Journal of Human Rights and the Environment最新文献_第3页

Interview: P Sands (PS) in conversation with R Spano (RS) – 8 July 2021 采访：P Sands（PS）与R Spano（RS）的对话——2021年7月8日

IF 1.7

Journal of Human Rights and the Environment Pub Date : 2022-09-30 DOI: 10.4337/jhre.2022.00.01

引用次数: 0

Book review: Geoffrey Garver, Ecological Law and the Planetary Crisis: A Legal Guide for Harmony on Earth (Routledge, Abingdon 2021) 266 pp. 书评：杰弗里·加弗，《生态法与行星危机：地球和谐的法律指南》（Routledge，Abingdon 2021）266页。

IF 1.7

Journal of Human Rights and the Environment Pub Date : 2022-09-01 DOI: 10.4337/jhre.2022.02.06

Erin Dobbelsteyn

引用次数: 0

Editorial: Climate change litigation and human rights: stocktaking and a look at the future 社论:气候变化诉讼和人权:盘点和展望未来

IF 1.7

Journal of Human Rights and the Environment Pub Date : 2022-03-28 DOI: 10.4337/jhre.2022.0001

A. Savaresi, Mariagrazia Alabrese, Joanne Scott

引用次数: 0

Rights-based litigation in the climate emergency: mapping the landscape and new knowledge frontiers 气候紧急情况下基于权利的诉讼:绘制景观和新的知识前沿

IF 1.7

Journal of Human Rights and the Environment Pub Date : 2022-03-01 DOI: 10.4337/jhre.2022.0002

A. Savaresi, J. Setzer

{"title":"Rights-based litigation in the climate emergency: mapping the landscape and new knowledge frontiers","authors":"A. Savaresi, J. Setzer","doi":"10.4337/jhre.2022.0002","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4337/jhre.2022.0002","url":null,"abstract":"This article revisits and expands on extant scholarly inquiries into the so-called ‘rights turn’ in climate litigation, with the objective of providing a more comprehensive appreciation of the role of human rights litigation in the context of the climate emergency. We rely on well-established categories used in the literature on climate litigation and on human rights and the environment to provide the first systematic analysis of rights-based litigation that aligns with climate objectives. Building on this basis, we consider the significant data and knowledge gaps concerning human rights litigation that does not align with climate objectives. We flag the need to better understand the role of rights-based litigation in the context of the complex societal changes associated with a just transition towards net zero emissions. The article contributes to scholarly inquiry into this new and increasingly prominent area at the intersection of human rights and environmental law, highlighting knowledge gaps that deserve further investigation, both from an academic and from a policy and practice perspective.\u0000\u0000* Email: Annalisa.savaresi@uef.fi.\u0000\u0000** Email: J.Setzer@lse.ac.uk. The authors are grateful to Gwenyth Wren for invaluable research assistance in the preparation of this piece. They are also grateful to Catherine Higham, Josh Gellers, Pau de Vilchez Moragues, Dennis van Berkel, Lisa Vanhala and two anonymous reviewers for comments on earlier drafts. Joana Setzer acknowledges support from the Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment, at the London School of Economics, and the ESRC Centre for Climate Change Economics and Policy (CCCEP) (ref. ES/R009708/1). The usual disclaimers apply.","PeriodicalId":43831,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Human Rights and the Environment","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44404722","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 11

Standards for adjudicating the next generation of Urgenda-style climate cases 裁决下一代乌干达式气候案件的标准

IF 1.7

Journal of Human Rights and the Environment Pub Date : 2022-03-01 DOI: 10.4337/jhre.2022.0003

L. Maxwell, S. Mead, Dennis van Berkel***

{"title":"Standards for adjudicating the next generation of Urgenda-style climate cases","authors":"L. Maxwell, S. Mead, Dennis van Berkel***","doi":"10.4337/jhre.2022.0003","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4337/jhre.2022.0003","url":null,"abstract":"Over the past decade, legal norms governing States’ obligations to mitigate climate change, and courts’ review of such efforts, have matured greatly in many jurisdictions around the world. In this article, we examine judicial decisions and consider future developments in Urgenda-style, or ‘systemic mitigation cases’ as we define them, at the national level. Systemic mitigation cases seek to compel a State or one of its organs to increase its overall mitigation efforts. These cases, which are growing in number, can lead to a significant increase in a country’s overall mitigation ambition. Yet a perceived lack of standards by which to assess mitigation efforts has given rise to judicial concerns regarding the separation of powers in adjudicating such cases. In response to these concerns, we present a framework based on international climate change law and best available climate science to assist litigants and courts in human-rights- and tort-based cases. We draw on principles developed by the Dutch courts in Urgenda v the Netherlands and on recent judgments of other national courts, and identify a range of concrete standards by which courts may assess whether a State has met the minimum legal requirements of its duty of care in the ‘next generation’ of systemic mitigation cases.\u0000\u0000* lucy.maxwell@urgenda.nl\u0000\u0000** sarah.mead@urgenda.nl\u0000\u0000*** dennis.van.berkel@urgenda.nl","PeriodicalId":43831,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Human Rights and the Environment","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44445327","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 5

Full accessInter-American approaches to the protection of the right to a healthy environment and the Rights of Nature and potential contributions to the European human rights system 美洲国家间保护健康环境权和自然权利的方法以及对欧洲人权体系的潜在贡献

IF 1.7

Journal of Human Rights and the Environment Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI: 10.4337/jhre.2022.00.03

引用次数: 0

The rights of nature, Indigenous peoples and international human rights law: from dichotomies to synergies 自然权利、土著人民权利和国际人权法:从二分法到协同法

IF 1.7

Journal of Human Rights and the Environment Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI: 10.4337/jhre.2022.02.04

引用次数: 1

Balancing its way out of strong anthropocentrism: integration of ‘ecological minimum standards’ in the European Court of Human Rights’ ‘fair balance’ review 平衡出强烈的人类中心主义:将“生态最低标准”纳入欧洲人权法院的“公平平衡”审查

IF 1.7

Journal of Human Rights and the Environment Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI: 10.4337/jhre.2022.00.02

引用次数: 2

Full accessThe future of environmental cases in the European Court of Human Rights: extraterritoriality, victim status, treaty interpretation, attribution, imminence and ‘due diligence’ in climate change cases 欧洲人权法院环境案件的未来:治外法权、受害者地位、条约解释、归因、紧迫性和气候变化案件中的“尽职调查”

IF 1.7

Journal of Human Rights and the Environment Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI: 10.4337/jhre.2022.00.06

引用次数: 0

Framing the normative role of the right to a healthy environment: thinking with internormativity, embodiment and emergence 确定健康环境权的规范作用:从规范间性、具体化和涌现性的角度思考问题

IF 1.7

Journal of Human Rights and the Environment Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI: 10.4337/jhre.2022.02.02

引用次数: 3