Communication Law and Policy最新文献_第8页

Leval, Pierre N. Toward a Fair Use Standard, 103 Harv. L. Rev. 1105 (1990) 《走向合理使用标准》，第103卷。L.修订版1105（1990）

IF 0.3

Communication Law and Policy Pub Date : 2020-07-02 DOI: 10.1080/10811680.2020.1767419

P. Aufderheide

引用次数: 1

Bezanson, Randall P. The Right to Privacy Revisited: Privacy, News, and Social Change, 1890-1990, 80 Cal. L. Rev. 1133 (1992) 《重新审视隐私权：隐私、新闻和社会变革》，1890-1990，80 Cal.L.Rev.1133（1992）

IF 0.3

Communication Law and Policy Pub Date : 2020-07-02 DOI: 10.1080/10811680.2020.1766320

Erin K. Coyle

{"title":"Bezanson, Randall P. The Right to Privacy Revisited: Privacy, News, and Social Change, 1890-1990, 80 Cal. L. Rev. 1133 (1992)","authors":"Erin K. Coyle","doi":"10.1080/10811680.2020.1766320","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10811680.2020.1766320","url":null,"abstract":"Scholarship often traces American privacy law to Samuel D. Warren and Louis D. Brandeis’s influential 1890 Harvard Law Review article. The Warren and Brandeis article argues judges ought to protect a person’s thoughts, sensations and emotions against invasions by the press, photographers, distributors of portraits, and publishers of gossip. Warren and Brandeis connected the right of privacy to personal dignity and what Judge Thomas M. Cooley identified as a “right to be let alone.” Just over a century later, Professor Randall P. Bezanson revisited their article. He explained Warren and Brandeis’s conception of privacy was a response to nineteenth century social conditions and cultural values that were distinct from twentieth century social conditions and cultural values. Bezanson’s article demonstrates a legal concept can be better understood by exploring social and cultural history to analyze what a particular law was intended to protect. While some legal scholarship explores legislative histories of statutory laws and case law cited in judicial opinions, legal scholarship also may consider other factors that influenced calls","PeriodicalId":42622,"journal":{"name":"Communication Law and Policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2020-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10811680.2020.1766320","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42925770","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Blanchard, Margaret A. The Institutional Press and Its First Amendment Privileges, 1978 Sup. Ct. Rev. 225 《机构出版社及其第一修正案特权》，1978年增刊。Ct。225年启

IF 0.3

Communication Law and Policy Pub Date : 2020-07-02 DOI: 10.1080/10811680.2020.1766324

Dean C. Smith

引用次数: 0

Breyer, Stephen. The Uneasy Case for Copyright: A Study of Copyright in Books, Photocopies, and Computer Programs, 84 Harv. L. Rev. 281 (1970) 布雷耶，斯蒂芬。版权的不安案例：书籍、复印件和计算机程序的版权研究，第84卷。L.修订版281（1970）

IF 0.3

Communication Law and Policy Pub Date : 2020-07-02 DOI: 10.1080/10811680.2020.1766888

Nina Brown

引用次数: 0

Bollinger, L.C. Jr. Freedom of the Press and Public Access: Toward a Theory of Partial Regulation of the Mass Media, 75 Mich. L. Rev. 1 (1976) 《新闻自由和公众访问：走向大众媒体的部分管制理论》，《密歇根大学学报》第75卷第1期（1976年）

IF 0.3

Communication Law and Policy Pub Date : 2020-07-02 DOI: 10.1080/10811680.2020.1766876

Philip M. Napoli

{"title":"Bollinger, L.C. Jr. Freedom of the Press and Public Access: Toward a Theory of Partial Regulation of the Mass Media, 75 Mich. L. Rev. 1 (1976)","authors":"Philip M. Napoli","doi":"10.1080/10811680.2020.1766876","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10811680.2020.1766876","url":null,"abstract":"In selecting my article, I pivoted at decision time from an article that was influential in my development as a scholar to one that has recently begun to strike me as particularly relevant to ongoing policy debates about social media platforms, despite falling a bit out of favor over the years. With that brief preface, I’ll begin my revisiting of Lee Bollinger’s 1976 article, and attempt to make the case that his defense of the regulatory distinctions that separate print and broadcast media in the United States may be useful in developing a regulatory framework for social media that is distinct from the rest of the Internet. Bollinger starts from the premise that there are both First Amendment benefits and costs associated with government intervention in the media sector. The benefits Bollinger focuses on are derived from the role that the government can play in ensuring “the widespread availability of opportunities for expression within the mass media.” Consequently, the partial regulatory system that emerged (with a regulated broadcast sector and unregulated print sector) is one that “captures the benefits of access regulation yet still minimizes its potential excesses.” Bollinger contends that, in upholding government intervention in the broadcast sector as constitutional, the Supreme Court of the United States “pursued the right path for the wrong reasons.” Specifically, the logic and rationality of this bifurcated regulatory framework did not have to be justified on the basis of any unique characteristics of broadcasting, such as spectrum scarcity (as it has been,","PeriodicalId":42622,"journal":{"name":"Communication Law and Policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2020-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10811680.2020.1766876","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43148076","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Anderson, David A. Freedom of the Press, 80 Texas L. Rev. 429 (2002) David A. Anderson，《新闻自由》，80 Texas L. Rev. 429 (2002)

IF 0.3

Communication Law and Policy Pub Date : 2020-07-02 DOI: 10.1080/10811680.2020.1765638

J. Kirtley

引用次数: 0

Blasi, Vincent. The Checking Value in First Amendment Theory. 3 A.B.A. Found. Res. J. 521 (1977) 布拉西,文森特。第一修正案理论中的检验价值。3 A.B.A.发现。Res. J. 521 (1977)

IF 0.3

Communication Law and Policy Pub Date : 2020-07-02 DOI: 10.1080/10811680.2020.1766870

Samuel A. Terilli

引用次数: 0

Blasi, Vince. The Newsman’s Privilege: An Empirical Study, 70 Mich. L. Rev. 229 (1971) Blasi，Vince。《新闻人的特权：一项实证研究》，70 Mich.L.Rev.229（1971）

IF 0.3

Communication Law and Policy Pub Date : 2020-07-02 DOI: 10.1080/10811680.2020.1766869

Gregory C. Lisby, Timothy Barouch

引用次数: 0

Bork, Robert H. Neutral Principles and Some First Amendment Problems, 47 Ind. L. J. 1 (1971) 《中立原则和一些第一修正案问题》，47 Ind. L. J. 1 (1971)

IF 0.3

Communication Law and Policy Pub Date : 2020-07-02 DOI: 10.1080/10811680.2020.1766877

E. Ugland

引用次数: 1

Anderson, David A. The Origins of the Press Clause, 30 UCLA L. Rev. 455 (1983) Anderson，David A.《新闻条款的起源》，30 UCLA L.Rev.455（1983）

IF 0.3

Communication Law and Policy Pub Date : 2020-07-02 DOI: 10.1080/10811680.2020.1765641

Jared Schroeder

引用次数: 0