{"title":"Mysterious Motions: A Genealogy of ‘Orbiting’ in Australian Indigenous Affairs","authors":"T. Neale","doi":"10.22459/LLCP.2019.11","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.22459/LLCP.2019.11","url":null,"abstract":"There are several signs that we are between distinct periods in federal policy in relation to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples in Australia. Following its emergence in 2015, the first and second Turnbull administrations demonstrated an acute case of policy aporia, lacking direction or vision in relation to Indigenous policy. Faced with the Uluru Statement from the Heart in May 2017—the outcome of deliberations by over 250 Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander representatives from across Australia—the Turnbull Government rejected its modest plans as ‘too ambitious’.1 This included the proposal for an elected ‘First Nations Voice’ that would act as an advisory body with far less institutional power than its predecessors, such as the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Commission (ATSIC) abolished by the Howard Government in April 2004. Since the Uluru Statement, the various federal policy processes built around a proposed referendum on the constitutional recognition of Indigenous peoples have come to a grinding halt. The ‘Recognise’ advocacy body established to foster public support for such a referendum was quietly folded after receiving $25 million in federal funding over","PeriodicalId":437463,"journal":{"name":"Labour Lines and Colonial Power: Indigenous and Pacific Islander Labour Mobility in Australia","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"129496187","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Coloniality of Power and the Contours of Contemporary Sport Industries: Fijians in Australian Rugby","authors":"S. Mackay, Daniel Guinness","doi":"10.22459/LLCP.2019.09","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.22459/LLCP.2019.09","url":null,"abstract":"Over several days in 2016, conditions became so bad in the Rugby Futures’ dormitory in Sydney that the young Fijian men who resided there needed to ask local leaders in the Fijian community for food and other essentials.1 Some of the men had previously experienced periods of hunger while looking for work or training for rugby in one of Fiji’s regional centres. However, in Australia, things had become worse. The Fijians had moved to Australia under the promise of a clear pathway into professional rugby. Yet, one man reported to us that, instead, they found themselves with a strict curfew, performing manual labour for salaries (75 per cent of which were confiscated by the Rugby Futures’ program head for what he called ‘board and services’), and unable to control their careers or even their passports. Occasionally, the program head would leave for the weekend, temporarily locking the men out of their only kitchen and food supplies.","PeriodicalId":437463,"journal":{"name":"Labour Lines and Colonial Power: Indigenous and Pacific Islander Labour Mobility in Australia","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"126996565","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Labour Lines and Colonial Power","authors":"V. Stead, J. Altman","doi":"10.22459/LLCP.2019.01","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.22459/LLCP.2019.01","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":437463,"journal":{"name":"Labour Lines and Colonial Power: Indigenous and Pacific Islander Labour Mobility in Australia","volume":"354 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"115930096","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"‘Boyd’s Blacks’: Labour and the Making of Settler Lands in Australia and the Pacific","authors":"T. B. Mar","doi":"10.22459/LLCP.2019.03","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.22459/LLCP.2019.03","url":null,"abstract":"Tracey Banivanua Mar’s untimely death on 19 August 2017 meant that she never completed this chapter. The version here is an edited draft of the paper that she circulated in the Labour Lines Workshop held at Deakin University in June 2017. Banivanua Mar wrote in regard to that draft: ‘NB as per “Labour Lines” suggestions, this paper is still in draft form for the purpose of workshopping. This paper and research has been funded by the Australian Research Council, and is part of the Discovery Project “Land and Colonial Cultures” (DP 120104928).’ Where possible, Tracey’s own words have been retained and only minor amendments and additional information gleaned from her notes have been made by Kalissa Alexeyeff, Lucy Davies and Alan Lester. We hope that researchers will be genuinely inspired by the paper’s insights into the transnational complexity of the early colonial labour trade, the global and intersecting reach of land, labour and commerce, and, most importantly, Pacific Islander experiences of mobility during the early nineteenth century.","PeriodicalId":437463,"journal":{"name":"Labour Lines and Colonial Power: Indigenous and Pacific Islander Labour Mobility in Australia","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"131396538","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"A Regulated Labour Trade across the Torres Strait: Papuan and New Guinean Domestic Workers in Australia, 1901–50","authors":"Lucy Davies","doi":"10.22459/LLCP.2019.04","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.22459/LLCP.2019.04","url":null,"abstract":"In 1927, Beatrice Abel, a missionary at the Kwato Mission in the Territory of Papua, asked Alice Wedega, a young Papuan woman, to travel to Australia with the wife of a business manager from the nearby island of Samarai. The wife was an Australian expatriate and she wanted a Papuan ‘girl’ to accompany her to Australia to care for her children while she was on leave. Since Wedega had a desire to travel, and the only way for a Papuan woman to leave the country at the time was as a servant, she agreed to go. After one week of travel by ship with her employer and her employer’s children, Wedega arrived in Sydney. Initially, Wedega revelled in the excitement of visiting a new city; however, following abuse from her employer, she wished to return to Papua. As Wedega later relayed in her autobiography, Listen, My Country, ‘my employer didn’t treat me as an ordinary girl at all, but as a kind of slave’.1 Wedega’s meals consisted of the leftovers from her employer’s meals, which she was given on the verandah or in her room. Wedega told Beatrice Abel’s friend, who visited Wedega and took her to church in Sydney, that she was being abused and wished to return home. The friend wrote to Abel who wrote to Wedega’s employer demanding that she allow Wedega to return home.","PeriodicalId":437463,"journal":{"name":"Labour Lines and Colonial Power: Indigenous and Pacific Islander Labour Mobility in Australia","volume":"80 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"122047466","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Intermediaries, Servants and Captives: Disentangling Indigenous Labour in D. W. Carnegie’s Exploration of the Western Australian Desert","authors":"Shino Konishi","doi":"10.22459/LLCP.2019.02","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.22459/LLCP.2019.02","url":null,"abstract":"In the late fifteenth century, Christopher Columbus kidnapped Caribbean people to train and use them as translators who could inform him about potential dangers and desirable commodities. The Dutch East India Company in the early seventeenth century instructed their captains to capture Indigenous peoples whenever possible for the same purpose. Then, in the late eighteenth century maritime explorers like James Cook and Matthew Flinders, on occasion, kidnapped Islander and Aboriginal people in the Pacific and Australia as punishment for perceived thefts, and as a means of asserting their authority over seemingly recalcitrant native peoples.2 Thus, for centuries European explorers felt at liberty to","PeriodicalId":437463,"journal":{"name":"Labour Lines and Colonial Power: Indigenous and Pacific Islander Labour Mobility in Australia","volume":"46 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"115948909","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Of Pizza Ovens in Arnhem Land: The State Quest to Restructure Aboriginal Labour in Remotest Australia","authors":"J. Altman","doi":"10.22459/LLCP.2019.12","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.22459/LLCP.2019.12","url":null,"abstract":"In contemporary Australian policy, and especially Indigenous policy, little distinction is made between labour, work, employment and jobs. In fact, most of the focus is on formal or paid employment. Consequently, in the last decade, we have seen the emergence of employment policy with the overarching goal to ‘close’, or at least reduce, the gap in formal employment outcomes between Indigenous and non-Indigenous Australians. As the 10th annual Closing the Gap report recently tabled in the Australian Parliament clearly demonstrates, this goal—first articulated by Kevin Rudd in 2008 as an element of the National Apology to the Stolen Generations and then adopted by the Council of Australian Governments that year— has failed. The goal was to halve the gap at the national level in what is technically termed the ‘employment to population ratio’ between 2008 and 2018.1 This goal has not only failed nationally, but also, and most spectacularly, in the 86 per cent of the Australian continent that is defined officially as remote and very remote; the latest census of 2016 indicates","PeriodicalId":437463,"journal":{"name":"Labour Lines and Colonial Power: Indigenous and Pacific Islander Labour Mobility in Australia","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"130767316","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"New Histories but Old Patterns: Kāi Tahu in Australia","authors":"Rachel Standfield, M. J. Stevens","doi":"10.22459/LLCP.2019.05","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.22459/LLCP.2019.05","url":null,"abstract":"Kāi Tahu (also known as Ngāi Tahu) is the predominant Māori tribe from the South Island of New Zealand.1 As with Ngāpuhi in the northern North Island, Kāi Tahu, especially in the southern South Island, were pulled into the expanding maritime frontier of New South Wales in the first decade of the nineteenth century. In this chapter, we examine some of the initial travels of Kāi Tahu people to Australia, focusing on the earliest periods of encounter with Europeans and Euro-Americans—collectively known as tākata pora (ship men or boat people). We do this to explore how this travel reflected Kāi Tahu worldviews, social structures and economic priorities. Shedding light on features of Kāi Tahu epistemologies of movement, we highlight how cultures of mobility and strategic responses to the historical circumstances they were operating within shaped Kāi Tahu decisions to travel to the Australian continent. We focus on Kāi Tahu people ‘Jacky Snapper’ and Tokitoki, and their takata pora companion, James Caddell, who first ventured to Sydney in 1822 from Foveaux Strait, as well as two young men, ‘Chief Attay’ and ‘Quolla’, believed to have been taken as hostages to Sydney in 1834. These young chiefs from Ōtākou are believed to have arrived in Sydney after having been kidnapped by the Sydney owners of an Ōtākou-based whaling station after increasing tensions with local Kāi Tahu. We also outline the longer history of travel to New South","PeriodicalId":437463,"journal":{"name":"Labour Lines and Colonial Power: Indigenous and Pacific Islander Labour Mobility in Australia","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"117144754","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Emergent Trends in Indigenous Labour Mobility: Flying to Work in the Nation’s Quarry","authors":"Sarah Prout Quicke, F. McKenzie","doi":"10.22459/LLCP.2019.10","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.22459/LLCP.2019.10","url":null,"abstract":"As a phenomenon, contemporary Indigenous mobility and migration resulting from employment in the mainstream labour market is relatively obscured in Australia’s public and scholarly consciousness. Given the ‘mobile turn’ in the social sciences,1 the ‘cultural turn’ within migration studies,2 the long legacy of Indigenous labour mobility and the central, though highly contested, place of mainstream employment in Australia’s current Indigenous affairs policy agenda,3 this obscurity is surprising.","PeriodicalId":437463,"journal":{"name":"Labour Lines and Colonial Power: Indigenous and Pacific Islander Labour Mobility in Australia","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"117252185","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Becoming ‘Overstayers’: The Coloniality of Citizenship and the Resilience of Pacific Farm Workers","authors":"M. Nishitani, Helen Lee","doi":"10.22459/LLCP.2019.07","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.22459/LLCP.2019.07","url":null,"abstract":"The Australian Government once described Pacific people as too ‘unsophisticated’ and ‘unsuited’ to settle in Australia and as a likely source of social problems.1 Ironically, this statement was made in a Cabinet submission in 1971, when the government was making progress towards abolishing the ‘White Australia’ policy in an attempt to signify Australia’s departure from racist immigration policies. This contradiction vividly illustrates Australia’s ambivalent attitude towards migrants from the Pacific. More than four decades later, the Australian Government’s view of Pacific people as permanent migrants has scarcely changed, although, in recent years, it has introduced the Seasonal Worker Programme (SWP), which encourages temporary labour migration from Pacific countries. This chapter explores the complex ways Australia’s immigration regime has influenced Pacific people’s mobility through forms of inclusion and exclusion, and their equally complex responses. In particular, we focus on the irregular migrants often referred to as ‘overstayers’ both by Australian authorities and within Pacific migrant communities.","PeriodicalId":437463,"journal":{"name":"Labour Lines and Colonial Power: Indigenous and Pacific Islander Labour Mobility in Australia","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"121654125","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}