British Journal of Diabetes最新文献

{"title":"The Rowan Hillson Inpatient Safety Award 2022 The best interventions: redesigning, rebuilding and maintaining safe inpatient diabetes care during COVID","authors":"U. Dashora, P. Kempegowda, A. Li, S. Harris, E. Castro, R. Hillson, C. Jones, K. Dhatariya","doi":"10.15277/bjd.2022.389","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.15277/bjd.2022.389","url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: The annual National Diabetes Inpatient Audit (NaDIA and NaDIA-Harms) in the UK continues to show significant problems with patient care. During the COVID pandemic patient care has been even more difficult. New initiatives are urgently required to improve inpatient safety for people with diabetes. Method: The Joint British Diabetes Societies for Inpatient Care (JBDS-IP) organised the seventh national Rowan Hillson Inpatient Safety Award on the theme of “the best interventions: redesigning, rebuilding and maintaining safe inpatient diabetes care during COVID”. Result: The winner was the DEKODE team, led by Dr Punith Kempegowda from University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, for their innovative quality improvement project across hospitals during COVID to improve diabetes-related ketoacidosis (DKA) management and study DKA in people with COVID. Adherence to national guidance improved in some hospitals, with falls in hypoglycaemia, and overall there was a significant improvement in awareness about DKA amongst junior doctors. The King’s College NHS Foundation Trust team, led by Adrian Li and colleagues, received the highly commended award for their innovative project of remote blood glucose (BG) monitoring across healthcare boundaries. This improved diabetes control and tackled health inequalities. Summary and conclusion: These and similar schemes need to be developed, promoted and shared to improve safety for people with diabetes admitted in hospital during COVID times.","PeriodicalId":42951,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Diabetes","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6,"publicationDate":"2022-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"67138968","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Abstracts from ABCD Conference","authors":"A. Two","doi":"10.15277/bjd.2022.393","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.15277/bjd.2022.393","url":null,"abstract":"Aim: Diabetic foot ulcers (DFU) are linked to morbidity, decreased mobility, and feelings of isolation, powerlessness and sadness. The aim of this study was to explore the prevalence of anxiety and depression symptoms in adult patients with DFU. Method(s): Patients with DFU attending our multidisciplinary diabetic foot clinic from February 14th to March 14th, 2022 were invited to complete a questionnaire which included sociodemographic questions, the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) scale to assess depression and the Generalized Anxiety Disorder scale (GAD-7) to assess anxiety. For each scale, a cut-off total score of 10 was used to identify those who met the criteria for anxiety and depression. Result(s): 60 patients completed the questionnaire. 83.25% of the participants reported that their diabetes foot care had not been affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. 25% reported moderate to severe anxiety symptoms, 10% reported mild anxiety symptoms while 65% reported no or minimal anxiety symptoms. Regarding depression, 30% reported moderate to severe depressive symptoms, 10% reported mild depressive symptoms, while 60% reported no or minimal depression (Figure 1). Patients with other co-morbidities were three times more likely to report depression compared to those without other co-morbidities (OR=3.2;95% CI 1.10-10.26). Patients younger than 50 years were nearly nine times more likely to report anxiety compared to those aged 60 years or above (adjusted OR=8.9;95% CI: 1.01-86.41) taking into account other variables. Conclusion(s): The prevalence of depression and anxiety in this cohort of patients with DFU was low, but the severity was moderate to severe in those who were affected. Patients with other co-morbidities and those younger than 50 years have worse mental health status. This finding needs to be taken into account in the management of patients with DFU. Attempts to reduce anxiety and/or depression could improve the quality of life of DFU patients.","PeriodicalId":42951,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Diabetes","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6,"publicationDate":"2022-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41294917","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Why are GLP-1 receptor agonists in short supply?","authors":"Clifford J. Bailey","doi":"10.15277/bjd.2022.382","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.15277/bjd.2022.382","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":42951,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Diabetes","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6,"publicationDate":"2022-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45182375","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Intra-operative tissue sampling and microbiological analyses during minor lower limb amputations in patients with diabetes are poorly reported and difficult to interpret","authors":"M. Gulamhussein, Ridwaan Sohawon, H. Travers, M. Wall","doi":"10.15277/bjd.2022.383","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.15277/bjd.2022.383","url":null,"abstract":"Diabetic foot disease (DFD) is a leading cause of acute sepsis and has long-term consequences for patients. It poses a strain on health resources in both the developed and developing world, with a significant impact on patient quality of life due to the associated complications of DFD and the often multiple interventions required to control infection and preserve limb tissue. Although there is evidence in the literature regarding early detection and prompt management of this debilitating condition, there is little structured evidence on how to gain accurate tissue sampling with processing to allow targeted antimicrobial therapy from minor amputations where bone cultures have been sent.\u0000Methods: A literature review was conducted to establish the publications on intra-operative bone sampling and processing taken during diabetic foot minor amputations and the pathways described for processing sample acquisition.\u0000Findings: Thirty papers were identified which highlighted some of the processes involved in the procurement of intraoperative tissue samples. No published paper reported a complete pathway for the ascertainment of samples, transfer and processing of these specimens.\u0000Conclusion: There is no published consistent pathway published for procurement of intra-operative diabetic foot specimens, for their storage, transportation and processing. Without documented, reproducible processes, it is difficult to interpret published results. This makes planning for targeted antibiotic therapy more difficult.","PeriodicalId":42951,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Diabetes","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6,"publicationDate":"2022-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47607661","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors and erythrocytosis: a review","authors":"N. Shah, Thushari Bandara, Harshal Deshmukh, Lucy Batten, C. Walton, T. Sathyapalan","doi":"10.15277/bjd.2022.384","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.15277/bjd.2022.384","url":null,"abstract":"Sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) are a class of anti-hyperglycaemic agents widely used in the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). They function by reducing renal glucose reabsorption and thereby promote urinary glucose excretion, resulting in improvement in glycaemic control. In large-scale clinical trials, SGLT2i have been shown to reduce cardiovascular mortality, non-fatal myocardial infarction and stroke significantly. In addition, clinical evidence suggests that they are renal protective as their use reduces the relative risk of end-stage renal disease and death from renal causes. These positive results have led to a rapid uptake of SGLT2i in clinical practice. Recently, clinical studies and case reports have suggested a link between SGLT2i therapy and erythrocytosis. The authors discuss possible mechanisms at cellular level that may cause erythrocytosis and explore its clinical relevance in people living with T2DM who are taking SGLT2i therapy.","PeriodicalId":42951,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Diabetes","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6,"publicationDate":"2022-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48186554","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Overview of the hybrid 82nd Scientific Sessions of the American Diabetes Association","authors":"C. Day","doi":"10.15277/bjd.2022.391","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.15277/bjd.2022.391","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":42951,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Diabetes","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6,"publicationDate":"2022-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41467176","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Reflections from IDF 2022","authors":"C. Day","doi":"10.15277/bjd.2022.400","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.15277/bjd.2022.400","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":42951,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Diabetes","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6,"publicationDate":"2022-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45042351","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"The place of Glucagon-like 1 peptide receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) in the new NICE guidelines – what is going on?","authors":"Stephen C. Bain","doi":"10.15277/bjd.2022.381","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.15277/bjd.2022.381","url":null,"abstract":"The article by Miles Fisher in this edition of the British Journal of Diabetes discusses cardiovascular outcome trials (CVOTs) which have examined the impact of GLP-1RAs in type 2 diabetes (T2DM). He queries ‘why updated guidance from NICE...fails to acknowledge the evidence-based cardiovascular benefits’. Indeed, clinicians in the UK will be puzzled as to why this class of glucose-lowering therapy is now a first-line option in European and North American guidelines for people with T2DM at high cardiovascular risk, but remains well down the pecking order in NICE guideline (NG) 28.1-3 This editorial will provide a short précis of the history of GLP-1RAs and NICE and try to explain the current impasse. The National Institute of Clinical Excellence (NICE) was established in 1999 to ‘diffuse the postcode lottery’ of healthcare (for example, varying access to medicines according to where people lived) and serves the National Health Services (NHS) in England, Northern Ireland and Wales. Since its set-up, there have been two changes in name, the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (2005) and the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (2013) but the abbreviation of NICE has stood the test of time and is a globally recognised brand. Well over fifty countries world-wide access guidelines produced by NICE rather than doing their own in-depth assessment of new medicines.4 When it was launched, NICE inherited various guidelines for the management of T2DM, which were rebadged. It produced its first clinical guideline for T2DM (CG66) in 2008.5 This was rapidly followed by the release of CG87 in May 2009, which was a short update on the ‘newer agents’ for blood glucose lowering.6 This guideline included exenatide, given twice daily, which was the first GLP-1RA to be licensed in the UK (in 2007). Exenatide was positioned as a third-line ‘alternative’ add-on therapy to be considered after insulin, a thiazolidinedione or a dipeptidyl peptase-4 inhibitor and it was only sanctioned for use with metformin and a sulfonylurea. CG87 introduced the body mass index (BMI) cut-off of 35 Kg/m2 for GLP-1RAs, which was not based on data from clinical trials but was the BMI at which the average cost of a long-acting insulin analogue was the same as BD exenatide. NICE also introduced ‘stopping rules’ where exenatide should be withheld when a reduction of at least 1% (11mmol/mol) in HbA1c and weight loss of at least 3% initial body weight was not achieved after six months. Stopping rules have not been recommended for any other glucose-lowering class. The next NICE guidance for the management of T2DM (NG28) was published in 2015 and is best remembered for the furore created by the recommendation of repaglinide as firstline treatment for people intolerant of metformin.7,8 In the preceding six years, GLP-1RAs had been added to the glucoselowering algorithm by means of single technology appraisals (TAs). These individual assessments by NICE had a more bind","PeriodicalId":42951,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Diabetes","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6,"publicationDate":"2022-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48885119","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Series: Cardiovascular outcome trials for diabetes drugs.","authors":"M. Fisher","doi":"10.15277/bjd.2022.387","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.15277/bjd.2022.387","url":null,"abstract":"LEADER was a landmark cardiovascular outcome trial with the GLP-1 receptor agonist liraglutide, which demonstrated significant reductions in major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE, a composite of cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction and non-fatal stroke), driven by a reduction in cardiovascular deaths and accompanied by a significant reduction in all-cause mortality. Shortly afterwards, the SUSTAIN-6 trial with once-weekly semaglutide demonstrated non-inferiority for MACE, with a nominal reduction in MACE that was driven by a reduction in the risk of non-fatal strokes. Since then, a further six cardiovascular trials have been published with GLP-1 receptor agonists, with major differences in study design and outcomes.\u0000Four trials have been performed with once-weekly formulations. The EXSCEL trial with once-weekly exenatide showed non-inferiority for MACE, but not superiority, with a reduction in all-cause mortality which was an exploratory outcome. The Harmony Outcomes trial with albiglutide demonstrated significant reductions in MACE, driven by reductions in fatal or non-fatal myocardial infarction. REWIND, with dulaglutide, also demonstrated significant reductions in MACE, this time driven by reductions in strokes. The AMPLITUDE-O trial with efpeglenatide showed significant reductions in MACE, but none of the individual components of MACE was significantly reduced as a secondary endpoint, and in contrast to other trials there was also a significant reduction in heart failure events. The fifth trial was the PIONEER 6 trial with the oral formulation of semaglutide, and this showed non-inferiority for MACE, but not superiority, with reductions in cardiovascular deaths and all-cause mortality which were secondary outcomes. Finally, FREEDOM-CVO with a subcutaneous mini-pump of exenatide showed non-inferiority for MACE and MACE plus hospitalisation for unstable angina. A reduction in albuminuria was seen in several of these trials, but there was no definite effect on eGFR or end-stage renal disease.\u0000Meta-analysis of the cardiovascular outcome trials with GLP-1 receptor agonists has demonstrated significant reductions in MACE, cardiovascular death, fatal or non-fatal stroke, fatal or non-fatal myocardial infarction, and all-cause mortality. It remains unclear why updated guidance from NICE on the management of T2DM in adults fails to acknowledge these evidence-based cardiovascular benefits.","PeriodicalId":42951,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Diabetes","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6,"publicationDate":"2022-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41852529","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Outcomes from day case surgery performed by one podiatric surgeon during the COVID-19 pandemic in patients from a multidisciplinary diabetic foot clinic","authors":"J. Dales, R. Jogia, R. Berrington, D. Modha, M. Kong","doi":"10.15277/bjd.2022.390","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.15277/bjd.2022.390","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":42951,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Diabetes","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6,"publicationDate":"2022-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44537612","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}