发布求助
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献

Communication Law and Policy最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
Going Viral: Limited-Purpose Public Figures, Involuntary Public Figures, and Viral Media Content 病毒式传播：有限目的公众人物、非自愿公众人物和病毒式媒体内容
IF 0.3
Communication Law and Policy Pub Date : 2022-01-02 DOI: 10.1080/10811680.2021.2014297
Derigan A. Silver, Loryn Rumsey
{"title":"Going Viral: Limited-Purpose Public Figures, Involuntary Public Figures, and Viral Media Content","authors":"Derigan A. Silver, Loryn Rumsey","doi":"10.1080/10811680.2021.2014297","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10811680.2021.2014297","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Viral content on the internet has become part of our everyday lives. It has even made its way into defamation litigation. This article explores how viral content is changing the legal definition of limited-purpose and involuntary public figures. The article argues that courts should not consider having access to social media alone as having “access to media” under the test for deciding when an individual is a limited-purpose public figure. Additionally, courts should focus the analysis on determining whether plaintiffs voluntarily injected themselves into a controversy to sway public opinion or to resolve the controversy either via the viral content or with other behavior. More importantly, we argue courts should no longer recognize involuntary public figures. Although some authors have suggested that in the age of the internet it makes sense to require more individuals to prove actual malice, we suggest courts should use a lower standard for some individuals to better compensate for injury to reputation.","PeriodicalId":42622,"journal":{"name":"Communication Law and Policy","volume":"27 1","pages":"49 - 76"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2022-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44630676","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Editor’s Note: A Vision for Communication Law & Policy in the Digital Age 编者按:数字时代传播法律与政策的愿景
IF 0.3
Communication Law and Policy Pub Date : 2022-01-02 DOI: 10.1080/10811680.2021.2014291
A. Sanders
{"title":"Editor’s Note: A Vision for Communication Law & Policy in the Digital Age","authors":"A. Sanders","doi":"10.1080/10811680.2021.2014291","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10811680.2021.2014291","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":42622,"journal":{"name":"Communication Law and Policy","volume":"27 1","pages":"1 - 2"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2022-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45941850","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Crimes of Communication: The Implications of Australian Espionage Law for Global Media 传播犯罪：澳大利亚间谍法对全球媒体的启示
IF 0.3
Communication Law and Policy Pub Date : 2022-01-02 DOI: 10.1080/10811680.2021.2014293
Rebecca Ananian-Welsh, S. Kendall
{"title":"Crimes of Communication: The Implications of Australian Espionage Law for Global Media","authors":"Rebecca Ananian-Welsh, S. Kendall","doi":"10.1080/10811680.2021.2014293","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10811680.2021.2014293","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Espionage has emerged as a leading national security threat for the digital age. Far from traditional wartime spy tactics, espionage now includes actors—including journalists—accessing and publishing sensitive information online to a global audience. This threat must be addressed; however, overbroad espionage laws have the capacity to criminalize legitimate journalism and chill free expression. This article examines the implications of Australia’s expansive 2018 counterespionage framework for foreign media. It argues that this broad suite of offenses creates a complex risk environment for global media reporting on issues that impact Australia’s national interest or foreign relations. These risks are exacerbated for media organizations owned or controlled by foreign governments and their journalists, sources, and associates. We consider whether the practical and political likelihood of extraterritorial enforcement alleviates the potential impact of the laws and argue for targeted reform to protect press freedom on a global scale.","PeriodicalId":42622,"journal":{"name":"Communication Law and Policy","volume":"27 1","pages":"3 - 29"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2022-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42271460","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Scoping the Journalists’ Freedom to Conduct Newsgathering at the European Court of Human Rights: A Step Toward a More Human Rights-Based Approach to the Coverage of ECHR Article 10? 界定记者在欧洲人权法院进行新闻采访的自由：对《欧洲人权公约》第10条的报道采取更基于人权的方法的一步？
IF 0.3
Communication Law and Policy Pub Date : 2021-10-14 DOI: 10.1080/10811680.2021.1963132
Chris Wiersma
{"title":"Scoping the Journalists’ Freedom to Conduct Newsgathering at the European Court of Human Rights: A Step Toward a More Human Rights-Based Approach to the Coverage of ECHR Article 10?","authors":"Chris Wiersma","doi":"10.1080/10811680.2021.1963132","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10811680.2021.1963132","url":null,"abstract":"At the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR), responding governments often argue that the right to “Freedom of expression” (Article 10) does not apply to cases because of journalists’ controversial methods of information gathering (such as wiretapping, secret recording, the use of aliases, and other methods). This article examines how the ECtHR’s international adjudication is a test of the boundaries of the freedom of journalism. It shows that it is a common human rights issue for the ECtHR to consider the justiciability of wide, principled freedoms about newsgathering. Through a conceptual, legal study of twenty-seven cases covering the past two decades, the analysis is focused on the criteria surrounding the scope of ECHR Article 10, paragraph 1, concerning the acts of a member state. It is argued that the way that the ECtHR is defining the contours of the freedom to conduct newsgathering and investigative journalism provides an undue challenge to legal certainty, because it is tending too much towards including a wide range of elements related to either journalistic ethics or “duties,” such as the lawfulness of journalists' conduct. The article advocates that a more human rights-based coverage under ECHR Article 10 is needed.","PeriodicalId":42622,"journal":{"name":"Communication Law and Policy","volume":"26 1","pages":"507 - 557"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2021-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47063705","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A History of Modern Press Access to the Supreme Court of the United States 美国最高法院的现代新闻史
IF 0.3
Communication Law and Policy Pub Date : 2021-10-14 DOI: 10.1080/10811680.2021.1963131
Michele Bush Kimball
{"title":"A History of Modern Press Access to the Supreme Court of the United States","authors":"Michele Bush Kimball","doi":"10.1080/10811680.2021.1963131","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10811680.2021.1963131","url":null,"abstract":"Throughout its history, the Supreme Court of the United States has allowed members of the press access to oral arguments and decision releases in its courtroom. However, it took nearly eighty years to formally codify a process by which members of the press were officially credentialed to cover the Court, a pass giving them access to the courtroom beyond the bar, access to walk the halls freely, to work in dedicated space in the building, and access to the justices themselves. This article traces the history of the press credentialing from the day the justices moved into the Supreme Court building in Washington, D.C., in 1935 to the unprecedented public access granted to oral arguments due to the social distancing required by the COVID19 virus in the spring of 2020. It is meant to fortify the historical record to ensure that the Court remains as open and accessible as possible to reporters because they act as emissaries of the public. The Court’s decisions affect all aspects of life for citizens, and therefore public knowledge of the Court’s work is essential to a strong democracy. Press access is key to that understanding.","PeriodicalId":42622,"journal":{"name":"Communication Law and Policy","volume":"26 1","pages":"438 - 506"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2021-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43346293","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Scandalizing the Court in the Commonwealth in the Twenty-First Century 21世纪的英联邦法院丑闻
IF 0.3
Communication Law and Policy Pub Date : 2021-10-14 DOI: 10.1080/10811680.2021.1963128
Roxanne Watson
{"title":"Scandalizing the Court in the Commonwealth in the Twenty-First Century","authors":"Roxanne Watson","doi":"10.1080/10811680.2021.1963128","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10811680.2021.1963128","url":null,"abstract":"In 2014, the highest court of appeals for Mauritius overturned the conviction of a journalist for scandalizing the court in an article that was sharply critical of that country’s chief justice. In 2020, a well-known attorney was convicted of scandalizing the court in India for tweets that were critical of that country’s chief justice. While in Victoria, Australia, three government ministers narrowly escaped charges of scandalizing the court by apologizing for criticisms made of a high court judge’s sentence in a terrorist case. “Scandalizing the court,” otherwise referred to as “murmuring against judges,” has been defined as “conduct which denigrates judges of the court so as to undermine public confidence in the administration of justice.” This article explores the action of scandalizing the court in three commonwealth countries. The three relatively recent cases are juxtaposed in order to provide the basis for the argument that these actions are not only ineffective in ensuring respect for the court or ensuring public confidence in the administration of justice, but also fly in the face of other important constitutional issues such as freedom of the press and the constitutional right to a fair trial. The action for scandalizing the court should be abolished in the commonwealth.","PeriodicalId":42622,"journal":{"name":"Communication Law and Policy","volume":"26 1","pages":"377 - 437"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2021-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42760539","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Broadcasting and Telecommunications 广播及电讯
IF 0.3
Communication Law and Policy Pub Date : 2021-10-08 DOI: 10.4324/9781003091660-8
D. Caristi, W. R. Davie, Laurie Thomas Lee
{"title":"Broadcasting and Telecommunications","authors":"D. Caristi, W. R. Davie, Laurie Thomas Lee","doi":"10.4324/9781003091660-8","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003091660-8","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":42622,"journal":{"name":"Communication Law and Policy","volume":"28 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2021-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"75183480","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Digital Online Media 数字在线媒体
IF 0.3
Communication Law and Policy Pub Date : 2021-10-08 DOI: 10.4324/9781003091660-9
D. Caristi, W. R. Davie, Laurie Thomas Lee
{"title":"Digital Online Media","authors":"D. Caristi, W. R. Davie, Laurie Thomas Lee","doi":"10.4324/9781003091660-9","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003091660-9","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":42622,"journal":{"name":"Communication Law and Policy","volume":"141 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2021-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"78496720","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Advertising Law 广告法律
IF 0.3
Communication Law and Policy Pub Date : 2021-10-08 DOI: 10.4324/9781003091660-11
D. Caristi, W. R. Davie, Laurie Thomas Lee
{"title":"Advertising Law","authors":"D. Caristi, W. R. Davie, Laurie Thomas Lee","doi":"10.4324/9781003091660-11","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003091660-11","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":42622,"journal":{"name":"Communication Law and Policy","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2021-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"74629067","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Meiklejohn, Hocking, and Self-Government Theory Meiklejohn、曲棍球与自治理论
IF 0.3
Communication Law and Policy Pub Date : 2021-07-03 DOI: 10.1080/10811680.2021.1937003
S. Bates
{"title":"Meiklejohn, Hocking, and Self-Government Theory","authors":"S. Bates","doi":"10.1080/10811680.2021.1937003","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10811680.2021.1937003","url":null,"abstract":"The philosopher Alexander Meiklejohn ranks among the most renowned First Amendment theorists. In Free Speech and Its Relation to Self-Government, published in 1948, he lays out four propositions: The First Amendment is intended to facilitate political discourse; its principal concern is the rights of listeners rather than those of speakers; the government has an affirmative obligation to improve the system of free expression; and effective political deliberation requires structure and rules. Together, these propositions add up to Meiklejohn’s self-government theory of the First Amendment. But he was not the first: All four propositions appear in a book published a year earlier by another philosopher, William Ernest Hocking, a member of the Commission on Freedom of the Press. This article critically examines the two men’s versions of self-government theory in the context of their backgrounds, their political philosophies, and their animating concerns about free speech.","PeriodicalId":42622,"journal":{"name":"Communication Law and Policy","volume":"26 1","pages":"265 - 311"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2021-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47175307","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
首页 上一页 下一页 尾页
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整，为了账户安全，请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们：info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务，方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号：481959085
Book学术官方微信