China Quarterly of International Strategic Studies最新文献_第7页

Power Transition Theory Revisited: When Rising China Meets Dissatisfied United States 重新审视权力转移理论:崛起的中国面对不满的美国

IF 0.2

China Quarterly of International Strategic Studies Pub Date : 2019-01-01 DOI: 10.1142/s2377740019500192

Serafettin Yilmaz, Wang Xiang-yu

{"title":"Power Transition Theory Revisited: When Rising China Meets Dissatisfied United States","authors":"Serafettin Yilmaz, Wang Xiang-yu","doi":"10.1142/s2377740019500192","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1142/s2377740019500192","url":null,"abstract":"Dissatisfaction is a major concept in power transition theory, which postulates that a rapidly rising power tends to be dissatisfied with the international system and would thus attempt to reform or replace it, whereas the hegemonic power would, by default, be satisfied with and work to maintain the status quo. This paper, however, offers an alternative outlook on the reigning-rising power dynamics by examining the conditions for and implications of hegemonic dissatisfaction and rising power satisfaction. It argues that although China, as a potential systemic challenger harboring grievances against the existing global regimes, has been a recurrent subject for studies, it is the United States, the established hegemon, that appears increasingly dissatisfied with the status quo. The U.S. dissatisfaction is informed by a set of internal and external factors often justified with a reference to China as a challenger, and is manifested in a number of anti-system strategies, including unconventional diplomatic rhetoric, as well as withdrawal from various international institutions or attempts to undermine them. The U.S. discontent, as contrasted with China’s satisfaction as a rising power, has a number of potential geopolitical and economic implications at the bilateral, regional, and global levels, endangering the viability and sustainability of the universally accepted political and economic regimes.","PeriodicalId":42595,"journal":{"name":"China Quarterly of International Strategic Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1142/s2377740019500192","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45347459","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 3

Toward a Transformed and Unequal World 走向一个变革和不平等的世界

IF 0.2

China Quarterly of International Strategic Studies Pub Date : 2019-01-01 DOI: 10.1142/s2377740019500118

Shuai Feng

引用次数: 0

The China-Pakistan Economic Corridor 中巴经济走廊

IF 0.2

China Quarterly of International Strategic Studies Pub Date : 2019-01-01 DOI: 10.1142/S2377740019500131

Z. Khan

引用次数: 2

Rebalancing Global Climate Governance and China’s Endeavor 全球气候治理再平衡与中国的努力

IF 0.2

China Quarterly of International Strategic Studies Pub Date : 2019-01-01 DOI: 10.1142/s2377740019500246

Yu Hongyuan

{"title":"Rebalancing Global Climate Governance and China’s Endeavor","authors":"Yu Hongyuan","doi":"10.1142/s2377740019500246","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1142/s2377740019500246","url":null,"abstract":"In December 2018, the 24th Conference of the Parties (COP) to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) was held in Katowice, Poland, and reached a package of agreements. It provided a new opportunity for the promotion of global climate negotiations and new momentum for the transformation of global climate governance as well. The Katowice conference continued the tradition of the previous conferences in enhancing policy coordination and contribution among various actors. The success of the conference depends on scientific reports of climate disasters, coordinated efforts by major countries, and the contribution of various non-state actors. However, as an ongoing process, global climate governance is still faced by many difficulties, such as weak synergy, staggering development of global environmental governance, daunting challenges to least developed countries (LDCs) in climate actions, and lack of fairness, which need to be tackled through joint endeavor by both developed and developing countries. As the second largest economy and biggest greenhouse gas emitter, China’s future engagement in global climate governance will be focused on promoting green competitiveness, enhancing its institutional power in the governance process, and strengthening pragmatic multi-stakeholder climate diplomacy, so as to promote common understanding among countries and help with their policy coordination for climate actions.","PeriodicalId":42595,"journal":{"name":"China Quarterly of International Strategic Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1142/s2377740019500246","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44791558","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 2

China’s Building of Overseas Military Bases: Rationale and Challenges 中国海外军事基地建设的理由与挑战

IF 0.2

China Quarterly of International Strategic Studies Pub Date : 2019-01-01 DOI: 10.1142/s237774001950026x

X. Guifang, Zheng Jie

引用次数: 0

Unique Role of Think Tank Exchange in Promoting the China-U.S. Relationship 中美智库交流在推动中美关系发展中的独特作用的关系

IF 0.2

China Quarterly of International Strategic Studies Pub Date : 2019-01-01 DOI: 10.1142/s2377740019500167

You-Shi Yuan

{"title":"Unique Role of Think Tank Exchange in Promoting the China-U.S. Relationship","authors":"You-Shi Yuan","doi":"10.1142/s2377740019500167","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1142/s2377740019500167","url":null,"abstract":"Since the establishment of the China-U.S. diplomatic relationship, think tank exchange between both countries has undergone four phases, from very limited communication in the early years to a growing number of mutual visits, co-organized conferences and events, joint research projects, as well as representative offices or joint research/teaching programs set up in the past decade. China-U.S. think tank exchange plays a unique role in enhancing mutual understanding and mitigating distrust between both countries, thus contributing to bilateral strategic stability and closer cooperation. Under the Trump administration’s trade war and decoupling attempts toward China, however, bilateral think tank exchange has experienced a significant decline over the past few years, marked by increasing restrictions on each other’s visits, less willingness of some think tanks in such exchange, and more hardline policy stance on each other, especially from the American side. At this difficult time for China-U.S. relations, bilateral think tank exchange should be encouraged and strengthened so as to help bring the bilateral relationship back on track.","PeriodicalId":42595,"journal":{"name":"China Quarterly of International Strategic Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1142/s2377740019500167","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45205127","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

U.S.-China Tech War 中美科技战

IF 0.2

China Quarterly of International Strategic Studies Pub Date : 2019-01-01 DOI: 10.1142/s237774001950012x

Haiyong Sun

{"title":"U.S.-China Tech War","authors":"Haiyong Sun","doi":"10.1142/s237774001950012x","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1142/s237774001950012x","url":null,"abstract":"The Trump administration has waged a technological war against China due to the differences between China and the United States in political values and geopolitical pursuits, as well as their rivalry on regional and global arenas. The United States regards itself as being on the moral high ground in the existing international order and intends to force China to abandon its policies in high-tech industries and technology transfer from foreign enterprises, in order to maintain its global supremacy. With a zero-sum mentality, the Trump administration is trying to use the leverage of advanced science and technology to maximize benefits for the United States in trade with China. Its tech war attempts against China mainly include trade sanctions, investment control, export control, and restrictions on the exchange of technological personnel. These moves will further harm China-U.S. security relations as well as their science and technology cooperation and undermine the regional situation and global science and technology governance. In order to promote sustainable global development and strategic stability, both sides need to undertake more effective efforts to manage their strategic competition, build a more balanced and mutually beneficial relationship in high-tech industries, and expand the space for cooperation in the field of global science and technology governance.","PeriodicalId":42595,"journal":{"name":"China Quarterly of International Strategic Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1142/s237774001950012x","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46577060","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 6

China’s Belt and Road Initiative 2.0 中国“一带一路”倡议倡议2.0

IF 0.2

China Quarterly of International Strategic Studies Pub Date : 2019-01-01 DOI: 10.1142/s2377740019500155

Jiahan Cao

{"title":"China’s Belt and Road Initiative 2.0","authors":"Jiahan Cao","doi":"10.1142/s2377740019500155","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1142/s2377740019500155","url":null,"abstract":"As China’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) quickly evolves into an updated version for realizing high-quality development, its long-term success will increasingly depend on how well it can earn international legitimacy and credibility. Since sustainability is a critical source of credibility for the BRI, it is necessary to move the BRI forward by amplifying its role as a development agenda and tapping its potential to support global sustainable development and facilitate implementation of the United Nations’ 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (2030 Agenda) through delivering more public goods to other developing countries. The BRI projects designed to strengthen infrastructure inter-connectivity can greatly fit the developmental needs of countries along the routes and expedite their achievement of sustainable development goals (SDGs), both explicitly and implicitly. Besides, the growing alignment between the BRI and the 2030 Agenda will generate more strengths and opportunities for China to be recognized as an indispensable player in international development cooperation, enhance the capacity of the BRI to manage environmental, social and governance risks in host countries, promote social cohesion and inclusiveness along the routes, and ultimately transcend short-term economic and political interests for China to win the hearts and minds of other stakeholders involved in the BRI.","PeriodicalId":42595,"journal":{"name":"China Quarterly of International Strategic Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1142/s2377740019500155","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41664240","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Intercultural Gaps Between Indonesia and China on the Belt and Road Initiative: Causes and Remedies 印尼与中国在“一带一路”倡议上的文化差异:原因与补救

IF 0.2

China Quarterly of International Strategic Studies Pub Date : 2019-01-01 DOI: 10.1142/s2377740019500234

Paulus Rudolf Yuniarto

引用次数: 4

The UK’s China Policy under U.S.-China Strategic Rivalry 中美战略对抗下的英国对华政策

IF 0.2

China Quarterly of International Strategic Studies Pub Date : 2019-01-01 DOI: 10.1142/s2377740019500106

S. Tim

引用次数: 1