Augustinian Studies最新文献_第9页

IF 0.1 4区哲学

Augustinian Studies Pub Date : 2020-01-24 DOI: 10.5840/augstudies202012357

Thomas R. Clemmons

{"title":"De Genesi Aduersus Manicheos","authors":"Thomas R. Clemmons","doi":"10.5840/augstudies202012357","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5840/augstudies202012357","url":null,"abstract":"This article examines Augustine’s early anthropology, particularly through De Genesi aduersus Manichaeos. The most thorough treatment of this topic is found in the enduring work of Robert J. O’Connell, SJ. O’Connell argues that Augustine drew directly from the Enneads in De Genesi aduersus Manichaeos to formulate his anthropology. This article evaluates and critiques the evidence and implications of O’Connell’s position concerning Augustine’s articulation of the “fall of the soul.” I argue that an attentive text-based reading of De Genesi aduersus Manichaeos reveals the shortcomings of O’Connell’s “Plotinian” rendering of Augustine’s anthropology. More importantly, I show that De Genesi aduersus Manichaeos illuminates dimensions of Augustine’s anthropology often overlooked. These include the human’s transformation to spiritalis through Christ and the eschatological configuration of the caeleste corpus. In contrast to O’Connell’s theory, which emphasizes the necessary “circularity” of Augustine’s anthropological framework (that is, the soul “returns” to a condition identical to the aboriginal state), I argue that in De Genesi aduersus Manichaeos Augustine advances an anthropology that is not merely “circular.”","PeriodicalId":43369,"journal":{"name":"Augustinian Studies","volume":"51 1","pages":"47-78"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2020-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42112387","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Between Discipline and Doctrine 在纪律与学说之间

IF 0.1 4区哲学

Augustinian Studies Pub Date : 2020-01-18 DOI: 10.5840/augstudies202011756

D. Hunter

引用次数: 0

The Challenge of Augustine’s Epistula 151 奥古斯丁书信的挑战151

IF 0.1 4区哲学

Augustinian Studies Pub Date : 2020-01-17 DOI: 10.5840/augstudies202011655

D. Clapp

引用次数: 0

Jonathan D. Teubner, Prayer after Augustine: A Study in the Development of the Latin Tradition 《奥古斯丁之后的祈祷:拉丁传统发展研究》

IF 0.1 4区哲学

Augustinian Studies Pub Date : 2020-01-01 DOI: 10.5840/augstudies202051111

J. Kenney

引用次数: 0

Augustine, De Civitate Dei: The City of God, Books XIII & XIV; Augustine, De Civitate Dei: The City of God, Books XV & XVI. Edited with an introduction and commentary by P. G. Walsh 奥古斯丁，《上帝的城市》，第十三和十四卷；奥古斯丁，《文明的上帝：上帝之城》，第十五册和第十六册。由P·G·沃尔什编辑，并附有介绍和评论

IF 0.1 4区哲学

Augustinian Studies Pub Date : 2020-01-01 DOI: 10.5840/augstudies20205114

M. Beckwith

引用次数: 0

Michael P. Foley, translation and commentary, On the Happy Life 迈克尔·p·福利，翻译和评论，《论幸福生活》

IF 0.1 4区哲学

Augustinian Studies Pub Date : 2020-01-01 DOI: 10.5840/augstudies20205119

Erik Kenyon

引用次数: 0

Boniface I, Augustine, and the Translation of Honorius to Caesarea Mauretaniae 博尼法斯一世，奥古斯丁，以及对凯撒利亚·毛利塔尼的翻译

IF 0.1 4区哲学

Augustinian Studies Pub Date : 2020-01-01 DOI: 10.5840/augstudies202051115

Geoffrey D. Dunn

{"title":"Boniface I, Augustine, and the Translation of Honorius to Caesarea Mauretaniae","authors":"Geoffrey D. Dunn","doi":"10.5840/augstudies202051115","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5840/augstudies202051115","url":null,"abstract":"Augustine’s Epistulae 23A*, 23*, and 22*, written in late 419 and early 420, present his involvement in the dispute concerning the translation of Honorius to Caesarea Mauretaniae (modern Cherchell), a city Augustine had visited in September 418 while fulfilling a commission from Zosimus of Rome. The translation of bishops from one church to another had been condemned by the 325 Council of Nicaea. The three letters are difficult to interpret because the information to his three correspondents (Possidius of Calama, Renatus, a monk of Caesarea Mauretaniae, and Alypius of Thagaste, who was in Italy at the time) seems to differ. A careful reading reveals that not only did Augustine’s knowledge of the situation change over time, but that the stress he placed on differing elements of that situation also changed depending upon the correspondent. The letters also disclose the involvement of Boniface I of Rome, Zosimus’ successor, and the complex relationship of the African churches with the bishop of Rome, especially in the matter of judicial appeal. What is suggested here is that Augustine, without saying so, seemed to be aware of the criteria Boniface had employed in another translation controversy, which was the approved translation of Perigenes as bishop of Corinth, and that, if applied to Honorius, this would lead the Roman bishop to reach a very different conclusion.","PeriodicalId":43369,"journal":{"name":"Augustinian Studies","volume":"51 1","pages":"23-46"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"71205321","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

A. Zumkeller, Das Mönchtum des Heiligen Augustinus 楚克雷，圣奥古斯丁的修士

IF 0.1 4区哲学

Augustinian Studies Pub Date : 2020-01-01 DOI: 10.5840/augstudies202051112

Frederick van Fleteren

引用次数: 0

Augustine, Confessions. Translated, with Introduction and Notes by Thomas Williams 奥古斯汀,忏悔。翻译，并附有托马斯·威廉姆斯的引言和注释

IF 0.1 4区哲学

Augustinian Studies Pub Date : 2020-01-01 DOI: 10.5840/augstudies20205112

Toni Alimi

引用次数: 0

Letter From the Editor 编辑来信