Negotiating Democracy and Religious Pluralism最新文献

Liberalism and the Path to Treason in the Ottoman Empire, 1908–1923 自由主义与奥斯曼帝国的叛逆之路，1908-1923

Negotiating Democracy and Religious Pluralism Pub Date : 2021-09-30 DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780197530016.003.0003

Christine M. Philliou

引用次数: 0

Conflict, Secularism, and Toleration 冲突、世俗主义与宽容

Negotiating Democracy and Religious Pluralism Pub Date : 2021-09-30 DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780197530016.003.0005

U. Mehta

引用次数: 0

Legal Contention and Minorities in Turkey 土耳其的法律争议与少数民族

Negotiating Democracy and Religious Pluralism Pub Date : 2021-09-30 DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780197530016.003.0014

Senem Aslan

{"title":"Legal Contention and Minorities in Turkey","authors":"Senem Aslan","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780197530016.003.0014","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197530016.003.0014","url":null,"abstract":"This chapter analyzes state-minority relations in Turkey as the state sought closer relations with the European Union over the last three decades. It examines the implementation of decisions by the European Court of Human Rights and the domestic courts as well as of legal reforms passed by the Turkish parliament that relate to the cultural demands of two largest minorities in Turkey, the Kurds and the Alevis. It underlines that in Turkey legislative reforms and progressive court judgments in favor of minority rights do not have much effect on shifting state policy on the ground. This is because state officials can act with impunity, enjoying wide discretionary authority and allowing extralegal and informal forms of official discrimination. Official discrimination can be best examined by focusing on administrative implementation rather than legal texts. This study also shows that the implementation of minority rights reforms is a contentious process that largely depends on bottom-up pressures through persistent social and political mobilization. In the absence of a strong movement, neither international pressure nor legal contention is adequate to change state policy on the ground.","PeriodicalId":430862,"journal":{"name":"Negotiating Democracy and Religious Pluralism","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"116683399","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

Plurality and Pluralism 多元化和多元主义

Negotiating Democracy and Religious Pluralism Pub Date : 2021-09-30 DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780197530016.003.0011

S. Kaviraj

引用次数: 1

Representative Democracy and Religious Thought in South Asia 南亚代议制民主与宗教思想

Negotiating Democracy and Religious Pluralism Pub Date : 2021-09-30 DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780197530016.003.0006

H. Iqtidar

引用次数: 0

“Stranger, Enemy” “陌生人,敌人”

Negotiating Democracy and Religious Pluralism Pub Date : 2021-09-30 DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780197530016.003.0015

Nosheen Ali

引用次数: 0

Islam, Modernity, and the Question of Religious Heterodoxy 伊斯兰教、现代性与宗教异端问题

Negotiating Democracy and Religious Pluralism Pub Date : 2021-09-30 DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780197530016.003.0002

Sadia Saeed

{"title":"Islam, Modernity, and the Question of Religious Heterodoxy","authors":"Sadia Saeed","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780197530016.003.0002","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197530016.003.0002","url":null,"abstract":"This chapter undertakes a comparative and historical inquiry to address the role of sharia in shaping concrete state responses toward managing “heterodox” religious communities across time and space. The aim of this inquiry is, first, to undertake a critique of civilizational analyses that seek to capture supposedly essential features of Muslim societies, and second, to underscore the marginal role of sharia in adjudicating issues related to religious heterodoxy in both early modern empires and modern Muslim states. It analyzes, first, how Muslim rulers in two early modern Muslim empires, Safavid Iran and Mughal India, dealt with the same heterodox group, the Nuqtavi Sufi order. Next, it focuses on how two contemporary Muslim-majority states that emerged from these empires, Iran and Pakistan, have sought to regulate and discipline “heretical” groups in their midst—Baha’is in Iran and the Ahmadiyya in Pakistan. The analysis opens space for formulating alternative accounts of transitions to modernity that are not beholden to teleological Eurocentric notions that normalize notions of unredeemable and non-usable pasts and always-already open and progressive futures.","PeriodicalId":430862,"journal":{"name":"Negotiating Democracy and Religious Pluralism","volume":"108 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"132054444","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0