Teoria y Realidad Constitucional最新文献

{"title":"El TEDH y las condenas a España por la vulneración del derecho a ser juzgado en un plazo razonable: las dificultades para alcanzar una duración óptima de los procesos judiciales","authors":"L. E. D. D. Rincón","doi":"10.5944/TRC.42.2018.23643","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5944/TRC.42.2018.23643","url":null,"abstract":"El trabajo analiza la doctrina fijada por el Tribunal Europeo de Derechos Humanos sobre la vulneración del derecho a ser juzgado en un plazo razonable del art. 6.1 del Convenio Europeo de Derechos Humanos y su aplicación al Estado Español en las sentencias condenatorias que hasta ahora se han dictado. También se examinan y se proponen algunas medidas preventivas destinadas a acelerar los procedimientos y a corregir los retrasos de los tribunales, así como otras de carácter reparatorio.The paper analyzes the doctrine established by the European Court of Human Rights on the violation of the right to be tried within a reasonable time of art. 6.1 of the European Convention of Human Rights and its application to the Spanish State in the condemnatory judgments that until now have been pronounced. It also examines and proposes some preventive measures aimed at streamline the process and correcting court delays, as well as other reparations.","PeriodicalId":43046,"journal":{"name":"Teoria y Realidad Constitucional","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5,"publicationDate":"2019-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5944/TRC.42.2018.23643","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49618219","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"La influencia de la CEDH y la jurisprudencia del TEDH en el ordenamiento constitucional italiano","authors":"Roberto Romboli","doi":"10.5944/TRC.42.2018.23638","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5944/TRC.42.2018.23638","url":null,"abstract":"El ensayo examina la influencia del CEDH y de la jurisprudencia del TEDH en el ordenamiento constitucional italiano, señalando la considerable importancia que tuvo, en ese ámbito, la ubicación de la Convención en el sistema de fuentes y la atribución a la misma del nivel de ley ordinaria. En particular, se evidencia cómo en Italia la influencia del Convenio ha comenzado a partir de las denominadas «sentencias gemelas» de 2007 de la Corte Constitucional, pues la interpretación del Constitucional permitió que se utilizara el CEDH como parámetro en los procesos de control de constitucionalidad de las leyes. Eso dio lugar a un contacto más estrecho con el TEDH y, por tanto, también a posibles casos de conflicto, que se analizan detalladamente. Se presta especial atención a la eficacia de la interpretación del CEDH por el TEDH y al tema de la eficacia de las sentencias que condenan a los Estados, indicando dos tipos de obstáculos: los de carácter procesal, es decir, el valor de la cosa juzgada y los de carácter normativo, a saber, la presencia de una ley nacional. En este segundo caso, se subraya como la solución es diferente dependiendo de si se consideran los efectos de las sentencias del TEDH respecto de la parte que resultó victoriosa en el proceso ante el TEDH o de otros sujetos que están en la misma condición sustancial, pero que no estaban presentes en el proceso que terminó con la condena. El escrito finaliza con unas breves observaciones sobre algunos acontecimientos recientes o futuros, como la entrada en vigor del Protocolo XVI del CEDH, la adhesión de la Unión Europea al CEDH y una eventual reforma del modelo de justicia constitucional italiano.The essay focuses on the level of influence that the ECHR and the European Court's case law exercise on the Italian constitutional system, revealing how important it has been to collocate the Convention in the sources of law's system and to recognize that it has the same level of ordinary statutes. It is particularly underlined how, in Italy, the ECHR influence started wit the “twins judgments” of the Constitutional Court in 2007, which helped the use of the ECHR as a parameter , of the constitutional legitimacy of statutes. This created a much closer contact with the European Court and, consequently, many possible occasions for conflicts, which are widely analyzed. Particular attention is dedicated to the importance of the European Court's interpretation of the ECHR and to the effectiveness of the condemnations of the States by the European Court, highlighting two obstacles: the ones depending on procedure law, with special reference to the value of judgments, and the ones depending on substantial law, with special reference to the existence of a national statute. In this second case, the solution is different depending if we consider the situation of a subject that is part of the trial or the one of a subject that hasn't been apart of it. The essay concludes with some short considerations about so","PeriodicalId":43046,"journal":{"name":"Teoria y Realidad Constitucional","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5,"publicationDate":"2019-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5944/TRC.42.2018.23638","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46586185","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"From dynamic to static: the evolution of the relationship between the UK and the European Court of Human Rights","authors":"M. Amos","doi":"10.5944/TRC.42.2018.23632","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5944/TRC.42.2018.23632","url":null,"abstract":"In this article the evolution of the relationship between the UK and the European Court of Human Rights is examined. With strong human rights protection through law now present at the national level, it is concluded that the relationship has moved from a dynamic to static. The implications of this for the protection of human rights in the UK are considered and evaluated.En este artículo se examina la evolución de la relación entre el Reino Unido y el Tribunal Europeo de Derechos Humanos. Teniendo en cuenta que ya existe a nivel nacional una importante garantía y protección de los derechos fundamentales, se observa que la relación ha cambiado de dinámica a estática. Las implicaciones que este paradigma tiene para el caso particular del Reino Unido será objeto de examen y discusión.","PeriodicalId":43046,"journal":{"name":"Teoria y Realidad Constitucional","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5,"publicationDate":"2019-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5944/TRC.42.2018.23632","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46881048","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Ejecutar en España las sentencias del Tribunal Europeo de Derechos Humanos. Una perspectiva de Derecho constitucional europeo","authors":"Enrique Guillén López","doi":"10.5944/TRC.42.2018.23640","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5944/TRC.42.2018.23640","url":null,"abstract":"En este trabajo se aborda la ejecución de las sentencias del TEDH desde la perspectiva del Derecho constitucional, más concretamente del Derecho constitucional europeo. Se comienza así señalando la cualidad sustancialmente constitucional que han adquirido el Convenio Europeo de Derechos Humanos y el Tribunal de Estrasburgo en un marco ordinamental caracterizado por la subsisidiariedad como instrumento óptimo para la garantía tanto del texto normativo como de las sentencias de su guardián. De aquí se deduce un tratamiento de estas últimas que pone el énfasis en la obligatoriedad de su cumplimiento. Éste es el sentido de la jurisprudencia del TEDH de modo que se ha podido hablar de la distorsión del carácter declarativo de sus resoluciones. Considerando el carácter constitucional del CEDH y del TEDH, y dada la necesidad de asegurar la eficacia de su doctrina para garantizar los derechos, se repara en el ordenamiento constitucional interno español entendiendo que es el derecho a la tutela judicial efectiva (ex art. 24) como derecho a la ejecución de lo juzgado el que hace necesario un procedimiento específico como el que se establece finalmente en la LO 7/2015.This paper studies the execution in Spain of the judgments of the European Court of Human Rights from the perspective of Constitutional Law, more specifically from the perspective of the European Constitutional Law. This begins by pointing out the substantially constitutional quality that both the Convention and the Court have acquired in an ordinamental framework characterized by the principle of subsidiarity as the optimal instrument for guaranteeing both the normative text and the judgments. From this we can deduce a treatment of the latter that puts the emphasis on the obligatory nature of its fulfillment. This is the meaning of the ECtHR jurisprudence so that it has been possible to speak of the distortion of the declaratory nature of its resolutions. Considering the constitutional nature of the ECHR and the ECtHR, and given the need to ensure the effectiveness of its doctrine to guarantee rights, it is focused on the Spanish internal constitutional order, understanding that it is the right to effective judicial protection (ex Article 24) as the right of having judgments executed that makes necessary a specific procedure like the one finally established in the LO 7/2015.","PeriodicalId":43046,"journal":{"name":"Teoria y Realidad Constitucional","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5,"publicationDate":"2019-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5944/TRC.42.2018.23640","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49391127","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"El contenido del derecho a un proceso con todas las garantías en la segunda instancia penal a la luz de la jurisprudencia del TEDH","authors":"Nicolás Pérez Sola","doi":"10.5944/TRC.42.2018.23651","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5944/TRC.42.2018.23651","url":null,"abstract":"Se analiza la recepción por el Tribunal Constitucional de la jurisprudencia del TEDH sobre el derecho al proceso con todas las garantías en la segunda instancia penal cuando a través de sentencia condenatoria se revisa sentencia absolutoria en la primera instancia.This essay focuses on the reception by the Constitutional Court of the case law of the ECtHR on the right to trial with guarantees of due process in second criminal instance, in cases where a court convicts an accused who was acquitted by the first instance.","PeriodicalId":43046,"journal":{"name":"Teoria y Realidad Constitucional","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5,"publicationDate":"2019-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5944/TRC.42.2018.23651","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42311851","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Examen de las sentencias del Tribunal de Estrasburgo que afectan al Reino de España","authors":"F. J. Portilla","doi":"10.5944/TRC.42.2018.23653","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5944/TRC.42.2018.23653","url":null,"abstract":"El presente estudio realiza una valoración conjunta del centenar y media de Sentencias del Tribunal de Estrasburgo en las que el Estado demandado es el Reino de España. Se realiza tanto un análisis global comparado en relación con países de nuestro entorno, como un examen cronológico de los asuntos que nos afectan. Se realiza también un estudio estadístico de los derechos más invocados y de las condenas reiteradas en relación con los derechos procesales y materiales. Resulta necesario, para acometer esta tarea, acomodar previamente la terminología empleada por el Tribunal Europeo de Derechos Humanos a nuestra dogmática de los derechos fundamentales. Se ofrece, finalmente, una síntesis básica de la doctrina jurisprudencial sobre cada uno de los derechos.The study is a joint exam of the more than a hundred ECHR Judgments condemnating the Spanish Kingdom. We make a global analysis comparing them within our nearest neighbours, while following a chronological path. Also we aim to make a statistical survey about the main rights claimed in Strasbourg, closely related to both substantive and procedural rights. We find necessary, also, to fit better the Strasbourg Case-Law terms into our national legal and fundamental rights terms. Finally, we give a basic synthesis on the main lines given in that Case-Law of every single right, maybe useful to set the light and shadow of our fundamental rights system.","PeriodicalId":43046,"journal":{"name":"Teoria y Realidad Constitucional","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5,"publicationDate":"2019-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41661766","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Los derechos económicos y sociales en la jurisprudencia reciente del Tribunal Europeo de Derechos Humanos: una selección","authors":"C. Gómez","doi":"10.5944/TRC.42.2018.23646","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5944/TRC.42.2018.23646","url":null,"abstract":"El Tribunal Europeo de Derechos Humanos y su jurisprudencia han analizado diversas situaciones y dictado numerosas sentencias a lo largo de los años estableciendo que el convenio impone obligaciones positivas a los Estados en el contexto de los derechos económicos y sociales y/o protegiendo indirectamente estos derechos indirectamente, mediante la interpretación abierta, dinámica y evolutiva del Tribunal.The European Court of Human Rights and its case law have faced several situations and issued many judgments over the years stating that the Convention imposes obligations on the States in an economic and social context and/or indirectly protecting these rights, which the Court has examined via a broad, dynamic and evolutive interpretation.","PeriodicalId":43046,"journal":{"name":"Teoria y Realidad Constitucional","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5,"publicationDate":"2019-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5944/TRC.42.2018.23646","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43702620","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Potencialidades del pilar europeo de derechos sociales en la praxis jurisprudencial del juez de Estrasburgo: entre la heterarquía vínculo social-vínculo económico y la disfuncionalidad","authors":"Ainhoa Lasa López","doi":"10.5944/TRC.42.2018.23650","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5944/TRC.42.2018.23650","url":null,"abstract":"El recurso a los principios de la protección efectiva y la interpretación evolutiva ha generado una prominente casuística de reconocimiento accesorio de algunos derechos sociales de prestación por parte del Tribunal Europeo de Derechos Humanos. Paralelamente, el Pilar Europeo de Derechos Sociales, con su objetivo de mejorar la integración positiva del euro sistema, parece ampliar el contenido de algunos derechos sociales contemplados por la Carta de Derechos de la Unión. Siguiendo estas coordenadas, el objetivo del presente artículo es reflexionar sobre el papel del Pilar en la línea argumental de la garantía de la dimensión objetiva de los derechos humanos de la Convención desarrollada por el juez de Estrasburgo.The use of the principles of effective protection and evolutionary interpretation has generated a prominent casuistry of accessory recognition of some social rights by the European Court of Human Rights. On the other hand, the European Pillar of Social Rights, with its objective of improving the positive integration of the euro system, seems to expand the content of some social rights contemplated by the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights. Following these coordinates, the objective of this article is to reflect on the role of Pilar in the line of reasoning of guaranteeing the objective dimension of human rights of the Convention developed by the judge of Strasbourg.","PeriodicalId":43046,"journal":{"name":"Teoria y Realidad Constitucional","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5,"publicationDate":"2019-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5944/TRC.42.2018.23650","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41414760","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"La protección del derecho fundamental al agua en perspectiva internacional y comparada","authors":"C. Bernal","doi":"10.2307/j.ctv1ddcv87.7","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1ddcv87.7","url":null,"abstract":"This paper investigates the enforcement of the constitutional right to water. From an international and comparative perspective, it aims to establish that proportionality analysis is the most appropriate standard for the judicial enforcement of this right. In order to accomplish this aim, it compares and assesses the use of the standards of reasonableness, the minimum core and proportionality analysis. It shows that proportionality offers more advantages and fewer disadvantages than reasonableness and the minimum core in the circumstances of adjudication of the constitutional right to water. These circumstances include the facts that the international and constitutional provisions guaranteeing this right are indeterminate, and that the right to water is generality satisfied in a free market in which public and private actors participate.","PeriodicalId":43046,"journal":{"name":"Teoria y Realidad Constitucional","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5,"publicationDate":"2018-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"88049807","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Austin, Hart y Shapiro:","authors":"","doi":"10.2307/j.ctv1ddcv87.17","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1ddcv87.17","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":43046,"journal":{"name":"Teoria y Realidad Constitucional","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5,"publicationDate":"2018-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"77883221","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}