Christian Bioethics最新文献_第10页

Calvin and the Duty to Respect a Patient’s Trust 加尔文与尊重病人信任的责任

IF 0.3 4区哲学

Christian Bioethics Pub Date : 2014-04-01 DOI: 10.1093/CB/CBU003

David T. Ball

引用次数: 1

Introduction: Overhearing strange voices next door 简介:无意中听到隔壁奇怪的声音

IF 0.3 4区哲学

Christian Bioethics Pub Date : 2014-04-01 DOI: 10.1093/CB/CBU006

J. Tilburt

引用次数: 1

On Poor Religious Coping: Spiritually Assessing Christianity’s Great Theologians 论糟糕的宗教应对:对基督教伟大神学家的精神评价

IF 0.3 4区哲学

Christian Bioethics Pub Date : 2013-12-01 DOI: 10.1093/CB/CBT028

D. Stahl

引用次数: 3

Spiritual Assessment and Health Care Chaplaincy 精神评估和保健牧师

IF 0.3 4区哲学

Christian Bioethics Pub Date : 2013-12-01 DOI: 10.1093/CB/CBT027

Bruce Rumbold

引用次数: 9

Of Idolatries and Ersatz Liturgies: The False Gods of Spiritual Assessment 偶像崇拜和伪礼拜仪式:精神评估的假神

IF 0.3 4区哲学

Christian Bioethics Pub Date : 2013-12-01 DOI: 10.1093/CB/CBT024

J. Bishop

引用次数: 9

Making Windows into Men's Souls: Ethical Perspectives on Spiritual Assessment in Nursing 打开男人的灵魂之窗:护理精神评估的伦理视角

IF 0.3 4区哲学

Christian Bioethics Pub Date : 2013-12-01 DOI: 10.1093/CB/CBT025

P. Draper, W. Mcsherry

引用次数: 1

A Theological Assessment of Spiritual Assessments 属灵评估的神学评估

IF 0.3 4区哲学

Christian Bioethics Pub Date : 2013-12-01 DOI: 10.1093/CB/CBT023

M. Balboni

引用次数: 10

Assessing the Spirit 评估精神

IF 0.3 4区哲学

Christian Bioethics Pub Date : 2013-12-01 DOI: 10.1093/CB/CBT026

J. Bishop, Emily K. Trancik

引用次数: 1

Lost in Translation: Spiritual Assessment and the Religious Tradition 迷失在翻译中:精神评估与宗教传统

IF 0.3 4区哲学

Christian Bioethics Pub Date : 2013-12-01 DOI: 10.1093/CB/CBT029

Emily K. Trancik

引用次数: 4

Constitutional Abortion and Culture 宪法堕胎与文化

IF 0.3 4区哲学

Christian Bioethics Pub Date : 2013-08-12 DOI: 10.1093/CB/CBT015

H. Alvaré

{"title":"Constitutional Abortion and Culture","authors":"H. Alvaré","doi":"10.1093/CB/CBT015","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/CB/CBT015","url":null,"abstract":"The U.S. Supreme Court’s abortion decisions over the past forty years have helped to shape cultural beliefs and practices concerning heterosexual relationships, marriage, and parenting. This is true both in the practical and in the legal senses. Practically speaking, definitively separating sex from childbearing, as only abortion can do (given how often contraception fails), inevitably changes the meaning of sex, and therefore of heterosexual relationships. Legally speaking, the Court’s influence was mediated significantly by its decision to locate the right of abortion in an area of constitutional law — substantive due process — which claims to contain only those rights that are indispensable to our national understanding of freedom, both at the level of the individual and respecting our overarching democratic order. In particular, over the course of forty years of abortion opinions, the Court’s reflections on a claimed link between abortion and freedom have led it to conclusions broadly reflected in modern American beliefs and practices insofar as sex, marriage, and parenting are concerned. These include, inter alia, a suspicion of motherhood on the grounds of its risks and harms, the dispensable roles and violent characters of men, the great importance of adults’ wishes, and the importance of sexual expression for individual identity, divorced from consequences for partners or children.","PeriodicalId":42894,"journal":{"name":"Christian Bioethics","volume":"19 1","pages":"133-149"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2013-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/CB/CBT015","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"60682251","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1