Criminal Law Forum最新文献_第8页

The Supervision of Guilty Pleas by the Court of Appeal of England and Wales – Workable Relationships and Tragic Choices 英格兰和威尔士上诉法院对认罪的监督-可行的关系和悲剧性的选择

IF 0.4

Criminal Law Forum Pub Date : 2020-07-07 DOI: 10.1007/s10609-020-09400-2

R. Nobles, David Schiff

引用次数: 2

Book Review 书评

IF 0.4

Criminal Law Forum Pub Date : 2020-06-27 DOI: 10.1007/s10609-020-09399-6

David Prendergast

引用次数: 0

The Catalysing Effect of the Rome Statute in Africa: Positive Complementarity and Self-Referrals 《罗马规约》在非洲的催化作用:积极互补和自我参照

IF 0.4

Criminal Law Forum Pub Date : 2020-06-02 DOI: 10.1007/s10609-020-09398-7

Patricia Hobbs

{"title":"The Catalysing Effect of the Rome Statute in Africa: Positive Complementarity and Self-Referrals","authors":"Patricia Hobbs","doi":"10.1007/s10609-020-09398-7","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10609-020-09398-7","url":null,"abstract":"The International Criminal Court’s (ICC) policy and practice of self-referrals has attracted some degree of academic criticism. This has been due partly because the procedure itself was, according to some opinions, never quite envisaged in the original Rome Statute, and partly because the concept of a State self-referral appears to contradict the Rome Statute objective of the ICC as a Court of complementarity. Following Gabon’s self-referral in 2016, and in view of the recent termination of the ICC Prosecutor’s Preliminary Examinations in Gabon, this paper argues that African States’ self-referral practice continues to represent a step backwards for African local justice and accountability. The fact that in this particular situation the necessary threshold was not met is actually not relevant for the argument put forward in this paper, namely that this practice should now be put under scrutiny rather than accepting, at face value, a self-referral whenever an (African) State proposes it. The strengthening of local accountability and the transformation of the local justice landscape should be considered as the ICC long-term objectives, and more dialogue (as well as political pressure) should be contemplated in order to gently coerce States to take on investigations and prosecutions of international crimes.","PeriodicalId":43773,"journal":{"name":"Criminal Law Forum","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2020-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138531959","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 2

The Catalysing Effect of the Rome Statute in Africa: Positive Complementarity and Self-Referrals 《罗马规约》在非洲的催化作用:积极互补和自我参照

IF 0.4

Criminal Law Forum Pub Date : 2020-06-02 DOI: 10.1007/s10609-020-09398-7

Patricia Hobbs

{"title":"The Catalysing Effect of the Rome Statute in Africa: Positive Complementarity and Self-Referrals","authors":"Patricia Hobbs","doi":"10.1007/s10609-020-09398-7","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10609-020-09398-7","url":null,"abstract":"The International Criminal Court’s (ICC) policy and practice of self-referrals has attracted some degree of academic criticism. This has been due partly because the procedure itself was, according to some opinions, never quite envisaged in the original Rome Statute, and partly because the concept of a State self-referral appears to contradict the Rome Statute objective of the ICC as a Court of complementarity. Following Gabon’s self-referral in 2016, and in view of the recent termination of the ICC Prosecutor’s Preliminary Examinations in Gabon, this paper argues that African States’ self-referral practice continues to represent a step backwards for African local justice and accountability. The fact that in this particular situation the necessary threshold was not met is actually not relevant for the argument put forward in this paper, namely that this practice should now be put under scrutiny rather than accepting, at face value, a self-referral whenever an (African) State proposes it. The strengthening of local accountability and the transformation of the local justice landscape should be considered as the ICC long-term objectives, and more dialogue (as well as political pressure) should be contemplated in order to gently coerce States to take on investigations and prosecutions of international crimes.","PeriodicalId":43773,"journal":{"name":"Criminal Law Forum","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2020-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138531961","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Book Review 书评

IF 0.4

Criminal Law Forum Pub Date : 2020-06-01 DOI: 10.1007/s10609-020-09395-w

R. Clark

引用次数: 0

Books Received 书收到了

IF 0.4

Criminal Law Forum Pub Date : 2020-06-01 DOI: 10.1007/s10609-020-09397-8

A. Heinze

引用次数: 0

“Tool in the R2P Toolbox”? Analysing the Role of the International Criminal Court in the Three Pillars of the Responsibility to Protect “R2P工具箱中的工具”?分析国际刑事法院在保护责任三大支柱中的作用

IF 0.4

Criminal Law Forum Pub Date : 2020-05-09 DOI: 10.1007/s10609-020-09394-x

Maartje Weerdesteijn, Barbora Holá

{"title":"“Tool in the R2P Toolbox”? Analysing the Role of the International Criminal Court in the Three Pillars of the Responsibility to Protect","authors":"Maartje Weerdesteijn, Barbora Holá","doi":"10.1007/s10609-020-09394-x","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10609-020-09394-x","url":null,"abstract":"In the last two decades, two important instruments emerged to combat mass atrocities. In 2002 the International Criminal Court (ICC) was established. Subsequently, in 2005, the international community politically committed itself to the responsibility to protect populations from mass atrocities (R2P) distinguishing three pillars: (i) the responsibility of the state to protect its own population, (ii) the responsibility to help states live up to this responsibility and (iii) the responsibility of the international community to intervene when states manifestly fail to protect their population. While the ICC is frequently referred to as a “tool in the R2P toolbox,” an analysis of the ways in which the ICC works within R2P’s pillar structure was missing. Using the R2P pillar-structure, this article systematically analyses how the ICC plays a role in the implementation of R2P. More specifically, this paper disentangles the diverse modalities of ICC engagement with states – such as ratification of its Statute, positive complementarity, opening of preliminary examinations or investigations – and demonstrates the complex dynamics of the interaction between the implementation of R2P and the actions of the ICC. The workings of the Court create fluid dynamics that shift back and forth between the different pillars at different points in time. In addition, the ICC can contribute to different pillars at the same time. In some instances, however, it fits uncomfortably in the R2P pillar structure, necessitating the conceptualisation of a pillar two and a half.","PeriodicalId":43773,"journal":{"name":"Criminal Law Forum","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2020-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138531960","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

“Tool in the R2P Toolbox”? Analysing the Role of the International Criminal Court in the Three Pillars of the Responsibility to Protect “R2P工具箱中的工具”?分析国际刑事法院在保护责任三大支柱中的作用

IF 0.4

Criminal Law Forum Pub Date : 2020-05-09 DOI: 10.1007/s10609-020-09394-x

Maartje Weerdesteijn,Barbora Holá

{"title":"“Tool in the R2P Toolbox”? Analysing the Role of the International Criminal Court in the Three Pillars of the Responsibility to Protect","authors":"Maartje Weerdesteijn,Barbora Holá","doi":"10.1007/s10609-020-09394-x","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10609-020-09394-x","url":null,"abstract":"In the last two decades, two important instruments emerged to combat mass atrocities. In 2002 the International Criminal Court (ICC) was established. Subsequently, in 2005, the international community politically committed itself to the responsibility to protect populations from mass atrocities (R2P) distinguishing three pillars: (i) the responsibility of the state to protect its own population, (ii) the responsibility to help states live up to this responsibility and (iii) the responsibility of the international community to intervene when states manifestly fail to protect their population. While the ICC is frequently referred to as a “tool in the R2P toolbox,” an analysis of the ways in which the ICC works within R2P’s pillar structure was missing. Using the R2P pillar-structure, this article systematically analyses how the ICC plays a role in the implementation of R2P. More specifically, this paper disentangles the diverse modalities of ICC engagement with states – such as ratification of its Statute, positive complementarity, opening of preliminary examinations or investigations – and demonstrates the complex dynamics of the interaction between the implementation of R2P and the actions of the ICC. The workings of the Court create fluid dynamics that shift back and forth between the different pillars at different points in time. In addition, the ICC can contribute to different pillars at the same time. In some instances, however, it fits uncomfortably in the R2P pillar structure, necessitating the conceptualisation of a pillar two and a half.","PeriodicalId":43773,"journal":{"name":"Criminal Law Forum","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2020-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138531958","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 4

Long Overdue: Decriminalisation of Attempted Suicide in Nigeria 长期逾期：尼日利亚自杀未遂的非刑事化

IF 0.4

Criminal Law Forum Pub Date : 2020-05-03 DOI: 10.1007/s10609-020-09392-z

Cheluchi Onyemelukwe

引用次数: 2

After the ICC Office of the Prosecutor’s 2016 Policy Paper on Case Selection and Prioritisation: Towards an International Crime of Ecocide? 继国际刑事法院检察官办公室2016年关于案件选择和优先顺序的政策文件:对国际生态灭绝罪?

IF 0.4

Criminal Law Forum Pub Date : 2020-04-18 DOI: 10.1007/s10609-020-09393-y

Ricardo M. Pereira

引用次数: 6