Criminal Law Forum最新文献_第6页

Dealing with Dangerous Offenders in Europe. A Comparative Study of Provisions in England and Wales, Germany, the Netherlands, Poland and Sweden 处理欧洲的危险罪犯。英格兰和威尔士、德国、荷兰、波兰和瑞典条款的比较研究

IF 0.4

Criminal Law Forum Pub Date : 2021-04-07 DOI: 10.1007/s10609-020-09411-z

Jörg-Martin Jehle, C. Lewis, M. Nagtegaal, N. Palmowski, Małgorzata Pyrcak-Górowska, Michiel van der Wolf, Josef Zila

引用次数: 4

Nigel Eltringham, Genocide Never Sleeps; Living Law at the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, Cambridge University Press, 2019, 218 pp. 奈杰尔·埃尔特林汉姆，《种族灭绝永不眠》;《卢旺达国际刑事法庭的活法》，剑桥大学出版社，2019年，218页。

IF 0.4

Criminal Law Forum Pub Date : 2021-03-27 DOI: 10.1007/S10609-021-09417-1

S. Darcy

引用次数: 0

‘Indirect Method of Proof’ and the Kuwaiti Anti-Money Laundering Law: A Lesson from the UK “间接证据法”与科威特反洗钱法：英国的经验教训

IF 0.4

Criminal Law Forum Pub Date : 2021-03-24 DOI: 10.1007/s10609-021-09415-3

Khaled S. Al-Rashidi

引用次数: 0

Books Received 书收到了

IF 0.4

Criminal Law Forum Pub Date : 2021-03-01 DOI: 10.1007/s10609-021-09414-4

A. Heinze

引用次数: 0

Causation in International Crimes Cases: (Re)Concenptualizing the Causal Linkage 国际犯罪案件的因果关系:(再)因果关系的概念化

IF 0.4

Criminal Law Forum Pub Date : 2021-02-27 DOI: 10.1007/s10609-020-09410-0

Marjolein Cupido

引用次数: 1

Error in Personam: Confusion in Indonesia’s Environmental Corporate Criminal Liability 人格错误：印尼环境企业刑事责任的困惑

IF 0.4

Criminal Law Forum Pub Date : 2021-02-25 DOI: 10.1007/s10609-021-09412-6

A. Wibisana, M. Faure, Raisya Majory

引用次数: 3

LEGISLATIVE EROSION OF JUDICIAL DISCRETION IN RELATION TO MURDER WITH EXTENUATING CIRCUMSTANCES IN BOTSWANA: A CRITIQUE OF THE AMENDMENT OF SECTION 203 (2) OF THE PENAL CODE 博茨瓦纳对情节可减罪的谋杀案件的司法自由裁量权的立法侵蚀:对刑法第203(2)条修正案的批评

IF 0.4

Criminal Law Forum Pub Date : 2021-02-19 DOI: 10.1007/S10609-021-09413-5

B. Dambe

引用次数: 0

About Disorder in the “cuisine interne” of Mihalache Grand Chamber Judgment: Some Reasons for a Radical Change of Approach in ne bis in idem Issues 论《米哈拉切大殿判决书》中“料理界”的失序:在观念问题上态度发生根本性转变的若干原因

IF 0.4

Criminal Law Forum Pub Date : 2021-02-18 DOI: 10.1007/s10609-021-09416-2

A. Tarallo

引用次数: 1

A Forgotten History: Forcible Transfers and Deportations in International Criminal Law 被遗忘的历史:国际刑法中的强制转移和驱逐

IF 0.4

Criminal Law Forum Pub Date : 2021-01-29 DOI: 10.1007/s10609-020-09409-7

Victoria Colvin, Phil Orchard

{"title":"A Forgotten History: Forcible Transfers and Deportations in International Criminal Law","authors":"Victoria Colvin, Phil Orchard","doi":"10.1007/s10609-020-09409-7","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10609-020-09409-7","url":null,"abstract":"Forced transfers and deportations of civilian populations are a persistent theme in atrocity crimes. Criminalizing forced displacement not only responds to a major human rights and atrocities problem which is not directly covered by either refugee or international human rights law; it can also serve an important deterrent effect. And yet a critical and enduring question has been around the nature of the relationship between the two offenses of deportation, in which a border is crossed, and forcible transfers, in which a border is not. While both are recognized today as crimes against humanity, the conventional story is that deportations have a much longer and more enduring history than forcible transfers. We argue that this is wrong, and that practice from the Nineteenth century through Nuremberg viewed ‘deportation’ as encompassing both forms of crimes. The loss of this history, however, has meant that in recent times the ICTY, ECCC, and the ICC have had to in effect reinvent the wheel of how forcible transfers are understood and how they are differentiated from deportations as a distinct crime. While a clear conception of forcible transfers as a crime against humanity is now developing in international criminal law, this has limited the number of prosecutions in spite of the fact that this provides a critical accountability mechanism.","PeriodicalId":43773,"journal":{"name":"Criminal Law Forum","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2021-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138532025","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

"Complete Labelling" and Domestic Prosecutions for Crimes Against Humanity. “完全标签”和反人类罪的国内起诉。

IF 0.4

Criminal Law Forum Pub Date : 2021-01-01 Epub Date: 2021-11-17 DOI: 10.1007/s10609-021-09426-0

Javier S Eskauriatza

{"title":"\"Complete Labelling\" and Domestic Prosecutions for Crimes Against Humanity.","authors":"Javier S Eskauriatza","doi":"10.1007/s10609-021-09426-0","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10609-021-09426-0","url":null,"abstract":"Fair labelling is an established principle of criminal justice that scrutinises the way that States use language in labelling criminal defendants and their conduct. I argue that \"complete labelling\" is a related but separate principle which has not received any explicit attention from commentators. Whereas fair labelling focuses, usually, on the protection of defendant's rights, the principle of complete labelling explains and justifies whether the labels attached appropriately represent the nature and scale of the wrong done to the community. As a case study, I apply this lens in the context of regional (U.S./Mexican) criminal justice responses to crimes against humanity perpetrated by \"drug-cartels\" in the context of the Mexican Drug War. Successive administrations in Mexico and the U.S. have tended to charge cartel leaders (and/or their political supporters) with so-called \"transnational crimes\" (for example, drug-trafficking, money-laundering, bribery/corruption). This is despite the fact that many of the most powerful cartels have controlled territory, attacked entire towns, carried out acts of terror, and disappeared thousands of people. The principle of complete labelling is useful in normative terms because it helps in the critical examination of a State's prosecutorial practices, exposing problems that might otherwise be missed. In relation to the case study discussed, for example, a focus on complete labelling helps to expose the regional prosecutorial policy as either an unjustified exercise in selectivity or, at worst, an expression of collective denial. After considering certain counteracting reflexions which speak to some of the foundational anxieties of international criminal justice, the article concludes that domestic prosecutions for crimes against humanity in the context of drug-cartels may, sometimes, be justified.","PeriodicalId":43773,"journal":{"name":"Criminal Law Forum","volume":"32 4","pages":"473-509"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8595055/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39642675","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 4