Law Culture and the Humanities最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
Volker Lipp, Professor Dr. Dr. h. c., Georg-August-University Göttingen, Germany: « Euthanasia » – A Comparative Legal Perspective Volker Lipp,教授,Dr. Dr. h. c,德国乔治-奥古斯特大学Göttingen:“安乐死”——一个比较法学视角
IF 0.3
Law Culture and the Humanities Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI: 10.5771/9783748921271-115
{"title":"Volker Lipp, Professor Dr. Dr. h. c., Georg-August-University Göttingen, Germany: « Euthanasia » – A Comparative Legal Perspective","authors":"","doi":"10.5771/9783748921271-115","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5771/9783748921271-115","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":43886,"journal":{"name":"Law Culture and the Humanities","volume":"87 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"74485798","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Kerstin Peglow, Professor, Université Paris Nanterre, Palliative care in Germany in the light of the decision of the Federal Constitutional Court of 26 February 2020 Kerstin Peglow,巴黎南泰尔大学教授,根据2020年2月26日联邦宪法法院的决定,在德国开展姑息治疗
IF 0.3
Law Culture and the Humanities Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI: 10.5771/9783748921271-58
{"title":"Kerstin Peglow, Professor, Université Paris Nanterre, Palliative care in Germany in the light of the decision of the Federal Constitutional Court of 26 February 2020","authors":"","doi":"10.5771/9783748921271-58","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5771/9783748921271-58","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":43886,"journal":{"name":"Law Culture and the Humanities","volume":"59 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"79202030","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Kartina A. Choong, Associate Professor University of Central Lancashire, UK, Re M (Declaration of Death of Child) [2020]: “No Best Interests to Consider”? Kartina A. Choong,副教授,英国中央兰开夏大学,Re M(儿童死亡宣告)[2020]:“不考虑最大利益”?
IF 0.3
Law Culture and the Humanities Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI: 10.5771/9783748921271-105
{"title":"Kartina A. Choong, Associate Professor University of Central Lancashire, UK, Re M (Declaration of Death of Child) [2020]: “No Best Interests to Consider”?","authors":"","doi":"10.5771/9783748921271-105","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5771/9783748921271-105","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":43886,"journal":{"name":"Law Culture and the Humanities","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"89788515","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Prasannanshu Prasannanshu, Professor National Law University Delhi, The Legal and Linguo-Cultural Aspects of End of Life in India Prasannanshu,德里国立法律大学教授,《印度生命终结的法律和语言文化方面》
IF 0.3
Law Culture and the Humanities Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI: 10.5771/9783748921271-188
{"title":"Prasannanshu Prasannanshu, Professor National Law University Delhi, The Legal and Linguo-Cultural Aspects of End of Life in India","authors":"","doi":"10.5771/9783748921271-188","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5771/9783748921271-188","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":43886,"journal":{"name":"Law Culture and the Humanities","volume":"35 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"86605336","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Scholarly Impact in the Age of Social Media 社交媒体时代的学术影响
IF 0.3
Law Culture and the Humanities Pub Date : 2021-11-03 DOI: 10.1177/17438721211035467
Stephen J. Vladeck
{"title":"Scholarly Impact in the Age of Social Media","authors":"Stephen J. Vladeck","doi":"10.1177/17438721211035467","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17438721211035467","url":null,"abstract":"By any measure, the most widely read thing that I’ve ever written was a tweet—one that registered over 10.9 million “impressions,” a statistic that captures the number of times an individual tweet appeared in readers’ Twitter timelines or search results. That eclipses my most downloaded paper ever by a factor of . . . over 7000. And although that tweet was not especially scholarly (unless you teach grammar, in which case you might even think that it was wrong), I spend much of my time on Twitter attempting to provide substantive legal content on matters within my academic wheelhouse—for instance, close and careful tracking of the Supreme Court’s so-called “shadow docket.” Although I also use Twitter for (most) of the bad reasons (Let’s Go Mets!), my principal use is to share news, legal analysis, and my and others’ scholarly ideas. The question is whether, for professional purposes, that’s all anything other than a frolic. Forests have already been felled on the perils of being an academic on Twitter, including the possibility that, without an edit button, we might cause harm to our reputations by writing something either blatantly incorrect or substantively objectionable; the absence of the intellectual rigor that characterizes more classical forms of scholarship; and, perhaps at a more banal level, the sheer time that it can take away from nobler professional pursuits. These concerns are quite real. But going by my experience, at least, there are also at least three significant upsides that are also worth weighing for those debating the virtues and vices of being an academic on social media in 2021. First, if nothing else, Twitter is a great forum for drawing attention to professional work that might be less visible on its own. When I finish a paper, publish an op-ed, or file a brief, I’ll contemporaneously tweet a URL link to the underlying document along with a brief summary. It’s possible for sufficiently motivated individuals to find (most of) these things on their own, but Twitter dramatically reduces (and accelerates) that effort. And “retweets” by others, whether with or without an endorsement, can further increase that visibility. For","PeriodicalId":43886,"journal":{"name":"Law Culture and the Humanities","volume":"19 1","pages":"25 - 26"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2021-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43413509","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Fairness Argument Against Catholic Integralism 反对天主教整体主义的公平性论证
IF 0.3
Law Culture and the Humanities Pub Date : 2021-10-29 DOI: 10.1177/17438721211054187
Kevin Vallier
{"title":"The Fairness Argument Against Catholic Integralism","authors":"Kevin Vallier","doi":"10.1177/17438721211054187","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17438721211054187","url":null,"abstract":"Political philosophers are overwhelmingly liberal: freedom and equality are the fundamental political values. Yet, in much of the world, people adopt religious anti-liberalisms. States must bring people into harmony with the cosmic moral order, not protect their autonomy. In this essay, I argue against Catholic integralism, the most intellectually sophisticated and long-standing Christian anti-liberalism. Most people believe that we should treat peoples of all race, nationalities, and creeds as equals. But Catholic integralism treats people unequally according to their creed because it coercively privileges one creed above all others—its own. So integralism treats its citizens unfairly.","PeriodicalId":43886,"journal":{"name":"Law Culture and the Humanities","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2021-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47818514","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Introduction. Drawing on the Legacy of Founding Fathers 介绍。汲取开国元勋的遗产
IF 0.3
Law Culture and the Humanities Pub Date : 2021-10-29 DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-81193-8_1
M. Stępień, Jan Bazyli Klakla
{"title":"Introduction. Drawing on the Legacy of Founding Fathers","authors":"M. Stępień, Jan Bazyli Klakla","doi":"10.1007/978-3-030-81193-8_1","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-81193-8_1","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":43886,"journal":{"name":"Law Culture and the Humanities","volume":"34 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2021-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"82741642","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Procedural Justice in South Korean Popular Culture. An Analysis of Court Hearings Using the Example of the K-drama Your Honor 韩国大众文化中的程序正义。以韩剧《法官大人》为例分析法庭听证
IF 0.3
Law Culture and the Humanities Pub Date : 2021-10-29 DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-81193-8_8
Katarzyna Rużyczka
{"title":"The Procedural Justice in South Korean Popular Culture. An Analysis of Court Hearings Using the Example of the K-drama Your Honor","authors":"Katarzyna Rużyczka","doi":"10.1007/978-3-030-81193-8_8","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-81193-8_8","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":43886,"journal":{"name":"Law Culture and the Humanities","volume":"55 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2021-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"83342121","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Does Visual Culture Pose a Threat to Law? 视觉文化对法律构成威胁吗?
IF 0.3
Law Culture and the Humanities Pub Date : 2021-10-29 DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-81193-8_9
Magdalena Wojdala
{"title":"Does Visual Culture Pose a Threat to Law?","authors":"Magdalena Wojdala","doi":"10.1007/978-3-030-81193-8_9","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-81193-8_9","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":43886,"journal":{"name":"Law Culture and the Humanities","volume":"21 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2021-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"87221741","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Customary Law Is Like an Onion: A Multilayered Approach to Customary Law and Its Status in the Contemporary World 习惯法就像洋葱:习惯法及其在当代世界地位的多层视角
IF 0.3
Law Culture and the Humanities Pub Date : 2021-10-29 DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-81193-8_3
Jan Bazyli Klakla
{"title":"Customary Law Is Like an Onion: A Multilayered Approach to Customary Law and Its Status in the Contemporary World","authors":"Jan Bazyli Klakla","doi":"10.1007/978-3-030-81193-8_3","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-81193-8_3","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":43886,"journal":{"name":"Law Culture and the Humanities","volume":"28 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2021-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"91170407","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信