International Review of Pragmatics最新文献_第3页

Editorial Note 编者按语

IF 0.8

International Review of Pragmatics Pub Date : 2023-01-19 DOI: 10.1163/18773109-01501001

Piotr Cap

引用次数: 0

‘Dear Dr John Smith. I refuse to obey this mark. That’s mean. So, can you give me a higher mark?’ 亲爱的约翰·史密斯博士。我拒绝服从这个标志。这是意思。所以，你能给我一个更高的分数吗?”

IF 0.8

International Review of Pragmatics Pub Date : 2022-06-30 DOI: 10.1163/18773109-01401001

David Rodríguez Velasco

引用次数: 0

Political dialogue across time, space and genres 跨越时间、空间和流派的政治对话

IF 0.8

International Review of Pragmatics Pub Date : 2022-06-23 DOI: 10.1163/18773109-01402004

P. Chilton, Monika Kopytowska

引用次数: 0

Online comments as inwards and outwards-directed acts in Polish and English 在线评论是波兰语和英语的内向和外向行为

IF 0.8

International Review of Pragmatics Pub Date : 2022-06-23 DOI: 10.1163/18773109-01402005

Barbara - Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk

{"title":"Online comments as inwards and outwards-directed acts in Polish and English","authors":"Barbara - Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk","doi":"10.1163/18773109-01402005","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1163/18773109-01402005","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 The main focus of the paper is to analyse selected English and Polish online comments on the Russia-Ukraine war (2022) from the perspective of dialogical discourse and define to what extent the exchanges satisfy the criteria of different types of dialogism with regard to their self- or other-referential character, i.e., inwards- or ingroup- directed, and what other circumstances are decisive in the determination of the exchange profiles. The materials are derived from selected Twitter comments referring to the war in Ukraine and its refugees, which dominate large segments of today’s online discourse. The research methodology employed is an interactional discourse analysis, which assumes that meanings are dynamic and created in interaction, and shaped by the cognitive and social potential of the participants, and their ideological preferences. The outcomes of the analysis indicate a complex character of the exchanges from a dialogical typology dilemma perspective and shed some light on the speakers’ argumentation. The analysis also shows a lower radicalization axis than in comparable samples referring to earlier refugee crisis scenarios in the years 2016–2020.","PeriodicalId":43536,"journal":{"name":"International Review of Pragmatics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2022-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44645695","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Exploring the didactic-psychological features of the dialogical discourse patterns in an online classroom context 探讨在线课堂语境下对话式话语模式的教学心理特征

IF 0.8

International Review of Pragmatics Pub Date : 2022-06-23 DOI: 10.1163/18773109-01402007

K. Hajiyeva, M. Mammadov

引用次数: 0

Dialogical humour in evening service encounters in the hospitality industry in Seville, Spain 在塞维利亚，西班牙的酒店行业晚上服务遇到对话式幽默

IF 0.8

International Review of Pragmatics Pub Date : 2022-06-23 DOI: 10.1163/18773109-01402002

M. Cruz

引用次数: 0

Shades of green 绿色的阴影

IF 0.8

International Review of Pragmatics Pub Date : 2022-06-23 DOI: 10.1163/18773109-01402001

D. Ponton

{"title":"Shades of green","authors":"D. Ponton","doi":"10.1163/18773109-01402001","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1163/18773109-01402001","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 Discursive interaction involves the co-construction of meaning between interlocutor/s and intended audience, a process which involves both explicit and implicit meanings (Kecskes 2016). However, since language is at best an imprecise tool for describing reality, even so-called explicit meanings are found to require effort to disambiguate, and true precision may not be attainable, despite sincerity on the part of the speaker/s. These aspects are especially relevant in considering public discourse on the environment, which represents a macro topic whose component discursive features are frequently big words in the sense originally identified by George Orwell (2013), i.e. nature, pollution, fossil fuels, conservation, green energy, global warming, climate change, etc. That is to say, their use signals the presence of ideologies (Fairclough 2003), deontologies (Roderick 2013), presuppositions (Levinson 1983) and naturalisations (Barthes 1957) which imply the use of meanings that are seldom self-evident, though they are presented as such. This paper explores interactions in the public domain about the current environmental crisis, showing how a pragmatic perspective that focuses on situated understandings of shared dialogue can illuminate these issues.","PeriodicalId":43536,"journal":{"name":"International Review of Pragmatics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2022-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45954413","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

Refashioning Chinese búshì (不是) rhetoricals 重塑中国的búshì修辞学

IF 0.8

International Review of Pragmatics Pub Date : 2022-06-23 DOI: 10.1163/18773109-01402006

Andrew H.C. Chuang

{"title":"Refashioning Chinese búshì (不是) rhetoricals","authors":"Andrew H.C. Chuang","doi":"10.1163/18773109-01402006","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1163/18773109-01402006","url":null,"abstract":"Two communication types of the Chinese [búshì … ma] patterning can be found in earlier studies in which Type 1 is understood as a yes-no question (default form) and Type 2 a rhetorical question carrying a negative semantic prosody, both types taking place in a “2-party” dialogue. This research has further identified an emergent “construction” (Croft, 2001) that figures also as a rhetorical question (Type 3) except in a “3-party” conversation setting. This Type 3 is found to serve a primary communicative purpose, that is, for “positive interpersonal bonding.” Other findings discussed include: (a) that [búshì … ma] has defaulted from Type 1 to Type 2 in today’s Mandarin Chinese, (b) that there exist subjectivity-based variations in interpreting the thematic agents of a Type 2 expression, (c) that Type 3 expressions have emerged on the grounds of “intersubjectivity,” and (d) that while both Types 2 and 3 are rhetorical questions, they indeed require very different sets of pragmatic competence for implementing an intended illocutionary force. The study looks particularly at how Type 2 and Type 3 [búshì … ma] constructions differentiate themselves from each other and how the [búshì … ma] patterning reflects linguistic economy and efficiency in real-life language use through grammaticalization (grammatical constructionalization).","PeriodicalId":43536,"journal":{"name":"International Review of Pragmatics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2022-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46293772","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Explicit and implicit offensiveness in dialogical film discourse in Bridgit Jones films 布里奇特·琼斯电影对话性电影话语中的显性与隐性冒犯

IF 0.8

International Review of Pragmatics Pub Date : 2022-06-23 DOI: 10.1163/18773109-01402003

A. Bączkowska

{"title":"Explicit and implicit offensiveness in dialogical film discourse in Bridgit Jones films","authors":"A. Bączkowska","doi":"10.1163/18773109-01402003","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1163/18773109-01402003","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 The paper discusses the concept of offensiveness, both explicit and implicit, in film dialogical discourse based on three parts of a romantic comedy. The differences between explicitness and implicitness on the one hand, and between implicitness and (in)directness on the other are presented in the theoretical part. Indirectness and implicitness are treated in the study as independent concepts that instantiate covert meaning. On the other hand, explicitness and implicitness are viewed as gradual concepts that allow some overlap; thus, direct implicitness and indirect explicitness emerge as possible options. Furthermore, the category of offensiveness is presented as a broad category, a superordinate term that subsumes offensive language, typically realised through explicitly offensive words, such as swearwords, and (non)offence, encoded by rhetorical devices. Offensive language can have the function of offending the target addressee, i.e., to cause offence, or to build, inter alia, a jocular, intimate or friendly atmosphere. Offensiveness can thus embrace propositions that lead to offence or convey other, non-offensive meanings. Examples of both offensive language (explicit/direct forms) and subtypes of offence (figurative forms), as well as a combination of both (e.g., figurative forms such as ironic comments that contain swearwords), are gleaned from the corpus of three parts of the eponymous romantic comedy. The analysis has shown that figurative forms are often conflated (to create metaphorical irony, ironic hyperbole, and the like), the implicit forms of offensiveness occur almost as frequently as explicit forms and are distributed equally across gender, varying forms of offensiveness play the whole gamut of functions, disparagement being only one of them.","PeriodicalId":43536,"journal":{"name":"International Review of Pragmatics","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2022-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43699184","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 2

Exploring dialogical discourse—pragmatics and cognition 探讨对话话语语用学与认知

IF 0.8

International Review of Pragmatics Pub Date : 2022-06-23 DOI: 10.1163/18773109-01402008

Barbara - Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk, Azad Mammadov

引用次数: 0