Association”), the recipient is not permitted to tell anyone of the FBI’s visit. Thus the executive director of the Connecticut-based library group was risking his freedom when he consulted the American Civil Liberties Union, and the Connecticut ACLU affiliate’s legal director had to speak only in the vaguest terms when she, as per the affiliate’s guidelines, sought permission of the Board (on which I sit) to take the case. As became apparent during the litigation, the gag order seemed more a function of the administration’s desire to prevent the librarian and similar NSL recipients from testifying in Congress, which was then considering extension of key Patriot Act provisions. Also deserving of comment, though not extended discussion, is the Court’s per curiam opinion in Federal Election Commission v. Wisconsin Right to Life, Inc. Here the Court, which had recently upheld against facial challenge portions of the McCain Feingold Act prohibiting certain kinds of “electioneering communications” close to Election Day, was asked to consider whether an “asapplied” challenge could be brought. The Court sends the case back to a special 3-judge federal district court for further fact finding. More detailed examination of the case will appear in our review of the 2006-2007 term, in which the case returned to the Court, resulting in a 5-4 decision finding that the Act could not be constitutionally applied to the ads run by the non-profit group. As to First Amendment cases in which the Court did reach the merits, the 2005-6 term included a campaign financing decision from Vermont, a decision finding against the claimed associational and “right not to speak” claims of law schools seeking to apply to the military their requirement that all employers wishing to participate in on-campus job fairs sign a non-discrimination pledge (which could not be signed, given the continuing application of the military’s “don’t ask, don’t tell” policy against gays), a decision upholding strict restrictions on certain prisoners’ reading materials, and a broad ruling to the effect that public employees’ speech that is a part of their job duties generally will not enjoy First Amendment protection. We now examine those four cases in turn.","PeriodicalId":439135,"journal":{"name":"Free Speech Yearbook","volume":"73 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2006-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"129728771","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Professional Nobility and In-Person Commercial Solicitation by Attorneys: The Rhetoric of Ambulance Chasing 职业高尚与律师的当面商业招揽:救护车追逐的修辞

Free Speech Yearbook Pub Date : 2006-01-01 DOI: 10.1080/08997225.2006.10556332

Gregory C. Lisby, Richard Herder

引用次数: 1

Mapping Free Speech Scholarship in the Communication Discipline: 1969–2006 传播学科的言论自由研究:1969-2006

Free Speech Yearbook Pub Date : 2006-01-01 DOI: 10.1080/08997225.2006.10556337

Pat Arneson, David R. Dewberry

引用次数: 8

David Riesman and First Amendment Jurisprudence: From the “Power of the State,” to “Protection of Autonomy” to “Intent to Intimidate” 大卫·里斯曼与第一修正案法理学:从“国家权力”到“自治保护”再到“恐吓意图”

Free Speech Yearbook Pub Date : 2006-01-01 DOI: 10.1080/08997225.2006.10556328

Jeremiah Hickey

引用次数: 1

A Fighting Creed: The Free Speech Narrative in the Danish Cartoon Controversy 战斗信条:丹麦漫画争议中的言论自由叙事

Free Speech Yearbook Pub Date : 2006-01-01 DOI: 10.1080/08997225.2006.10556327

A. Battaglia

引用次数: 6